Saturday, April 26, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada
Home Blog Page 27

Brock men’s wrestling team cleans up at USports Nationals 

0

The Brock Badgers travelled to Edmonton this weekend for the U Sports Championship, where they competed against the best schools in Canada for their eighth consecutive national championship banner. 

The Badgers were the number-one ranked team in the country for much of the season and entered the tournament as the team to beat. They had six athletes who finished in the top three in six of the ten weight classes. They notched two golds, three silvers and one bronze medal, finishing the tournament with 65 team points, which was 14 better than the next team, McMaster Marauders. 

Carlos Vargas finished first in the 68 kg weight class. He faced off against Saskatchewan in the final and added yet another clean sheet to his multiple this season, winning 10-0 on a technical fall. 

His fellow gold medalist Bobby Narwal competed in the 72 kg weight class and also swept the round-robin matches, winning in many different ways such as technical fall and pin fall victories. In the finals, he managed to beat Calgary in a technical fall victory to join Carlos on the podium. 

Other Brock athletes with medals included Max Budgey (silver, 76 kg), Jordan Wylie (silver, 82 kg), Roger Li (silver, 125 kg) and Gabriel Blachette (bronze, 65 kg). 

The rest of the Badgers also competed but did not finish on the podium. These athletes were Mark Summers (fourth, 90 kg), Callum Knox (fifth, 100 kg), Gabriel Sementilli (sixth, 57 kg) and Cho Sherpa (sixth, 61 kg). 

Brock head coach Marty Calder also left Alberta with an award, winning the male team coach of the year in U Sports. 

To learn more about the men’s wrestling team this year visit gobadgers.ca

Brock men’s basketball falls to underdog Gaels in Quarter Finals

0

After finishing the season 16-6 and being tied for first place in the OUA Central, the Badgers took on the Queen’s’Gaels in a quarter-final do-or-die matchup on Feb. 25.

The two are very familiar, meeting each other in the OUA Championship game last year where the Badgers won 95-75 to take home the Wilson Cup.

Brock won the tip-off, getting first possession of the game but, unfortunately, a turnaround jumper from Jevon Brown did not fall and Queen’s stormed down the court, scoring the first bucket of the game just a few possessions later. The Badgers struggled early shooting the ball but their defence made up for it. Three minutes into the game, the score was tied at two’s. 

Both teams ramped up the scoring through the next couple of minutes, trading three-pointers to bring it to 10-10 halfway through the first quarter. The rest of the quarter was more of the same; both teams scored at a relatively similar pace with the quarter ending 18-17 for Queens. 

The Gaels came out for the second quarter with more urgency than the Badgers, going on a 7-0 run within the first few minutes of the quarter and stretching their lead to nine, 30-21. The bucket from Kascius Small-Martin ended Queen’s run and got the Badger back within seven with just over half of the quarter to play. 

Queen’s continued to outscore the Badgers for the remainder of the second quarter and went into the half leading 42-36. Badger Jordan Tcheunte shot 50 per cent from the field, netting nine points, three rebounds and two blocks. While Gaels’ Cole Syllas led Queen’s with 14 points, six rebounds and two assists. 

The Badgers needed to pick up the offence if they wanted to get back into the game. But the Gaels’ defence stood tall and kept the Badgers to 19 for the second straight quarter in a row. The Badgers trailed 64-55 with a quarter of play left and their season on the line. 

The Badgers went on an 11-0 run to bring them back within one point with just over five minutes to play, with buckets from Tcheunte, Bujdoso and Caldwell during the huge offensive run, 69-68. 

The two teams continued to trade buckets down the stretch, with Queen’s widening their lead to five points. With one minute left the Badgers were down 78-74 as Bujsoso carried the ball up the court. On an iso play, Bujdoso drove in, spun around and hit the fadeaway jumper to bring the Gaels’ lead down to two with 33 seconds left. 

On the next possession, Queen’s came down the floor trying to kill as much time as possible but an interception by Bujdoso stopped the play. One ref called jump ball, the other called Gaels’ ball and it was decided that it would be Gaels’ ball with 17 seconds left in the game and four seconds on the shot clock. Queen’s inbounded the ball and Michael Kelvin III hit a two-point shot over the Brock defender to put the Gaels back up four, 80-76. 

With 17 seconds left, Bujdoso sprinted down the floor right into the paint, putting in the layup. Brock intentionally fouled on the next play with six seconds left but the Queen’s shooter hit both free throws to extend the lead to four. With six seconds left, the Badgers would add two more points at the buzzer but it was not enough to tie the game as it ended 82-80 for Queen’s. 

The Badgers lost in the quarter-finals in what could’ve been such a promising season. The three top scorers for the Badgers in the 2022-23 season were Isiah Bujdoso (13.88 PPG, 5.13 REB/G & 4 AST/G), Jordan Tcheunte (11.19 PPG, 8.62 REB/G & 2.83 AST/G) and Godsman Kwakwah (11.05 PPG, 3.81 REB/G & 0.62 AST/G). 

To take a deeper look into the Badgers season go to gobadgers.ca and to take a look into the OUA stats look here

Welland lawyer appointed Judge of the Superior Court of Justice of Windsor

0

A lawyer based in Niagara has been appointed as a Judge of the Superior Court of Justice in Windsor, Ontario.

J. Ross Macfarlane is a lawyer at Flett Beccario, Barristers & Solicitors, a law firm located in Welland. After completing his Bachelor of Laws at the University of Ottawa and Bachelor of Arts and Science at McMaster University, he was eventually called to the bar of Ontario in 1995.

He continued practicing in Ottawa until 2003, until he returned to his hometown of Welland to join Flett Beccario as a senior litigator. His father, Duncan M. Macfarlane, is also a lawyer at the firm.

Macfarlane specializes in commercial litigation, focusing on bankruptcy, insolvency, debtor/creditor, and commercial disputes. His clientele includes both individuals and major institutions, including banks, credit unions and local businesses within Niagara.

His professional resume includes high-level positions such as being the former president of the Welland County Law Association and a position on the board of directors of Niagara College Learning Enterprises Corp. During his time in Ottawa, he taught civil litigation and insolvency law at the Bar Admission Course and spent time as a guest lecturer.

According to Flett Beccario, Macfarlane has found success in many of his cases, a number of which were filed in the Ontario Reports.

He is also the former president of Les Marmitons International, a gentleman’s cooking club with 19 chapters across the continent. In June 2016, he was awarded the John-Pierre Jobin Award, the highest honour from the organization.

Macfarlane is one of the five judicial appointments announced in February. He is replacing Justice G. Verbeem, who retired on Dec. 15, 2022.

Ukraine appeals to Canada for support with its damaged railway system

0

Ukraine has appealed to Canada for help in repairing and improving their railway system as the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues.

Ukraine’s railways have proven essential to the country during the Russian invasion, which began over a year ago. Trains have allowed four million Ukrainians to escape occupied areas and flee to adjacent countries, bringing thousands of wounded Ukrainians to hospitals. The railway system is also used to transport Ukrainian soldiers to the front lines and to bring civilians and resources back to safety.

But as of late, enemy attacks on the railways have left 20 per cent of the system completely unusable, according to Ukrainian Railways CEO Oleksandr Pertsovskyi. Ukrainian Railways, a company which has played a major role in the relationship between Ukraine’s rail systems and the war, is now asking for Canada’s help.

The company is specifically interested in Canada’s potential support due to its position as a large industrial manufacturer in the railway industry.

While Ukraine’s railway industry has maintained overall success throughout the war despite challenges including bombings and blackouts, Ukraine believes it is the right time to reach out for support.

Ukraine has already made efforts towards making their railway services more accessible to civilians throughout the war, inducting measures such as the abandonment of ticketing. Trains were slowed down in fear of derailment or Russian sabotage, and pets were allowed on trains so fleeing Ukrainians could bring them along. Ukraine Railways estimates that 120,000 animals have used the system since the start of the war.

On Sept. 28, 2022, Omar Alghabra, the Canadian Minister of Transport, worked with Ukrainian officials to devise a support plan in coordination with major Canadian railways. The collaborators’ goals include supporting the rebuilding of damaged systems, maximizing rail capacity, analyzing challenges to the Ukrainian railway system and the hope of working with the government and industry allies.

“As a key ally and partner to the Ukrainian reconstruction efforts, the Government of Canada will leverage broader industry and supply chain partnerships that can help inform decisions on freight commodity movements by rail,” said Alghabra. “Together with our industry partners, we will ensure the continued movement of people and crucial commodities and products that are vital to supporting the wellness and livelihoods of Ukrainians.”

The Railway Association of Canada is currently analyzing what parts Ukraine’s railway system requires and how they can be attained within Canada. The association represents Canada’s largest rail companies as well as some rail manufacturers.

“Canada’s railways deliver reliably over more than 42,000 kilometres of track—as they have through two world wars and other major world events since Confederation,” said Marc Brazeau, the president and CEO of the Railway Association of Canada. “Overcoming logistical and other challenges, Canadian railroaders never shy away from stepping up in times of need and working together for the good of all. Our member railways have deep talent pools and a breadth of expertise to bring to bear in helping Ukrainians get food, energy and other goods to market at this incredibly difficult time.”

Ukrainian Railways hopes that with Canada’s help, the railway system might even surpass what it was before the war—currently, the distance between the rails is incompatible with the railway standard of the rest of Europe, something that the company hopes to change. They also hope to transform destroyed stations into ones that will provide better support to Ukrainians after the war, citing accessibility concerns as a major point of focus.

As the war in Ukraine wages on, the country is appealing to Canada for support in repairing and improving this crucial system, which has proven instrumental to their successes over the course of Russia’s invasion.

Should Family Day be spent with family?

0

Family Day is an annual holiday traditionally associated with spending time with those an individual considers family.

While Family Day may not be a national holiday, it still usually means a day off for most individuals living in New Brunswick, Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, British Columbia and Ontario. This year, the holiday took place on Feb. 20.

But are people really spending the holiday with family, or is Family Day just a relaxing day off? Certain individuals take the perspective that Family Day is meant to mean time spent with loved ones, and to reflect upon familial values.

“Family Day may be a leisurely day off from work and school, but it’s meant to be an opportunity to reflect on the importance of spending quality time with our families, and feeling gratitude for the deep bonds and connections we share with one another,” wrote Nirmala Raniga for The Province.

This comes at a point in human history where traditional quality “family time” is sparse. A 2018 study found that American families spend an average of 37 minutes with their loved ones on weekdays, which is in great contrast to the three hours a day American adults spend on social media.

Others believe that people should not have the pressure of spending holidays with family, citing concerns of family toxicity as a major reason.

“Feeling powerless toward an obligation to return home, regardless of the impacts on our mental health, has far-reaching consequences,” wrote Christina Wyman for The Guardian. “It can affect peoples’ finances, their confidence and their relationships. Not to mention the fact that people overstate the importance of going home when it comes to maintaining a meaningful connection with our families.”

So, is it really necessary to spend Family Day with family, and how are Brock students implementing their thoughts on the matter into how they spent their day?

“Family Day’s never really been celebrated in my family,” said Colton Weaver, a second-year concurrent education student. “We’re kind of like a ‘only get together on major holidays’ kind of family. Even with where my parents work, a lot of the time they work on Family Day because they’re in fields where they don’t get the day off.”

Weaver used some of his time on Family Day to engage with his personal interests. Despite this, he added that he was able to make time for his family within the day.

“Since I had work off, I just did whatever hobbies I have—you know, reading, going to the gym and that kind of stuff. My family and I had dinner together, so I guess that’s where we reconnected,” said Weaver.

Weaver doesn’t see a problem with taking time for yourself on the holiday, but hopes that those who feel disconnected from their families might consider spending Family Day with their loved ones.

“I think it’s fine to do whatever you want to do—but, I would encourage people who don’t see their family normally to actually take part in spending it with their family,” said Weaver. “I’m close with my family—maybe not in person, but I do talk to them over social media and by sending letters. It’s not like I’m totally detached from them. I would recommend it for people who have family problems to take advantage of the day.”

Family Day does not mean the same thing to everyone. With so many unique types of relationships, spending time with family can look different for each individual—and this especially applies to Family Day.

“I’d say typically, it’s usually a free day off,” said Alex DeCicco, a second-year dramatic arts student. “Even back when I was in Thunder Bay with my actual family, it’s always been a day off that I could take to just relax.”

DeCicco believes that quality time does not necessarily need to follow a textbook definition of “family.” DeCicco’s Family Day might have been spent at a distance from his family back home, but connections with loved ones were still present throughout the day.

“This Family Day, it turned out that [my girlfriend] and I were both off work, so we got to spend the day together. So, it didn’t feel like we were doing a Family Day activity, but realistically, it turned out that way because we were both spending time with each other,” said DeCicco.

DeCicco spent much of the day watching videos and playing Minecraft with his girlfriend. He added that the pair spent a lot of time with their pets, as they consider them to be family.

While he doesn’t think strict family time on the holiday should be a necessity, DeCicco admits that taking some time to think about loved ones is valuable.

“I think many people do have families that are not close to them, either symbolically or physically,” he said. “So, it could be difficult for some people to spend time with their family, but—certainly, in the name of the day is the word ‘family,’ so I figure that if you can’t spend time with your family, you’re at least thinking about them.”

With so many perspectives on not only Family Day but on family in general, there is no definite consensus on any sort of “correct” way to spend the holiday. With each family being unique in terms of relationships and dynamics, it’s possible that every person’s Family Day is different.

Trade and other free market ideals aren’t the primary reason for global poverty reduction

0

No, trade isn’t the primary reason for global poverty’s decline over the last 50 years.

If you’ve ever gone down the right-wing media rabbit hole, you’ve likely seen some variation on the “global trade and capitalism have unequivocally alleviated human poverty and suffering since the industrial revolution” argument.

For example, bestselling author Jordan Peterson published a video to his Facebook page called “The Only Systems That Seem To Lift People Out Of Absolute Poverty Are Free Market Capitalist Systems” where he starts by citing Venezuela’s decline in wealth over the last 30 years. Venezuela, mind you, has a smaller public sector employment percentage (18 per cent) than France (20 per cent) and Norway (29 per cent). This is only the beginning of the contradictions presented by Peterson’s video.

The most glaring aspect of Peterson’s thesis is that the country that lifted the most people out of poverty in the last 50 years is China. In fact, China has lifted around three quarters of the global population living in extreme poverty since the transformations undertaken by Deng Xiaoping in the ‘70s into the ‘80s. China is, however, far from a free market capitalist system. While I’m not ready to praise the Chinese model, it’s simply a fact that the success of that model has been due to aggressive state intervention in private markets; it’s a complete top-down structure—hardly a free market.

Harvard professor of cognitive psychology Steven Pinker, was grilled for a similar reductionist argument on the alleviation of global poverty by Mehdi Hasan of Al Jazeera. Hasan probes Pinker’s argument in his book Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress that extreme poverty since the ‘90s shows a sharp declining trend according to the Global Bank’s setting the extreme poverty line at 1.90 USD a day. Hasan points out the arbitrariness of the 1.90 figure, in that if you measure extreme poverty at 5.50 USD, a billion people have been added to that level since 1981.

Even when it comes to the absolute figures, the picture of relative poverty alleviation in even the last 20 years itself is unclear. What figures can’t explain is that the history of many Third World countries had them being bullied by global financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) into debt peonage causing structural poverty. As the late anarchist author David Graeber outlined at the outset of his book Debt: The First 5000 Years, after the OPEC oil crisis of the ‘70s, many Western banks had received large deposits of oil money from the petroleum nations abroad and invested them in Third World countries often, through sales-pitches to dictators — many of whom pocketed large portions of these investments in their personal bank accounts — at low interest rates which skyrocketed in the next decade causing the IMF to demand that these countries strip price controls and their social safety nets to pay it off causing mass poverty. Not to mention, the IMF pushed these countries to adopt free market models which the citizens didn’t even vote for and which didn’t address their poverty in the slightest.

Many South American countries fell prey to the Washington Consensus in the latter half of the 20th century as well. Take the democratically elected leader in Chile, Salvador Allende, who was ousted in a U.S.-backed coup leading to the brutal dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet. After Pinochet sealed the power vacuum, the World Bank and IMF began to see Chile as credible, unlike during the Allende years. The same was true in Brazil when the democratically elected Joao Goudart was on the receiving end of a three-year suspension of IMF loans until a military coup in 1964 that saw the loans start streaming back in shortly after. Then there’s U.S. president Ronald Reagan’s legacy of harshly embargoing the democratically elected Sandinista, Daniel Ortega, in Nicaragua and funding the counterrevolutionary faction of The National Guard, the “Contras.”

South America’s broad leftwing “pink tide” movement throughout the 21st century has been one of the key players in lifting global poverty. Recently reelected president of Brazil, Lula da Silva, in his first term as president, lifted millions out of extreme poverty through his state-directed Bolsa Família program which gave out over $8 billion worth in monthly stipends.

Needless to say, the idea that global poverty rates have been alleviated by free market capitalist policies and ideals is simply not true and, in fact, reproduces the structural poverty that global economic institutions such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund have trafficked in creating for decades.

The Nordic model of social democracy is a good step, but a step nonetheless

0

Nordic countries are leaders in developing robust social safety nets and healthy communities.

While a step in the right direction these Nordic bastions of social democracy should be looked at as just a step nonetheless.

The Nordic model for anyone even slightly to the left has been a primary example of how a welfare state mixed with robust measures for collective bargaining, including interlocking arrangements with government, trade unions and corporations, leads to healthier, happier, highly-educated populations.

For the right that sees a laissez faire approach to the market as a vehicle for those outcomes, the Nordic bloc — Norway, Sweden, Finland, Iceland, Denmark — has been something of an annoying blot, keeping much of the Keynesian consensus alive to their success.

It’s worth a quick survey of the successes of these nations.

Finland, which has an entirely free public education system from preschool to post-secondary, even including meals at the university, has consistently ranked amongst the top nations in the world in education indexes. And when things such as mandatory maternal packages with books whenever a child is born as well as the fact that parent’s incomes don’t matter an iota when it comes to the education a child will receive are accounted for, it’s not too controversial to say Finland has the best education system in the world.

