Friday, April 25, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada
Home Blog

Djo flips the script again with his third album “The Crux” 

0

Score: 4/5 

Djo summons new musical directions for his third studio album, a mostly successful venture that capitalizes on the success of the softer sounding “End of Beginning.” 

I’m a recent but hardcore fan of Stranger Things star Joe Keery’s musical persona, Djo, so I was incredibly excited when he announced his third studio album, The Crux, which released on April 4. 

The leadup to this album featured the early releases of “Basic Being Basic” and “Delete Ya,” two laid-back tracks that embody enthusiastic and mournful tones respectively, but harness the same catchy riffs and choruses that made so many great songs on DECIDE — Djo’s second album, which featured the hugely popular “End of Beginning.” 

It was surprising, then, that so much of The Crux features classic-rock influences like Fleetwood Mac and Queen, but it’s understandable. Each of Djo’s albums has harnessed a different energy: Twenty Twenty was particularly psych-rock while DECIDE was electronic, but those albums were connected by a sound that was uniquely “Djo,” and that remains true in The Crux

The album begins with “Lonesome Is A State of Mind,” a track that starts melancholic, reflecting on the repetitive nature of life: “I’ve seen this movie before / I think I’ve heard this song,” Djo sings in a soft voice. This tone quickly bounces into something more hopeful as the instrumentals swell into an upbeat and enthusiastic chorus that retains sadness in the background, a feat accomplished by keening vocals and airy notes: “You’re not lonely / When you’re hanging with yourself.”  

The song sets the tone for the rest of the album: one that will continue to balance hope and mourning with startling deftness and grace. 

“Basic Being Basic” jumps into the fray next, showcasing Djo’s monotonous, bouncing vocals amidst an almost eight-bit, synth instrumental backing, both elements something fans will recall from DECIDE.  

The first chorus establishes a cheerful mood that continues to jump through the rest of the song until the intoxicating and thumping bridge, but the upbeat tone betrays the lyrics, which reflect on how complicated and potentially sad a “basic” life is: 

“Change your body, change your face, curl your hair then make it straight / […] / It’s a flash photograph / What an empty epitaph that is (That’s basic).” 

And finally, if you’ve ignored the lyrics and simply grooved along to the song, the ending hits you in the face with its plain final line, suddenly delivered without tone or musical background: “Yeah, my tight five might get a laugh as is / If that’s funny, [plainly] I’m not funny.” 

Next up is “Link,” the first classic rock song of the album, with electric riffs driving the listener through lyrics about feeling empty after supposedly achieving success and realizing that sometimes, the prescribed path isn’t the one that makes you happy — something I’m sure a lot of soon-to-be graduates can understand. 

The song is a wild success, showcasing Djo’s ability to embody a rock n’ roll timbre adjacent to “Flash Mountain” way back on Twenty Twenty. Djo jives triumphantly here, championing everyone who would stray from the norm: “I said hey! / A link is breaking out of the chain!” 

If you told me “Potion,” the album’s fourth track, was a lost Fleetwood Mac song, I would believe you. The jaunty strings and Djo’s falsetto lyrics detailing his search for a lover “who leaves on the lights” pull at your chest in the best way. Once again, the emotional resonance here is undeniably rich, making for a simple song that hits all the right notes. 

“Delete Ya,” the other previously released song from this album, will resonate most with fans of “End of Beginning.” The content is strikingly similar, dealing with nostalgia and love for a past place and lover that feel impossible to let go of. “Oh God, I wish I could delete ya / ‘Cause nothing can compete with ya,” croons Djo in yet another sombre track that you can’t help but sing and dance along to. 

The song displays just how technically complex Djo’s music has become. His previous two albums contained this same dichotomy, but it feels distilled to perfection in the first half of The Crux, emotional and moody but contagiously sticky. And this time, the bleak ending of “Delete Ya” — “One heart could bleed for the future us / If we were young, but this is done” — leads into another bleak song. 

“Egg” begins with a murky, electronic beat and more of Djo’s low, almost-whispered vocals detailing the speaker’s uncertainty and dissatisfaction: “Don’t you wish you could be somebody else?” 

