Saturday, October 11, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Canadian government is hypocritical for not condemning Israeli apartheid

|
|

Canadian politicians have put forward bold rhetoric, sanctions and funding in support of Ukraine’s struggle against Russia’s colonial actions, making the Canadian government nothing short of hypocritical for not doing the same regarding colonial Israel.

At a Ukraine rally in Toronto, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made headlines when he lambasted a heckler in the crowd much to the applause of the crowd and the media: “Hey sir, I think Ukrainians can teach you a little more about freedom and liberty so why don’t you settle down.”

Canada has been a financial supporter of Ukraine since the invasion took place little over a year ago, with $1 billion committed in military aid to the country alongside sanctions on over 1,600 individuals and entities affiliated with Russia.

Sanctions are no doubt needed in this context, and military aid can be helpful, but Canada, like many Western nations, seems to see the funding and unquestionable support of Ukraine as a surrogate for peace negotiations which has already led to edifying examples of war fever.

What’s especially hypocritical, though, is that this same energy of respecting a nation’s sovereignty doesn’t carry to analogous cases of illegitimate colonial violence in the world.

Since the 1967 war, international law has recognized the annexation of Gaza and the West Bank in Israel as an illegal occupation. Despite this, Canada continues to build strategic trade agreements with the Israeli government, including an annual payment of $1 million towards industrial R&D in Israel, even as violence against the Palestinian population has ramped up in the past few months under the recently elected far-right Israeli government. With this in mind, critics are right to wonder if this is just a case of settler-colonial powers recognizing one another.

Additionally, Canada continues to cut petrol-based bilateral import deals with Saudi Arabia that run into the multiple billions of dollars, despite their continued attacks on the internationally recognized Yemeni government, not to mention the mass-executions taking place within the oil monarchy’s borders.

Simply put, Canada cares more about supporting nations that are European, NATO-affiliated, free-market oriented or have key resources.

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Understanding the populist era through Doug Fords alcohol fixation.  

Pouring out a bottle of Crown Whiskey on live stream is a political appeal to populism. Doug Fords progressive conservatives maintain popularity within Ontario’s democratic system by employing a pragmatic style of populism best understood through the provinces alcohol policies.

Trump and acetaminophen: The Western right and mistrust of scientific authority 

The recent claims from the Trump administration regarding the absent link between acetaminophen and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) reflect a growing mistrust toward scientific authority from the right.

Textbook costs are a barrier to education 

Hefty textbook lists have clear class implications and rack up expenses for financially vulnerable students.

Canada Post is not failing — it’s being failed 

I dread December through March at Brock. It is not just the exams and dark skies, but the cold and icy daily trek from Lot 2. For Canada Post workers, that’s the job; bone chilling, frost biting, wind whipping walks; eight hours a day, five days a week, four to six months out of the year.

When growing up means growing apart 

Last spring, I made the difficult decision to take an extra year of undergrad.  

Is veganism a class privilege? 

The meat industry benefits from nutritionally sufficient plant-based diets remaining unaffordable for many. 

Poilievre would not bring stability to the working class 

Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre’s criticism of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s response to the cost-of-living crisis is hypocritical given that his policy values are antithetical to defending the stability of the working class. 

Editorial: Remember when technology was exciting? 

When Apple revealed its latest iPhone lineup during their annual September event, I was forced to reckon with an uncomfortable yet inevitable realization: new technology just isn’t all that exciting anymore. This is especially disappointing because only a couple decades ago, technological innovation was one of the most exciting points of discussion and speculation as we watched it consistently evolve and change our lives in mind-blowing ways.