Norway nationalized their oil and gas industry in the government enterprise, Equinor, which controls 60 per cent of production on the Norwegian continental shelf. Having that kind of control means the process of moving to renewables will be much easier as it’s a unilateral move, unencumbered by private monopolies lining their pockets and waiting for the other guy to get out first leaving a movement to renewables in a stale-mate which the world simply can’t afford to be at the cost of. In 2016, Equinor ranked fifth in terms of respect for arctic Indigenous peoples’ rights out of 92 oil and gas companies, a respect that the private hands on the Keystone XL Pipeline in North America which continues to spur multiple protests from Indigenous nations, has failed to consider.

While no utopia in this respect with fairly extensive waiting lists to get a home, Sweden has half of its population living in public housing which are owned by municipalities. This comes with a series of benefits, foremost of which is that with the large municipal supply of housing, the population can more directly influence how housing policy functions. That means far less cut-throat landlords. While still relatively expensive, rent in Sweden is, on average, significantly cheaper than in the United States.

Sweden also touts a decentralized, mostly public universal healthcare system which has some of the highest health outcomes in the EU. While on the topic of healthcare, all the Nordic countries have largely free public healthcare with some minor copayments when visiting GPs and getting prescriptions and certain services. This model has the Nordic countries ranking among the highest in the world in terms of healthcare.

In terms of law and order, Norway presented a series of reforms to their prison systems in the 1990s when they had recommitment percentages similar to that of the United States (roughly 70 per cent). With reforms that outlawed life-sentences, the maximum amount of time being 21 years regardless of the crime, and humane prisons cells, some of which look like nice dorms, the recidivism rate reached a low of 20 per cent by the 2020s. In Denmark, the open prison system which allows inmates to leave the prison to see family, visit work, and go to school so long as they return under a strict curfew, has led to low levels of recidivism as well.

And the list goes on.

It’s undeniable these social democracies have done a number of things right, most importantly maintaining state interventionism to support the population in the most important sectors for well-being.

A common retort by the right is that the Nordic model’s success has largely to do with social cohesion and tight cultural ties of cooperation and equality. The fact that Sweden was amongst the most unequal European countries in the late 19th century should dispel any beliefs that there’s just something special in the drinking water north of Europe.

With all that being said, the Nordic model is still a step. To move to a more socialist model of governance, where workplaces are incentivized to democratize as well as moving to renewable energy is pursued with the urgency befitting that project, what we observe in these north European enclaves of social democracy is a good model for renewing the premium put on state intervention for important aspects of society—health, education, housing. However, one shouldn’t obfuscate that compared to other OECD countries, the Nordic countries have seen a relatively high level of income inequality since the 1980s. Luckily, lots of this income is redistributed through the more sane tax brackets in these countries.

Regardless, the Nordic model ought to be something leftists in North America continue to pitch as a stepping stone to a more equitable society.

SJCx SAWs BIPOC Galentine’s day event successfully created a feeling of community for women of colour at Brock

0

What better way to celebrate Valentine’s Day than to have a Galentine’s celebration?

On Feb. 12., Brock’s Student Justice Centre (SJC), in collaboration with the South Asian Women’s Society (SAWs), hosted a Valentine’s Day-themed party in Pond Inlet from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., created specifically for BIPOC women to celebrate the holiday with their girl-friends.

As soon as the clock struck 3:00 p.m., BIPOC students started coming into Pond Inlet, which was decorated by the SJC and SAWs teams in shades of red and pink and adorned with heart balloons and garlands all around.

Some of the activities that were advertised on SJC’s social media included cookie decorating, painting, a Valentine’s Day-themed photo booth, music and snacks. The expectations they set were surpassed.

Not only did each carefully decorated table get its own Valentine’s Day cookie decorating set, but students also had the chance to grab a fresh canvas and acrylic paint to put their creativity to the test, often in the form of Valentine’s Day-themed art.

Additionally, the SJC team set out a card-making station equipped with various forms of colourful paper, stickers, markers and envelopes for attendees to write love letters directed to themselves or others.

For those who were not as artsy or who wanted to share a group activity, there were opportunities to grab board games or card games to play with friends.

As for the food options at the event, students had different types of pizza to choose from, as well as the chance to make their own candy grams by grabbing the candies of their choosing and placing them in love-themed plastic bags, all provided by the event organizers as well.

Attendees took advantage of how the sun gleamed into Pond Inlet to take photos in front of the Galentine’s photobooth. The heart decorations and pink garlands propped on the wall, along with the shiny heart balloons that the SJC team left out for students to be used as props, guaranteed an evening full of smiles and fun group photos.

The evening also had something to offer on a deeper level, as many students felt the event was much needed to create a stronger sense of community for women who also identify as BIPOC.

“It was nice because I got to meet some new people, and we all have similar identities in the way we are all racialized and women,” said Angelica Pangilinan, a fourth-year sociology student and the president of the Brock BIPOC caucus. “When we were talking about our lives and our experiences, and the places we have in our families, I think I found some more relatability in talking to people who had similar experiences.”

Given the strong community bonds that were made at the Galentine’s Day party, it is clear that SJC and SAWs managed to plan an event that truly united women of colour at Brock to invest in their female friendships as part of their yearly Valentine’s Day celebration.

“I don’t curl often, but when I do”: Jarred Allen, the world’s most interesting man

0

The more you look into the career of former NFL defensive end Jarred Allen, the more questions you’re left with.

For example, what kind of serious athlete wears the number 69 for their entire career? Certainly not someone who played 11 seasons of strong football in the NFL. Or, who rode a horse onto the U.S Bank Stadium field for his induction into the Minnesota Vikings ring of honour. Probably not one who has multiple All-Pro and Pro-Bowl appearances.

It’s sometime in 2017, presumably, and Allen is asking a lot of questions about his career. He has just finished announcing his retirement on Twitter by posting a video of him—quite literally—riding his horse into the sun (you may notice a theme with the Texas native), and, at 34 he feels a little aimless.

Many athletes struggle to adjust to retirement, especially well-paid, high-profile ones like Allen. At the end of his football career, and feeling listless, Allen needed a solution to his retirement problem and, thanks to a wager with an old friend, he found one: don’t retire.

Sounds simple enough, but for a defensive player on the wrong side of 30, there aren’t many NFL general managers knocking down your door, even if you aren’t concerned about your own well-being at this point in your career.

Allen needed a different sport, preferably low-impact. After watching the movie about the British ski jumper, Eddie the Eagle, Allen also wanted something a little less common. His choice was curling.

At this point you’re probably questioning why you should care, and a valid one considering I also don’t really care about the post-retirement athletic pursuits of NFL players. Except, of course, when they’re good.

Allen, not content with simply finding something to occupy his time, needed a challenge, and thus the bet was born: Jarred Allen was going to win Olympic gold.

The first and largest hurdle for Allen was obvious in that he had never actually curled before. Picking up the stone for the first time later that year, you could be forgiven for laughing at Allen’s elaborate plan to avoid spending time at home.

“I thought curling was going to be a lot easier than it was,” said Allen to the Star Tribune, “But I’m one of those guys who, once I start something, I’m going to see it through.”

Fast forward to February, 2023, and Allen is right in the thick of the U.S.A. National Curling Championships, an event that determines the American representative for the World Championships and an essential step on the way to the Olympics.

According to Allen, “Our goal at nationals is to beat as many teams as we possibly can and see where we land.”

Allen’s team is skipped by Jason Smith, who represented the States at the 2010 Vancouver Olympics, and also features former LA Rams QB Marc Bulger. The team at one point also featured two other former NFL-ers, Keith Bulluck and Michael Roos.

The tournament couldn’t have started any better for team Smith, taking all of the first three matches. In fact, team Smith actually took down team Shuster in the first game of the tournament. Shuster is the first American to ever win Olympic gold in curling, which he did in 2018, roughly the same time at which Allen began curling.

Unfortunately, 3-0 was as good as they would get, going 0-4 the rest of the way. While they may not have advanced, Allen and his team certainly showed they belonged, and that they could have more to offer in the years coming. And, with the next winter Olympics not until 2026, team Smith has plenty of time to work on their game.  

Women’s volleyball win last two home games, move to third in the country

0

Continuing a five-game win streak, the Badgers’ women’s volleyball team captured their final two home victories of the regular season over the Queen’s University Gaels this weekend.

A middle-of-the-pack team, Queen’s gave Brock a chance to cement their place in the top of the OUA.

The Badgers got to work early on their goal in a set that saw them flex their hitting prowess. Queen’s kept it close throughout the set, only falling 25-20; however Brock’s 16 kills and .429 hitting percentage simply overpowered the Gaels.

The second set saw much the same for both sides. Posting identical hitting percentages, neither team could gain much of an edge. Neither team were able to go up by more than two until they found themselves knotted at 19.

Three kills, all courtesy of assists from Sarah Rohr and an attack error from Queen’s quickly put Brock in the driver’s seat with only two points separating them from the end of the set. Though the Gaels added two more, Brock put the wraps on set number two as well, claiming it 25-21 in a game that was soon becoming closer than the score.

The third set began just like the other two without either team jumping out to a big lead, at least early on. Queen’s had kept the score close all night thanks to their strong play at the net, and in the third set, it was starting to finally pay dividends on the scoreboard. As the Badgers struggled to deal with the Gaels’ blocking, Queen’s went up 18-12.

Undeterred, the Badgers battled back, tying the score at 20. Brock wouldn’t look back from there and, sealing it on a block from Grace Pyatt, the Badgers took the third and final set 25-22.

Very tight for a 3-0 match, the Badgers only held a 46.0 – 45.0 lead in points over all three sets. Nevertheless, the Badgers led by significant margins in most categories, including kills, assists and digs.

Individually, Madison Chimienti, who continues to sit in U-Sports’ top 35 in kills per set, led the way with a game-leading 13 kills in addition to three blocks. Aleiah Torres (third in the country in digs per set) and Sarah Rohr (fifth in the country in assists per set) continued their huge body of work, putting up 11 digs and 32 assists, respectively.

Before taking the court against the Gaels again on Saturday in their final home game of the regular season, the Badgers honoured their two graduating senior players, Grace Pyatt and Christina Jovetic.

A home-grown talent from Thorold, Pyatt, Applied Gerontology major and Middle has been with the program since 2017-18. In her time with Brock, Pyatt has racked up 487 kills on 0.308 hitting percentage.

Also a Niagara Region local and Middle, Jovetic has been with Brock since 2018-19 where she has 244 kills on a 0.287 hitting percentage.

Though Queen’s jumped out to an early 3-0 first-set lead, that was pretty much the most fight we would see from them on Saturday evening.

The Badgers struggled at the net, committing six errors to only nine kills, but it didn’t really matter. The Gaels were unable to capitalize on any of Brock’s mistakes and, in fact, were much worse, committing 12 errors to 11 kills. Despite a pitiful -0.026 hitting percentage leading to a 25-20 first set loss, this was as close as the Gaels would get.

In fact, building on their poor performance, the Gaels doubled down, posting nine errors and a -0.139 hitting percentage. Though the score was close at times, the Badgers pulled away late, rinsing the Gales 25-16 in the second set.

In the third set, Queen’s posted a positive hitting percentage for the first time in the match, but it was too little too late, losing 25-19 to fall in straight sets to the Badgers.

Brock held considerable leads in every team statistic, and were particularly impressive when it came to service with seven aces. Jovetic had two aces of her own, in addition to seven blocks and an assist. Fellow senior Pyatt had nine kills and five blocks.

Sadie Dick, 24th in all of U-Sports in kills-per-set, had a game-high ten kills to go along with six blocks. Of course, it goes without saying, Rohr and Torres led the game in assists and digs.

With back-to-back straight-set victories, including one on Saturday’s Seniors Night, Brock moved one game ahead of Western University for the top slot in the OUA. The Badgers’ 16-2 record also leaves them tied for third in the country and the best team outside of western Canada. Their infinitesimal 12 points against is also the fewest in the entire country.

Next Saturday and Sunday, the Badgers wrap-up their regular season against second-last-place Trent University and further lock-in their top seed and home-court advantage going into the playoffs. For the team’s full-schedule and results, find them on gobadgers.ca.

Women’s hockey: Badgers keep playoff hopes alive with Bold win over TMU 

0

On Feb.11, Brock’s women’s hockey team suited up for a home game against Toronto Metropolitan University (TMU) Bold that had huge playoff implications. 

With just three games left in the regular season, the Badgers are currently fighting for the fourth and final playoff spot in the OUA West, tied with the Western Mustangs, while TMU holds the fourth playoff spot in the OUA east division. The matchup marks the second and final game between the teams this season as they look to sweep the season series 2-0. 

The Bold had a strong start to the game—winning the opening faceoff and controlling possession for much of the first five minutes. Brock goaltender Kenzie Harmison had to be sharp early, making a left pad save on a two-on-one rush for the Bold. 

Despite Brock’s up-and-down season, Harmison has arguably been the one consistent player on the team. Through 16 games played in the season, she has posted a .933 save percentage and 1.84 goals against average, both are sixth best in the OUA. The Badgers would need a solid game out of Harmison if they wanted to keep their playoff hopes alive. 

After being on their heels for the first five minutes of the game, the Badgers started to push back, making clean break-out passes and cycling them in the TMU zone. Despite all of the offensive zone time, no high-danger chances came from it. In fact, they were giving up dangerous chances off the rush due to long shifts in the offensive zone that would lead to many of the Badger players being tired. 

The game tightened up defensively as the first period came to end with neither team able to beat the opposition’s goaltender. Harmison managed 13 saves in the first period while TMU goaltender Alexia Stratos had six saves of her own. 

The second period brought more of the same as both teams got their fair share of chances. The best chance of the period came off the rush for the Badgers when Rebekah Feld ripped one off the right post leading to a rebound out in front. But it was cleared away by the TMU defender, not allowing another scoring opportunity. 

The shots for each team in the second period were closer than in the first, though TMU still had the edge offensively in the period, managing seven shots to Brock’s six. 

The Badgers needed to get their offence going to start the third period and that is exactly what they did. A failed clear attempt by the TMU defenseman was picked off by Badger Lauren Diks and quickly passed over to Madeline Nicholson, who made no mistake beating Stratos over the shoulder to take the 1-0 lead early in the third period. 

Brock used the momentum from the first goal to try to get another but Stratos stood strong for TMU, keeping it a 1 goal game. Her best save of the sequence came off of a slot shot from Rebekah Feld that she was able to make a blocker save on. 

All the pressure eventually got to TMU, leading to a Brock powerplay just under half way through the third. Unfortunately, Brock was unable to score on the powerplay and did not get many chances through to the net as TMU defenders did a great job of getting in the lane and blocking shots and cross-seam passes. 

Brock’s powerplay was followed by three TMU power plays but Harmison’s and the Brock penalty killers’ never say die effort killed all six minutes of TMU’s powerplay. The Bold continued to pressure throughout the rest of the game, even pulling their goalie with 1:15 left in the third period. But Brock was able to hang on for the 1-0 victory on the back of Harmison’s first OUA shutout, keeping Brock’s playoff hopes alive. 

The Badgers have two games left in the regular season taking place on Feb. 17 and 18 against the Western University Mustangs (away) and York University Lions (home). 

Tickets to Brock’s last home game at Canada Games Park can be bought here and all other information regarding the team can be found at gobadgers.ca

Three sports you didn’t know existed 

0

Many of us grew up playing classic Canadian sports such as hockey, soccer, basketball and baseball but what constitutes classic sports in other parts of the world can be  unimaginable to the Canadian mind. 

Here are three sports that Canadians probably have never heard of:

Bossaball

Bossaball was created nearly two decades ago in Spain. The game is played on an inflatable surface with a volleyball-style net in the middle and a ball. The net is three metres high and the game is played in teams of five. Each side also has a trampoline that allows players to gain extra height while trying to hit the ball over the net. 

Similar to volleyball, the objective of the game is to hit the ball over the net with a maximum of five hits. However, there are restrictions on how many times you can hit the ball with a specific part of your body in one possession. For each possession, a team is only able to make contact with the ball once with their hands, twice with their feet and twice with their head. The game is normally played in the best of three sets with each set going up to 25 points. 

The game has grown across Europe in countries such as Belgium, the Netherlands and Spain, with the Netherlands launching the first-ever bossaball major league in 2015. Over the past seven to eight years the league has grown exponentially as every two years World Bossaball Championships are hosted in either Netherlands or Belgium with 8-10 countries competing in the tournament. 

Bossaball has yet to make its way to North America but with other countries in Asia and South America starting to play the game as well, we may see it come overseas in the next couple of years.

Competitive Sleeping

Yes, it is exactly what it sounds like. Competitive sleeping was first played in 1998 in the State of California. People gathered together and created a competitive sleep league. Now, many countries have their own league for the sport and the World Sleep Championship (WSC) is a yearly tournament where the best sleeper in the World is crowned.

So you may be wondering how they crown the best sleeper. All competitors are given an Oura ring. An Oura ring is a bracelet that tracks your body day and night. For this specific sport, it is used to track your zen sleep which is the main focus of scoring in the competition along with time and stillness. The longer your body is in a zen sleep the better chance you have at winning. 

In the case of the WSC, the competition is over two weeks long as Sleep Racers will battle it out in a series of round-robin and elimination matchups. After 60-plus hours of sleeping, a winner is crowned with a WSC belt and a cash prize. 

The 2023 event has yet to be announced but with the success of the 2022 competition had to earn sponsorships from Oura, Fitbit, Jamieson and other companies that make sleeping pills despite them being deemed “performance enhancing” and banned from all league play. 

Zorbing

Remember the movie G-Force with the spy hamsters who roll around in their little hamster balls? Well, now you get to be the hamster and roll down a massive hill, or even a mountain. 

Zorbing originated in Rotorua, New Zealand in 1994. The sport or recreational activity consists of people inside a massive plastic ball rolling down a hill. 

People can partake in it recreationally in other countries such as England, Ireland and here in Canada. The sport is comparable to ziplining or rock climbing as it can be done leisurely or at a higher level depending on how adventurous you are. 

In New Zealand, they host tournaments for the sport where people can be seen going down steep hills in a timed event. Whoever has the fastest time without exiting the course/track is deemed the winner of the zorbing tournament. 

Highlight reels for bossaballcompetitive sleeping and zorbing can be found at their respective links. 

Brock men’s basketball lose two on the road 

0

The Brock men’s basketball team took on the University of Windsor Lancers and Western University Mustangs this weekend on Feb. 10 and 11.

Heading into the matchup against Windsor, the Badgers sat at the top of the OUA with a 15-3 record and 0.833 win percentage. Windsor wasn’t far behind with a great record of their own at 13-5. The Badgers were in for a tough matchup as Windsor was looking to secure first in the OUA west division. 