The whole song is a gradual building-up of pressure, with haunting instrumentals resonating like unsaid horrors lurking beneath the surface until the tension breaks with Djo’s rageful screams mounting into a startling cut.  

But there is no relief in this song: the building tension resumes as twinkling overtures, haunting voices and other instrumentals — including a saxophone in the final seconds — overlap and finally go silent. 

With all that pressure, the next song, “Fly,” provides some soothing relief with its airy, acoustic guitar thrums and breezy vocals. The pain of the previous song is evident here, with a speaker craving to fall back into old comforts after a long, loveless winter: “When will spring come again? I need the bloom,” sings Djo. “Falling back to her / Could be easy to do / But I must fly / Fly away from her.” 

Ultimately, the song embodies a liminal space between life stages, reflected by the psychedelic, echoing instrumentals and the vocals that drift between stanzas. It is another hauntingly beautiful song that ends with a triumphant chord and equally triumphant lyrics: “Wind is at your back now / Carry me away now.” 

Fittingly, the next song begins with a bouncy, upbeat throughline reminiscent of “Mr. Blue Sky.” This is “Charlie’s Garden,” a track that splices bright verses with a nearly biblical, sermon-esque chorus and phone calls voiced by Charlie Heaton, Joe Keery’s co-star on Stranger Things, of all things. 

“Charlie’s Garden” feels like a showcase of ignorant bliss in the face of trouble, with the speaker trapped in a cycle of deferral and empty promises: “That work just won’t do itself / […] / I’ll just wait another day / One more day / In Charlie’s garden.”  

This is an undeniably fun track even before the bright trumpets join the fray, but the phone calls especially — in which Djo is repeatedly set aside in what seems like a professional setting — seem to imply a darker side of the story, which the speaker ignores and fully cuts off at the end of the song. 

It is somewhat strange then, that “Gap Tooth Smile” is the next song. This is a straight-up love song, a punchy, rock n’ roll tune detailing someone falling for the simple features of a woman: “It’s her hair, her style / But I fell in love with her gap-tooth smile.” The song features groovy licks, psychedelic riffs and a whole lot of fun. It may be a little out of place with the rest of the songs, but it’s a great thrill. 

“Golden Line” represents where this album begins to lose steam, in my opinion. The tunes are light, almost angelic, as Djo reflects on how love can lift even the darkest spirits: “The world can be so cruel / But I still trust in love.” On my first listen-through of this album, I began to feel fatigued by this point, but admittedly, I’ve come around a bit more on subsequent listens. It’s a solid entry either way: Djo’s voice is soulful and rich, especially at the track’s end, when it fades perfectly into the next song. 

“Golden Line” flows right into “Back On You,” which begins with a choir hymn before a steady drum beat interrupts the vocals and brings another classic rock beat to the forefront. This is a fun song with a lot to like — groovy licks and layered vocals all around as Djo thanks the friends and family who’ve supported him this far in his journey — embodying angelic rock n’ roll vibes to build to a strong, triumphant finale. 

But there’s still one more song, the denouement-esque “Crux.” This song is a blend of so many sounds we’ve heard in the album, with musical motifs reminiscent of “Charlie’s Garden” and “Back On You” specifically. 

Piano chords and a deep guitar thrum hold “Crux” together as it builds into soft choruses about staying true to yourself and spreading love with your community: “Get back to your heart / But only if you give it back again,” sings Djo. 

It’s a poignant ending to this emotional rollercoaster, satisfying so many dissonant chords from before, but it doesn’t reach the same highs nor does it feel as satisfying as the endings of Twenty Twenty or DECIDE

Overall, while The Crux may not feel like Djo’s most cohesive album from front to back, many of its songs send his musicality to new heights. The beginning of this album, especially, is a powerhouse of poignant and thrilling tracks that have become instant staples of my playlist. This is a musician with a bright future, whose unique sound can stretch into any number of genres, emotions and styles. 

I’m already anticipating his next album, but I’ll be happy with Stranger Things season five in the meantime. 

