Monday, March 31, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Video streaming services are changing the landscape of entertainment, maybe for the worst

|
|

Video streaming services have not only changed the way consumers take in entertainment but the entertainment itself, encouraging a “pump-and-dump” model on the part of producers.

HBOMax, Disney+, Apple TV, Amazon Prime Video, Netflix; all of these Nasdaq-listed video streaming platforms are dominating the way that video entertainment is consumed. Netflix, the biggest of the lot, has over 200 million subscribers as of May this year.

Streaming platforms allow for an asynchronous, mostly frictionless watching experience available from the comfort of home, making it both more difficult to stop a binge and less likely you’ll buy video entertainment in physical format. On top of that, although cinemas have done better since the beginning of the pandemic in 2020, seeing major box office successes in 2021 and well into 2022, producers are now doing exclusive releases with large streaming platforms. This creates a larger delta in terms of where film viewership and ultimately money is being funneled, encouraging more producers to make films meant for streaming rather than the theatre.

In the past, a film had its box office sales during its initial release and a TV show had a scheduled airing on cable. More importantly, they also usually had a subsequent DVD release, which often came a few months or a year after the debut. This DVD release was a secondary source of revenue and therefore something film producers had to keep in mind.

If you made a movie or TV series that did well in the box office or upon airing but not in terms of a physical release, it likely had a lot of hype surrounding it but wasn’t a great piece that viewers would want to physically own for repeated watches. This model encouraged films to be made that seemed to have replay value. That is, they were likely strong films. Additionally, the basically deceased market of brick and mortar stores that sell DVDs, such as Blockbuster which has one store left in Oregon, U.S., facilitated a kind of “third place” for film and TV buffs to interact, discuss, recommend and debate with each other or staff.

Streaming platforms cancel a lot of these aspects, being more congenial to a “pump-and-dump” model. For example, Netflix’s pay structure for films or series that get their licensing fee is an upfront, lump sum payment to the writers, actors, staff and producers in exchange for infinite streaming of their product instead of box office and DVD sales or digital ownership purchases of any kind. While this isn’t necessarily the case, with the Netflix model the burden of making a film that is just as good as the hype that surrounds it is less important as future sales don’t affect revenues nearly as much.

A good example of this is 2019’s Netflix exclusive El Camino: A Breaking Bad Movie which rode on the vast popularity and love for the then six years old TV series Breaking BadEl Camino was a massive disappointment, with actors who didn’t do much to look like how they did in the series to a meandering, half-baked plot; it was a perfect example of a fiscally strategic yet qualitatively unwarranted revival.

This can also be seen in the dime-a-dozen Marvel TV series that are streaming exclusives as well. It’s probably not a coincidence that the Disney+ exclusive series She-Hulk has gone viral a few times now for ridiculous scenes that look like YouTube parodies such as the “She-Hulk Twerks with Megan Thee Stallion” meme.

Essentially, video streaming services have given consumers access to seemingly endless entertainment, cutting out the sometimes pesky aspects of going out to see a movie or when watching a TV show. Annoyances such as waiting in lines or for a specific time that a show is slotted in are becoming things of the past.

All that being said, the costs associated with this may be harder to detect in the short run, including less quality material as well as less of a physical interaction with the mise-en-scène of theater and DVD releases as well as new forms of interpassivity that see large portions of students needing some kind of streaming platform in the background to be able to study.

Video streaming services may be more convenient but the question to ask is if these subtler costs are worth it.

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Chibi-Robo: Nintendo’s strange, charming and underappreciated hidden gem 

I’m willing to bet that you haven’t played Chibi-Robo. 

Dating apps are the way of the future, and that absolutely sucks 

Dating apps are set to dominate the future of finding love, and I couldn’t be unhappier about it. 

Dissecting the embarrassing Trump-Vance meeting with Zelenskyy 

On Feb. 28, U.S. President Donald Trump met with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to discuss strategies for dealing with the Russo-Ukrainian War that has ravaged the streets of Ukraine since the Russian invasion over three years ago. What ensued can’t simply be described as a failed negotiation — the meeting put the embarrassing ineptitude of the Trump administration on display for the whole world to see. 

Diving into the subreddit that hates Taylor Swift 

The behaviour of the Reddit community r/travisandtaylor goes far beyond fair criticism of Taylor Swift — it’s devolved into full-on hating for the sake of hating, with a dash of misogyny. 

“The Giving Tree” isn’t as bad as people say 

The Giving Tree has faced a lot of rightful criticism over the years, but the book is still a very important piece of literature. 

There’s nothing wrong with Shrek 5’s new look 

The teaser for Shrek 5 might use a different visual design for the franchise’s characters than what fans are used to, but the public backlash isn’t warranted. 

Trump is using tariffs to assert power, not to increase Canadian border security 

Don’t be fooled by the false pretenses of punishing a lack of border security behind Trump’s tariffs on Canadian industries; his trade wars are simply an expression of his desire to exert economic power onto other nations to see if he can bully them around. 

Who is the iPhone 16e actually meant for? 

Cost-effective purchasers would be wise to avoid Apple’s new “budget” iPhone 16e.