The first quarter was back and forth as both teams spaced the floor well on offence, taking the smart shots and not forcing anything. Brock’s Isiah Bujdoso continued to dominate like he has all season, scoring back-to-back buckets to give the Badgers the largest lead of the quarter. But just a few possessions later, the game was all tied up at 19 heading into the second quarter. 

Badgers Jevon Brown also had a great first quarter, which he continued into the second scoring the first bucket out of the break. The Badgers continued to battle hard on both sides of the floor but the Lancers offence started to catch fire.

Lancer player Thomas Kennedy was nearly unstoppable, scoring 16 points in the first half on 7-11 shooting and also adding two blocks. Kennedy’s strong play mixed with the support by six of his other teammates who made at least two buckets in the first half gave the Lancers a seven-point lead heading into the second half. 

The Badgers were going to have to improve their shooting percentage in the second half if they wanted to make a comeback, shooting just 34.1 per cent in the first half compared to the Lancers 50 per cent. 

Unfortunately, the Badgers were unable to find a rhythm coming out for the third quarter, leading to a huge run from the Lancers. This time on the back of Najee Brown-Henderson who managed 8 points on their 13-2 run in the quarter. The Badgers trailed 74-48 at the end of the third quarter due to abysmal defence and poor three-point shooting. 

Though this Badgers team is not ranked first in the OUA for nothing as they came out hot in the fourth quarter. The Badger went on a 11-0 run in the first three minutes of the quarter to bring the game back within 15 points. 

Two free throws made by the Windsor guard ended the run but that did not discourage the Badgers as they made it 76-65 with just under five minutes to play in the game. A timeout was called by the Lancers’ head coach to try and get his team’s playback in order, which it did. 

The Lancers came out of the timeout and made three buckets in a row and despite the Badgers doing the same, there would not be enough time left on the clock to make the comeback. 

The Badgers fell to the Lancers 88-75 despite out scoring them in the fourth quarter 27-14. They looked to bounce back the next day against the below .500 Western Mustangs. 

On Feb. 11 the Badgers took on the Mustangs and the game started in similar fashion to the night before as both teams were scoring at the same pace. The quarter ended 23-21 for the Mustangs but the Badgers were getting production from many of their players with four players having four or more points in the quarter. 

The Badgers’ offence remained at the same pace in the second quarter with Western managing a few more buckets, once again outscoring the Badgers, this time 28-20. Western had a 10-point lead heading into the half and coach Willy Maniget was visibly upset with his team after 20 minutes of play. 

In the third quarter, Brock came to play on both sides of the floor scoring 23 points and only allowing Western 18 for their lowest-scoring quarter of the game. Brock’s Jevon Brown continued to be a threat on the offensive side of the floor with seven points in the quarter, adding to his four in the first to half. 

Brock was back within five to start the final quarter, and just like against Windsor, their offence got hot but so did Western’s. Brock was unable to claw back into the game as they lost 95-91. Their first time losing back-to-back all season. 

Despite the loss, Brock’s Daniel Caldwell managed to drop 23 points, seven assists and seven rebounds. Jevon Brown also had a strong game with 19 points, five rebounds, three steals, two assists and one block. 

The Badgers are back in action next weekend Feb. 17 and 18 for a home and home against TMU, their final two games of the regular season. Tickets for the Feb. 17 game at the Bob Davis Gymnasium can be found here and for all other information on the Brock Badgers visit gobadgers.ca.

Farmers and producers encouraged to apply to local Farmers Market

0

The City of St. Catharines is searching for vendors for their 2023 Farmers Market.

Farmers and producers are being encouraged to apply for space at the market. As the event grows to include new outdoor spaces, farmers are being welcomed back into the city during the harvest season.

“We really want to focus on building the sustainability of our community by bringing on more local farmers and producers this year,” said Deanna Chakarova, a farmers market coordinator, through a press release. “One of the best features of the market is the interaction customers have with vendors who grow and produce their own products. We have some incredible farmers and vendors in our community who offer high-quality locally made products, and we would love to see them join our market community.”

The market, which has run since the early 1860s, expands beyond selling and purchasing—the event also aims to engage members from the community across all ages. Local musicians will be taking part in the market, and an interactive discovery table will be present in order to provide unique experiences to attendees.

The market is known to offer a wide array of locally-sourced fresh foods and handmade items. Fresh farm produce, baked goods, fresh flowers and local preserves are a few examples of items that can be purchased at the market.

The city has provided an extensive list of market vendors, which cover a variety of products. As the city attempts to expand its offerings, new vendors are being called to hopefully join the list.

The market is also known for its events throughout the year. Along with the discovery table; “Winter at the Market,” “Music in the Square” and the “Community Engagement Series” are among this year’s offerings.

Those who are interested in applying for a space in the market can do so through the official application form, and have until Mar. 4 to do so if they wish to receive priority screening.

The 2023 St. Catharines Farmers Market is open on Saturdays from 7 a.m. to 1 p.m., with extensions occurring between May and October. Between March and December, it is also open Thursdays from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. The market is located at the corner of King St. and James St.

Local theatre company reflects on social issues by inviting audience members to join the experience

0

Mirror Theatre is a not-for-profit theatre company driven to advance an audience’s understanding of social issues.

The organization, which began in 1995 by Dr. Joe Norris, was originally located in Alberta before eventually moving to Ontario. The original company in Alberta closed down, and a new version of Mirror Theatre began operating in the Niagara Region.

The company is volunteer-driven, and a few of its members double as instructors at Brock. One of these members is Kevin Hobbs, who is the president of Mirror Theatre and professor of dramatic arts courses at Brock, including applied theatre.

“Mirror Theatre is a research-based and educational theatre company,” said Hobbs. “It uses dramatic premises and techniques in order to, frankly, explore the world; or, to allow people to explore the world for themselves.”

Mirror Theatre’s performances generally revolve around specific themes, each cover the understanding of social issues. As such, their process can certainly be described as unconventional—rather than sitting down and writing a script, the team must first research the effects of the social issues they wish to spread awareness about.

“We do interviews—we find out their stories. I don’t like to use the term ‘data,’ I much prefer the word ‘stories.’ Hearing the stories, and with their permission, taking the stories and devising something. We put them into play in order to present to an audience. That comes down to two things: it comes down to education, in the presentation to the audience—but because we engage the audience in talking back and forth with them, it’s also further research. They share their stories as well, and the research just continues. In a scientific formality, it’s known as ‘dissemination’; here, we share stories,” said Hobbs.

While Hobbs points out that Mirror Theatre does not work for Brock in any official capacity, they are certainly affiliated through the number of alumni, faculty, teachers and students that participate in their work. Brock also allows Mirror Theatre the space to rehearse within the Marilyn I. Walker downtown campus, something that Hobbs is grateful for.

There are several ways that this research might be conducted. Mirror Theatre’s creative process is one that takes some work, but it must be completed carefully in order to represent social issues onstage properly.

The scenes that Mirror Theatre devise deviate in length, sometimes ranging anywhere from 30 seconds to five minutes. These scenes, which the team refer to as “activating scenes,” are created to encourage discussion.

Through interviews, the team will search for ideas that especially stick out to them and create a product deriving from their inspiration. The core cast, which consists of approximately eight individuals, will generally improvise rather than create a formal script. While script notes are occasionally taken, the exact wording is not written in stone.

Mirror Theatre will also invite those who wish to co-create with the company, devising scenes with individuals providing new perspectives.

The team will also occasionally also use visual art as a reference and their understanding of these works to devise scenes on stage.

The number of scenes that Mirror Theatre might present within a single performance varies. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the company was restricted to performing online, but Hobbs pointed out that their passion lies especially within in-person performances.

Another unique component of Mirror Theatre’s approach lies in their use of Forum Theatre. This form of theatre involves an individual known as the ‘Joker,’ who facilitates the discussion with the audience. Hobbs has quite a bit of experience within the role of the Joker.

“The Joker can come in and break the rules, but do so in a way that engages the audience. So, I talk directly to the audience. I ask the audience questions. Sometimes, I invite audience members to come down if they’ve seen something in a scene, and say ‘I really don’t like how that was said.’ Come on down, let’s try it differently. And if people are willing to come down onto the stage, they’ll try something. So, in fact, part of the work becomes embodied for them, because they’re actually stepping into the roleplay and doing the work.”

It is important to the members of Mirror Theatre that their work lives on beyond the specific performances they put on stage. As such, they have created a Facilitator’s Guide to teach those who wish to become Jokers themselves.

Providing Jokering techniques to those who take interest through workshops or guides is exciting to the company, as it means their work lives on even if they are not directly involved in subsequent processes.

Mirror Theatre uses the funds accrued from performances to give experiences to those who typically cannot afford it. As such, Hobbs believes that their work goes beyond simply understanding the community—they are devoted to supporting the community as well.

“We charge for our work, and the money that we receive goes into an account which then goes to different conferences. We provide students—Brock students, mostly—the opportunity to go to a conference; something they may not be able to do, they may not have that financial support… and be part of an academic conference. Maybe that’s where they want to go. Or, they can be part of writing a paper; because Mirror Theatre, we’re involved in writing lots of academic papers, as well. What we want to do is: we want to provide experience, and it depends on the experience that people want.”

Mirror Theatre conducts workshops that invite attendees to join in on a performance. These workshops can occur in places like classrooms, and are typically at least 90 minutes in length. Hobbs is a believer in ‘scaffolded learning,’ which starts a workshop off in an easy manner before eventually transitioning to allow participants to join the experience and embody their work.

“We don’t have answers. That’s an important thing. We’re not here to provide the answers; we’re here to ask the questions,” said Hobbs. “And if people walk away confused, it’s not because we’re trying to confuse them, but it’s probably because they’re thinking through things—and hopefully, they’re going to continue to think through things. There are big social issues that you can’t deal with solely in two hours, but what we can do is, we can start the conversation—and ask people to have the conversation with themselves.”

More information on Mirror Theatre can be found on their website.

Tensions between the U.S. and China continue to grow after suspected spy balloon shot down

0

Tensions are continuing to rise between the U.S. and China after the former shot down a suspected spy balloon flying through its airspace, which has since been followed by multiple more.

The balloon was first spotted by the public over Montana on Feb. 1. The following day, the Pentagon publicly revealed that the balloon had been flying over American land for several days.

After a reported second balloon sighting above Latin America—since confirmed to have also been owned by China—pressure mounted on President Biden to take action.

The U.S. government shot down the original balloon with a missile fired by an F-22 fighter plane on Feb. 4.

Since the U.S. downed the balloon, the Chinese government has voiced its disdain for the military action taken against the aircraft—despite claiming that the balloon was a “civilian airship” being used for scientific research (such as meteorology). The following days have seen tensions between the countries continue to rise.

On Feb. 6, Washington accused China of using the aircraft to gather surveillance. The Chinese government continued to assert that the balloon was intended for scientific purposes, and that it had unexpectedly veered off-course into American airspace.

It was soon revealed that China had declined a proposal for a phone call between the countries’ respective top defence officials, stating that Washington had not “created the proper atmosphere for dialogue.” The Chinese government has maintained that the U.S’s response to the situation has been manipulated and overblown, and that shooting down the balloon was “irresponsible.”

Tan Kefei, a spokesperson for the Chinese government, has warned that China “reserves the right to use necessary means to deal with similar situations.”

The Pentagon has stated that the proposed phone call was an attempt to decrease tensions and “responsibly manage the relationship” between the countries. They expressed disappointment towards China for their unwillingness to talk, and affirmed that they remain committed to “open lines of communication.”

Earlier to its arrival above the U.S. mainland, the balloon had flown above parts of Canada, leading many to question why the Canadian government had not taken action to down the aircraft. Anita Anand, Canada’s Minister of National Defence, responded to critics by stating that the Canadian government had been closely monitoring the balloon in cooperation with the U.S., but did not shoot it down because it “posed no imminent risk to Canadians at all.”

On Feb. 10, a second high-altitude object was shot down over Alaska. The object, described as being the size of a small car, posed a “reasonable threat” to civilian aircraft, according to National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby. He did not elaborate on whether the object was another balloon, or who the object belonged to.

Similar to the first incident, the U.S. government has stated that the Chinese government has been closed-off to discussion regarding the incident.

On Feb. 11, a third airborne object was shot down by the U.S. military. The object was destroyed over central Yukon, and while no confirmation has been provided as to whether the object originated from China, it is another example in a string of incidents that have left Western governments on high alert.

While many questions regarding the aircrafts entering North American airspace have yet to be answered, one certainty remains: as attempts for communication fall through and additional sightings are being reported, the tensions between the U.S. and China are continuing to balloon.

Skip the quasi-partisan arguing over carbon taxes, nationalize oil in Canada now

0

The amount of Canadian partisan squabble that would be cut down by nationalizing oil is astounding. Also cut down significantly by nationalizing oil: the Earth burning.

Pierre Poilievre is unashamedly a broken clock when it comes to attacking the liberals’ federal carbon taxes. The Leader of the Opposition, an Alberta native, knows how to play to his hometown as it’s ostensibly in the interest of Albertans and Alberta’s oil industries to avoid tacked-on costs associated when “technology,” not incentives to reduce fracking, are his answer. Not only that, but Poilievre is on the record stating he wants to unleash domestically produced oil — an increase in 400,000 barrels a day in Newfoundland and pursuing the Keystone Pipeline — if he gets into the executive seat in the 2025 election.

The conservatives harp on how these costs affect the poor most by driving up the price of everything related to oil. Green party MP Mike Morrice made the solid point that while the price of gas went up 2.2 cents per litre in a year, in the same time the profits of oil and gas companies went up 18 cents per litre, something the Leader of the Opposition is curiously hush about condemning.

It’s worth circling and underlining that in Poilievre’s contentious parliamentary battles with the opposing aisle over carbon pricing, he doesn’t mention that the rebates for those provinces that are part of the Climate Action Incentives program — which comes directly from the federal tax because the consumer bears the cost of carbon taxes where this program is instituted — have always either broken even with what Canadian’s lost in paying for oil derived products, but mostly earned them more money. It’s the projection of the Parliamentary Budgetary Office that with the liberals’ plan to increase the carbon price to $170 per tonne of CO2 emitted by 2030 there will be “net loss” for households. It’s this prospect that Poilievre hedges his populist rhetoric on.

Poilievre is right in a couple of his underbaked prescriptions. He often states that with the removal of the carbon tax, “technology” will abate climate change. What technology? Well, by using nuclear energy to power electricity grids and carbon capture technology. Both important ways to combat emissions, but if Poilievre is going to up domestic oil fracking then these hardly fix the root issue—it’s a bandaid solution.

The liberal doctrine of a slow wrangling of the oil and gas industries and Poilievre’s deregulatory full-steam-ahead approach becomes a false dichotomy when the necessary solution of nationalizing oil is the best approach to make everyone happy.

For one, as Matt Bruenig of the Jacobin highlights, oil is an industry that is necessary to keep in the short term and vitally necessary to eliminate in the long term. Central control means this controlled phasing out of oil can be guaranteed as private firms have virtually no incentive structure to do this under current global market logics.

Second, the Canadian government can do what the Alaskan government does with their Alaska Permanent Fund: a yearly dividend enshrined in the Alaskan constitution that guarantees 25 per cent of the oil revenue flowing from the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System for future generations who won’t be able to use oil averaging $1600 per year for every Alaska resident.

Thirdly, concerted efforts to cover up the damage that oil production is doing to the planet will not be much of a worry under government control whereas industries can lobby politicians and funnel tons of money into advertising that either denies or obfuscates the realities of climate change. In Canada, lobbyist funding does not need to be disclosed according to regulatory legislation.

Oil production in Canada should be nationalized out of necessity.

Panic! At The Disco should have disbanded in 2015, not 2023– here is why

0

On Jan. 24, Panic! At The Disco or rather sole remaining member Brendon Urie, announced plans to disband after completing their upcoming European tour.

In Urie’s statement, he revealed the reason behind disbanding Panic! At The Disco was his new focus on family life, as he and his wife are expecting a child this year: “I am going to bring this chapter of my life to an end and put my focus and energy on my family, and with that, Panic! At The Disco will be no more,” said Urie.

Although disbandment announcements tend to be saddening for music fans, in the case of Panic! At The Disco, it provides relief.

The decline in their music quality as a result of all original band members leaving the project, combined with Urie’s racist comments and allegations of sexual misconduct throughout the years, all point to one thing: Brendon Urie should have left the legacy of Panic! At The Disco untouched well over eight years ago.

For those who are not familiar with the band or who haven’t kept up with them since the early 2000s, it has been years since Panic! At The Disco has been anything but Brendon Urie’s glorified solo project—which explains why Urie single-handedly wrote the disbandment announcement.

The initial band line-up for Panic! At The Disco, formed in 2004, consisted of Brendon Urie for vocals and guitar, Ryan Ross on lead guitar and lyrics, Spencer Smith playing drums and Brent Wilson for bass guitar. Wilson left as early as 2006, followed by Ross stepping away in 2009, and then Smith leaving in 2015. Other members, such as Dallon Weekes, who were added to the line-up following the departure of original members, also eventually left the project, leaving Brendon with full artistic control over the future of Panic! At The Disco since 2015.

From 2004 to 2015, Panic! At The Disco managed to always bring something new to the table in terms of alternative sound and lyrical themes, which in return ensured that the general public held their music with esteem and eagerness for more. For instance, the transition from their edgy emo-dance debut album, A Fever You Can’t Sweat Out (2005), to their folk, Beach Boys-influenced sophomore record Pretty. Odd. (2008) proved to fans early on in their career that their sound and themes would be bound to change, but not in a way that compromised quality.

Notably, Urie probably wishes the same could be said regarding the works he has had full creative liberty for following Smith’s departure in 2015.

Admittedly, not everything produced during the “solo” era of Panic! At The Disco has been terrible. Still, the decline in the band’s uniqueness and lyricism has increased as the years have gone by. Originally, the release of Death of a Bachelor (2016) painted a promising picture for the music quality Urie would maintain for the band, but those expectations quickly vanished following the release of Pray for the Wicked (2018), and even more so with the release of Viva Las Vengeance (2022).

As illustrated by Sheroog Kubur from The Gauntlet in their critique of Viva Las Vengeance (2022), “As a solo project, Viva Las Vengeance would have been more passable, but by using the Panic! At the Disco name, a precedent was set. One that expects grandeur and personality. Unfortunately, this album only shows that the death of the bachelor was also the death of Panic! At the Disco — or at least the version that fans fell in love with.”