Don’t worry, you’re not crazy: advice from a soon-to-be Brock graduate 

0

As a soon-to-be graduate, I’ve learned a lot from my time here at Brock. Here are my most important lessons condensed into one article. 

I have a lot of feelings as I write this. There’s relief, of course, that my responsibilities are slowly dwindling as I knock out the final projects of my undergraduate degree, but also melancholy that it’ll be all over soon. 

See, Brock and I have a complicated relationship. It has beaten me down to my lowest lows as I sobbed by the Sir Isaac Brock statue when everything just seemed like too much, but it’s also built me up with some of my greatest achievements, both personally and professionally. It’s been the setting of my transformation from a young, naive kid to someone who feels (mostly) ready to tackle the world. 

With this in mind, I like to think I’ve picked up a few tidbits of knowledge that others should know, particularly if they’re just starting out at Brock. You might call this an early Beginner’s Guide article for next year, a relic that newer students or incoming first-years can find and hopefully learn from (or dismiss, because we all know how first-years are). 

Now, this isn’t intended to be a guidebook, like a “Top Tips to Survive at Brock” or something like that, but I’d like to think it might encourage someone to take risks or get a little bit more out of this major period in your life. 

I mainly just want to tell people to make the most out of their time at Brock. It’s really that simple. Brock University is teeming with possibilities that anyone can just reach out and grab. 

There are hundreds of clubs led by passionate individuals that might just introduce you to a community you didn’t know existed in the real world; if you have a passion that isn’t answered by any pre-existing clubs, make the space yourself. Brock lets you do that. 

In this post-COVID world, there are so many gaps that need to be filled, even four years after the fact. 

There are dozens of jobs you could apply to right here on campus. The Brock Press, for example, is currently hiring (wink wink, nudge nudge) but there are also opportunities at BrockTV, BUSU and within the university institution itself. 

Sometimes professors hire research assistants, even from first-year classes, but you’ll only learn about that if you make connections. These people that you’re going to spend the rest of your undergrad with, your fellow students, roommates and even professors, could be your ticket to the future. You might end up in a career you love thanks to your connections, find a life-long partner or discover a passion you never knew you had. Talk to people — everyone and anyone you meet — and you might be surprised at how many doors open up for you. 

Attending class is important, even if it doesn’t seem that way. Showing up is both the easiest and hardest part, but once you do that, the rest will fall into place. 

That’s not to say your undergrad is going to be a walk in the park; it will be hard, if not just for the classes and assignments then all the other shit you’ll find yourself dealing with. If you’re coming straight from high school, as I did, this degree will represent a complicated time in your life, when you become a young adult and learn about all the new problems that accompany the title. On top of your scholarly responsibilities, you’ll feel pressures from your personal relationships, your career and more. None of that takes a backseat because you need to focus on an essay, unfortunate as it is. 

And gods forbid you decide to pursue graduate studies, which will require you to dedicate an entire year of your life (at least) to simply applying, a process that will overlap with your fourth-year, fall-term responsibilities, and when that’s over, you’ll sit with the pressure of an incoming decision for months, the fate of your future resting on a handful of grad committees at a handful of universities. But I digress. 

The most important thing to remember in the face of all these mounting pressures is that you’re not alone. If you need help, ask for it! There are resources here at Brock that can help you with accommodation needs, personal troubles and more. Most professors will grant you an extension if you ask for it ahead of the due date with an adequate reason, even if that reason is 12 other assignments due on the same day. 

Take care of yourself, seriously. The life of a university student is not easy; sometimes it demands 14-hour days as casually as you might ask for an iced coffee at Tim’s, and it can be easy to fall into bad habits like staying up all night or drinking exorbitant amounts of energy drinks.  

Don’t do this, seriously. Your body and spirit will thank you for it. 

Know that breaks are alright to take, try your best to schedule your school responsibilities ahead of time and, when you inevitably leave your assignments to the last minute, forgive yourself and hunker down. Know yourself and how you work, then go backwards from there. If all else fails, remember that you can ask for help. Nobody, and I mean nobody, can criticize you for that. 

