Thursday, October 23, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Canadians begin questioning the government’s TFW program  

|
|

Online communities, traditional news media and politicians have begun questioning the suspicious use of the Federal Government’s Temporary Foreign Worker (TFW) and Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA) programs to access slave-like labour, suppress wages and increase profits in Canada’s difficult labour market.  

Over the past several days, an online map that allows Canadians to view the amount of LMIA assessments approved across the country raised suspicions on whether corporations are requesting and if the government is approving TFWs in good faith. This comes during one of the worst labour markets Canadians have experienced in a decade (not including the pandemic).  

When created, the TFW program was meant to allow employers to fill jobs that did not have enough interested and qualified Canadian applicants with temporary foreign workers. When corporations apply to bring in a TFW, they may or may not be required to request a LMIA assessment, with several exemption codes existing.  

Corporations that need to request a LMIA assessment must prove that there is a need for a TFW and that no Canadians or permanent residents are available to do the job. The viral map (linked above) uses Statistics Canada information to display how many LMIAs have been approved across Canada, with places like the GTA numbering in the thousands. Commenters both online and through opinion articles have begun to question whether corporations are being honest about their need for TFWs. 

Canada’s TFW program has been identified by the United Nations as leaving temporary workers vulnerable to “contemporary forms of slavery” due to the nature of the program. 

Individuals under the TFW program generally come from the global south in search of better opportunities. However, once they arrive in Canada, they are tied to a single employer due to their immigration status. In practice, this results in TFWs working in poorer conditions for significantly less money with a greater risk of workplace abuse. These are all described as integral features of the program by Amnesty International.  

The abuse of TFWs and the effects the program is perceived to have had on entry level and summer jobs for Canadians (who generally have more labour rights than TFWs) have led to an online discussion on the state of corporate abuse, government corruption and collective worker treatment.  

The LMIA map has resulted in more targeted criticism of specific regional markets, with residents having an easier time and growing interest in observing permit approval rates.  

The discussion on TFWs, which has propagated in online forums such as Reddit, has wound its way into more traditional media across the political spectrum in pieces by the Globe and Mail, CBC’s Radio-Canada and The National Post following calls by British Columbia Premier David Eby and opposition leader Pierre Poilievre to end or reform the program.  

As reported by the CBC, Premier Eby went on record “during an unrelated announcement” to say that “The Temporary Foreign Worker program is not working. It should be cancelled or significantly reformed […] we can’t have an immigration system that fills up our homeless shelters and our food banks […] we can’t have an immigration program that results in high youth unemployment.” 

The sentiment bridges the gap between political parties, as it places the New Democratic Party (NDP) Premier on the same page as Conservative leader Poilievre, who released a similar statement.  

Eby went on to discuss his belief that the TFW program is being abused through forgery and corruption. 

While the TFW program has been in the spotlight for Canada’s difficult job market, experts interviewed by CBC suggest that “the real challenge […] lies with international students who can obtain open work permits after graduation that can be valid for up to three years.”  

The discussion surrounding the labour market and TFWs has flared up into mainstream media in recent days, with an increasing amount of public scrutiny and suspicion rising around the true intentions of the program.  

As it stands, according to CTV News, Prime Minister Mark Carney has stated that the Temporary Worker program “has a role,” but “has to be focused” and that tariffs remain a priority for the government. He noted that businesses“want the program to exist.” 

The future of immigration policies in relation to employment and quality of life make their way to the front of Canadian politics as the cost of living and employment crises hit the youth hardest.  

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Where does rapture content come from? 

As our political climate remains in a troubling state, whisperings that the “end times” are near can be convincing — leading theories to spread rapidly in online spaces. 

Mapping MAMM #4: What the f*** is Canadian Literature anyway? 

Mapping MAMM is an ongoing series which gets into the research questions surrounding the Mapping Ann-Marie MacDonald Research Project. My previous articles have introduced the project as well as examined its cross-disciplinarity and ethics of care. In this fourth installment, I’ll get into the “fraught construct” that is CanLit. 

Late Night comedy in the face of censorship  

Jimmy Kimmel is a late-night comedy staple. Having been on the air since 2003, the comedian is perhaps best known for his viral videos, including “Mean Tweets” — where celebrities read hateful posts on X and his long running YouTube series “I Told My Kids I Ate All Their Halloween Candy.” Kimmel has always been a relatively tame figure in late night media. Though not as politically neutral as Jimmy Fallon, he is certainly not as outspoken as fellow late-night hosts Seth Meyers, Stephen Colbert, John Stewart or John Oliver. 

USA: Not fascist, just anti-anti-fascism 

The United States is not a fascist state. Elections still occur, courts still sometimes check executive power and journalists and comedians still speak out against the government. Within the remains of a democratic framework, on Sept. 22, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order designating “Antifa” — a composition of autonomous groups affiliated with political movements against fascism and other far-right extremist ideologies — as a domestic terrorist organization. Despite the lack of legal framework for this designation, the executive order purports that dissent against the Trump administration is a threat to national security rather than a legitimate democratic right

The war within: Pete Hegseth and the weaponization of U.S. military identity 

When Pete Hegseth — formally the U.S. Secretary of Defense, but ceremonially the Secretary of War — took the stage at Marine Corps Base Quantico on Sept. 30, his first words carried the weight of an era. “Welcome to the War Department,” he said to a packed auditorium of generals, admirals and senior officers. “The era of the Department of Defense is over.”

Five activities to add to your fall bucket list 

If you’re looking for something fun to add to your bucket list this fall, this list of autumn activities is perfect for you. 

Brock’s Wellness Fair spotlights countless student services and opportunities  

The 2025 Brock Wellness Fair gave students the chance to explore a wide range of services, supports and community spaces available both on and off campus. From volunteer initiatives and interfaith opportunities to a variety of mental health supports and athletics, the fair displayed a growing list of opportunities for students to take care of themselves, connect with others and make Brock feel like home. 

10 years after TRC’s Calls to Action and Canada’s promises of reconciliation are still pending 

Ten years have passed since the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) released their landmark Final Report in June 2015. The Commission, established under the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, spent seven years gathering testimony from over 6,000 Survivors to document the devastating legacy of residential schools. This led them to issuing 94 Calls to Action — a roadmap for governments, institutions and Canadians to repair harm and build a more just future. These Calls were never meant as symbolic gestures; they were concrete, actionable steps. A decade later, one question remains: has Canada lived up to them?