To make matters more complicated, Urie has tarnished the way people perceive Panic! At the Disco — as if the public needed any more reasons to disengage from new releases.

In recent years Urie has faced sexual assault allegations, has been caught saying the N-word while singing and has had videos of him from past concerts resurface. In one resurfaced video, Urie is recorded threatening to sexually abuse people in the audience after the show.

Urie having the gumption to use the band’s title for as long as he has to put out mediocre solo music has deteriorated the band’s discography and image, and unfortunately, the disbandment announcement is unlikely to fix Panic! At The Disco’s legacy.

Zoning solutions often don’t address the needs of populations

0

Zoning practices today do not address the needs of vast swaths of people.

Zoning has a complicated history. What started as a fairly straightforward way of designing what land would be used for what, has become a matrix of competing interests that implicates lobbyists, lawyers, planning consultants, government agencies, land-use experts, and more. In 1916, New York City’s inaugural zoning code was 85 pages, in 2019 the city’s code was nearly 3500 pages long.

When imagining how zoning practices are problematic we often focus on what was explicitly harmful in zoning practices of the past. The primary example is that as a part of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal initiatives after the Great Depression, the Federal Housing Agency (FHA) insured mortgage payments so lenders would take on less risk thus opening the space for low income families affected by the recession to get homes and pay their principal reliably through a government backstop.

As part of the stipulations made in deals to banks, the FHA asked for special requirements such as spaced housing, increased construction and racial segregation. Red and yellow lines were drawn on zoning maps to denote that African American and/or immigrant families dwelled in those areas and therefore were bad investments bound to go rotten.

This meant that white suburban neighborhoods flourished and expanded and because of those property taxes collecting more on average for the local school, these suburban neighborhoods often had better education outcomes creating a cycle of quality-of-life inequality, the legacy of which is still felt today.

In Canada as well, redlining was practiced and was caused specifically by suburban development. This is noticeable in Hamilton, Ontario where industrial lakeside residences were massively disinvested with the rise of the suburbs in the Mountain and West End.

Redlining was outlawed in the wake of the Civil Rights Movement with the Fair Housing Act of 1968, however zoning practices continue to fuel inequality in less explicit ways to this day.

Framing is important here: zoning has to do with future uses of land and what’s permitted after a type of zoning is ratified, whereas urban planning has to do with how things will be built and for whom. Urban planning has to dip its toes into zoning, of course, but this distinction is important for thinking through equitable housing as Samuel Stein of Jacobin points out.

What needs to be altered is the amount of control capital has in construction through zoning lobbying.

For example, Hamilton is constructing a Light Rail Transit system as promised in Andrea Horwath’s mayoral campaign platform. Justin Trudeau has stated that affordable units will be ensured to be built by the transit line but this is largely contingent on if the public tracts of land are preserved for low income housing or, as is often the case, sold to the highest bidder which leads to gentrification.

This is why Bernie Sanders’ 2020 platform for universal rent control plus public housing to aid the supply shortfall from controls should be taken seriously before getting caught in debates around what types of zoning are desirable. If you start from a place where affordable housing is paramount, then zoning becomes epiphenomenal to that initiative.

As is often the case, changes to zoning for inclusionary housing have to go through long variance appeals with municipal governments that can stretch for years and cost a lot of money.

Public housing with rent control means controlling for the lack of capital investment in housing as it won’t be as desirable to compete in rent controlled markets, which public housing will cushion for and people will have homes. The more housing becomes vertical deposit boxes for speculators, meant solely for exchange-value, the less credulity we have in trusting capital with our housing.

We should start to take degrowth economics seriously

0

Degrowth economics is becoming a hot-discussed model for how the allocation of scarce resources should be done in the future, and it’s worth thinking about.

What is a degrowth economy? It’s where the point is literally to shrink the economy.

Degrowth advocates a complete reversal of what’s considered positive indicators in a modern economic context. From a macroeconomic view, the main indicator of an economy’s well-being is gross domestic product (GDP), though many economists think that looking at the consumer price index (CPI) is a better way to measure an economy’s well-being. Degrowth economics would do away with both measures on a series of grounds, but mainly that neither measures adequately reflect well-being per se. For example, the United States has the largest GDP in the world but ranked 27th on health and education in a world index study from 2018.

Three objections to GDP are often raised from a degrowth perspective. First, as shown above, GDP doesn’t necessarily mean everyone’s well-being is going up in a nation. Second, and closely related to the previous point, GDP says little about redistribution; GDP could be high in a country while the majority of income goes to the top per cent of earners. For example, if the welfare redistribution policies of the post-WWII era in the US remained, then the bottom 90 per cent of Americans would have earned $2.5 trillion dollars by 2018, a staggering 12 per cent of GDP.

Finally, GDP is a measure of gross produce, meaning what’s valuable at the end of the day is churning out product. Degrowth economics tries to account for the climate crisis as well as the empirical fact that the earth has a finite amount of resources, something that doesn’t factor into mainstream measurements of macroeconomic well-being.

Karl Marx was privy to this final critique over a hundred years earlier when sketching out the imminent antagonisms to capital in his three-volume study of political economy. In the first volume of Capital, Marx notes in a chapter on the transformation of money into capital that what’s unique to capitalism is that the source of product creation itself, labour-power, becomes just another commodity bought and sold in the complicated web of exchanges, consumption, distribution, production and so on, on the market. This is precisely the moment where, unlike anytime in human history, the global economy becomes analogous to its own autonomous machine, feeding off living labour to turn it into dead labour with no one at the wheel. The idea of capital being an abstract parasite, zombie-like in its crushing pressure over our lives, is apt.

Jean Baudrillard, a thinker often roped in with theorists parallel to degrowth wrote of the “violence of global.” The theorist most (in)famous for arguing we live in a hyperreality, Baudrillard turned up the stakes of Marx’s notion of labour-power as its own commodity and saw that prices and labour had become floating signs in an ocean of signs forever severed from their referents as we were now in the age of the simulacrum. One gets the sense in Baudrillard’s fatalism that nothing can be done but degrowth advocates and leftists more broadly today realize that this can’t be a solution with global temperature rises being as threatening as they are. Notions of hyperreality might be pertinent when doing media, linguistic and value studies, but a third of Pakistan being underwater is something we can register as urgent and real.

Degrowth economics has found itself to be somewhat interdisciplinary as it focuses on humanity and human well-being, something all too often disavowed by mainstream economics. Feminism, as an example, has been arguing for centuries about how work in the domestic sphere is not considered valuable in the market. Again, GDP doesn’t factor in domestic work and general upkeep, things like washing dishes, folding clothes, putting the groceries away, and raising children—though one could (and should) argue that without the unpaid work done in the domestic sphere, primarily by women, our societies would stop functioning and would tank GDP, a searingly ironic thought.

Degrowth is also understandably concerned with greenhouse gas emissions. Some strands of thought think something called “decoupling” is possible, that is that you can wean off of GHG while continuing to grow GDP. However, in 2019, the European Environmental Bureau did a literature review that largely debunked this idea.

The truth about degrowth is that it is as radical as it needs to be on fossil fuels. The global economy will have to shrink while moving to renewables as fast as possible.

Take the Amazon Rainforest for example, the massive 550 million hectares of dense forestry is important because it is essentially a massive CO2 sink, though its abilities to be so are already being undermined by climate change.

One thing that rich nations can do in the short term to stop, say, deforestation in the Amazon, is strike upfront stall deals with a country like Brazil so vital ecospheres such as the Amazon don’t fall capture to industry. This is strictly a preventative measure and not the solution by any means.

Degrowth economics is just one option of a variety that could be taken to combat the destruction of the environment, and while objectors say that degrowth will increase poverty, it should be mentioned that the myth that capitalism is a tide that will rise all boats is true between countries, within countries it’s increasingly the opposite.

Not to mention that the tides that will rise with the current system are likely to be from extreme weather events rather than the trickle down of global market shares.

It’s time to stop hating MrBeast

0

Jimmy Donaldson, better known as “MrBeast,” is known for his outrageously expensive and large-scale video concepts and execution. His YouTube catalogue, which includes videos such as “Hydraulic Press Vs Lamborghini,” “I Ate $100,000 Golden Ice Cream” and “I Spent 50 Hours Buried Alive” have amassed Donaldson a whopping 131 million subscribers on his main channel alone.

These types of videos, which are produced purely to entertain Donaldson’s viewers and draw in new ones, are not the only thing that he is known for. Donaldson has attained a massive portion of his success thanks to his philanthropic stunts. In these videos, he gives those who are selected to appear opportunities to win massive cash prizeslarge diamonds worth $38,000Lamborghinis and even private islands.

Another channel run by Donaldson, Beast Philanthropy, is dedicated purely to his goal of helping those in need. While the videos on this channel are not nearly as high production as many of the elaborate concepts created for his main channel, it has attained 11.7 million subscribers of its own.

MrBeast’s philanthropic work has undoubtedly spawned a major portion of his viewership.

Unlike other individuals of immense wealth, Donaldson pours his earnings back into his work, much of which is given away to participants. “I’ll use my money to help people and I promise to give away all my money before I die,” said Donaldson in a tweet on Jan. 30.

While he is not obligated to follow through on this claim, Donaldson’s actions prove that he takes this idea seriously. In an interview with Colin and Samir, Donaldson revealed that his videos have forced him to take out loans in order to continue, and when a video performs well, he uses the money it makes to make the next one even bigger.

For Donaldson, it’s not just his wealth that makes him famous—it’s how he uses it.

On Jan. 28, MrBeast uploaded a video that performed especially well: 1,000 Blind People See For The First Time. In the video, Donaldson pays for the eye surgeries of 1,000 individuals who have lost their vision so that they can once again see the world clearly.

Donaldson made sure to extend the reach of the project beyond the United States by paying for the surgeries of blind individuals in other countries in which this type of medical operation is usually inaccessible. The video highlights the support provided by the MrBeast team to people in Namibia, Mexico, Honduras, Indonesia, Brazil, Vietnam, Kenya and Jamaica.

Jeff Levenson, the ophthalmologist and surgeon who worked alongside the MrBeast team to create the video, revealed to CNN that they began by calling homeless shelters and free clinics to produce a list of patients who required the surgery but could not afford it. Levenson also got the MrBeast team into contact with SEE International, for which he is the chief medical officer. This additional outreach helped Donaldson to find and support more blind individuals, and the 1,000 surgeries were done in about three weeks.

“I just haven’t been me for the last 62 years,” said one man in the MrBeast video shortly after his surgery. “I can actually see your face,” he then said to Donaldson.

Another man was brought to tears when Donaldson surprised him with the presence of his son immediately after his surgery, honouring the man’s request that the first thing he would like to see upon his vision returning was his child.

The video is certainly one of Donaldson’s most touching—well, at least, MrBeast fans certainly seem to think so.

“This man is what keeps me believing that we are all capable of great things. This man is genuinely a kind person,” Karim Hussain commented.

“I usually don’t comment, but this man is literally the definition of kindness. I admire you [so] much. I’m crying,” read a comment from fdciabdul.

For further evidence, simply visit the video’s comment section, which currently stands at well over 250,000 comments.

To assume this would be the response of the average viewer would be logical. After all, Donaldson is using his wealth to restore vision to 1,000 people, giving them a new sense for the world. One individual whose vision was restored had never been able to drive a vehicle, so Donaldson made sure to surprise him with a Tesla after his surgery.

But it’s not all perfect for MrBeast. Donaldson has learned, especially in recent years, that fame comes with certain individuals who will attempt to burn his media empire down.

A major starting point for the backlash occurred when Twitch streamer HasanAbi (real name Hasan Piker) made a point during a stream that it is unacceptable that it should be up to one wealthy individual to provide surgeries for the blind. Instead, he argues, everyone should have access to these medical procedures.

I completely agree.

Such a surgery should be completely accessible to anyone who requires it. As Hasanabi states, it is entirely unjust that there is a “paywall” placed over life-changing procedures. To deny that this is an issue would be to place money above the betterment of human life.

Where this critique takes a dark turn, however, is when hate began forming towards Donaldson himself.

Before long, to the surprise of absolutely no one, certain Internet users-–largely stemming from Twitter—started voicing their disdain towards the video.

“Rich people are so funny [because] they already have all the money but they think they’re also entitled to have everyone love them,” wrote one user.

“LOL and here, we have a possible example of a communal narcissist,” wrote another, in reference to Donaldson.

Others began referring to the latest video from MrBeast as “charity porn,” referencing the idea that content creators like MrBeast only stay relevant because the work they do for others is deeply satisfying to watch.

“It’s the never ending cycle of content creation that makes [MrBeast] feel insidious,” wrote a fourth user. “The underlying notion that if the camera wasn’t on to feed the machine nothing would happen. The dystopian thought we’re reliant on YouTube views instead of [a] competent government for assistance.”

“The rich are inherently bad, doesn’t matter what you do [or] what you do with it,” wrote a fifth.

Certain users went so far as to call the video’s concept “demonic.”

A major point of contention is that MrBeast should have simply completed this act without filming or uploading it, and that he is “using” disabled individuals as a result. What these critics fail to recognize is that MrBeast must profit off of viewership in order to gain the funds to help even more people in future projects.

As previously stated, Donaldson reinvests virtually every dollar earned from a video into making future ones even better. If he were to do major, expensive acts of kindness without monetizing the process, then his cycle of revenue, much of which is used to support more people in need, would be cut off.

In other words, while it would certainly be noble for Donaldson to pay for 1,000 surgeries without global viewership, it means that he would not be able to help as many people in the future. If having cameras roll is the price to pay in order to provide help to tens of thousands of people, so be it. I would rather these people get the support that they need with cameras on, than not get the support at all.

It is worthwhile to mention that Donaldson is not filming anyone who isn’t aware they are being recorded. Every person featured in the video is aware that they are participating in a video project, but to them, I bet regaining their eyesight is a worthwhile trade-off—the pure ecstasy that many of them emit in the video certainly gives this impression.

Another point that critics should take notice of is the conversation that this type of video creates. Donaldson’s project has undeniably spread awareness about the massive global blind population. Inadvertently, he is also raising awareness about problems with capitalism, as the claims that we should not have to have this kind of video exist are legitimate.

“Why would anybody criticise this work and raising awareness of it through film and social media channels?” questioned Andrew Hodgson, president of the National Federation of the Blind of the UK in a remark to BBC Newsbeat. “Anything that puts a spotlight on such treatable eye conditions like cataracts and provides funding for people to undergo surgery to restore their sight should be welcomed.”

Even Donaldson himself recognizes the absurdity of the situation. “I don’t understand why curable blindness is a thing,” he wrote in a tweet on Jan. 30. “Why don’t governments step in and help?”

But Donaldson is not to be blamed for the existence of this flawed system. He did not create it, nor does he even support it as a concept—he is simply making use of it through his wealth to help others because it is the only system available. If the choice is between Donaldson taking advantage of an unethical system to help 1,000 people (through his own strategy of reinvesting what he makes into helping others), or simply not helping people at all, then I would certainly advocate for the former. It doesn’t mean I think this “paywall” is good, it just means I support MrBeast in his mission to help as many people as possible.

It’s going to take a lot more than one MrBeast video for this flawed system to get a much-needed revamp, but one thing’s for sure: had Donaldson not created the video, something that wouldn’t have changed are the lives of the 1,000 people that would continue to be blind.

Reflecting on his career and the women’s volleyball season with coach Steve Delaney

0

Coming off two important home wins against the York Lions, the Badgers faced a tougher and even more important opponent on Saturday, Feb. 4. Sitting with a 13-2 record, the Badgers were only one game back with a game in hand on this weekend’s matchup with the Waterloo Warriors.

In many ways, this is the definitive matchup of OUA women’s volleyball.

As of Saturday, Waterloo was first, with 28 points with 46 sets for and 15 against. The Badgers are second, with 26 points, 43 sets for and 11 against. Brock is first in the OUA in kills per set, Waterloo is second. Waterloo is first in hitting percentage while Brock is third. Brock puts up an OUA-high 11.79 assists per set, while Waterloo is not far behind at 11.42. Points per set? A dead tie for first between the Badgers and the Warriors at 16.2 apiece.

Gearing up for a playoff run, and looking to build on last years’ OUA title and national championship appearance, this is one of the Badgers’ most important games of the regular season. Before their game, to discuss this matchup, the Badgers’ dominating 2022-23 regular season run, and his path to becoming one of the country’s best volleyball coaches, head coach and reigning U Sports Coach of The Year Steve Delaney sat down to talk about it.

This interview has been edited for conciseness and clarity.

Steve Delaney: It’s basically playoff time now. We’ve played Waterloo already and they’re a great team. We’re going into their gym, and they’re also really tough to play against in their gym, so we’ve got our work cut out for us. Like you mentioned, it is definitely a battle for the top of the OUA; whoever wins that match will kind of be in the driver’s seat because, you know, you’re playing a team that’s got the same record as you, that’s a big piece if you’re trying to hold home-court advantage over the playoffs, which we’re trying to do. We did it last year, and it worked out well for us, because we’re also tough to beat at home, so we’re trying to hold on to home court advantage if we can.

Delaney played at the university level with the University of Winnipeg before turning pro in France and Finland, in addition to being a member of the Team Canada Beach Volleyball team. He got his coaching start with Burlington’s Halton Hurricanes, where he won provincial and national medals.

Steve Delaney: I started coaching at the club level with the Halton Hurricanes, around 2016. It was just something that kind of got a hold on me, and I was in the area, and I thought it was kind of time to get back into volleyball and give back. I mean, volleyball has given a lot of opportunities to me. Like, after I was done playing, seriously, professionally, I really, really began to enjoy it even more because of the relationships I’d made and that type of stuff. So, I was happy to give back, to the city of Burlington and working with the Hurricanes, and as I was doing that, I was doing some provincial team stuff, and it came up that the Brock job was available. The former men’s coach and I met at a volleyball event in Ottawa, he was telling me about the opportunity, and I was thinking “this sounds like something I’d like to apply to”, and I did and now I’m here. 5 years later, it’s been a great experience, we’ve put a lot of work in, we’ve made some pretty good progress, we’re just striving to be the best we can.

In 2019-20, Delaney’s Badgers claimed the OUA West Division title and a silver medal at the OUA Championships. Their OUA Final Four appearance since 1991 and Delaney’s first OUA coach of the year, he would go on to win another, in addition to a U-Sports Coach of the Year.