Maybe I’ve scared you away by now, but if you’re still reading this, I think you’re ready for the experience that’s coming. And if you’re a fellow soon-to-be-graduate like me, I hope you’re nodding your head in agreement, reflecting on all the times you haven’t done this. Indeed, I’m currently writing this when I should be winding down for bed. 

But alas, you should do as I say and not as I do. 

Realistically, everyone will go through their own process and learn their own lessons, but if I knew I had to take things into my own hands sooner, I would have opened myself up to a lot more opportunities. Hey, I might’ve even been Editor-in-Chief by now if I’d known about this little joint when I started out, but now the world will never know. 

Instead, I bestow that opportunity to you, should you choose to pursue it, or any other opportunity, for that matter. You have to make your own space here at Brock: others will help you achieve your goals along the journey, but nobody’s going to do it for you (and I don’t mean Odysseus). 

Finally, and I say this with utmost seriousness, you have to know if university isn’t right for you. If you give it a solid go, if you really try and it just doesn’t work, that is nothing to be ashamed of. In fact, it might be better for you to drop out and pursue other avenues, like a college program or just hopping into the professional world, before you become burnt out trying to spin your wheels across the same patch of ice over and over again. Sometimes it just doesn’t work out, but that isn’t the end by any means. I have friends who dropped out and they’re doing great now, but what’s important is that they realized university wasn’t right for them. It’s alright not to make it all the way through, because odds are, you weren’t getting what you wanted from it in the first place. 

But if university is the right place for you, and you put in the hard work, the literal sweat and tears an undergraduate degree demands of you, you might just find exactly what you were looking for (or exactly that which you weren’t looking for, but needed to find). I’ll say it again: your time at Brock is what you make of it. 

And despite everything, despite the crazy shit you’ll juggle trying to get your undergraduate degree, remember to enjoy it.  

Remember to savour those late nights with friends or by yourself, those spur-of-the-moment hookups, the parties, your class cohorts, everything. Because before you realize it, you’ll be sitting exactly where I am, wondering where it all went. 

You’ll be able to see just how sweet it was, despite the hardships, because you made it the experience that you needed. 

And if you’ve gotten that far, you can do anything. 

Women’s sports threatened by new research cuts  

0

The intersection of politics and sports took another sharp turn when the Trump administration issued a sweeping directive through Executive Order 14168, removing the terms “female,” gender,” “pregnant” and “LGBTQ+” from all federal research grants. 

Although framed under the guise of “neutrality” and the elimination of “ideological bias,” this move, issued on (date here), has sparked intense criticism from the athletic and academic communities, particularly those engaged in women’s sports. The implications are far-reaching, not only in academic research but also in athlete development, injury prevention and health equity. By targeting language central to the study of sex-based differences, the administration has not only disrupted existing research but created a chilling effect that could severely undermine the future of evidence-based support for women in sports. 

This fallout has been immediate. Universities and research institutions are now scrambling to reword grant applications or risk the loss of federal funding. In several high-profile cases, grants dedicated to the study of injury patterns unique to female athletes — such as ACL tears, which occur two to six times more frequently in women than in men — have been revoked. Researchers at Stanford and the University of North Carolina confirmed that proposals exploring the menstrual cycle’s impact on athletic performance were pulled for review, with some terminated outright. 

These studies, already vastly underrepresented in sports science, provide foundational data that inform everything from training schedules to recovery protocols. Their loss means fewer tools for coaches, trainers and athletes to mitigate risk and enhance performance. It’s a significant step backward in a field already marked by gender imbalance. In 2023, just eight per cent of all sports science research focused exclusively on women, according to a report by the British Journal of Sports Medicine. With this new order, even that sliver of progress is under severe threat.  

The research purge has prompted international concern. The United States was, until now, a leader in sex-differentiated sports science. Countries like Australia and the United Kingdom, both of which have recently launched multi-million-dollar initiatives to support female athletes, have condemned the U.S. directive. In March, the Global Alliance for Female Athletes — a coalition of sports researchers and policy advocates from over 10 countries — issued a joint statement decrying the decision as a direct assault on the advancement of a safe, equitable and high-performing athletic environment for women.  

