Monday, March 31, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Western leaders are being too hawkish on Ukraine, Putin still an international criminal

|
|

The Russian invasion of Ukraine is nearing its one-year anniversary and taxpayers shouldn’t have to fund a war that western leaders don’t want to end; why not pursue peace negotiations instead?

Last week, world leaders met at Davos for the return of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Ukraine war was hot on the lips of many of the attendees. Most notably, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, in a bid for further funding towards the war, said that “Weapons are the way to peace.” Commentators worldwide are right to see the Orwellian aroma of this statement.

Perhaps negotiation is the way to peace.

For example, why did a western leader like the former U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, when he was still in office, influence Volodymyr Zelenskyy to drop the near-approved 15-point peace agreement with Russia back in May of 2022? Johnson sowed doubt in Zelenskyy’s mind over the tentative agreement, claiming that Putin would abuse the agreement, with the implied corollary that the West could push Putin to defeat so long as Ukraine didn’t sign on to the agreement.

Finland’s Prime Minister, and the world’s youngest government leader, Sanna Marin, a darling of liberal feminist discourse on the difficulty of being a “girlboss” in power, stated in veritable hawkish terms at the WEF that, “We do not know when the war will end. But we have to make sure it will end [sic], Ukrainians win—there is no other choice… I think other countries are looking very closely at what is happening now in Ukraine, and if Russia would win, then it would send a message that you can invade another country, you can attack another country, and you can gain from that.”

What does win mean here for both Russia and Ukraine? It sounds as if any peace negotiation with Putin is Russia “winning,” and only Ukraine and NATO defeating Putin’s entire army is a “victory” for Ukraine. Marin’s statement echoes the kind of dog whistling and global factionalism that Canada’s Deputy Minister, Chrystia Freeland put to use when asked by a member of the African Development Bank about Western funds being diverted from supporting Africa to the war effort, in which she replied that democracy can only be defended if people are “willing to die for it,” a lesson which Zelenskyy “understood from day one.”

Canada has already dispersed $2 billion since October to Ukraine with billions more to come in throughout the year. While I don’t object to helping the Ukrainians with funding and even weaponry when peace doesn’t seem to be an option, when Western leaders are spinning the funding of the war as a necessary procedure to protect global democracy against the autocratic east when Russia is a weak kleptocracy, it becomes hard to see the rationality of immense spending on the war. Especially when, in Canada, we’re seeing food banks struggling with low resources during this current economic downturn.

It’s not a matter of obscuring Russia’s supreme act of international crime, it’s a matter of negotiating a solution so that Putin’s dominion on raw resource exports slowly fades out — as it is already— along with his regime, Lord willing, instead of the possibility of nuclear fallout.

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Chibi-Robo: Nintendo’s strange, charming and underappreciated hidden gem 

I’m willing to bet that you haven’t played Chibi-Robo. 

Dating apps are the way of the future, and that absolutely sucks 

Dating apps are set to dominate the future of finding love, and I couldn’t be unhappier about it. 

Dissecting the embarrassing Trump-Vance meeting with Zelenskyy 

On Feb. 28, U.S. President Donald Trump met with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to discuss strategies for dealing with the Russo-Ukrainian War that has ravaged the streets of Ukraine since the Russian invasion over three years ago. What ensued can’t simply be described as a failed negotiation — the meeting put the embarrassing ineptitude of the Trump administration on display for the whole world to see. 

Diving into the subreddit that hates Taylor Swift 

The behaviour of the Reddit community r/travisandtaylor goes far beyond fair criticism of Taylor Swift — it’s devolved into full-on hating for the sake of hating, with a dash of misogyny. 

“The Giving Tree” isn’t as bad as people say 

The Giving Tree has faced a lot of rightful criticism over the years, but the book is still a very important piece of literature. 

There’s nothing wrong with Shrek 5’s new look 

The teaser for Shrek 5 might use a different visual design for the franchise’s characters than what fans are used to, but the public backlash isn’t warranted. 

Trump is using tariffs to assert power, not to increase Canadian border security 

Don’t be fooled by the false pretenses of punishing a lack of border security behind Trump’s tariffs on Canadian industries; his trade wars are simply an expression of his desire to exert economic power onto other nations to see if he can bully them around. 

Who is the iPhone 16e actually meant for? 

Cost-effective purchasers would be wise to avoid Apple’s new “budget” iPhone 16e.