Steve Delaney: First of all, I might get a lot of the credit, but it doesn’t happen without all the athletes on the court. It’s the ones in practice, contributing and getting the job done. It’s not just me, it’s a collective, it’s all together. I think the biggest thing we changed moving forward was, I think the athletes were ready for a change. I think they were open to new ideas and new voices, so I think that definitely helped the situation. When you’re at the bottom of the rankings, the only place to go is up. I think one of the first things I told them at open-gym over the summertime, was “this is not a last place team, I can tell you by the talent in this gym, it’s not a last place team. All we have to do is figure a few things out.

We tried to fix our serve to pass. That was the biggest impact I tried to make, because I saw we were giving away a lot of free points in that area, and now that’s one of our strengths. So, I think by having our serve to pass game on point, that puts us into a position to be competitive in almost any match. Those small things, while I was trying to create a culture where people can feel vulnerable at times but also supported by their team and by their coaches, its not an easy thing when you’re striving to win the OUA all the time, and playing a high-performance sport, its not always the most fun things, there’s always a little hard work involved, but hopefully its really rewarding at the end of the season.

In his five years at Brock, the mark Delaney has left on the program and the school is evident, and much of that is thanks to his approach as a coach and as a leader.

Steve Delaney: My philosophy is more… When people ask that question, I usually say I believe in creating winners on and off the court, turning positive reinforcement into error detection. So what that means is I want you to win in the classroom, and in life, but I want you to win on the court as well, but hopefully I can empower you to do that by being positive, but also being able to help identify some areas to improve through self-reflection and certain types of comments that help you be better. That’s what I try to do for myself, I wasn’t always that way, so as I’ve matured, there’s been a lot more self reflection that pertains to how I can be better, and trying to hopefully pass that on to the girls that I coach, have them learn some of the mistakes I’ve made along the way, so they’re hopefully not making the same errors I made. So that’s pretty much how that works in terms of philosophy.

With the team’s success this season, there has also come a significant amount of individual success for the Badgers. Sadie Dick and Madison Chimienti are eight and eleventh in the OUA in kills per set, while Emily FoestLaurin Ainsworth and Christina Jovetic all also occupy the top 50. Grace Pyatt, Dick, Ainswoth and Chimienti are first, seventh, twelfth and 22nd in hitting percentage. Sarah Rohr is second in assists, and Aleiah Torres is also second in digs per set. With all the star power, it’s worth asking whether recruiting or development has been more to thank.

Steve Delaney: Recruiting has actually been super hard after we won last year. It’s been harder to try and get people to come to Brock. I think it’s because they know we’re a young team and a lot of them are playing well, so they might not be able to get playing time. Like anything else it’s earned, playing time is earned, respect, from your teammates and your coaching staff, is kind of earned as well, so recruiting is definitely a big piece, but developing once you get here is key. I mean, Sarah Rohr didn’t come in and start right away. She had to earn her way, and she worked really hard, not just in practice, but away from the gym, away from Brock, in the summertime she was playing beach, she was hitting the weights in the gym, and Aleiah [Torres] is one of our strongest athletes in the gym when we go to lift. So those two athletes that you mentioned, I think the work ethic that has helped them progress, in terms of being one of the top players in the OUA in their position, if not Canada.

To continue to make strides in their development as a team, the Badgers flew out to British Columbia over the winter break to train and match up against some of their western competition.

Steve Delaney: The idea was, we have to go out and compete against some of those teams we never see. Some of those teams out West, they’re very good out there. They have very good programs. Multiple schools. Everybody knows that Canada West is a very tough conference so it was great to go compete against them. Some great team bonding moments too. Some hikes, we spent New Years together, played a bunch of games, it was really good to have some team bonding. It was also a sacrifice for everybody because we were all away from our friends and our families who we weren’t seeing over new years, so we kind of worked through that, and it brings you closer in a way, because everyone’s happy to be there, working towards getting better, but at the same time too, we’re also missing home and your loved ones, and we were kind of going through that together. It was a really good trip. We experienced, as I mentioned, some of the most beautiful mountains, and lakes, and hikes and walks that we did. So we had a really really positive experience, and we got to train against UBC, Fraser Valley, and Trinity who are some of the top teams in the country, so if we don’t do that trip, we don’t have that opportunity to train against those teams.

With the season drawing to a close and his team playing well, Delaney won’t be making any major changes down the stretch.

Steve Delaney: There are some tactical things that I usually don’t employ until we get close to playoffs, which is, well, kind of now. It might as well be the playoffs for us. If we want to hold home-court, we pretty much got to win every game. So, its important to do those little tweaks and little things that, in a five set match, the proper tactical change can sway that final set in either direction. So those little things that we’re going to work on, hopefully become big in terms of results.

The Badgers would ultimately come up with a four-set win over the Warriors on Saturday, giving them the best record in the OUA. The Badgers were powered by a strong two-way performance from Chimienti, who had a game-high 15 kills with a team-leading 15 digs, in addition to Rohr who had 48 assists. The Badgers play their last two home games of the regular season next weekend, on Friday Feb.10 and Saturday Feb.11. For their full schedule and results, go to gobadgers.ca.

Badgers split weekend at home as season nears a close

0

The women’s basketball team played two home games over the weekend, and with the regular season coming to a close, these were essential.

The Badgers entered the weekend 9-7 having won four of their last six games. Two wins would put them in a tie with Toronto Metropolitan University for second in the OUA Central.

The Badgers’ first game was on Friday against the University of Toronto. One of the five worst teams in the OUA, the Varsity Blues have struggled mightily this year, and having lost their last four, shouldn’t have posed much of a challenge for Brock.

Though U of T would get out to an early 8-2 lead on the strength of two threes, the Badgers suffocated them the rest of the way, emerging from the quarter up 18-8.

In the second quarter, the Badgers piled onto their first quarter advantage, leading by as much as 18. Some continued three-point shooting by the Blues brought them within 15, but the Badgers still held a clear and decisive advantage going into the half.

Nothing much would change for U of T’s fortunes in the third.

Brock quickly stretched out their lead to 19, before U of T once again marginally trimmed this down to 15 with some help from the three ball.

The fourth quarter was where U of T showed their first signs of life, but it was too little too late. U of T was able to outscore the Badgers 13-8 in the quarter, but lost by a final score of 57-47.

Madalyn Weinert once again led the charge for the Badgers, putting up 20 points on 64 per cent shooting, six rebounds, three steals, three assists and a block in only 25 minutes of playing time. Olivia Fiorruci and Noor Bazzi were the other two Badgers to score in double digits, with 10 and 11 respectively.

Back in Bob Davis Gymnasium the next day, the Badgers had a much taller task on their hands with the Guelph Gryphons, who are sixth in the OUA.

Guelph took the initial lead, but they wouldn’t be able to hold onto it. The Gryphons grabbed an early four point lead, but Brock ground away at the difference, before going up by one on an Allison Addy layup with four minutes left in the first.

Up by two, the Badgers were in a solid, if unsatisfying, position heading into the second.

Never able to stretch this lead to more than four, the second quarter repeated the first in a mirrored fashion.

Guelph chipped away at Brock’s small lead before taking a more commanding one of their own when Guelph’s Mackeely Shantz scored eight points in just over a minute to put them up by six.

Shantz is one of the very few players in the OUA who is having a comparable season to Brock’s Weinert. Sitting one slot and 0.3 points per game ahead of Weinert in scoring, the whole night was a head-to-head battle between two of the OUA’s biggest stars.

With Weinert already at 15 points in the game and Shantz at 12, they would not disappoint.

Guelph jumped out to a ten point lead in the third quarter, and though Brock would valiantly whittle down the score, they were ultimately unable to overcome their first-half deficit, losing 70-65.

Though a close, back-and-forth game down to the whistle, Guelph outperformed Brock in a few key areas, like second-chance points, points off turnovers and points in the paint, which spelled the difference.

Weinert had another fantastic double-double performance, with 26 points on 52 per cent shooting, twelve rebounds, six assists, two steals and a block, all while playing the full 40 minutes.

Shantz was no slouch either, scoring 24 on 59 per cent shooting, eight rebounds, five assists, three blocks and two steals.

Addy, who shot a perfect 5-5 from the field in the first half added 13 points, while Fiorucci’s ten rounded out Brock’s scoring.

Now with a 10-8 record, the Badgers have only four games remaining in the regular season, with their next two being away games against Windsor and Western on Feb. 10 and 11. For the team’s full schedule and results, please go to their page on gobadgers.ca.

Men’s Hockey Seniors’ Day gives a chance to look back of coach T.J. Manastersky’s huge first season

0

Feb. 4 was Seniors’ Day for the Brock men’s hockey team, the annual celebration of the team’s graduating members at one of their final home games of the regular season.

Although you wouldn’t know it by their third-place rank in the OUA, this hockey team has been through a lot.

Like every collegiate team, they had to deal with intense pandemic restrictions and shortened seasons due to COVID-19, but the group also had to sit through several coaching changes, and, last year, battled their way through a bittersweet Cinderella run through the National Championships.

In many ways, Saturday’s event was both a celebration of the team’s perseverance and their impact on the program, and a dedication to their unfinished business.

Though making a run at the National Championship like last season will be difficult to replicate, the Badgers have managed to build on that performance this year.

Brock was not a particularly strong team during the 2021-22 regular season, finishing third in their five-team division and 11th in the OUA overall. While last year’s team struggled to score and to keep their tempers, scoring only 47 goals while registering 233 penalty minutes, the story could not be more different this year.

“It’s not like we’ve got a couple guys who’re doing it all, we’ve got a lot of people contributing to that offence, which is great to see,” said Badger’s head coach, T.J. Manastersky, “I think our discipline has been very strong in one respect… we don’t give up very many goals 5v5, so our goaltending has been strong, our team defence has been strong and I believe we’ve been tough to play against most nights,” said Manastersky

There’s been a lot that has changed for this Badgers squad, and coach Manastersky is the first evidence of that.

Despite their unprecedented playoff run, the Badgers found themselves in need of a new head coach this offseason, and brought in T.J. Manastersky to fill the vacancy.

After graduating with his Masters of science in education, health and physical education, Manastersky’s career got off the ground quickly.

“I started coaching young. I was sort of in my early to mid 20s when I started. I coached in the D1 and D3 levels, and I’ve been a head coach for nine years prior to Brock, so I was on a path, in my mind, to become an NCAA D1 coach.”

However, when the head coaching role opened up at Brock, the chance to coach closer to his childhood home of Oakville was enticing, but this proximity “wasn’t enough” for him to take the job.

“What made me really want it is I thought, if we operate the right way, we do this the right way, we can build a hockey team that’s successful and is a national contender every season,” said Manastersky.

With only three games left in the regular season, it looks like Manastersky might be right.

“It’s a veteran group that believes in itself, so that in and of itself, is really important. Before you can win you have to believe you can, and this group does.”

On Saturday, Feb. 4, with a chance to leapfrog a third-place Lakehead side, there are few games left where winning would have a bigger impact on the Badgers’ place in the standings. Luckily, the Badgers are heating up at just the right time.

“It’s an exciting time of year, three games remaining, won our last five, so you’re feeling good about that – players are feeling good about themselves.”

Leading into the weekend, a number of Badgers are certainly feeling good about themselves and their performance thus far.

Forward Jacob Roach’s 29 points and 19 assists place him fourth in the OUA in the former and sixth in the latter, in addition to being sixth in points per game. One slot ahead of him, at 1.23 points per game, is fellow Badger Adam Berg, whose 14 goals place him fifth in the OUA. Captain Jared Marino’s point-per-game pace also lands him in the OUA’s top 15 in scoring.

Defenseman Zach Taylor is seventh among OUA defensemen in scoring, and is third in goals.

Despite the Badgers operating on more of a goaltending battery system, Mario Peccia is top 15 in save percentage, top ten in goals against average, and third in shutouts.

Even centres Frank Pucci and Tyler Burnie, though hampered by playing fewer games, still sit at eighth and seventh in points per game, respectively.

“It’s easy for me to say as the coach that I think we’re playing a style of game that promotes offence, but I do believe that, and I think the stats speak to that,” said Manastersky.

“It’s the same players who have been here, it’s a veteran group, but they’re scoring more than they ever have before. I think almost every player is having a career year, as far as their offensive production…there’s been a lot of learning and adapting that the players have had to do, and they’ve done a tremendous job of it.”

Novelty and change have been big themes of this year’s iteration of the men’s hockey team. Sure, on the ice and behind the bench there’s a lot that’s new, but off the ice there are some pretty major differences as well.

“There were lots of changes this year.” said Joel Anthony, a Video Production Manager with BrockTV, who has had a keen focus on the men’s hockey team this season.

“They have a new coach, a new home rink and the Steel Blade Classic took place this year for the first time since COVID-19, which was a new event for certain players and a familiar one for others.”

The new home rink, inside the brand-new Canada Games Park, is probably the most noticeable change.

“I’ve been excited to see the rink since my first year,” said Junior defenceman Matthew Barnes, who’s had to wait until his third year for an on-campus home rink and practice facility. Built to accommodate the sporting event of the same name over the summer, the arena is one of the nicer facilities in the OUA.

The other change is the reason why Anthony is so invested with the team: the BrockTV documentary. Titled When It Matters Most, the docu-series highlights the team throughout the season, following the style of other sports documentaries like All or Nothing, or Last Chance U.

“I didn’t anticipate the documentary to delve so deeply into the team,” said Anthony on his role with BrockTV relating to the men’s hockey team.

Imagining a small, less ambitious project, Anthony, along with his partner Neville Madill, got to work on what they expected to be a few interviews and some short episodes. Instead, they’ve created an ongoing, multi-episode series spanning the length of the season.

“TJ was incredibly accommodating and helpful when we first started filming for it, allowing us to capture a variety of original content, granting us access to the locker room during intermissions of games, allowing us to accompany the team to an away game, and letting us film at practice,” said Anthony.

The first two episodes have already dropped while shedding a light on the Badgers’ play this year and giving BrockTV full-access, and so far, Manastersky is impressed with the product.

“Them and the crew are doing an absolutely outstanding job, and for us, as a hockey team, it’s just so special to be able to document your season, for one, but also from a recruiting standpoint, creating exposure for everyone, it’s been awesome,” commented Manastersky on the documentary

For Manastersky, he views a lot of his role as a coach as putting Brock on the map, in hockey and otherwise. Though he admits growing up he didn’t know much about the area, let alone the school, Manastersky has been impressed in his short time at Brock.

“This school, in so many ways, is the best kept secret in Canada,” said the coach.

“I really believe in Brock University. I think that this school is on the rise, it’s up and coming. It really is a young school relative to every other school, the academic majors are really exciting. There’s so much passion in this school.”

Manasterky’s belief in Brock and their hockey program will hopefully provide them with something they’ve lacked in the past: consistency.

“You can tell…he wants to be the cement to this program, and he wants to be here for a while.” said Junior defenseman Johnny Schaefer in the first episode of When It Matters Most.

Manastersky himself feels this way about his role in the program.

“Hopefully now at least there can be some stability in the coaching position year over year.”

Saturday’s game, Brock’s second-last home game of the regular season, was precluded with the recognition of all of the team’s graduating senior players.

The 2023 Badgers senior cohort was a large one, including Tyler Rollo, Christian Girhiny, Jared Marino, Johnny Shaefer, Matthew Barnes, Christian DeDonato, Frankie Pucci, Cole Thiessen, Adam Berg and Justin Brack. Besides featuring many of the team’s highest scorers, Manastersky also views the seniors as his essential leadership core.

“They’ve been through a lot, so that leadership group, those seniors,” said Manastersky. “This Saturday is senior night, so all those guys, they’ve already left their mark on the program. Hopefully they’ve got another chapter or two to write here before they’re done, but they’ve been a huge asset in getting me acclimated to Brock, in helping me and supporting me.”

Though they would fall 4-1 on an empty-net goal, Brock held a significant advantage in both time of possession and shots for much of the game. Roach was stoned on a breakaway chance less than a minute in, and Brock held a near-double shot advantage through the first, but thanks to an uncharacteristic lack of discipline on the part of the Badgers, and some opportunistic scoring from Lakehead, the Thunderwolves grabbed an early lead and sat on it for the remainder of the game.

Brock battled until the final whistle, peppering Lakehead Max Wright netminder with shots. Wright, who had dialed up his game in the third, stood tall, blanking the Badgers for the three-minute stretch where their goalie was pulled.

The lone Badgers goal was scored by Adam Berg, with assists coming from Roach and Burnie.

Now sitting at 34 points through 25 games, the Badgers are third in the OUA West and fourth in OUA overall. With only two games left and three points behind first-place Windsor, claiming the OUA West is still possible, but some chips need to fall their way.

The Badgers’ next game is in Guelph on Friday, Feb. 9 and their last home game is Saturday, Feb. 11 against University of Toronto. For their full schedule and results, go to gobadgers.ca.

Former Brock hockey player makes an unlikely journey to NHL all-star

0

Logan Thompson had been playing hockey since before he can remember. Growing up in Calgary he played for the Calgary Bisons and Calgary Buffaloes, triple-A teams in the AMHL.

In his WHL draft-eligible year he was selected 112th overall by the Brandon Wheat Kings. In his first year with Brandon, he played four games before being sent to the AJHL (Alberta Junior Hockey League) where he played 22 games for the Grand Prairie Storm and posted a .906 save percentage and 3.39 goals against average. Serviceable numbers in a high-scoring junior league.

The next season, Thompson made the Wheat Kings as their backup goaltender. That season was the first he was eligible for the NHL, so being the backup did not help him in terms of his stock in the NHL draft. He played 23 games with a 2.63 GAA and a .898 save percentage, which would not be good enough to warrant a call from an NHL team.

The next two seasons (2016-17 and 2017-18) Thompson was the Wheat King’s starter. In 2017-18 Thompson had nearly thirty wins on a team that finished second in the WHL and had a record of 40-6. Unfortunately for Thompson, he did not see a future for himself in pro hockey, and neither did pro teams, so he decided to pursue a degree in sport management at Brock University.

2018 marked the first year and only year that Thompson attended Brock. He played on the Brock men’s hockey team in 2018-19 and helped lead them to a 19-9 record which finished top of their division in the OUA and was a team record in wins for Brock men’s hockey team. Thompson also won OUA rookie of the year, goalie of the year and was named a first-team all-star.

