Friday, November 21, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

A “travesty for democracy,” Bill 2 and the notwithstanding clause 

|
|

On Oct. 28, Premier Danielle Smith and the government of Alberta passed Bill 2 in response to the ongoing strike between the Alberta Teachers’ Association (ATA) and the continued negotiations of new contracts. The bill imposes the province’s most recent offer — one that nearly 90 per cent of teachers rejected — as a binding agreement. 

The move follows weeks of failed talks with 51,000 teachers walking off the job on Oct. 6. Bill 2 legislates a province-wide collective agreement for all teachers from Sept. 1, 2024, through Aug. 31, 2028. Within the agreement, there is a 12 per cent general increase in salary over the next four years (three per cent per year); 3,000 new teachers and 1,500 new educational assistant appointments as well as strict back-to-work orders beginning Oct. 29. Teachers who defy the order face fines of up to $500 per day, while organizations could face $500,000 per day. 

“Our intention is to pass this legislation immediately and end the strike by the Alberta Teachers’ Association,” Smith said during a press conference on Oct. 27. The government fast-tracked the bill through the legislature that evening, with Government House Leader Joseph Schow moving to limit debate. 

In a press conference later that night, Jason Schilling, president of the ATA, denounced the fast tracking of Bill 2 as a “travesty for democracy” and released plans to pursue “all legal alternatives to challenge the bill’s egregious assault on the collective bargaining rights of teachers, and by extension, all workers” the following morning. 

Bill 2 marks the first time in over three decades that Alberta has invoked Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, known as the notwithstanding clause. The clause allows provincial and federal governments to override certain Charter rights for up to five years when enacting legislation. 

Richard Mailey, director of the Centre for Constitutional Studies at the University of Alberta’s Faculty of Law, told the Calgary Herald that governments often turn to Section 33 when they believe their justification for limiting rights would not withstand judicial scrutiny. 

Recent uses of Section 33 include Saskatchewan’s 2023 parental-consent bill for students under 16 using preferred names or pronouns, and Quebec’s 2019 ban on religious symbols for public workers, which the province renewed in 2024. The federal government has never invoked the clause. 

Bill 2’s use of Section 33 suspends local bargaining until 2028, enforces back-to-work fines and overrides teachers’ right to freedom of association, meaning the imposed agreement did not require the approval of the ATA. 

The decision has drawn intense criticism. Leader of the opposition, Naheed Nenshi, called the use of Section 33 a “nuclear option.” Additionally, Gil McGowan, president of the Alberta Federation of Labour, has started to gauge interest in a general strike under the banner of the Common Front coalition to oppose the bill and its implications for workers’ rights. 

The province defends Bill 2 as a necessary measure to protect students’ education and minimize classroom disruptions. However, critics argue that less extreme options were available and that invoking Section 33 to end a labour dispute sets a dangerous precedent. 

Political observer Rachel Gilmore warned in a video on TikTok that Alberta’s move could embolden other provinces to override collective-bargaining rights in future disputes, further testing the limits of Canada’s Charter protections. Ontario’s 2022 attempt to use Section 33 in a similar education-worker strike was retracted after widespread public backlash. 

Public reaction to the use of Section 33 has been mixed. CBC reported parents are happy to see their kids back in school but conflicted about the way in which back-to-work legislation was brought forward.  

Though Bill 2 succeeded in ending the strike, its broader implications remain uncertain. It is yet to be known if legal challenges will arise and observers warn that Alberta’s decision to invoke Section 33 in a labour dispute could reshape how constitutional rights are interpreted across the country and how province-wide strikes are dealt with fundamentally. 

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

CUPE 4207 bargaining with Brock University  

On Oct. 23, a rally and barbeque in solidarity with CUPE 4207 took place at Glenridge A as the labour union continues engaging in collective bargaining with Brock University. 

Air travel woes as U.S. government opens following nation’s longest shutdown 

The United States government shutdown created travel woes for passengers travelling to or through the country. As a result of the shutdown, there is currently a lack of air traffic controllers, creating serious travel issues for would-be fliers.

Dr. Emily Grafton discusses her book “Divided Power: How Federalism Undermines Reconciliation” 

Dr. Emily Grafton — professor at the University of Regina and author of the newly released book Divided Power: How Federalism Undermines Reconciliation — delivered a lecture at Brock University on Nov. 11, encouraging Canadians to rethink the constitutional foundations that shape Indigenous and state relations. 

Amazon cuts 14,000 corporate jobs as A.I. reshapes the workplace  

Amazon has announced that their company will reduce approximately 14,000 corporate positions globally with plans to eventually reduce up to 30,000 positions altogether, calling the move a strategic shift towards greater efficiency and innovation in an increasingly A.I.-driven environment. The initial phase of cuts affected white-collar and middle-management functions, while warehouse and frontline logistics jobs remain largely untouched.  

Exploring modern masculinity: Brock’s new reading club takes on a cultural crisis 

Associate Professor in the Political Science department at Brock University, Dr. Stefan Dolgert, has started a small but growing initiative to create a safe and welcoming space for young men to discuss issues they may be facing today: loneliness, emotional isolation and the influence of harmful online ideologies. Spearheaded by Professor Dolgert, the Men’s Reading Club at Brock, has undergone its first official meeting with a second in progress.

What the federal budget means for students 

The 2025 federal budget announced on Nov. 4 has made waves across Canada. Ballooning deficits, spending cuts, major investments and infrastructure dominate headlines. But behind the chaos is one question: What does this budget actually mean for students and young Canadians? 

Concerns of fraud push feds to seek visa cancellation powers, singling out India and Bangladesh 

India and Bangladesh have been singled out as “country specific challenges” by the Canadian government in Bill C-12, which seeks mass visa cancellation powers for circumstances such as pandemics, wars and “country-specific visa holders.”  

Blood donation event to take place on campus Nov. 25 

Brock students, staff and faculty will have the opportunity to participate in a life-saving initiative this month as the Brock Leaders Citizenship Society partners with Canadian Blood Services (CBS) to host an on-campus blood donation event.