Beyond injury prevention, the loss of sex-specific research also threatens progress in understanding female specific performance metrics, energy availability and mental health support. Female bodies are not simply smaller versions of male bodies; they respond differently to training, nutrition and recovery. Removing the word “female” from grant language doesn’t make these differences disappear — it makes them invisible to the common eye. 

Amid this controversy, Nike released one of the most pointed advertisements in its history. Debuting during the 2025 Super Bowl, the ad, titled “So Win,” is a powerful rebuttal to the political climate. Featuring a sequence of elite female athletes, the commercial intercuts archival footage of their setbacks and recoveries and reflects on the disparities of women athletes, both systemically and in media coverage. At its climax, the ad fixates on how women are told they can’t be a certain way, but should strive for success anyway: “Whatever you do, you can’t win… So win!” 

Although Nike has faced criticism in the past for its treatment of women, including backlash over its maternity policies, this campaign marks a return to its activist marketing roots. The ad is bold, unapologetic and aimed squarely at policies threatening to silence women’s stories.  

The ad struck a cultural nerve with the masses, as social media exploded with praise from athletes and advocates. The truth is that women’s sports have always been political, because women have always had to fight for legitimacy in spaces built without them in mind.  

The Trump administration’s decision is not about semantics. It compromises not only scientific integrity but athlete safety. For collegiate programs, where Title IX compliance is already under scrutiny, this creates further disparity. Athletic departments rely on federally funded research to develop training protocols, manage athlete health and allocate resources. Without clarity on needs specific to female bodies, these systems risk becoming dangerously misaligned with reality.  

What’s especially troubling is that this decision comes amid a historic surge in interest and investment in women’s sports. The WNBA just added its 13th franchise, NCAA women’s basketball broke viewership records during March Madness and sponsorship deals for women’s league athletes are climbing. Yet, while the commercial appeal of women’s sports grows, the infrastructure to support them scientifically is being dismantled. Women’s empowerment is impossible if you strip away the research that sustains it.  

By the numbers: Alex Ovechkin breaks Wayne Gretzky’s NHL goal-scoring record 

0

The chase is over: Alex Ovechkin has broken Wayne Gretzky’s 31-year NHL regular season goal-scoring record. 

From his patented spot on the left face-off circle, Ovechkin did the improbable, scoring his record-breaking 895th career goal against the New York Islanders on April 6 to stand alone at the top.  

With 895 (and counting) goals scored during his 20-year career, here is a breakdown of Ovechkin’s goal statistics and its historical significance. 

1,487 It may have been a coincidence or it may have been a sign, but it took Ovechkin 1,487 games to reach his 895th goal, which was the same number of games Gretzky played in during his career when he totalled 894 career goals. Adding to the prognostication, Gretzky scored his 894th and final career goal against the New York Islanders — the team that Ovi scored 895 against — adding to the ties between the two all-time greats. 

183 Ovechkin has scored his 895 career goals against 183 goaltenders, which is an NHL record. He has beaten future Hall of Famer Marc-Andre Fleury the most, scoring 28 goals in 47 games against him, while his milestone goal on April 6 was the first he scored against his fellow countryman, Ilya Sorokin. There have also been 28 goalies whom Ovechkin has recorded a shot against but hasn’t scored on, with Vitek Vanecek making the most saves (19) without allowing a goal to Ovechkin. 

565 During his career, Ovechkin has scored 565 even-strength goals, which ranks third overall in NHL history. His first career even-strength goal came in his NHL debut on October 5, 2005, against the Columbus Blue Jackets when he recorded a pair of goals in Washington’s 3-2 home victory. Ovi is now only two even-strength goals away from leaping above Gordie Howe for second all-time at the time of writing and is 53 away from passing Wayne Gretzky for first in that category. 

325 One of the most prolific and dangerous power-play snipers, Ovechkin is the NHL’s all-time leader in power-play goals with 325. Known for making a living at the left face-off circle on the man advantage, Ovechkin notched his first power-play marker in his NHL debut on October 5, 2005, and hasn’t looked back since. The 39-year-old has recorded double-digit power-play goal years in 18 of his 20 seasons in the NHL while scoring 20 or more power-play goals in four seasons with 25 in 2014-15 being his single-season career-high. 

