Friday, November 21, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

1989 (Taylor’s Version): revisiting Taylor Swift’s crown jewel record

|
|

Rating: 4/5 

Taylor Swift’s 1989 (Taylor’s Version) cracks the shrewd, cool-girl persona embodied by Swift in 1989, letting a light of vulnerability and ache contextualize each song. 

1989 (Taylor’s Version) marks Swift’s fourth go at re-recording her previous albums, following the release of Speak Now (Taylor’s Version) in July. The eagerness to reclaim the work from Swift’s first six albums stems from a decision by her previous label, Big Machine Records, to sell the master recordings without Swift’s consent. This sparked a commitment on Swift’s behalf to reclaim the master recording rights to her past catalogue in the form of re-mastered recordings, now known as Taylor’s Version.  

The public reception to Swift’s re-recordings thus far has been overwhelmingly positive, embracing her as a hegemonic force in pop music and culture. Seeing as 1989 largely cemented Swift as a critically acclaimed pop idol, the re-recording had great expectations to meet. 

1989 (Taylor’s Version) mostly manages to capture the essence of pop perfection established by Swift’s crown jewel, 1989. That said, a trained Swiftie ear may notice incongruences in the mixes or instrumentation that distinguish 1989 (Taylor’s Version) from the original record, 1989

While some songs stood out because of flaws in mixing and production, others were able to shine brighter than ever before. Some flawed attempts to capture the essence of the original tracks include hit songs such as “Style” and the album opener, “Welcome to New York”. Weirdly enough, the problem with both re-mastered versions is not one of unhinged creative liberties taken, but rather an issue of lack of attention to detail. 

For “Style (Taylor’s Version),” the iconic guitar riff that carries the rhythm of the song sounds robotic and plays with a different tonality than the original. Likewise, the synthesizers in the mix fail to reflect the growing energy of the song before it bursts into the chorus.  

In contrast, songs like “I Wish You Would” and “I Know Places” not only stayed close to their original versions but were also invigorated through Swift’s vocal performance and high-quality mixing. In “I Know Places (Taylor’s Version)”, Swift sounds more certain in her vocal performance, granting an engaging listening experience and heightened connection to the message of the song. 

Along with the standard tracks included in 1989, five new tracks “From The Vault” were included in 1989 (Taylor’s Version). Songs “From The Vault” are songs that were written for a particular album yet were scrapped in the original release for one reason or another. When 1989 (Taylor’s Version) was announced, Swift highlighted that the 1989 re-recording was her favourite thus far. 

“To be perfectly honest, this is my most FAVOURITE re-record I’ve ever done because the 5 From The Vault tracks are so insane. I can’t believe they were ever left behind,” said Swift. 

For this instance, Swift dug out “Slut!”, “Say Don’t Go”, “Now That We Don’t Talk”, “Suburban Legends” and “Is It Over Now?” from the 1989 vault. Pleasantly, all vault tracks exemplify genius song-writing abilities and vocal delivery from Swift, but the production often fails at sonically placing the songs within the sound of 1989.  

In tracks such as “Suburban Legends (Taylor’s Version)” and “Now That We Don’t Talk (Taylor’s Version)”, the production and vocal delivery resembles Swift’s work in her most recent record, Midnights, more than it does 1989.  

That said, the real power behind the 1989 vault tracks lies in the world-building aspect of the album. Much of the writing throughout 1989 intentionally shied away from journal-like recounts, focusing more on general tropes and imagery to depict Swift’s stories. Instead, the vault tracks break down the intentionally vague, cool-girl persona in other songs in 1989. For instance, “Slut! (Taylor’s Version)” builds off the more abstract themes in songs like “Out Of The Woods” to recount her difficulties navigating love in the public eye, and the slut-shaming that accompanies it.  

Despite some obvious production flaws across hit songs in 1989 (Taylor’s Version), the re-recording remains reasonably close to its original. If anything, 1989 (Taylor’s Version) has a secret power, and that is all attributed to the genius songwriting present in the vault tracks.  

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Artist spotlight: Del Water Gap 

Indie pop heads and casual listeners alike can find something to love in the music and artistry of Del Water Gap.

Mumford & Sons and Hozier explore “rubber band theory” in their newest collaboration 

Mumford & Sons and Hozier have produced a beautiful new track, treating their fans to a folk collaboration for the ages.

“Everybody Scream”: a call to arms that shakes the soul 

Score: 4/5  Everybody Scream is an album that leaves you speechless. It’s dark and soul crushing yet somehow purifying — a disorienting journey from near death to rebirth.

The “Wicked: For Good” hype machine 

Is it just me, or is Wicked absolutely everywhere? 

Ella Fitzgerald’s classic holiday album “Ella Wishes You A Swinging Christmas” turns 65 this year 

In the 65 years since Ella Fitzgerald released Ella Wishes You A Swinging Christmas, the record has become a holiday classic. 

“Rumours” by Fleetwood Mac: a timeless masterpiece 

When Rumours first hit the shelves on Feb. 4, 1977, it quickly became clear that British-American rock band Fleetwood Mac had created something extraordinary. Nearly half a century later, the album’s blend of emotional honesty and intricate harmonies still resonate with listeners across generations.

The Brock Colouring Kettle Club creates space for mindfulness on campus 

Brock’s Colouring Kettle Club welcomes like-minded people to gather in the name of wellness. 

Apple TV+ is the destination for your next favourite show 

Apple TV+ is a streaming service that doesn’t make a lot of sense on paper, yet it has carved out a place as one of the most forward-thinking studios of the 2020s.