After his season with Brock, he was approached by ECHL club Adirondack Thunder – New Jersey Devils ECHL affiliate – to come to finish the season with them. Thompson spoke on how surprised he was about the offer from a pro hockey club, in an NHL Press Conference leading up to All-Star Weekend “Pro hockey wasn’t even on my mind, I was just a kid having fun. I had school on Monday and Tuesday. I would go home and play video games, drink beer and just be a college student.”

After a discussion with his family and some close friends, Thompson decided to go play out the season in Adirondack. He explained why he made the decision to ditch the degree in an interview done with Jesse Granger of the Athletic, “you have to believe in yourself and bet on yourself. The biggest thing for me was if I didn’t make it, I wanted to at least say I tried. I didn’t want to have any regrets.”

In eight games in the ECHL, he had a 2-4-1 record with a 2.72 GAA and a .918 save percentage. He also managed to get a one-game stint in the AHL with the Birmingham devils that season.

The following season, Thompson remained in the ECHL, this time playing for the South Carolina Stingrays. There, he proved to himself and everyone else that he was indeed a pro hockey player leading the team to the best record in the league, 44-14-3 before the pandemic shut down the season.

His excellent performance in South Carolina led to his first NHL contract offer. The Vegas Golden Knights signed Logan to a two-year entry level contract with an 800,000 AAV. Logan spent the majority of the first year in the AHL where he led the league in save percentage, GAA, as well as advanced goalie stats (goals saved above expected, saves per 60 minutes and saves made in high-danger scoring chances). However, he was called up to back up Robin Lehner after Marc Andre Fleury went down with an injury. Thompson ended up playing eight minutes and 15 seconds in the NHL in a win over the Minnesota Wild. He made two saves on two shots and was registered for the win, his first in the NHL.

In 2021-22 Thompson became a regular backup towards the end of the season and took over the starting role once Lehner went down with an injury. He played 19 regular season games netting a 10-5-3 record. The performance to end the year earned Thompson another NHL contract, this time a three-year, one-way deal, worth 766,667 per year as he was projected to be the backup.

But a nagging injury required Robin Lehner to get surgery before the season started leaving Thompson the front-runner for the starting job in Vegas. He seized the opportunity and gained the full trust of his teammates, coaches and front-office staff.

Thompson played incredibly to start the year and earned the rookie of the month in November with a record of 8-2 with a .909 save percentage and a 2.88 GAA. That incredible goaltending continued down the stretch as Thomspon was eventually named to the NHL all-star game on Jan. 5, the first rookie goalie in NHL history to be named an all-star.

The all-star game took place on Feb. 3 and 4 where Thompson participated in the goalie tandem challenge and played half of the game between the Pacific division all-stars and the central division all-stars, which he lost.

Thompson, though new to the NHL, seems to have found a home in the league for years to come despite his unconventional path to the show.

Women’s hockey: Badgers lose in overtime despite dominant performance

0

On Feb. 4 the Brock women’s hockey team took on the Laurier Golden Hawks. The Badgers were looking to win two in a row after their 3-1 win against Western on Feb. 3. It also marked their third and final matchup against Laurier of the regular season, as the Badgers beat them in their first two matchups 2-1 in a shootout and 3-1.

In the first minute of the game, the Badgers had a great opportunity as Rebekah Feld manoeuvred herself through two defenders and centred the puck out front to two Badgers who unfortunately missed the pass due to a good stick by the Laurier defender.

The Badgers used that great first shift as something to build off of. They controlled a lot of the offensive zone time early, working the puck low to high and pinning Laurier in their own end. Kaitlyn Colonna had a great chance at the 15:00 minute mark as she rushed end to end before riffling a shot at the Laurier goaltender who made the save and controlled the rebound.

The rest of the first period was more of the same as the Badgers continued to dominate both sides of the ice, out-shooting their opponent 10-2. But they were unable to solve Acadia Carlson who kept the game scoreless through 20 minutes of play.

The Badgers got off to a great start in the second period getting in on the forecheck leading to their first powerplay of the game just 30 seconds into the period. Brock’s powerplay has improved as of late as they now have a 10.6 per cent conversion rate.

The Badgers controlled the puck in the offensive zone moving it around looking for shooting lanes but could not get the puck through to the net. The pressure led to Laurier taking two more penalties and the Badgers having another full four minutes on the powerplay. But they were unable to convert as Carlson continued to dominate in between the posts.

Just less than ten minutes through the second the Badgers took a penalty that then led to four more penalties being called against them the rest of the period. Laurier got a few good chances but despite Kenzie Harmison not seeing much rubber in the game, she made some big saves. After killing off ten minutes worth of penalties both teams managed to get out of the period without allowing a goal in a period that saw eight minor penalties called in total.

Throughout 40 minutes of play, the shots were 16-9 in favour of Brock. To start the third period both teams were playing conservatively not wanting to give the other an inch of ice.

The game started to open up again at the end with the best chance towards the end of the period. A Badgers three on two rush led to a tough angled shot turned away by the sprawling Acadia Carlson. The goaltender battle continued as Harmison and Carlson both posted shutouts through three periods despite both team’s trading chances down the stretch.

The two teams headed to overtime for the second time this season. Brock once again controlled the start of the overtime period spending much of the first 90 seconds in the Laurier zone.

An attempted clear by Laurier’s defender was picked off by Rebekah Feld who stormed back into the zone on a two-on-zero opportunity with Catriona Cormier. Feld made a nice forehand to backhand move but Carlson made an even better blocker save.

Just a minute later a defensive zone mishap for the Badgers was picked up by the Laurier forward who took it in 1 on 1 against Harmison and beat her with a quick forehand to backhand deke to end the game just less than half way through the overtime.

Laurier avoided the season series sweep and the Badgers failed to win what would’ve been their third back-to-back wins on the season. Kenzie Harmison finished the game with 14 saves on 15 shots while Acadia Carlson posted a 26-save shutout, her fourth shutout of the season.

Brock is back in action next weekend Feb. 11 at Canada Games Park against Toronto Metropolitan University (TMU). Both Brock and TMU are 4-6 in their last ten games and Brock has won the only matchup between the two teams this season, 4-2.

Tickets for that game can be bought here and the game can also be streamed on OUAtv. For information on the women’s hockey team visit gobadgers.ca.

Badgers beat Varsity Blues at home, improving to 14-3

0

On Feb. 3, the Brock men’s basketball team was back at home for a game against the University of Toronto (U of T) Varsity Blues. Heading into the game, Badgers were just one win ahead of U of T in their divisional standings with a record of 13-3, but U of T had two games in hand against them at 12-6.

The game had a slow offensive start as both teams shot a combined two for 11 through the first three minutes. At around the halfway mark of the quarter, the scoring started to pick up as Badger Godsman Kwakwah scored a spin-around jumper, followed up with a Michael Okeke steal, leading to a fast break dunk.

The U of T Varsity Blues answered back with back-to-back threes, both scored by Ryan Rudnick. The quarter continued to be close down the stretch and would finish with a last possession three from Kwakwah to send the Badgers up 23-20 heading into the second quarter.

Badgers started the second quarter the way they ended the first –with a three – but this time from Daniel Caldwell. Though on the next three possessions on the offensive, the Badgers came up short, shooting zero for five and allowing U of T to storm back, taking their first lead of the game 25-23.

But a Kwakwah three ended the Varsity Blues’ run and sparked the Badgers on a 7-0 run to regain the lead, 30-25. Badgers controlled the quarter offensively, outscoring the Varsity Blues 22-18, finishing the quarter 48 per cent from the field and were up 45-38.

Godsman Kwakwah had 15 points and shot four of five from beyond the arc in the first half. While Daniel Caldwell had 11 points, four rebounds, two steals and one block, with six of his 11 points from three-point range.

Caldwell continued his strong performance, netting Brock’s first bucket of the third quarter. But the Badgers went cold soon after as many trips to the free-throw line resulted in less than 50 per cent shooting.

Just five minutes into the third quarter, the Varsity Blues managed to go on another 7-0 run, making it just a one-possession game. Five of the seven points on the back of Callum Baker, who had been U of T’s go-to player thus far.

The rest of the quarter was back and fourth basketball leading to an eventual buzzer-beater for U of T, moving the score to 54-51 Brock through three quarters. During the break in-between quarters, Badgers coach Willy Manigat was not pleased with his team’s performance thus far, giving them a stern talking-to on the sideline.

Both teams started the quarter missing their first two offensive possessions and it was U of T’s Callum Baker hitting a fadeaway jumper to cut the score to just one point. Brock’s poor free throw shooting continued as Jevon Brown went one for two from the line and on the very next possession U of T tied the game at 55.

U of T played great defence leading to many fast-break opportunities and an eventual five-point lead with half of the fourth quarter to play. Brock’s big players showed up in the last five minutes. Isaiah Bujdoso and Jordan Tchuente each had two baskets in the next three minutes in a back-and-forth sequence of events.

With the score tied 67-67, U of T swung it around the horn and Aleer Aleer-Leek hit a corner three with just 55 seconds left. But the Badgers’ never say die effort led to a Tchuente three on the very next possession tying the game, followed by a stop on defence.

With less than 24 seconds left in the game, the Badgers stormed down the floor with a chance to win it. With just 4.4 seconds left on the clock, Tchuente made a nice dribble move leading to the layup, taking the lead 72-70. U of T got one final chance to tie or win the game with a three, but a deep three attempt was an eventual airball and the Badgers won their seventh in a row, 72-70.

Daniel Caldwell finished the game with 18 points, seven rebounds and added another steal in the second half, making it three on the night. Isaiah Bujdoso and Jordan Tcheunte both had 10 points, with Tcheunte grabbing more rebounds with nine, compared to Bujdoso’s five.

The Badgers are now 14-3 and look to continue their run of impressive basketball against the University of Windsor and Western University on Feb. 10 and 11. Those games can be streamed on OUAtv.

For more information regarding the Brock men’s basketball team visit gobadgers.ca

Summer Company opens applications for young entrepreneurs hoping to start a business

0

If you are a young entrepreneur looking for a way to start your business, you might want to consider the Summer Company.

The Summer Company is funded by the Ontario government and allows individuals aged 15 to 29 to apply for the program, which provides successful applicants funding and membership to start and grow their own businesses. Applications have just opened to the program for 2023.

The Summer Company has allowed Tyler Snure to start his company, Snure Stories, which allowed him to follow his dreams of becoming a full-time author. The 21-year-old St. Catharines native has now published two novels as part of his series, The Jewels of Fate, with the most recent entry having launched last summer.

“Before I did the Summer Company program, I knew nothing about running a business,” said Snure. “But I did know that being a writer or an author, especially if you’re doing it full-time, is a business. So it is necessary to learn those skills, and more of the entrepreneurial side of writing that a lot of authors don’t think about, or don’t really enjoy. That’s what really pushed me towards the program.”

Snure has gained a lot from the program, and he says there’s more to it than just financial support. The Summer Company has not only allowed him to start his business, but also to excel in the business world.

“It’s not just about funding, it’s also about mentorship,” said Snure. “There are mentors who are professional business owners in the Niagara Region who agree to be a part of this program. They are experts in the industry, so they can help you depending on the business you’re starting. You get paired with someone else in your industry. They give you tips like marketing, sales, time management, finance management; all kinds of stuff.”

Those who are selected can receive up to $3,000 in funding; $1,500 of which is given at the start of the process to help startup the business, and the other $1,500 is given to those who successfully finish the program.

But the program seeks young entrepreneurs who show promise, and as such, they must prove they are dedicated to their work. Snure says that gaining full support from the Summer Company is not as easy as simply applying – one must first show commitment to their craft.

Those who are thinking of applying should be ready to dedicate serious time and energy to their business venture. For example, high school students are required to spend at least 280 hours working on their business over the summer, and for post-secondary students, they should expect a minimum of 420.

More expectations of selected applicants include the opening and operating of a bank account for the business, agreement to an on-site visit with a program provider and the spending of the first payment within the first 30 days.

The guidelines for the program are strict, and Snure acknowledges the hard work he had to put in to find success.

“We had meetings every two weeks. We would go into the Summer Company office downtown, and we’d have a meeting. We’d talk about how the last two weeks went, growing our business, what we learned, what we’re struggling with, what we need help with; all that kind of stuff.”

Snure’s relationship with the Summer Company started with a guest speaker in his high school entrepreneurship class. He is grateful to his entrepreneurship teacher, Holly Etherington, for encouraging him to apply.

“We actually had the head of the Summer Company program come and give a guest presentation to our class, and afterwards, Mrs. Etherington told me that I should consider applying. That was what started me on the trajectory of the Summer Company. As soon as I found out what they were all about, what they did, I’m like, ‘yes, this is amazing, I want to be a part of this.’”

Snure believes that the Summer Company is also special because it can appeal to each individual’s needs. Every person can grow in their own way using the help of the program, and what one person might find most valuable may be entirely different for someone else.

“One of the biggest takeaways I learned was networking. There were two big events that we participated in and the whole point of these events was to throw us to the wolves by getting us to meet other business owners—people who weren’t associated with the Summer Company program. At first, it was really intimidating, but then you quickly realize that they’re very welcoming. The other thing is they’re still learning too, and the whole point of networking is learning to find those people where it’s ‘how can I help you, how can you help me,’ and making those connections. I didn’t realize how important that is in business. It’s just a good life skill, too.”

While those who are in the Summer Program can certainly expect support in their business ventures, they should also be prepared to dedicate themselves toward this passion.

Information on eligibility for the Summer Company program can be found here.

St. Catharines approves location for its fifth splash pad

0

St. Catharines will soon install its fifth splash pad, the details of which were finalized through a unanimous vote at city council on Jan. 30.

The splash pad will be built in Secord Woods Park in Merritton, and will cost $1.5 million to complete. After searching for public input on the potential of this location when it was still just a proposal last fall, the council has confirmed that the community seemed to approve, leading the city to move forward with their plans.

The splash pad will contain a seasonal washroom as well as a sun shelter. The splash pad and each of its corresponding facilities will be built within the park next to Applewood Public School.

According to the results of the studies by the City Council, a lingering public concern was the absence of any on-site parking. The District School Board of Niagara (DSBN) has presented a solution by offering space in Applewood Public School’s parking lot during the summer.

There will be some overlap between the school year and the splash pad season, but a staff report claimed this period would be “minimal”—equating to approximately five to six weeks per year.

Despite this, Merritton Councillor Jackie Lindal made an amendment to add a 10-space parking lot on the site of the splash pad at an estimated cost of $100,000. She believed this was necessary because of the potentially rising popularity of the splash pad as summers continue to grow warmer. She also stressed the importance of accessibility and the issues that may arise from the overlap between the school year and the splash pad season.

Merritton Councillor Greg Miller argued that there is no necessity to immediately add more parking, therefore waiting for a more crucial time for this addition would be a better plan. Lindal asserted that building everything at once rather than staggering the process would minimize costs, however, her amendment failed.

The city’s plan also includes a relocation of the Secord Woods Park playground. The site will be moved next to the splash pad in an estimated six to 10 years when it requires a replacement.

While council had originally approved a $1 million budget for the splash pad in 2021, another $350,000 had to be added because of heightened construction costs. $200,000 had already been approved for the design of the splash pad and its surrounding facilities in 2020.

The splash pad is expected to begin construction later this year, and it will be ready to welcome children and families by spring 2024.

Princeton Review Law School preparation sessions available for Brock students at no cost

0

Whether a student is set on going to law school post-graduation or, at the very least, have considered becoming a lawyer, preparing for law school is a rigorous and often costly endeavour.

However, organizations such as The Princeton Review are dedicated to helping students get into their dream schools, offering free online resources to aid in students’ application processes to figuring out further steps such as post-graduate programs including law school, medical school, and nursing school.

For Badgers interested in a future in law, the Princeton Review will host a Virtual Mock LSAT Day and Virtual Law School Symposium available for Brock students at no cost.

The Virtual Law School Symposium will take place from 6 to 9:00 p.m. on Thursday, Feb. 2, and aims to explain the law school application process to Brock students. Attending students can expect to receive an overview of how to apply to law school, a discussion of strategies for the Law School Admission Test (LSAT), and an interactive Q&A period with law school graduates and current law students.

Additionally, the Virtual Mock LSAT Day is taking place from 10 to 2:00 p.m. on Saturday, Feb. 4, which will give Brock students a chance to write a practice LSAT online. Students will also be able to access a detailed performance report once the test is over, which will help identify weaknesses in different LSAT categories and note their projected LSAT scores.

Along with offering free online sessions for universities, the Princeton Review also features free strategy and trivia sessions available for anyone to register on their website.

Some examples include the LSAT Logic Games Strategy Session, occurring on Tuesday, Feb. 28, from 9 to 10:30 p.m., and the LSAT Arguments Strategy Session, hosted online from 9 to 10:30 p.m. on Monday, Mar. 1. These sessions will deal with more specialized strategies for acing the LSAT, the first one teaching how to understand the logic games section of the test, and the second explaining how to approach the logical reasoning questions correctly.

Likewise, the Princeton Review offers the LSAT Trivia Session on Tuesday, Mar. 2, from 10 to 11:30 p.m.

To register for the Brock-specific law school preparation sessions and other freely available Princeton Review sessions, click here.

Discussing BrockTV’s When It Matters Most with creator, Neville Madill

0

BOn Jan. 20, BrockTV dropped the first installment of their new docu-series When It Matters Most. Episode One: New Beginnings is the introductory chapter of BrockTV’s partnership with the Badgers men’s hockey team.

Besides the obvious new beginning of a blank season, When It Matters Most shows just how much a turnaround this season is from the last.

Fresh faces on both sides of the bench and a brand-new arena mark a massive change for the hockey program, which is exactly what creators Neville Madill and Joel Antony had in mind.

“For me, I just got my job at BrockTV over the summer, and I only have one more year left, so I felt like I wanted to do something big, I wanted to go all in.” Said Madill, a third-year Sport Management student.

“I wanted to make something I could be proud of and maybe could open doors for me. And I wanted to match it with some passion, with my love for university sport in Canada.”

Madill is the current Brock Sport Management Council President and a producer for BrockTV. Hoping to make his name in the sport industry, When It Matters Most, and BrockTV by extension, gave Madill an exciting opportunity.

Just as much as BrockTV, it was head coach TJ Manastersky who provided Madill with the chance. Though he didn’t create the project, Manastersky actually was responsible for getting the ball rolling.

“I started at the beginning of the year when [Manastersky] reached out to me,” said Madill on his partnership with the coach.

