Friday, December 12, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Doug Ford’s attempts to dodge testifying at the Emergencies Act hearing is cowardly

|
|

Doug Ford continues a trend of fence riding and dodginess to save his political credibility in refusing a summons to testify at the Emergencies Act inquiry in Ottawa.

The Public Order Emergency Commision is opening an inquiry into the use of the Emergencies Act last winter to combat the Convoy Protest. Mayors from across Ontario, including the mayor of Ottawa, have accepted testifying at the inquiry.

Recently re-elected Ontario Premier, Doug Ford, on the other hand, is refusing to testify on grounds that the inquiry is a federal matter not a provincial one, hence not his concern. Commentators are correctly pointing out that this is a strategic move to not have to testify at the hearings and sway voters who may have been supportive of the Convoy.

This kind of dodginess might ring familiar to those who are used to Ford’s unwillingness to stir the pot so as not to be divisive. For example, back in November of 2021 Ford refused to mandate a COVID-19 vaccine requirement for hospital workers, leaving “human resourcing decisions up to individual hospitals.” His style is a slow, subtle undercutting of essential caretaker funds in the province, pushing privatization wherever he can and acting coy and passive in the name of individuals’ freedoms.

This refusal to testify is more proof of the inability of Ontario’s Premier to be a leader.

At the Legislative Assembly of Ontario opposition members pushed the Premier to “come clean” and speak with the Commission. Ford’s one and only response before a fellow MP took the rest of the opposition’s heat was the following:

“Mr. Speaker, this is a federal inquiry into the federal government’s use of the federal Emergencies Act… This was a policing matter, not a political matter. And the opposition knows, Mr. Speaker, politicians don’t direct the police.”

This appeal to institutional authority’s discretion is of course extremely similar to Ford’s hands off, leave it up to hospitals, approach to vaccine mandates for hospital workers. Ford’s political imaginary is one where the government is not beholden to how institutions function and deal with issues, but tries to maximize their autonomy and thus can place blame on individual institutions or actors instead of government direction.

It’s time to stop electing political leaders who, in the interest of corporate lobbyists, preach apolitical solutions to keep the wheels turning on Bay Street instead of stepping up and leading for the good of the electorate.

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Why are we so obsessed with self-improvement? 

The rise of the “winter arc” trend isn’t anything new. The internet is obsessed with self-improvement messaging, reinventing a lifechanging trend to leave us feeling unproductive and inferior with the come of each new season. 

Shopping isn’t the only way to spread Christmas cheer   

The celebration of Christmas in the contemporary context is deeply embedded in consumerism, but it doesn’t have to be. 

The race to label a glitchy TikTok as “censorship” signals eroding trust toward media institutions 

A video discussing the Jeffrey Epstein emails appears to “glitch” the moment its creator says “Syria,” cutting or de-syncing the audio in a way that behaves differently depending on how and where the clip is played. The comments immediately and confident started labelling the glitch as a form of deliberative platform censorship. This diagnosis provides a small but indicative reflection of how people view the current political and media environment with such distrust that anomalies are read as manipulation by default, not errors. 

Short-form content posted on TikTok has become the music industry’s biggest helper and largest enemy   

While TikTok has skyrocketed many previously unknown musicians into stardom overnight, it has also created a desire for instant gratification amongst consumers.

Vogue’s “boyfriend” commentary presents misogyny under the guise of empowerment 

Vogue’s recent commentary on heterosexual relationships is just plain old misogyny and gender essentialism redressed as feminist empowerment.

Is it just me, or is Lot 2 worse than ever? 

I'm hardly the first to say it, but Lot 2 sucks.   The dreaded walk, the bone-chilling wind, the speeding cars — students know the routine. Aside from the lower upfront cost of the parking pass, there aren’t many upsides to parking there. Lot 2 is consistently frustrating, and in the winter, those frustrations turn into hazards.

Misery loves company and company loves capitalism 

At some point, a tragic backstory became a necessity for worth. I’m sure you’ve seen the glorification of tragedy, with crying selfies taken in good lighting, “sad girl” playlists and the perfect curation of melancholy 

Black Friday isn’t what it used to be  

Black Friday isn’t an event anymore — it’s a strategy.   I’ve always considered myself a shopping addict. I never turn down a sale, and my bank account lives in fear of my impulse-buying habits. But this year, as I was scrolling through the so-called Pre-Black Friday deals, it hit me: Black Friday isn’t what it used to be.