Monday, March 31, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Doug Ford’s attempts to dodge testifying at the Emergencies Act hearing is cowardly

|
|

Doug Ford continues a trend of fence riding and dodginess to save his political credibility in refusing a summons to testify at the Emergencies Act inquiry in Ottawa.

The Public Order Emergency Commision is opening an inquiry into the use of the Emergencies Act last winter to combat the Convoy Protest. Mayors from across Ontario, including the mayor of Ottawa, have accepted testifying at the inquiry.

Recently re-elected Ontario Premier, Doug Ford, on the other hand, is refusing to testify on grounds that the inquiry is a federal matter not a provincial one, hence not his concern. Commentators are correctly pointing out that this is a strategic move to not have to testify at the hearings and sway voters who may have been supportive of the Convoy.

This kind of dodginess might ring familiar to those who are used to Ford’s unwillingness to stir the pot so as not to be divisive. For example, back in November of 2021 Ford refused to mandate a COVID-19 vaccine requirement for hospital workers, leaving “human resourcing decisions up to individual hospitals.” His style is a slow, subtle undercutting of essential caretaker funds in the province, pushing privatization wherever he can and acting coy and passive in the name of individuals’ freedoms.

This refusal to testify is more proof of the inability of Ontario’s Premier to be a leader.

At the Legislative Assembly of Ontario opposition members pushed the Premier to “come clean” and speak with the Commission. Ford’s one and only response before a fellow MP took the rest of the opposition’s heat was the following:

“Mr. Speaker, this is a federal inquiry into the federal government’s use of the federal Emergencies Act… This was a policing matter, not a political matter. And the opposition knows, Mr. Speaker, politicians don’t direct the police.”

This appeal to institutional authority’s discretion is of course extremely similar to Ford’s hands off, leave it up to hospitals, approach to vaccine mandates for hospital workers. Ford’s political imaginary is one where the government is not beholden to how institutions function and deal with issues, but tries to maximize their autonomy and thus can place blame on individual institutions or actors instead of government direction.

It’s time to stop electing political leaders who, in the interest of corporate lobbyists, preach apolitical solutions to keep the wheels turning on Bay Street instead of stepping up and leading for the good of the electorate.

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Chibi-Robo: Nintendo’s strange, charming and underappreciated hidden gem 

I’m willing to bet that you haven’t played Chibi-Robo. 

Dating apps are the way of the future, and that absolutely sucks 

Dating apps are set to dominate the future of finding love, and I couldn’t be unhappier about it. 

Dissecting the embarrassing Trump-Vance meeting with Zelenskyy 

On Feb. 28, U.S. President Donald Trump met with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to discuss strategies for dealing with the Russo-Ukrainian War that has ravaged the streets of Ukraine since the Russian invasion over three years ago. What ensued can’t simply be described as a failed negotiation — the meeting put the embarrassing ineptitude of the Trump administration on display for the whole world to see. 

Diving into the subreddit that hates Taylor Swift 

The behaviour of the Reddit community r/travisandtaylor goes far beyond fair criticism of Taylor Swift — it’s devolved into full-on hating for the sake of hating, with a dash of misogyny. 

“The Giving Tree” isn’t as bad as people say 

The Giving Tree has faced a lot of rightful criticism over the years, but the book is still a very important piece of literature. 

There’s nothing wrong with Shrek 5’s new look 

The teaser for Shrek 5 might use a different visual design for the franchise’s characters than what fans are used to, but the public backlash isn’t warranted. 

Trump is using tariffs to assert power, not to increase Canadian border security 

Don’t be fooled by the false pretenses of punishing a lack of border security behind Trump’s tariffs on Canadian industries; his trade wars are simply an expression of his desire to exert economic power onto other nations to see if he can bully them around. 

Who is the iPhone 16e actually meant for? 

Cost-effective purchasers would be wise to avoid Apple’s new “budget” iPhone 16e.