136 Adding to his potent arsenal, Ovechkin has also showcased his clutch gene, scoring an NHL all-time high 136 game-winning goals throughout his career. Ovechkin’s first career game-winning goal came in his fourth NHL game on November 10, 2005, when he buried a third period power-play goal to lead the Capitals to the 3-2 victory against the New York Rangers. He has recorded a career-high 11 game-winning goal seasons three times, occurring in the 2007-08, 2010-11 and 2014-15 seasons. 

32 To break a goal-scoring record, goals need to come in bunches, and Ovechkin did just that as he’s registered 32 career hat-tricks, which is the fifth most all-time. His first career hat trick came on January 13, 2006, scoring all three Capitals goals against the Anaheim Ducks in a 3-2 overtime victory. The Ducks are just one of 20 NHL teams whom Ovechkin has scored a hat trick against, which is tied with Brett Hull for the most teams recording a hat trick against in NHL history. 

14 Longevity also plays a massive role in reaching a goal-scoring milestone, and Ovechkin has shown his knack for scoring throughout his entire 20-year career. “The Great 8,” as he is commonly referred to, has tallied 14 40-goal campaigns, which is the most in NHL history. His first 40-goal season came in his rookie year when he recorded 52 goals, resulting in Ovi winning the Calder Memorial Trophy as the league’s top rookie. Ovechkin’s most recent 40-goal season was in fact this season, having scored 44 goals in 65 games. 

65 Ovechkin’s best season on a goal-scoring front was in 2007-08, when he recorded a career-high 65 goals — his only season where he passed the 60-goal plateau. That season, Ovi scored 22 power-play goals, 11 game-winning goals and two overtime goals, indicating his impact on team success. He is one of only five players to score 60 or more goals in a single season in the 21st century, joining an exclusive list of Steven Stamkos, Connor McDavid, David Pastrnak and Auston Matthews (twice).  

9 As a result of his high-scoring seasons, Ovechkin has won the Maurice “Rocket” Richars Trophy as the NHL’s regular season goal scoring leader nine times during his 20 seasons. Ovechkin first won the award in 2007-08, when he recorded his career-high 65 goals, and his most recent Rocket Trophy was captured in the 2019-20 season, when he scored 48 goals in a COVID-shortened 68 games. Due to his goal-scoring success, Ovi has been awarded the Hart Memorial Trophy as the league’s MVP three times (2007-08, 2008-09 and 2012-13) and has won the Ted Lindsay Award as the NHL’s most outstanding player on three separate occasions (2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10). 

— 

With the chase now in the rear-view mirror, Ovechkin has his eyes set on 1,000 career goals, which would further cement him as the greatest goal scorer of all time if he can accomplish that feat. 

For more information and statistics on Alex Ovechkin, visit nhl.com. 

Palestinian support group suspended at McMaster for claims of antisemitism 

0

McMaster University suspended the school’s Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights organization pending an investigation into the club, and the founder of the Brock club has spoken up in response. 

Across the world, there has been a growing movement to get academic institutions to divest from companies with ties to Israel in response to the staggering violence in Gaza. At the time of writing, more than 50,800 Palestinians are confirmed dead and over 115,600 are wounded, with thousands more missing under the rubble. 

Several U.S. colleges including Brandeis University, Columbia University and The George Washington University have had many problems with SPHR’s American equivalent, Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) for similar misconduct. 

The SPHR group and its delegates have hosted multiple anti-Israel rallies on several campuses, especially since the October 2023 massacre. 

Jerusalem Post reporter Gil Troy visited Jewish schools in Vancouver, Ottawa, Toronto and Montreal to speak with students about how they were being affected by the rise of antisemitism due to Israel’s actions. He spoke in Jewish day schools to sixth and twelfth graders, on campus and in Hillels. “No Jewish professor is okay, no Jewish student is okay, we’re not okay,” said one professor. Troy heard of teachers imposing assignments in class about how “Israelis are savages” and of history teachers “claiming that just as racist White women invented stories about Blacks raping them in America’s South, Jewish women made up stories about Palestinians raping them on October 7.” Many students in elementary schools reported enduring Nazi jokes and constant hatred. 

