Thursday, April 3, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Tensions between the U.S. and China continue to grow after suspected spy balloon shot down

|
|

Tensions are continuing to rise between the U.S. and China after the former shot down a suspected spy balloon flying through its airspace, which has since been followed by multiple more.

The balloon was first spotted by the public over Montana on Feb. 1. The following day, the Pentagon publicly revealed that the balloon had been flying over American land for several days.

After a reported second balloon sighting above Latin America—since confirmed to have also been owned by China—pressure mounted on President Biden to take action.

The U.S. government shot down the original balloon with a missile fired by an F-22 fighter plane on Feb. 4.

Since the U.S. downed the balloon, the Chinese government has voiced its disdain for the military action taken against the aircraft—despite claiming that the balloon was a “civilian airship” being used for scientific research (such as meteorology). The following days have seen tensions between the countries continue to rise.

On Feb. 6, Washington accused China of using the aircraft to gather surveillance. The Chinese government continued to assert that the balloon was intended for scientific purposes, and that it had unexpectedly veered off-course into American airspace.

It was soon revealed that China had declined a proposal for a phone call between the countries’ respective top defence officials, stating that Washington had not “created the proper atmosphere for dialogue.” The Chinese government has maintained that the U.S’s response to the situation has been manipulated and overblown, and that shooting down the balloon was “irresponsible.”

Tan Kefei, a spokesperson for the Chinese government, has warned that China “reserves the right to use necessary means to deal with similar situations.”

The Pentagon has stated that the proposed phone call was an attempt to decrease tensions and “responsibly manage the relationship” between the countries. They expressed disappointment towards China for their unwillingness to talk, and affirmed that they remain committed to “open lines of communication.”

Earlier to its arrival above the U.S. mainland, the balloon had flown above parts of Canada, leading many to question why the Canadian government had not taken action to down the aircraft. Anita Anand, Canada’s Minister of National Defence, responded to critics by stating that the Canadian government had been closely monitoring the balloon in cooperation with the U.S., but did not shoot it down because it “posed no imminent risk to Canadians at all.”

On Feb. 10, a second high-altitude object was shot down over Alaska. The object, described as being the size of a small car, posed a “reasonable threat” to civilian aircraft, according to National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby. He did not elaborate on whether the object was another balloon, or who the object belonged to.

Similar to the first incident, the U.S. government has stated that the Chinese government has been closed-off to discussion regarding the incident.

On Feb. 11, a third airborne object was shot down by the U.S. military. The object was destroyed over central Yukon, and while no confirmation has been provided as to whether the object originated from China, it is another example in a string of incidents that have left Western governments on high alert.

While many questions regarding the aircrafts entering North American airspace have yet to be answered, one certainty remains: as attempts for communication fall through and additional sightings are being reported, the tensions between the U.S. and China are continuing to balloon.

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Why won’t Poilievre get his security clearance? 

Poilievre’s reluctance to get his security clearance has become central to the Liberal Party’s campaign strategy for criticizing the Conservatives, and for good reason. 

Carney triggers snap election set for April 28 

Amidst the ongoing trade war with the U.S., Prime Minister Mark Carney has triggered a snap election set to take place in late April. 

Press BUSU Board Check-In: Solution to BUSU’s club funding shortage delayed after discussions about discrimination and fairness 

Lengthy conversations about fairness and potential discrimination led to the BoD delaying a solution to fix the funding shortages that have plagued the CPC since 2023. 

Would the U.S. actually invade Canada? 

Trump’s repeated talk of annexing Canada begs the question: Could the U.S. ever actually invade Canada, and what would happen if they did? 

Innovation in action: Brock’s Innovation Showcase 

Brock LINCS brings together innovation, networking opportunities and investors at Brock Innovation Showcase event.   

Why did Mark Carney call an early election? 

With all the opposition leaders previously declaring their intent to facilitate an early federal election when parliament was to resume, it was in Carney’s best interest to call the election himself. 

What to know about Mark Carney’s cabinet picks 

Carney chooses a much smaller cabinet than Trudeau’s as the country narrows in on the trade conflict with the U.S. 

What the impending closure of Hudson’s Bay at the Pen Centre means for Canadian retail 

Hudson’s Bay will start liquidating its entire business and begin the process of closing all its stores pending a court approval.