“We didn’t know each other, he was new to Brock this fall, he got hired over the summer, we really just wanted to chat… so he really just brought about this opportunity for me. He was like, ‘Oh we’d like more surrounding the team, we want to let everyone know that the rink is right across the street, its right here on campus’, so he’s giving me this opportunity, but we’re also helping him grow the program.”

In Madill’s eyes, When It Matters Most is a mutually beneficial arrangement for him and Manastersky:

“[Manastersky wants to] build a hockey team that can hopefully be the best in Canada one day, and to hopefully win the National Championship. So I think it goes for both sides where I get to really start my career with this project, and on his side, he’s got a documentary that he can show recruits, show to friends and family, and share with his network.”

It also gives a chance to put some Brock Badgers in the spotlight.

The men’s hockey team has had a strong season thus far, with a 15-7-0 record through 22 games, and have the third-most goals in the OUA. Though their 30 points are good for fourth in a very tightly fought OUA West Division, if they could have stretched even two of their losses into overtime, they would be second in the West and third in the OUA overall.

The team themselves has, unsurprisingly, been instrumental in letting Madill and Antony document their success.

“The whole team, we’ve appreciated the support, letting guys infiltrate their locker room. … we’ve appreciated their support through this opportunity,” said Madill.

It’s also been a banner season of individual performances for the Badgers. Tyler Burnie, Jared Marino, Jacob Roach and Adam Berg are all in the OUA’s top-20 scorers. Berg, who is fifth in points-per-game and tied for seventh in goals, earned an OUA Athlete of the Week honours for Jan. 23 after scoring eight points in two games.

As expected, the players and their personalities are what shine through in the documentary.

“Olivier Deroches and Christian Cote, two players, both from Quebec, the Quebecois-Canadian really shone through in that interview, and we’re going to be putting that one in the fourth episode. Those two personalities are really good,” said Madill, naming some of the team’s prominent personalities.

“Cole Tymkin is a really funny guy in the locker room… and Jared Marino, Captain, he’s just that classic captain. You can just tell that all the guys really like him, but he’s also really intense, he’s a really tenacious leader and really wants that chance to win the Queen’s Cup and make their way to Nationals this year. The guy who’s really captivating is Marino.”

Personality is what’s going to sell the product, but in demonstrating the skill and competition that occurs in the OUA, it might be high time some of these athletes get their due.

“In U Sports, there’s a lot of really good players coming from Major Junior, whether that be the OHL, WHL, QMJHL,” said Madill, “[we’re] really just trying to showcase the talent and try to grow OUA hockey and U Sports hockey because we think they should have a little bit more shine on them.”

The discussion of talent in the OUA has never been more relevant, especially here at Brock. Brock alum Logan Thompson recently became the starting goalie for the Vegas Golden Knights of the NHL, in addition to being a potential front-runner for the NHL’s Rookie of the Year award. This all happens less than four years after Thompson started 14 games for the Badgers.

This documentary provides opportunities to different stakeholders to show their mettle, the Badgers as a top team in U Sports, Manastersky as a vision-driven coach, and the skill and personalities of the athletes. Despite this, Madill is most cognizant of the benefits BrockTV has provided for him, and can provide for other Sport Management students.

“Everyone at BrockTV has been amazing in the production. There has been so much support from everyone and we’ve been able to get multiple producers involved, whether that’s with b-roll footage collection, interviews, or narration.”

As more episodes drop in the coming weeks, make sure to follow along on BrockTV’s YouTube page.

After wrapping up two games this weekend, the Badgers are back in action on Friday Feb. 3 and 4, when they play an away game at University of Toronto and a home match against Lakehead.

For their full schedule and results, go to the gobadgers.ca page, and for more information about BrockTV, visit them at their website.

Popular therapeutic approaches feed us a contradiction

0

*DISCLAIMER: Reach out to a healthcare professional for a proper diagnosis, or for professional help. This is intended to be educational information, and should not be taken as medical advice.*

Modern therapy has its limits.

Here in the West, we put a huge premium on happiness. We are inundated with messaging that tells us to not only be happy but be uniquely happy, find a happiness that’s yours. What if the reality of these items, happiness and uniqueness, were that they are mutually exclusive? In other words, what if those things that make us unique are those things we’re willing to suffer for, those things that we are willing to be caught in that creative fever that goes beyond the pleasure principle to realize?

This is not a prescription for an atavistic asceticism, something that has ironically emerged as a subspecies of the self-help industry in the form of boiled down, cleanly packaged revivals of ancient philosophical schools such as stoicism. Instead, what if we risk the theory that parsing these categories of happiness alongside uniqueness and self-acceptance, exposing their immanent contradiction, can go a long way when it comes to finding deep satisfaction?

In fact, this ideological split happened institutionally in the mid-20th century when the interdisciplinary field of psychoanalysis birthed and began splitting from the then new, specialised field of ego psychology which offered a positivist account of the ego, looking to study and remedy it as an empirical phenomenon.

Arguably the most famous Freudian disciple still being used in 21st century social theory, Jacques Lacan, was not excited about this emerging new science, calling American ego psychology a “judicial astrology” full of “philistines,” and that it “immerses its categories in psychoanalysis to reinvigorate its lowly purpose of social exploitation.”

After fully shedding the vestiges of psychoanalytic treatment, save the general acceptance of the unconscious, ego psychology has come to dominate therapeutic treatment today, and with its criterion of “the unity of the subject” (Lacan) it fits nicely with the massive pharmaceutical companies that make a killing by solving psychic issues through a one-to-one treatment of psychic distress with different medications. However, we should problematize this simple reduction as Mark Fisher, a man who struggled with major depression, so presciently did in Capitalist Realism:

“The current ruling ontology denies any possibility of a social causation of mental illness. The chemico-biologization of mental illness is of course strictly commensurate with its depoliticization. Considering mental illness an individual chemico-biological problem has enormous benefits for capitalism. First, it reinforces Capital’s drive towards atomistic individualization (you are sick because of your brain chemistry). Second, it provides an enormously lucrative market in which multinational pharmaceutical companies can peddle their pharmaceuticals (we can cure you with our SSRIs). It goes without saying that all mental illnesses are neurologically instantiated, but this says nothing about their causation. If it is true, for instance, that depression is constituted by low serotonin levels, what still needs to be explained is why particular individuals have low levels of serotonin. This requires a social and political explanation; and the task of repoliticizing mental illness is an urgent one if the left wants to challenge capitalist realism.”

To explore this contradiction of happiness and self-acceptance with a current example, I’m going to put Lacanian categories of analytic treatment in conversation with actor Jonah Hill’s recent documentary on Netflix titled Stutz.

Stutz is a good example of how a lot of ego psychology operates today. Phil Stutz, Hill’s therapist and object for the documentary, preaches a frank and straightforward approach to therapy, though it should be said that his brand of therapy is unique in that he mixes Jungian mysticism with more modern cognitive behavioural therapy. This is something of a perfect combination given our ruling postmodern ideology where we adopt cheapened eastern spiritualism, as well as playful sympathies to astrology and other cheap metaphysics, while staying anxiously grounded by a good liberal instinct to adhere to scientific technocracy.

Hill is clearly ecstatic about Stutz and his approach throughout the documentary; in fact, one gets the impression that Hill reveres his therapist. Stutz seems to grasp this as well, often deflecting or probing Hill’s admiration of him, up to a point. This is precisely where Lacanian analysis would read the Hill-Stutz therapeutic journey as having made progress but remaining ultimately incomplete.

At the end of the documentary in an admittedly touching scene Stutz says to Hill that he “feels closer to him now than when we started” and tells Hill “I love you,” Hill replies, “I love you” — the screen goes black and credits roll.

Sigmund Freud was explicit, in a letter to his disciple Carl Jung, that psychoanalysis is “in essence a cure through love.”

The Lacanian approach also expects the analysand (Hill) to love their analyst (Stutz). In fact, Lacan believed that every speech act, precisely as a speech act, is an implicit demand for love. However, the Lacanian analytic experience takes a radical approach with this knowledge: the point is for the analysand to not demand the love of the analyst anymore, to be fully self-sufficient. Put in Lacanian jargon, the point is to be able to incarnate the big Other (with a capital “O”) — law, language, radical alterity, trans-individual authority — into oneself, to have one’s own symbolic compass if you will.

The Lacanian cure has the analysand finally not idealizing the analyst, no longer seeing them as the locus of truth (the big Other), not feeling a parental-like bond with the analyst anymore. Only then, as Lacan says in the final page of his famous Seminar XI, does “love beyond Law” emerge, no longer as narcissistic (mis)recognition, but as a feminine, asexual sublimation of the Thing — experienced in the “ecstatic surrendered” of music and religion as Bruce Fink explains — from drive into love.

The problem with modern ego psychology is that it’s more lucrative to be this friend(ly master) who embodies truth for the analysand because it remains utterly positive, it wants to assure the subject of the unity of herself, and so therapist after therapist will lend their subjects Mark Manson’s The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck and ask how that new medication is working until the cows come home, but their intervention never traverses beyond this stage. The Lacanian solution is that no unity of yourself exists; we are split subjects, divided by the effects of language which turn our needs into demands for love, demands which always miss the mark. This not hitting the mark is where desire enters the picture, because in order to desire something we must not have it. If we have what we desire, we thereby can no longer desire it.

Desire is founded around a lack.

Lacan puts it in this way: “Desire is neither the appetite for satisfaction nor the demand for love, but the difference that results from the subtraction of the first from the second, the very phenomenon of their splitting (Spaltung).”

So when we are encouraged to find happiness in our uniqueness in much of the therapeutic and advertising language that permeates discourses in the West as well as in modern approaches to therapy — we should question whether there is a stable possibility for both at once.

Perhaps the most spiritually fulfilling situation to be in is to suffer for oneself by fully assuming one’s division.

Crime and violence is often never as spontaneous as liberals see it

0

Living in the financial triangle of Ontario — Ottawa, Toronto, Quebec — it’s hard to avoid the constant reminders, from eye-grabbing chyrons to strangers’ small talk, about the recent uptick in crime in Canada with the current economic downturn. The leader of the Official Opposition, Pierre Poilievre, continues to remind his base that “Canada is broken,” especially when it comes to city crime.

“In particular, he [Poilievre] emphasized the issue of crime, saying cities are becoming ‘crime zones’ under Trudeau’s watch and suggesting he is not taking the necessary action to reduce violence.

Poilievre named Toronto as an example after a string of violent incidents on the city’s transit system in recent weeks.

A Statistics Canada report released last Nov. shows the country’s homicide rate increased for the third consecutive year, with cities like Winnipeg and Regina boasting the worst rates per capita. The crime severity index was down in 2021 and 2020 after five years of increases.”

Alongside increased crime in the city comes increased frustration at the current administration.Prime Minister Trudeau recently visited Hamilton for a cabinet retreat. There were protesters outside of his hotel, swarming him, shouting threats and epithets, and whose car horns I could hear from my apartment several blocks away. A couple nights later my partner’s car window was smashed-in overnight and her glovebox and armrest compartment emptied.

When the economy hurts the poor hurts most.

It’s no secret that austerity measures used to combat inflation are a way to discipline workers, and with the 8th consecutive interest rate hike from the Bank of Canada in a 12-month period, the discipline is only getting harsher. It’s no secret that Trudeau has become unpopular with the working class and it’s been a gift to the progressive conservatives who know how to channel that frustration for their own political ends like Poilievre.

Conservatives, then, like to prey on middle class fear and preach the need for law and order, as mayor of Toronto John Tory is in response to the latest violence sprees on the TTC. Because of transit levels being relatively low, likely due to the pandemic, Tory has been cutting its transit funding, which means less staff for oversight and maintenance. Meanwhile, the Toronto government is spending an estimated $300 million on hosting part of the FIFA World Cup in 2026.

This is obscene, especially when with the right planning, properly funded infrastructure can improve community safety.

With the trend of unconscious flight away from city cores over the past few decades, cities exhibit some verisimilitude to the fantasy cities portrayed in film noir—a sinful, trash-laden, claustrophobic, space of financial perdition.

I recently spoke to a man in Hamilton who was on disability — he had had several tendons in his forearm slashed while on the job — who recently lost custody to his six children and was in a weaning stage of an opioid addiction. We briefly chatted about Trudeau’s visit and he said something along the lines of, “No one likes him here anyways, so why is he the leader?” to which I replied; “Good point!”

It’s true, the political polarity of where I live is overwhelmingly NDP and conservative. The two of us agreed that if working people were unified, if they came out to vote as a class coalition instead of federal election voter turnout dropping in the 2019 election to 44 per cent, then we could have leaders who represent the masses.

Capital has done a tremendous job to depoliticize the masses since the neoliberal period. With the precarious work regime, the smashing of the trade unions and new forms of atomization that provide just enough freedoms in the form of self management, such as Uber and OnlyFans, so as to make it harder to organize simply by the logics of self-determination that still siphons surplus value towards Silicon Valley. Workers have not been able to fully recover from this consolidation in the hands of private enterprise.

Philosopher Slavoj Žižek in his book Violence speaks about the limits of a liberal attitude towards crime by comparing fascinating manifest subjective violence to the quiet, hardly detectable objective violence that hums along slowly in the background:

“Opposing all forms of violence, from direct, physical violence (mass murder, terror) to ideological violence (racism, incitement, sexual discrimination), seems to be the main preoccupation of the tolerant liberal attitude that predominated today… Is there not something suspicious, indeed symptomatic, about this focus on subjective violence—that violence which is enacted by social agents, evil individuals, disciplined repressive apparatuses, fanatical crowds? Doesn’t it desperately try to distract our attention from the true locus of trouble, by obliterating from view other forms of violence and thus actively participating in them?”

This is precisely the attitude that should be considered when we speak about the recent uptick in crime; how the very way we approach the issue can already be a part of the problem. The more agency liberals and conservatives pathologically project onto the desperate, the more they fall prey to keeping them there.

Free will is not evenly distributed.

Women’s volleyball regain form in weekend sweep of York Lions

0

The Brock women’s volleyball team were back in action for a home double-header this weekend.

Looking to rebound from losing two of the past three, the women’s volleyball team got an opportunity against the York University Lions. The Lions on the other hand, sitting around the middle of the pack in the OUA, looked to pick up at least one win to stay above .500.

This would not come easily for the Lions.

Friday’s match started close, with both teams trading early kills. York kept it close throughout the first set, and actually led the Badgers in this regard, 11-10. However, it was York’s attack errors that would spell the end of their commendable run, falling 25-17 in the first set.

Undeterred, the Lions showed great resilience in the second set. The set was a battle of attrition, neither side giving an inch. Neither York nor Brock surrendered more than three consecutive points in the set. York improved on their strong hitting, racking up 13 kills, while cutting down their attack errors from nine to four.

Unfortunately for the Lions, the Badgers’ play at the net also improved, jumping to 19 kills and taking the set 25-27.

This time, there would be no bounce-back from the Lions. Matching seven kills with seven errors, their attack efficiency dropped to zero, while, on 13 kills, Brock’s jumped to .286.

Brock took a dominating third set 25-14, and the match in straight sets.

Less than 24 hours later, the Badgers and Lions would take the court again, York no doubt hoping for a better execution down the stretch.

Though York got out to a quick 6-2 lead, their hold on the set quickly dissipated when Brock tied the score at nine shortly thereafter. With several big pushes, the Badgers came out on top, 25-19.

York offered very little resistance early in the second set. Brock went up first 4-0, then 6-1, eventually stretching their lead as wide as 16-4. Brock pulled off the gas a little, but with York operating in negative attack efficiency, the Badgers still cruised to a 25-14 second-set victory.

Brock looked like they had things all but wrapped up, starting the third set up 8-2. York, with nothing left to lose and plenty left in the tank, battled back to knot the game at 21 before taking their second lead of the day. Trading blows the rest of the way, the Badgers clawed their way to a 25-27 victory off an attack error.

Sadie Dick had an outstanding performance over the weekend, leading both Friday and Saturday’s matches in kills. Madison Chimienti and Emily Foest both also had strong weekends, while, as expected, Sarah Rohr and Aleiah Torres led in assists and digs, respectively.

The Badgers next play on Saturday, Feb. 4 against the Waterloo Warriors. Playing the top-ranked team in the OUA, the Badgers have a chance to leapfrog Waterloo in first with a win this weekend. Their full schedule and results can be found on gobadgers.ca.

Meet Madalyn Weinert of Badgers women’s basketball

0

It’s Saturday, Jan. 21 and the Brock Badgers women’s basketball team has just come up with a statement 69-62 win.

Perhaps more accurately, the Badgers’ star guard Madalyn Weinert came up with a statement win for Brock. Playing the entire 40 minutes of the game, Weinert had a game-high 34 points on 57 per cent efficiency, a game-high five blocks, nine rebounds (second highest in the game), and an assist and a steal for good measure. In fact, her 20 points in the second half would have been good for the game-high (York’s highest scorer had 19 in the game).

This kind of dominance is not unfamiliar to Weinert this season. Saturday was Weinert’s eighth-straight game scoring in double-digits, a streak dating back to the Badgers’ last game against York in November. That November game is one of only two where Weinert wasn’t in double-digits. It’s also the only one where she didn’t lead the Badgers in scoring.

Weinert’s explosion has been good enough to net her fifth place in the OUA in points, seventh in rebounds, fifth in blocks and twelfth in field goal percentage, in addition to a bevy of awards this year, including three Brock Athlete of the Weeks, and most recently, an OUA Athlete of the Week.

A sophomore Medical Science student and a St. Catherine’s native, Madalyn Weinert has been the driving force behind this Badgers squad, though she’ll never admit it herself.

I got a chance to sit down with one of the top sophomore players in Canada this week to discuss her torrid pace this season, changes in her roles and responsibilities, and life as a Brock student-athlete.

This interview has been edited for conciseness and clarity.

Luke Sweeney: I guess to start off, you’re just named Brock athlete of the week and an OUA athlete of the week, so pretty huge deal, especially coming off a big weekend.

Madalyn Weinert: Yeah, it was big and it’s exciting. It’s been a different season than we had last year, so that’s come with its own challenges and its own ups and downs. The team’s quite young this year, and I think how we’ve played and how we’ve shown how we can play against York and Carleton especially is just a testament to how the team is going to thrive in coming years. I’m really excited to continue to work with the same group of girls. I think that’s always a bonus, to be able to stick with a group for multiple years. That’s always beneficial to the team and to incoming girls, to have people to look up to and people to set a precedent.