Montreal’s McGill University has especially seen rising tensions on their campus. Shortly after the Israel-Hamas war began, McGill asked their SPHR branch to stop using the school’s name over posts on social media that described the terror group’s attack against Israel as “heroic.”  

A McGill spokesperson denounced the celebration of acts of terror and violence and said their SPHR branch operates independently from McGill. McGill SPHR accused the university of being “ complicit in upholding the apartheid regime of Israel.” During a protest on July 7, 2024, tear gas was used on a crowd of pro-Palestinian activists for breaking and entering as well as interfering with police officers. Montreal police also said protestors threw objects and vandalized the exterior of the administration building. 

McMaster University has seen similarly rising tensions, specifically when a pro-Palestinian encampment was set up on May 5, 2024 on university property. Students demanded the university divest from companies they say have ties to Israel and the conflict in Gaza. The student-led encampment lasted two-and-a-half weeks before the school and protestors “agreed on terms.” 

McMaster agreed to new commitments including the creation of an open process to allow questions about the school’s investments and making up to $200,000 available to support qualified Palestinian academics and students under the school’s Scholars-at-Risk Program and Students-at-Risk Bursary. 

On August 26, 2024, three McMaster students with connections to the university’s SPHR brank were banned from campus activities after they participated in a pro-Palestinian protest earlier in the year. The university said it reserved the right to ban people who pose a “risk,” but the Canadian Union of Public Employees said they will “fight for the right to protest” and expect to see the three students, all elected leaders with the union, back on campus soon. If they are found on the grounds they are currently banned from, policy states “they will be subject to a charge by Security Services under the Trespass to Property Act.” 

In January 2025, McMaster University in Hamilton suspended the Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR) group pending an investigation “into their repeated misconduct.” 

The group is accused of antisemitic behaviour and incitement on the campus, which includes glorifying the horrors of October 7

Brock University has officially taken a neutral stance on the Palestine-Israel conflict. In November of last year, an event titled “Understanding the Palestinian Struggle” was shut down by Brock due to worries of spreading antisemitism brought to light by the club Chabad

The founder and club executive of SPHR at Brock and BUSU Board Member Mohiz Imitiaz contacted The Brock Press to share his thoughts. 

Imitiaz told The Brock Press that Islamic Relief Brock, a student-led charity organization rooted in compassion and justice, stands in solidarity with SPHR and all those who advocate for Palestinian human rights. 

“The suspension of SPHR at McMaster is not just an attack on a student group,” said Imitiaz. “It is a threat to every organization that seeks to do good. We call for the protection of all groups working toward justice for the oppressed and acting in defence of human rights everywhere, in both word and action.” 

Imitiaz also wanted to draw attention to some articles published decades ago in The Brock Press to show BUSU’s support and advocacy for student actions, as well as the ongoing conversation on Palestinian human rights. These are the ones Imitiaz listed: 

In 1969, BUSU joined the country-wide protest regarding the war in Vietnam. 

  • In 1972, BUSU planned to boycott Kraft products, and about 400 students from across Ontario marched on the Ontario Legislature Building on Nov. 21 to protest the hike in tuition prices. 
  • In 1973, in an unprecedented show of support, more than 1,300 Brock students attended a student union meeting on January 17 to vote in support of a university-wide moratorium. This issue shows a photo of “packed students union representing student political will for advocacy.” 
  • In 1980, BUSU President Mike O’Bright represented Brock at the Queen’s Park underfunding protest with 3,000 students. 
  • In 1982, a Palestinian information officer spoke to local press at Brock University about the Israel and Palestine conflict. 
  • In 1988, BUSU paid for students’ bus ride to Queen’s Park to protest underfunding. 

Imitiaz also supplied this statement from “Gabriel Spokesperson for 905,” which may be in reference to the group 905palestine, a Niagara Palestine Coalition. 

