Saturday, October 11, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Doug Ford’s attempts to dodge testifying at the Emergencies Act hearing is cowardly

|
|

Doug Ford continues a trend of fence riding and dodginess to save his political credibility in refusing a summons to testify at the Emergencies Act inquiry in Ottawa.

The Public Order Emergency Commision is opening an inquiry into the use of the Emergencies Act last winter to combat the Convoy Protest. Mayors from across Ontario, including the mayor of Ottawa, have accepted testifying at the inquiry.

Recently re-elected Ontario Premier, Doug Ford, on the other hand, is refusing to testify on grounds that the inquiry is a federal matter not a provincial one, hence not his concern. Commentators are correctly pointing out that this is a strategic move to not have to testify at the hearings and sway voters who may have been supportive of the Convoy.

This kind of dodginess might ring familiar to those who are used to Ford’s unwillingness to stir the pot so as not to be divisive. For example, back in November of 2021 Ford refused to mandate a COVID-19 vaccine requirement for hospital workers, leaving “human resourcing decisions up to individual hospitals.” His style is a slow, subtle undercutting of essential caretaker funds in the province, pushing privatization wherever he can and acting coy and passive in the name of individuals’ freedoms.

This refusal to testify is more proof of the inability of Ontario’s Premier to be a leader.

At the Legislative Assembly of Ontario opposition members pushed the Premier to “come clean” and speak with the Commission. Ford’s one and only response before a fellow MP took the rest of the opposition’s heat was the following:

“Mr. Speaker, this is a federal inquiry into the federal government’s use of the federal Emergencies Act… This was a policing matter, not a political matter. And the opposition knows, Mr. Speaker, politicians don’t direct the police.”

This appeal to institutional authority’s discretion is of course extremely similar to Ford’s hands off, leave it up to hospitals, approach to vaccine mandates for hospital workers. Ford’s political imaginary is one where the government is not beholden to how institutions function and deal with issues, but tries to maximize their autonomy and thus can place blame on individual institutions or actors instead of government direction.

It’s time to stop electing political leaders who, in the interest of corporate lobbyists, preach apolitical solutions to keep the wheels turning on Bay Street instead of stepping up and leading for the good of the electorate.

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Understanding the populist era through Doug Fords alcohol fixation.  

Pouring out a bottle of Crown Whiskey on live stream is a political appeal to populism. Doug Fords progressive conservatives maintain popularity within Ontario’s democratic system by employing a pragmatic style of populism best understood through the provinces alcohol policies.

Trump and acetaminophen: The Western right and mistrust of scientific authority 

The recent claims from the Trump administration regarding the absent link between acetaminophen and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) reflect a growing mistrust toward scientific authority from the right.

Textbook costs are a barrier to education 

Hefty textbook lists have clear class implications and rack up expenses for financially vulnerable students.

Canada Post is not failing — it’s being failed 

I dread December through March at Brock. It is not just the exams and dark skies, but the cold and icy daily trek from Lot 2. For Canada Post workers, that’s the job; bone chilling, frost biting, wind whipping walks; eight hours a day, five days a week, four to six months out of the year.

When growing up means growing apart 

Last spring, I made the difficult decision to take an extra year of undergrad.  

Is veganism a class privilege? 

The meat industry benefits from nutritionally sufficient plant-based diets remaining unaffordable for many. 

Poilievre would not bring stability to the working class 

Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre’s criticism of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s response to the cost-of-living crisis is hypocritical given that his policy values are antithetical to defending the stability of the working class. 

Editorial: Remember when technology was exciting? 

When Apple revealed its latest iPhone lineup during their annual September event, I was forced to reckon with an uncomfortable yet inevitable realization: new technology just isn’t all that exciting anymore. This is especially disappointing because only a couple decades ago, technological innovation was one of the most exciting points of discussion and speculation as we watched it consistently evolve and change our lives in mind-blowing ways.