Sunday, December 22, 2024
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

When it comes to virtue signalling, sharing isn’t caring

|
|

In most cases, people who take part in online trends intended to fight hate are more concerned with making themselves feel righteous than making any sort of meaningful difference. 

After the murder of George Floyd in May of 2020, there were mass protests, memorials and condemnations across the world. The murder reinvigorated the Black Lives Matter movement and became a major topic of public discussion, creating widespread conversation over the inequalities faced by Black Americans on a daily basis.  

In the following days, social media users banded together, deciding to use their massive collective power to make a difference. Well, at least, that was the plan. 

On June 2, 2020, millions of Instagram users posted black squares to their accounts, flooding the average user’s feed with the hashtag #BlackoutTuesday. The online “protest” was meant to effectively shut down the platform’s regular usage for a day. Many users would post a black square, put the trending hashtag in the caption and move on with their day. 

Unfortunately, as we have since discovered, a bunch of people posting literally nothing on their social media pages before returning to normal the next day doesn’t seem to have much of an impact on racial disparities, racist police brutality and more casual forms of everyday racism. 

What was the expectation here? Was this some sort of attempt to legitimately combat racism? Was it supposed to make an impact on the treatment of Black individuals? Or, perhaps it was an effort to spread awareness or resources on the Black Lives Matter movement? 

In truth, it was none of these things, regardless of what anyone might claim. Posting a black square on Blackout Tuesday was simply an incredibly easy and thoughtless way to feel as though you’ve made some sort of impact or statement. The “protest” wasn’t concerned with making any sort of valuable difference, it was a display of self-righteousness meant to make you feel like a good person without putting in any effort. 

In fact, it can be argued that those who took part in this trend actually hurt the Black Lives Matter movement, since the #BLM and #BlackLivesMatter hashtags became clogged with empty, black squares rather than actual resources to help those searching for information. 

So, to those who blacked out their social media accounts, congratulations; do you feel like you’ve made a meaningful difference? 

This is the act of virtue signalling: the public display of good intentions to make yourself look or feel like a good person without anything of substantive value to back up your displays. 

Anyone with an Instagram account and thirty seconds of free time can partake in virtue signalling. The act is mindless, yet the belief that “I’m a good person for doing this” is real. It takes someone who actually cares about a movement to attend a physical protest, make a donation to a cause or display any level of sincerity through true action. 

It doesn’t end with black squares, though. Mindlessly reposting resources to Instagram stories is often another form of virtue signalling. While it might seem like people are trying to share valuable resources, many are just looking for an easy way to demonstrate solidarity without truly caring about the subject matter much at all. 

Those who posted a black square for Blackout Tuesday or reposted some pre-created templates on their Instagram story as the fullest extent of their effort to “show solidarity” should know that they haven’t supported the Black Lives Matter movement in any valuable way. Instead, they’ve simply contributed to one of the most lazy, arrogant and embarrassing social media trends to exist over the last decade. 

Of course, not everyone has this mentality, and some people are out there fighting for legitimate change. The same cannot be said for individuals who upload a social media post and call it a day. For many, lazy social media posts or changed profile pictures are the only support they’re willing to show. Those individuals should realize the lack of value they are bringing to these important conversations. 

Perhaps some feel that they’ve shared enough resources or have publicly conveyed a strong enough stance that this couldn’t possibly apply to them. I invite those individuals to reflect upon their own actions throughout major events and ask themselves whether they’ve really done their part to create an impact in the world.  

It is only once we end the collective will to act solely for self-benefit that we can move closer to making the world a brighter place for all. 

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Taylor Swift doesn’t owe Toronto anything 

Going home between concerts in Toronto doesn’t make Taylor Swift a bad person.  

Goodbye glasses, hello LASIK MD! 

My experience with LASIK MD corrective eye surgery has truly been eye-opening, and I cannot recommend it enough. 

Why “Elden Ring: Shadow of the Erdtree” shouldn’t have been nominated for Game of the Year 

Elden Ring: Shadow of the Erdtree should not have been nominated for Game of the Year (GotY) at The Game Awards. 

Public displays of affection: keep it to yourself 

When you’re in public with your significant other, please don’t reach a level of intimacy that makes others uncomfortable. 

Something needs to be done about downtown St. Catharines 

St. Catharines is becoming more violent, and the recent downtown shooting proves that something needs to be done about it. 

Let’s leave “Do They Know It’s Christmas?” in 2024 

On the heels of its 40th anniversary, it’s time to ditch “Do They Know It’s Christmas?”  

Coca-Cola’s new A.I. Christmas ad is an attack on artists 

Coca-Cola has found themselves in a controversy over their recently released A.I.-generated Christmas advertisement, and they deserve every bit of backlash they’ve received. 

Should we forgive Marques Brownlee? 

The prominent tech YouTuber Marques Brownlee is in a controversy after it was discovered that he drove much higher than the speed limit in a recent video showing off his Lamborghini. After his long, respectable career as a reputably ethical tech journalist, it’s probably best that we forgive Brownlee — but that doesn’t mean we should forget what he’s done.