Thursday, October 23, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Would the U.S. actually invade Canada? 

|
|

Trump’s repeated talk of annexing Canada begs the question: Could the U.S. ever actually invade Canada, and what would happen if they did? 

Earlier this month, in a statement made before Mark Carney replaced him as Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau claimed that President Donald Trump was deliberately trying to undermine Canada’s economy as part of his plan to eventually annex the country. Since winning re-election, Trump has consistently shown little respect for Canadian sovereignty, frequently calling Canada the “51st state” and referring to Trudeau as its “governor.” He has also described the Canada-U.S. border as “an artificial boundary” and cast doubt on the legitimacy of the 1908 treaty that established it. 

So far, Trump has not suggested deploying troops to Ontario. Instead, he appears convinced that he can force Canada into annexation by other means. 

But Canadians are firmly against the idea. 

“Canada will never, under any circumstances, become part of the United States,” Prime Minister Mark Carney firmly stated, leaving no doubt about the nation’s stance. Additionally, the Canadian Armed Forces reported in February that after years of declining recruitment, enlistment numbers have spiked since Trump’s inauguration, with roughly 1,000 more applicants compared to the previous year. While Canadian officials stopped short of directly linking this surge to Trump’s aggressive rhetoric, they didn’t dismiss the possibility. 

With Canada clearly unwilling to join the U.S. by choice, the question remains: Would Trump actually attempt to annex the country by force? If so, would U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth support such an outrageous move? 

In Trump’s previous term, his own team often stepped in to block some of his more reckless ideas — such as launching military strikes on Iran or Venezuela. Former Defense Secretary Mark Esper revealed that he had to prevent Trump from ordering law enforcement to shoot protesters in the legs during the George Floyd demonstrations near the White House. 

However, with complete loyalty to Trump now seemingly the primary qualification for government employment in the U.S., Trump may have freer reign. 

The idea of the United States invading Canada may sound like the plot of a far-fetched dystopian thriller, but history, rhetoric and modern geopolitics remind us that even the unthinkable, at times, is not impossible. 

St. Catharines — nestled in the Niagara region, just a stone’s throw from the U.S. border — would likely be among the first to feel the ripple effects of any cross-border aggression. To understand how such a scenario might unfold, it’s worth revisiting the last time it happened — the War of 1812 — and weighing that against recent political tensions and the realities of modern warfare. 

In 1812, the United States invaded what was then British North America, hoping to annex Canadian territory. The Niagara Peninsula was a key front, with battles fought in Queenston Heights and Fort George. Canadians, British troops and Indigenous allies resisted, ultimately preventing a U.S. takeover. The war forged a distinct Canadian identity, particularly in border communities like oursSt. Catharines. 

If the unthinkable occurred and the U.S. considered military action against Canada, what would happen first? 

  1. Diplomatic collapse: The first sign would be a severe diplomatic breakdown — trade freezes, ambassador recalls and NATO crises. The U.S. and Canada are NATO allies; an invasion would dismantle that alliance and trigger global outrage. 
  1. Cyber and economic warfare: Before boots hit the ground, cyberattacks would likely cripple communication networks and financial systems, targeting banks, infrastructure and emergency services. 
  1. Border seizures: Niagara would be a key target. Border crossings in Buffalo and Niagara Falls could be militarized almost instantly. Airspace closures, roadblocks and evacuation orders would follow. 
  1. Global response: Allies in Europe and Asia, as well as the United Nations, would condemn the invasion. Economic sanctions on the U.S. would be swift and severe (already, Germany and Britain have issued travel advisory warnings to the U.S.). 
  1. Canadian resilience: While Canada’s military is smaller, it is modern and well-trained. More importantly, Canada’s defence would be bolstered by global support. Unlike 1812, today’s Canada stands on the world stage with powerful allies. 

In reality, an outright U.S. invasion of Canada remains highly unlikely — not only because of military or political consequences, but because the two nations are deeply interconnected economically, culturally and diplomatically. Still, the War of 1812 teaches us that the unimaginable has happened before, and the political climate of recent years tells us that no scenario is too absurd to consider — especially when it comes to Donald Trump. 

For communities like St. Catharines, the question isn’t just “What if?” It’s a reminder to stay informed, engaged and aware of our place in both history and current affairs. 

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Where does rapture content come from? 

As our political climate remains in a troubling state, whisperings that the “end times” are near can be convincing — leading theories to spread rapidly in online spaces. 

Mapping MAMM #4: What the f*** is Canadian Literature anyway? 

Mapping MAMM is an ongoing series which gets into the research questions surrounding the Mapping Ann-Marie MacDonald Research Project. My previous articles have introduced the project as well as examined its cross-disciplinarity and ethics of care. In this fourth installment, I’ll get into the “fraught construct” that is CanLit. 

Late Night comedy in the face of censorship  

Jimmy Kimmel is a late-night comedy staple. Having been on the air since 2003, the comedian is perhaps best known for his viral videos, including “Mean Tweets” — where celebrities read hateful posts on X and his long running YouTube series “I Told My Kids I Ate All Their Halloween Candy.” Kimmel has always been a relatively tame figure in late night media. Though not as politically neutral as Jimmy Fallon, he is certainly not as outspoken as fellow late-night hosts Seth Meyers, Stephen Colbert, John Stewart or John Oliver. 

USA: Not fascist, just anti-anti-fascism 

The United States is not a fascist state. Elections still occur, courts still sometimes check executive power and journalists and comedians still speak out against the government. Within the remains of a democratic framework, on Sept. 22, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order designating “Antifa” — a composition of autonomous groups affiliated with political movements against fascism and other far-right extremist ideologies — as a domestic terrorist organization. Despite the lack of legal framework for this designation, the executive order purports that dissent against the Trump administration is a threat to national security rather than a legitimate democratic right

The war within: Pete Hegseth and the weaponization of U.S. military identity 

When Pete Hegseth — formally the U.S. Secretary of Defense, but ceremonially the Secretary of War — took the stage at Marine Corps Base Quantico on Sept. 30, his first words carried the weight of an era. “Welcome to the War Department,” he said to a packed auditorium of generals, admirals and senior officers. “The era of the Department of Defense is over.”

Five activities to add to your fall bucket list 

If you’re looking for something fun to add to your bucket list this fall, this list of autumn activities is perfect for you. 

Brock’s Wellness Fair spotlights countless student services and opportunities  

The 2025 Brock Wellness Fair gave students the chance to explore a wide range of services, supports and community spaces available both on and off campus. From volunteer initiatives and interfaith opportunities to a variety of mental health supports and athletics, the fair displayed a growing list of opportunities for students to take care of themselves, connect with others and make Brock feel like home. 

10 years after TRC’s Calls to Action and Canada’s promises of reconciliation are still pending 

Ten years have passed since the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) released their landmark Final Report in June 2015. The Commission, established under the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, spent seven years gathering testimony from over 6,000 Survivors to document the devastating legacy of residential schools. This led them to issuing 94 Calls to Action — a roadmap for governments, institutions and Canadians to repair harm and build a more just future. These Calls were never meant as symbolic gestures; they were concrete, actionable steps. A decade later, one question remains: has Canada lived up to them?