Saturday, February 22, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Criticizing popular subjects doesn’t make you more intelligent

|
|

Disliking popular things just because they’re popular doesn’t mean you’re morally or intellectually superior, it just earns you the reputation of being a frustrating contrarian

Whenever something becomes popular, there are a few naysayers prepared to criticize it. From larger complaints to minor nitpicks, certain individuals always seem to be ready to bash the latest trend.  

This is nothing new. Take Entertainment Weekly’s list describing 10 reasons why “you” hate Twilight, including such critiques as “vampires shouldn’t sparkle” and “Robert Pattinson’s just not that cute.” 

If it seems like these writers are grasping at straws, that’s because they are. The truth is, there’s something intrinsically enjoyable about opposing the majority. It might provide the satisfaction of freedom or release, while in some cases, it allows the contrarian a feeling of ideological superiority. If the majority seems to be enjoying something yet one individual stands against it, that person may feel that they are more knowledgeable on the subject than those who they believe are too easily influenced. This mentality meant the birth of the word “sheeple,” a term meant to describe those who engage in herd mentality rather than thinking for themselves. 

In reality, consistent defiance doesn’t make the contrarian appear more intelligent, it just displays their arrogance and inherent unwillingness to partake in social norms. 

This isn’t to say that it’s always wrong to oppose popular opinion. Sharing different thoughts is important, and every voice is ultimately valuable. Unique perspectives can help foster conversation and share new thoughts worth consideration. The difference lies in people who feel an air of superiority through their refusal to enjoy anything popular. 

There is science behind this mentality. The Guardian lists several reasons that might cause someone to stand against a majority, such as group polarization or a desire for rebellion.  

Part of the issue lies in those who desire to take enjoyment away from others. Feeling superior in an opinion might bring about the will to inform others why they are wrong to enjoy a certain subject, or how they are too easily influenced by what’s societally popular at a given time. 

The phrase “let people enjoy things” may have started as a meme derived from a webcomic, but there is truth within the sentiment. Some have twisted the phrase in an attempt to negate legitimate criticism; but when applied in the appropriate context, it becomes a message that contrarians could stand to learn from. 

Enjoying popular things doesn’t make you basic, boring or unintelligent. Thinking for yourself is certainly important, but if your own thinking leads you to enjoyment of a societal trend, there is nothing to be ashamed of. 

Unsurprisingly, the internet is a fantastic place to find those who enjoy complaining since there are plenty of contrarians able to fuel their collective fire. Observe this Quora thread originally posted by a web-surfer wanting to know why TikTok is “so cringy”. Chances are that this person already knows why they dislike TikTok, but they hope to see opinions from others who share their annoyance – and they’d become quite satisfied in this regard. 

“It’s full of dumb dances, stupid trends [and] dangerous challenges,” responds one user. “The people on there have nothing to do besides post good for nothing content.” Take note of this comment’s insulting tone. This is not a genuine critique on TikTok, it is an attack on the platform’s creators simply because they are fun to hate. 

What the contrarian doesn’t realize is that they are only harming their own experience. Attacking something just because it’s popular doesn’t mean that public perception will be successfully swayed, but it does mean that the complainer will not experience the joy and togetherness of sharing a common interest with a group. Rather, through their insistent self-isolation, the contrarian puts themselves at the ironic risk of garnering a negative reputation for themselves

Standing against a public opinion is certainly valid when a personal conclusion is drawn from critical thinking. When a person complains about a popular trend due to an insistence on defiance, however, they only open themselves up to criticism in the process. 

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

The Federal Conservatives are turning their backs on Canadians 

The federal Conservatives are telling us what they stand for, and it’s not Canadians. 

Face it, Beyoncé deserved Album of the Year 

Just because your favourite singer didn’t win the Grammy you thought they deserved doesn’t mean that Beyoncé didn’t deserve her’s. 

Social media ruins attention spans, social skills and creativity 

The internet and the abundance of online social media platforms is creating a culture of mindless scrolling, shorter attention spans, a lack of creativity and the disintegration of social skills. 

What to know before you start collecting video games 

There are some important things to know before collecting retro video games to avoid scams and get the best bang for your buck.  

Anchovies are the best pizza topping and you can’t convince me otherwise 

Anchovies are an amazing pizza topping and I’m tired of pretending they’re not. 

Don’t let Trump saving TikTok fool you into thinking he’s changed 

Gen Z would be wise not to start considering Donald Trump a hero despite his recent quest to “save” TikTok from being banned in the U.S. 

Meta has underestimated the threat of online misinformation 

Meta’s decision to remove its fact-checking feature following the rise of Republican control of the White House is a last-ditch effort to gain legislative leverage from Trump despite the flood of non-flagged misinformation that will soon infiltrate American citizens’ social media timelines. 

Exploring the Archives: Has the downplaying of women’s healthcare really come that far in the last half-century? 

This past summer, a few of my colleagues and I worked alongside the Brock Archives & Special Collections department to digitally archive all of The Brock Press’ physical volumes. Dating from September 1964 to March 2020, these issues covered 56 years of Brock history, much of which had been, up until that point, nearly lost to time.