Sunday, February 22, 2026
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Why “Elden Ring: Shadow of the Erdtree” shouldn’t have been nominated for Game of the Year 

|
|

Elden Ring: Shadow of the Erdtree should not have been nominated for Game of the Year (GotY) at The Game Awards. 

Let’s get something out of the way: I’m not saying that Shadow of the Erdtree isn’t a quality experience or that its developers at FromSoftware aren’t deserving of recognition. As someone who’s not played the content myself, I can’t say whether it’s something I would personally enjoy, but all the reception I’ve heard online has been overwhelmingly positive

No, the quality of the product isn’t the issue here. The problem is that Shadow of the Erdtree isn’t a standalone game; rather, it’s a paid expansion in the form of DLC for the already existing Elden Ring, which won Game of the Year in 2022. 

That’s right — one of the six nominees for Game of the Year isn’t even a game. 

This is a baffling decision by the voting jury. How they could categorize an expansion — which requires the player to already own the Elden Ring base game and progress to a certain point in the game before accessing the new content — is beyond me. This would be like nominating those short Pixar movies that precede major films as “movie of the year.” Sure, it might be fantastic content, but it’s not an independent experience that should be directly compared to standalone movies. 

If this were a sequel or spin-off to Elden Ring that could be purchased on its own, this wouldn’t be a problem. The concern isn’t that it exists within the world of Elden Ring, the concern is that Shadow of the Erdtree is categorically not an actual game. 

This is also upsetting because this DLC has now filled the spot of a GotY nomination that could have been saved for another developer’s standalone product. We might never know what it is, but there’s a game out there that earned seventh place in the jury vote for this year’s nominees, and it won’t get its recognition as a Game of the Year nominee because a paid expansion took its place. 

The Game Awards are now defending this decision in a FAQ posted on their website: 

“The Game Awards aims to recognize the best creative and technical work each year, irrespective of the format of that content’s release. Expansion packs, new game seasons, DLCs, remakes and remasters are eligible in all categories, if the jury deems the new creative and technical work to be worthy of a nomination. Factors such as the newness of the content and its price/value should be taken into consideration.” 

It’s true that Shadow of the Erdtree is an impressive feat that’s garnered plenty of positive reception. It’s also true that it’s quite substantial in size, taking just over 25 hours for the average player to complete the new content. In fact, that’s longer than some standalone games in their entirety, so it’s quite impressive for a DLC offering. 

But at the end of the day, the amount of content and its quality doesn’t matter. Game of the Year nominations should be reserved for games, and it’s disturbing that an expansion has been nominated in place of an actual standalone product. 

This begs the obvious question: Why don’t The Game Awards simply create a new category dedicated to the best DLC of the year? The award show already has 29 categories for awards this year — best multiplayer, best art direction and best audio design to name a few — so creating a new category dedicated to paid expansions seems like a no-brainer. This could actually be a very interesting category, with more and more developers releasing DLC for their games in recent years, and would give those teams the rightful recognition they deserve without impeding on the territory of the coveted Game of the Year award. It’s not that DLC should never be considered for an award, it’s just that they should be in a distinct category separate from standalone releases. 

It’s hard not to feel a little sorry for the development team at FromSoftware throughout this controversy. As more and more critics object to Shadow of the Erdtree’s inclusion as a GotY nominee, it might feel like people are trying to belittle their accomplishments by saying it shouldn’t have been nominated. 

The difference is that no one’s saying Shadow of the Erdtree didn’t deserve to be nominated — it simply shouldn’t have qualified in the first place. Many critics agree that the expansion is a phenomenal piece of content that deserves recognition, but it’s wrong to place it in a category where it simply doesn’t belong.  

None of this is FromSoftware’s fault. All they did was make content so amazing that it apparently caused the voting committee to question the definition of a “game.” It’s just a shame that they’ve become caught in the middle of all this as a result. 

The real perpetrators here are The Game Awards’ voting committee, who seem to have forgotten what a “game” is. If these are the most trusted and distinguished critics within the gaming journalism industry, I have to question what kind of people we’re allowing to make these decisions. 

No, Elden Ring: Shadow of the Erdtree should not be nominated for Game of the Year. It’s a beloved piece of content, but Game of the Year should be reserved for the type of product that the category is named after: games. 

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Social media has an alt-right pipeline problem, and women are its newest target 

Trends that urge women to step into their “divine feminine energy,” consume their way into a “clean girl aesthetic” and blame small mistakes on the fact they are “just a girl” are not products of neutral shifts in our algorithms. The differing frames women have been forced into online indicate subtle dog whistles to alt-right ideologies, ultimately functioning to naturalize conservatism, traditional gender roles and regressive choice feminism. 

The loneliness epidemic: a Gen-Z moral crisis, or a product of intimacy without dependency? 

If you’ve ever scrolled through social media, sat through a family dinner or had to endure a ‘situationship,’ surely you have been exposed to the common diagnosis of modern dating as a moral failure. It’s always the same arguments: the newer generation is impatient, nobody wants to put in the work, everyone is incapable of commitment and they’re all addicted to novelty. 

The presentation of technology and its inevitability  

For the first two decades of the 21st century, technology advanced at breakneck speed. Its rapid development often left sacrificed accountability, with tech being allowed to interfere with institutions like democracy, personal rights, privacy and ownership. 

The NHL is homophobic and the use of “Heated Rivalry” in their promotion doesn’t change that 

Piggybacking off the popularity of Crave’s new hit hockey show, Heated Rivalry, doesn’t make the NHL any less homophobic

Brock University’s Concurrent Education program is exhausting its students before they get the chance to become educators 

The Concurrent Education program at Brock University is unnecessarily difficult and ridiculously expensive, causing future educators to experience complete burnout before they even have a chance to reach the classroom. 

Should you do a moot court on a whim? 

On Jan. 24, on a frigid morning during a cold snap and with just four hours of sleep, I embarked at 7:40 a.m. to meet my partner in crime, Wenyang Ming, for my first mock moot court trial.  

A good rom-com shouldn’t be the exception, but the rule 

The rom-coms of today don’t just disappoint — they feel out of touch.

Editorial: Feelings over Trump’s military intervention in Venezuela are contrasting but not contradictory 

The response to the United States’ capture of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro displays an unusual juxtaposition: many Americans are upset at U.S. President Donald Trump for his unannounced military intervention while, on the contrary, many Venezuelans — namely those living within the U.S. — have met the news with widespread celebration.