Wednesday, December 24, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

We need to stop entertaining the 401 tunnel idea 

|
|

We shouldn’t be entertaining Ford’s idiotic highway 401 tunnel pipedream, let alone charging taxpayers 9.1 million dollars to conduct a feasibility study.  

There are many things wrong with the 401-tunnel idea. To clarify, this is a plan to build a three-level tunnel under Highway 401 — from Scarborough to Mississauga — with two levels dedicated to east and west traffic and one level dedicated to transit.  

It is obvious that this project won’t solve the problem it intends to address: reducing traffic. Dozens of studies have shown that adding more lanes to an existing highway doesn’t alleviate traffic since bottlenecks are the root cause of congestion.  

To illustrate, adding more lanes to the Gardiner won’t solve traffic when it originates from a lack of road capacity on Toronto city streets. The only car centric solution to this would be to raise city blocks to build suburban type stroads.  

Even this solution wouldn’t work. Those who’ve commuted in suburbs should consider that with a population as dense as the GTA’s, the only effective solution to traffic is to get as many people off the road as possible and to expand public transit. That’s simply a fact — not a political stance — as every other idea proposed simply won’t solve traffic congestion.  

Highway 401 is already in the top five widest highways in the world at 18 lanes. While you could argue that the tunnel is a more environmentally friendly way of adding capacity, it just isn’t the most efficient and cost-effective way to do so.  

The best option to add capacity is to build transit. This is what the province was originally trying to do, with plans to create an electrified modern suburban rail service in GO Transit, before the idea was scaled back. 

Given the province’s track record with construction projects as simple as throwing up electric wires or building an LRT, it’s hard to imagine an incredibly complex project succeeding, especially with very few successful global examples. 

The second-best option — if we were to focus solely on cars — would be to complete the Highway 413 project, which would then act as a publicly owned (assuming we don’t sell it) bypass highway for traffic.  

Another option would be to buy back Highway 407, which should never have been sold in the first place. A cheaper alternative could also be to heavily increase GO Bus service along Highway 407, in hopes of reducing the number of cars on Highway 401.  

Ford’s tunnel plan is simply absurd and should not be considered an option. As said by the Leader of the Official Opposition in Ontario, Marit Stiles, “I don’t know how they sleep at night. […] I’ll just say it; I think very few people believe that this is a real thing.” 

There is simply no logical or economic reason to advocate for this project and politically, it’s a distraction at best and some form of corruption at worst. In general, I think we should stop giving politicians any serious consideration on nonsensical ideas.  

The more we hear a politician out on their latest idiotic idea, the more power we give their rhetoric and the further we drift away from any actual progress.  

So, how do we know if an idea is idiotic? Well, beyond simply taking a moment to read through it and considering its practicality, general expert opinion can also provide support for identifying an idiotic idea.  

It’s a lesson for opposition leaders to learn as well. Instead of just playing back the absurdity of Ford’s ideas, they should present their own counter in addition to giving their reactions, so that Ford is not the only one making a proposal. 

We shouldn’t simply be hearing people out just to knock them down without providing our own proposals, as that makes for weak politics. We should instead lead with a clear idea of our own.  

Essentially, I think the opposition has been doing too much to try and make us consider Ford’s ideas. They haven’t been doing enough to outwork him and show the electorate what other options there are.  

It’s one thing to stand up and point out how stupid your opponents’ ideas sound, but it’s another to actually stand up and show the electorate what your ideas look like in comparison. 

We shouldn’t be talking about Ford’s tunnel idea. We should be talking about the opposition’s proposals on how to mitigate traffic along Highway 401’s corridor, but we aren’t. Until then, Ford’s stupidity will be the only thing we hear.  

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

“Wicked”: the end of an era  

This review contains spoilers for Wicked: Part One, Wicked: For Good and Wicked, the Broadway musical.  

It’s time to shut up about opting out of the compulsory bus pass fee because you own a car 

Owning a personal vehicle doesn’t make your argument against a compulsory bus pass good. In fact, this grievance tends to be deeply classist. 

Niagara Transit could do a better job with public communication  

Niagara Transit (NT) is scheduled to undergo some rapid changes over the next 10 years as part of a strategic growth plan. This is great news, as there is plenty of room for optimization and growth in the region’s transit system.

Identities aren’t something that can be sold 

In the age of doomscrolling and rampant consumerism, identities are becoming increasingly centred around products and online aesthetics. Despite the fact that one’s identity can’t be boiled down to a “type,” your social media feed might try to convince you that, with the right products, you can try on pre-conceived identities until you find the right match. 

Why are we so obsessed with self-improvement? 

The rise of the “winter arc” trend isn’t anything new. The internet is obsessed with self-improvement messaging, reinventing a lifechanging trend to leave us feeling unproductive and inferior with the come of each new season. 

Shopping isn’t the only way to spread Christmas cheer   

The celebration of Christmas in the contemporary context is deeply embedded in consumerism, but it doesn’t have to be. 

The race to label a glitchy TikTok as “censorship” signals eroding trust toward media institutions 

A video discussing the Jeffrey Epstein emails appears to “glitch” the moment its creator says “Syria,” cutting or de-syncing the audio in a way that behaves differently depending on how and where the clip is played. The comments immediately and confident started labelling the glitch as a form of deliberative platform censorship. This diagnosis provides a small but indicative reflection of how people view the current political and media environment with such distrust that anomalies are read as manipulation by default, not errors. 

Short-form content posted on TikTok has become the music industry’s biggest helper and largest enemy   

While TikTok has skyrocketed many previously unknown musicians into stardom overnight, it has also created a desire for instant gratification amongst consumers.