LS: Well you’re talking about the differences in the team, and that’s kind of something I wanted to ask you about; obviously there’s a lot of turnover in the university basketball setting, so what are some of the biggest team developments you’ve seen since last year, as well as maybe some of your personal developments?

MW: In terms of the team, again we’re young. We lost a lot of senior leadership last year, which has opened the floor for younger girls like myself to be able to step into [those roles]—we’ve all stepped into those different roles in different ways, its all about learning every day. There’s multiple of us who’ve stepped up to try and fill in those roles.

LS: Obviously, from a lot of different perspectives, you’ve been dealing with a lot of increased responsibility this year, so how have you been dealing with that, what’s that been like for you?

MW: So yes there’s been some additional responsibility, but I think it’s just learning to be ok, accepting the uncomfortable positions that you sometimes get put in. Something that you see at the beginning of the year is everyone always wants to have the same role they did last year, and it’s always tough to find that new role and excel in that role. I think that’s something that stuck with me. It’s so much easier to let the team handle it, and let other people deal with it, but when I start to get older and move through the program, there’re more responsibilities put on me, so I think it’s just stepping into a role where the team needs me next. It’s never about what’s best for me, but what’s best for the girls on the team and what’s best for the success of our team.

LS: Yeah, and well, I have to say you’re doing a pretty stand-up job of leading the group. I mean, you’re fifth in the OUA in points per game, you’re shooting 41%, seventh in rebounds, 12th in assist, and even fifth in blocks, which is pretty outstanding because you’re a guard. What’s been the biggest key for you? What’s led to this?

MW: I think it’s just coming together as a team. If they don’t do their job, then I’m not in the position to have those blocks, to record those points, so it’s really been all about coming together as a team which has allowed me to play the role that I need to do on this team. It’s being in the gym every day for practice, for lift, being at Canada Games (Park) for individual practice. It’s all those little things. It’s when we’re able to have those team dinners and team lunches, it’s about bringing everyone together, and that opens up the opportunity for me to play well. If they don’t do their jobs, if they don’t participate and give it all they’ve got, then I don’t get those opportunities either. So, it just comes down to teamwork.

LS: Absolutely. Obviously from what you’ve been saying, there’s quite a lot of stuff that goes into keeping up with the varsity schedule, and I know you’re also a Med Sci student which obviously dictates a lot of work-life balance. So how do you maintain that when you’ve got the work, life but also the varsity sport to balance in there too?

MW: I think it’s just time management. Actually, well, it is just time management. It’s knowing that at night sometimes instead of sitting down to watch TV or scroll on your phone, you need to put in the hour of work. It’s knowing that during the day sometimes you’ve got to go sit in study hall or go sit in the library and not with your friends because you need to get something done. Its planning, focus, and time management.

LS: Yeah, for sure. Again, I see you’re also from St. Catherine’s, which I’m sure is a big reason you’re at Brock, but were there any other things that drew you here?

MW: Yeah so, I was from here, so that was definitely a draw to come to Brock. I’d kind of always wanted to be a doctor, and when my dad spoke with the cardiologist [at St. Catherine’s General], he’d done both his undergrad and his masters here. So, I knew that even if I chose Brock, there wasn’t going to be a disadvantage instead of going to a school that has a med school, so I think that gave me confidence in choosing Brock as well.

LS: What are your favourite things about being a Brock student, an athlete at Brock, and also just an athlete on this team?

MW: One of the things I love about Brock, even though it’s obviously growing, I feel like it’s smaller. I feel like there’s always people I’m saying hi to, and that I can have a conversation with. Oh, and I love how everything’s in the same building, that’s great. And then, as a student-athlete, I love the community that’s being able to be built amongst the athletes, coming out of last year, even with Covid still. I think this year, people have really got to know each other a little bit more, and it’s just fun to see different teams supporting each other.

LS: Down the stretch, what’re you looking for from the team and from yourself?

MW: I’m really excited for the next couple weeks. Playoffs are coming so I think it’s a big push right now, every game matters. I’m super excited to see how we continue to work together, continue to get better every game. And for myself, keep doing what the team needs, anything the team needs is what I want to be focused on.

Weinert picked up right where she left off, leading the Badgers to a road win over Nipissing off the strength of a near-triple-double performance. Weinert had 11 points, 12 rebounds, eight assists, two blocks and a steal, while forward Olivia Fiorucci led the game in points with 15.

This weekend, the Weinert and the Badgers begin a two-game homestand at Bob Davis Gymnasium where they’ll take on University of Toronto on Friday, and Guelph on Saturday. Their full schedule and results can be found on their gobadgers.ca page.

Women’s hockey: Badgers put up a Bold performance in win over TMU

0

On Jan. 27, the Brock women’s hockey team took on the Toronto Metropolitan University, also known as the TMU Bold, for their first regular season matchup in just over three years.

The last time the teams met on Feb. 1, 2020, TMU got the better of the Badgers, beating them 2-1 in a shootout and outshooting them 37-26. Six Badgers from that roster three years ago remain on the team, including Mishayla ChristensenKaitlyn ColonnaRebekah FeldLauren DiksMikayla Flanagan and Paige Cohoon.

The game was played at 11 a.m at Mattamy Athletic Centre, which might be familiar to some as the old Maple Leaf Gardens building. Many of the fans in the crowd were young children from local elementary schools in the area. The two goaltenders in the match may not have the best record, but they have been playing unbelievable hockey for their respective teams this season.

Brock goaltender Kenzie Harmison got the start, and despite the poor 3-7 record, she currently has a 2.19 GAA, and a .926 save percentage. That is good enough for fifth in the OUA in save percentage for goalies that have played 10 or more games this season.

TMU goalie Alexie Stratos had played just five games heading into the matchup against Brock, but has been solid between the pipes, boasting a 2.46 GAA and a .910 save percentage. Those numbers may not be as great as Harmisons’, but they have been good enough for the best of the three goalies on TMU’s roster.

Brock kicked off the game with their fastest start this season, scoring just nine seconds into the game. A rush into the zone, followed by a cross-seam pass by Allison Stevenson right to Catriona Cormier, who put it into the open cage. With the Badgers leading 1-0, all students in the crowd were loving the hot start, despite it coming from the away Brock Badgers.

The next ten minutes of the game were back and forth as both Brock and TMU had 5 shots each, not allowing many high-danger chances. Though multiple failed zone exits by the Badgers led to a shot from the point by TMU defender Megan Breen and a rebound out front to Brooke Michaud was put past the blocker of Harmison to tie the game 1-1.

The remainder of the period would see some tight checking and chances off the cycle in both ends of the ice, but neither team was able to beat the opponent’s goaltender. After just twenty minutes of play, the shots were 14-10 in favour of TMU.

To start the second period, both teams could not establish any offensive zone time as much of the first five minutes was consistent dump-and-change hockey. It was not until the 11:01 mark of the period that the floodgates reopened. The Badgers Paige Cohoon put one past Stratos on the powerplay off of a massive scramble in front of the net. Stratos was furious with the call as she thought she was pushed into her net along with the puck, but the goal stood after the refs got together to discuss the play.

The TMU players were angry, and it showed. Soon after they had a powerplay of their own that they inevitably tied the game on. A pass from the slot, down low to Erika Crouse, who tipped it over the right pad of Harmison. 2-2 with just under five minutes to play in the second period and the young crowd going wild for the Bold.

Brock answered back soon after scoring their third go-ahead goal of the game. This time it was Mishayla Christensen who beat Stratos with a slap shot from the high slot. The period would finish 3-2 and the Badgers had just twenty minutes to play to secure their first victory over TMU in three years.

The Badgers would do just that, allowing only five shots on goal and playing very low-event hockey. An empty netter scored by Madison Cronkwright extended the Brock lead to 4-2 with just over ten seconds left as they cruised to their fifth road win of the season.

The Badgers are currently 8-13 with five more games left in the regular season, making it possible for them to finish .500. Their next matchup is against Western University on Feb. 3. That matchup and all future games can be streamed on OUAtv and tickets to the Feb. 4 game at Canada Games Park can be purchased here.

All information regarding the Badgers can be found at gobadgers.ca.

What’s new at the NHL All-Star Game?

0

The NHL All-Star weekend is just around the corner and this time it is set to take place on Feb. 3 and 4 in South Florida. Feb. 3 will feature the skills competition while Feb. 4 will see the return of the four-team three-on-three style tournament.

Although there may not be as much excitement surrounding the NHL All-Star weekend as in previous years, that has not been due to a lack of effort from the NHL. This year saw a new voting system put into place where fans were able to vote for any two skaters and one goalie from each division that they wanted to see at the All-Star game—on top of the already selected one player from each team by league staff.

The last time fans were able to vote for any player in the league was back in 2016 when all fans from across the league came together and voted Arizona Coyotes goon John Scott captain of the Pacific division All-Star team. This year, no one “un-deserving” was voted in by the fans.

The Feb. 3 All-Star competition will feature many of the same events from previous All-Star weekends, such as the fastest skater, hardest shot, accuracy shooting and the breakaway challenge, which returned last year. This year it will highlight former Canadian goaltender and Hall of Famer Roberto Luongo, who used to play for the Florida Panthers. He will take the ice to face some shots from today’s greatest to see how many in a row he can stop, if any at all.

Similar to last year, the competition will feature a couple of Florida-specific competitions: The NHL pitch and puck on a golf course, the NHL Splash shot on the beach and the NHL Tendy Tandem.

The NHL pitch and puck on a golf course will be a combination of golf and hockey shots on a par 4 hole. Whichever player can complete the hole in the least amount of shots will win the competition.

The NHL Splash shot will take place on a beach but has yet to be announced what the actual competition will be.

The NHL Tendy Tandem will be a competition that will feature two goalies competing at the same time; one shooting pucks at a hole/target and one goalie stopping as many shots as possible in the timeframe announced later by the NHL.

Feb. 4 will feature three three-on-three style hockey games, each containing two ten-minute halves. The semi-finals will feature the two Eastern Conference divisions (Atlantic and Metropolitan) and the two Western Conference divisions (Pacific and Central) facing off against each other. The winner of the East and the winner of the West will then square off in a third and final game. The winning team gets a one million dollar cash prize to split between all players.

The All-Star game can be watched on TSN channels, TSN.ca and the TSN app. To view, the NHL All-Star teams visit NHL.com.

Niagara-on-the-Lake museum offers free admission to all Niagara residents throughout February

0

Those who wish to learn more about Niagara’s long and varied history should look no further than the Niagara-on-the-Lake (NOTL) Museum, which is offering free admission to all Niagara residents throughout the month of February.

The campaign, titled “Free February,” will give those who live in Niagara an opportunity to learn about the history of the town of NOTL with no cost.

The museum runs not only permanent exhibitions but temporary ones as well, which might incentivize history enthusiasts to make consistent returns to the museum.

Currently, the temporary exhibition on display is titled “All Along the Waterfront,” and focuses on the importance of water and the relationship it holds with humanity. The museum hopes to spread awareness of how NOTL’s waterways, the Niagara River and Lake Ontario, have played a prominent role in the town’s history. The museum believes that a better understanding of the relationship that humans hold with water will “help us ensure its protection for future generations.”

The museum is also advertising its permanent exhibition, which details 9,000 years of NOTL’s past, ranging from Indigenous history to the increased tourism of the 1970s. The exhibit holds a series of significant artifacts, including uniforms worn during the War of 1812.

The museum also displays two new student exhibits. The first, “A History of Cycling,” observes the history of travel on two wheels; while the second, “Through All Eyes,” dedicates itself to the timeline of Indigenous culture in Niagara.

If you wish to extend your learning even further, the museum also offers virtual lectures, which run weekly from Feb. 1 until Mar. 8.

The lectures are presented over Zoom video calls every Wednesday morning at 11 a.m. They are free to attend, but registration is required. Weekly topics include historic homes in Queenston (a rural community based in NOTL) and Canada’s relationship to the Civil War.

Information on exhibits and events can be found on the museum’s website. The website also provides links to ordering virtual tickets for the weekly online lectures.

Federal Court of Appeal rejects appeal to block Rogers-Shaw merger

0

The Competition Bureau’s appeal to stop the $26-billion Rogers-Shaw merger has been rejected by Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal.

The deal was first made through an announcement from Rogers Communications Inc. on Mar. 15, 2021, in which the Toronto-based communications company made a proposal to purchase Shaw Communications Inc., a major competitor based in Calgary.

Shaw shareholders voted in favour of the sale in May 2021.

“It’s time to move forward,” Shaw writes on its website. “This pro-competitive transaction will increase wireline and wireless competition while clearing a path towards lower prices, more investment and greater innovation that Canadians need and deserve.”

While it appeared as though the deal would be closed within the first half of 2022, these plans were halted when the Competition Bureau filed an application to block the merger. They stated that the move would result in worse service and increased prices for the general public.

A mediation period in Oct. 2022 with the Competition Bureau did not lead to finalized negotiations, and the conflict continued into the new year.

Despite the number of roadblocks that the companies have faced since the deal’s proposal, most issues have been resolved without fail. To overcome some of these concerns, Rogers and Shaw were required to sell Freedom Mobile (which is owned by Shaw) to Vidéotron, a division of Québecor Inc, for $2.85 billion.

One hurdle that the companies had not yet been able to clear is the dispute with the Competition Bureau. The Bureau submitted an appeal to overturn a tribunal decision approving the merger, claiming that the tribunal had made “four legal errors” causing the deal to be approved erroneously.

The Court of Appeal did not agree, and rejected the appeal.

“We are truly disappointed that the Federal Court of Appeal has dismissed our appeal of the Competition Tribunal’s decision in Rogers-Shaw,” wrote Matthew Boswell, Commissioner of Competition, in a statement. “Although today’s developments are discouraging, we stand by the findings of our investigation and the decision to challenge the merger. We brought a strong, responsible case to the Tribunal after conducting a thorough examination of the facts.”

However, Boswell added that he accepts the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal and will not pursue a further appeal in this matter.

While things are looking up for Rogers and Shaw, the final issue stands with federal Innovation Minister François-Philippe Champagne, who continues to oppose the deal.

Champagne has a set of conditions in which the proposal must be revamped before it can go through. “My only concern is to provide better prices to Canadians,” he stated in a press conference.

On Jan. 24, Champagne posted a tweet containing his statement on the Court of Appeal’s ruling.

“I am aware of the Federal Court of Appeal’s decision regarding the Competition Tribunal’s ruling on the Rogers-Shaw transaction. I will be reviewing it closely,” read the statement.

Rogers and Shaw have extended the deadline for the merger’s closing from Jan. 31 to Dec. 31. During the tribunal hearings, lawyers from Rogers argued that the company would be forced to pay an additional $250 million to shareholders if the deal did not close by this date.

As it currently stands, the decision by the Federal Court of Appeal brings Rogers and Shaw one step closer to closing their deal, but it is clear they have a few more hurdles to clear before they can complete their $26-billion merger.

Universal government programs are more durable and less expensive

0

Universal programs for social welfare are more durable and less expensive.

A common myth that has permeated political discourse since the neoliberal turn in the 1970s is that with the welfare state stripped back and private capital’s being largely unencumbered by regulation, bloated government institutions and spending will go down.

The reality has been quite the opposite.

One reason for this is extremely simple: capitalism has never truly existed. In all its societal permutations, private capital has needed a strong state to protect it and bail it out when things go wrong. The go-to example is the 2007-8 financial crisis where the big banks were “too big to fail” and had to be bailed out by the government otherwise the crash would have been catastrophically worse. Not to mention at the beginning of COVID-19, many Western states had something like communism with the government sending out checks and temporarily nationalizing certain industries like railways in the U.K. because the market was not equipped for a disaster like COVID despite its more beneficent supports such as Bill Gates, saying for years that we need better infrastructure for potential pandemics.

One premise that flies in the face of neoliberal arguments for stripping back the government’s functions is that between universal programs and means tested programs. The argument usually runs as such: With universal programs, we don’t want to be giving extra services like child tax credits or social security checks to high income earners, that’s a waste of money. Therefore, means-tested programs, where benefits are usually calculated based on an individual’s income, will save spending that would otherwise be a waste.

An irony in this regard is that under Margaret Thatcher, neoliberalism’s key progenitor, government spending mostly rose due to the structural unemployment of her austerity policies, as unemployment is a costly issue for the government.

Another irony lies in simple logistics. If a program is universal, it means that you don’t need robust, round-the-clock run institutions to decide who gets what in society. This means less governmental bureaucratic bloat. In terms of the actual programs themselves, The Center for Economic Policy and Research found that in the case of the United States’ Social Security, the common retort made by billionaires like Peter Peterson that “I don’t need my Social Security checks” means that the government is handing out too much, doesn’t hold water as a critique of mismanaged government spending:

“While the wealthy and very wealthy do claim a substantial portion of personal income, they do not account for a large share of Social Security benefits. The reason is simple: Social Security benefits are capped, so that even the richest beneficiary cannot receive a much higher benefit than what typical workers receive. And, since there are not many wealthy people, their benefits are a relatively small share of the total benefits paid out by the program.”

Another important factor to consider is that universal programs, once they are instituted, are often hard to get rid of. Take universal single-payer healthcare in Canada, for example. All polling is unanimous in showing that the majority of Canadians support universal healthcare. In the U.S. in 2020, Bernie Sanders’ Medicare-for-All, a universal healthcare coverage plan, has increasing majority support according to polls. The main cause of bankruptcy in the U.S. is from medical debt; though America has some of the best healthcare options in the world, those options are for the few who can afford it.

Interestingly, when what would become the blueprint for Canada’s universal healthcare plan — the first of its kind in North America — was being workshopped in the province of Saskatchewan as the Saskatchewan Medical Insurance Act, the RCMP spied on community clinic activists in the ‘60s on the grounds of the push for single-payer healthcare being a “subversive communist” plot.

This context is important, especially as Ontario’s current premier, Doug Ford, is giving medical services over to for-profit clinics under claims that our system is like North Korea’s and Cuba’s. Aside from the fact that Cuba’s healthcare system is the envy of many nations, this kind of neo-Red Scare rhetoric, which one expects in the 1960s, is concerning considering it’s 2022—there’s no Bay of Pigs humming along in the background and anyone who says the Russo-Ukraine war fits the bill is not operating in reality. Not to mention, Ontario had a budgetary surplus of $2.1 billion in 2021 which could have been directed at improving our healthcare facilities instead of capping nurse’s wages.

The truth is in the people; universal programs are popular and durable because they help the people. There’s a lot of truth in the quip that socialism is when the government actually does stuff.