Tuesday, February 24, 2026
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

When it comes to virtue signalling, sharing isn’t caring

|
|

In most cases, people who take part in online trends intended to fight hate are more concerned with making themselves feel righteous than making any sort of meaningful difference. 

After the murder of George Floyd in May of 2020, there were mass protests, memorials and condemnations across the world. The murder reinvigorated the Black Lives Matter movement and became a major topic of public discussion, creating widespread conversation over the inequalities faced by Black Americans on a daily basis.  

In the following days, social media users banded together, deciding to use their massive collective power to make a difference. Well, at least, that was the plan. 

On June 2, 2020, millions of Instagram users posted black squares to their accounts, flooding the average user’s feed with the hashtag #BlackoutTuesday. The online “protest” was meant to effectively shut down the platform’s regular usage for a day. Many users would post a black square, put the trending hashtag in the caption and move on with their day. 

Unfortunately, as we have since discovered, a bunch of people posting literally nothing on their social media pages before returning to normal the next day doesn’t seem to have much of an impact on racial disparities, racist police brutality and more casual forms of everyday racism. 

What was the expectation here? Was this some sort of attempt to legitimately combat racism? Was it supposed to make an impact on the treatment of Black individuals? Or, perhaps it was an effort to spread awareness or resources on the Black Lives Matter movement? 

In truth, it was none of these things, regardless of what anyone might claim. Posting a black square on Blackout Tuesday was simply an incredibly easy and thoughtless way to feel as though you’ve made some sort of impact or statement. The “protest” wasn’t concerned with making any sort of valuable difference, it was a display of self-righteousness meant to make you feel like a good person without putting in any effort. 

In fact, it can be argued that those who took part in this trend actually hurt the Black Lives Matter movement, since the #BLM and #BlackLivesMatter hashtags became clogged with empty, black squares rather than actual resources to help those searching for information. 

So, to those who blacked out their social media accounts, congratulations; do you feel like you’ve made a meaningful difference? 

This is the act of virtue signalling: the public display of good intentions to make yourself look or feel like a good person without anything of substantive value to back up your displays. 

Anyone with an Instagram account and thirty seconds of free time can partake in virtue signalling. The act is mindless, yet the belief that “I’m a good person for doing this” is real. It takes someone who actually cares about a movement to attend a physical protest, make a donation to a cause or display any level of sincerity through true action. 

It doesn’t end with black squares, though. Mindlessly reposting resources to Instagram stories is often another form of virtue signalling. While it might seem like people are trying to share valuable resources, many are just looking for an easy way to demonstrate solidarity without truly caring about the subject matter much at all. 

Those who posted a black square for Blackout Tuesday or reposted some pre-created templates on their Instagram story as the fullest extent of their effort to “show solidarity” should know that they haven’t supported the Black Lives Matter movement in any valuable way. Instead, they’ve simply contributed to one of the most lazy, arrogant and embarrassing social media trends to exist over the last decade. 

Of course, not everyone has this mentality, and some people are out there fighting for legitimate change. The same cannot be said for individuals who upload a social media post and call it a day. For many, lazy social media posts or changed profile pictures are the only support they’re willing to show. Those individuals should realize the lack of value they are bringing to these important conversations. 

Perhaps some feel that they’ve shared enough resources or have publicly conveyed a strong enough stance that this couldn’t possibly apply to them. I invite those individuals to reflect upon their own actions throughout major events and ask themselves whether they’ve really done their part to create an impact in the world.  

It is only once we end the collective will to act solely for self-benefit that we can move closer to making the world a brighter place for all. 

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Social media has an alt-right pipeline problem, and women are its newest target 

Trends that urge women to step into their “divine feminine energy,” consume their way into a “clean girl aesthetic” and blame small mistakes on the fact they are “just a girl” are not products of neutral shifts in our algorithms. The differing frames women have been forced into online indicate subtle dog whistles to alt-right ideologies, ultimately functioning to naturalize conservatism, traditional gender roles and regressive choice feminism. 

The loneliness epidemic: a Gen-Z moral crisis, or a product of intimacy without dependency? 

If you’ve ever scrolled through social media, sat through a family dinner or had to endure a ‘situationship,’ surely you have been exposed to the common diagnosis of modern dating as a moral failure. It’s always the same arguments: the newer generation is impatient, nobody wants to put in the work, everyone is incapable of commitment and they’re all addicted to novelty. 

The presentation of technology and its inevitability  

For the first two decades of the 21st century, technology advanced at breakneck speed. Its rapid development often left sacrificed accountability, with tech being allowed to interfere with institutions like democracy, personal rights, privacy and ownership. 

The NHL is homophobic and the use of “Heated Rivalry” in their promotion doesn’t change that 

Piggybacking off the popularity of Crave’s new hit hockey show, Heated Rivalry, doesn’t make the NHL any less homophobic

Brock University’s Concurrent Education program is exhausting its students before they get the chance to become educators 

The Concurrent Education program at Brock University is unnecessarily difficult and ridiculously expensive, causing future educators to experience complete burnout before they even have a chance to reach the classroom. 

Should you do a moot court on a whim? 

On Jan. 24, on a frigid morning during a cold snap and with just four hours of sleep, I embarked at 7:40 a.m. to meet my partner in crime, Wenyang Ming, for my first mock moot court trial.  

A good rom-com shouldn’t be the exception, but the rule 

The rom-coms of today don’t just disappoint — they feel out of touch.

Editorial: Feelings over Trump’s military intervention in Venezuela are contrasting but not contradictory 

The response to the United States’ capture of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro displays an unusual juxtaposition: many Americans are upset at U.S. President Donald Trump for his unannounced military intervention while, on the contrary, many Venezuelans — namely those living within the U.S. — have met the news with widespread celebration.