McMaster has taken the side of scholasticide and oppression. Suppressing Palestinian systems of knowledge and organizing on one hand but then offering money on the other is a blatant disregard for academic norms and principles. Academic institutions are not banks or trading guilds. We are institutions of knowledge. If an institution of knowledge is unable to cut ties with supremacist ideologies — like Zionism — that aim to eliminate peoples and systems of knowledge, they doom themselves to stagnation and irrelevance. You can’t claim to be building education if you tacitly support its destruction. 

It is impossible for Brock to be neutral in this situation. Either this institution condemns the scholasticide (destruction in whole or in part the educational system) in Palestine or, by its silence, accepts that it’s okay to destroy universities. Either it condemns the suppression of Palestine solidarity or, by its silence, attempts to profit from the chilling effect it has caused. “Attempts” being the key word here. The students will not be silenced, and if they aren’t given “proper channels,” then the institutions in question are fully responsible for the natural consequences of oppression. 

–– 

The suspension of the Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR) group at McMaster University has sparked broader conversations about academic freedom, student activism, and the limits of protest on university campuses. While the university cited repeated misconduct and antisemitic rhetoric as grounds for the suspension, supporters argue that such actions suppress advocacy for Palestinian human rights and academic expression. 

Figures like Mohiz Imitiaz and groups such as 905palestine view the suspension as part of a larger trend of silencing pro-Palestinian voices under the guise of maintaining campus safety. They point to a long history of student activism at institutions like Brock to emphasize the importance of continuing that legacy today. 

As the investigation into SPHR at McMaster unfolds, it highlights the ongoing tension between ensuring respectful discourse and preserving the right to protest. With universities across Canada grappling with similar issues, the outcome at McMaster could set a precedent for how institutions respond to political activism amid global conflict. 

An overview of the federal election campaigns so far 

0

As the federal election draws nearer, parties are making their stances on vital issues clear. 

Campaigning for the 2025 federal election began far before Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that Canada’s federal election would be taking place months earlier, on April 28, instead of its planned timing for fall of 2025. As such, in the midst of this politically tense moment, the federal election has centred around a few key issues that have become imperative to campaigning. 

Here is where each party stands on the most pressing issues in Canada. 

Canada-U.S. relations 

According to Carney, Canada’s current trade relationship with the U.S. was the catalyst for calling a federal snap election, contributing to it being one of the core pegs of the major parties’ election campaigns thus far. 

In a media release posted to the Liberal Party of Canada’s website, the Liberals outline that their approach to the trade crisis is focused on the auto and manufacturing industries. In the release, the Liberals pledge to begin a Strategic Response Fund of $2 billion, wherein the money will be used to “boost our auto sector’s competitiveness,” enhance expertise in manufacturing sectors and establish a fully protected Canadian supply chain for automaking industries. 

The media release also outlines that the Liberals plan to remove “all federal-regulated internal trade barriers by Canada Day,” giving them a mere two months to do so. They have also pledged to make Employment Insurance (EI) more accessible and reinvest the proceeds gained from tariffs back into Canadian workers. 

Pierre Poilievre, Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, has said that he decided not to base his election campaign around the current status of Canada-U.S. relations, as many issues integral to his campaign predate the tariff conflict. In a media release on the Conservative Party of Canada’s website, Poilievre said he will create a “Keep Canadians Working Fund,” which is a fund specifically dedicated to providing a temporary loan and credit program to businesses that are directly affected by Trump’s tariffs. 

Another media release outlined that the Conservatives plan to remove the Goods and Services Tax (GST) from Canadian-made vehicles following Trump’s tariffs on the Canadian auto sector. 

The New Democratic Party (NDP) shared a comprehensive tariff response plan on their website. In the plan, the party pledges to improve EI in several ways, including raising to Maximum Insurable Earnings, increasing the benefit to above 55 per cent; reducing the qualification threshold to “a universal 360-hour standard”; extending EI benefits to contractors and the self-employed; broadening work-sharing programs to ensure hours are spread evenly among employees; eliminating the one-week waiting period for benefits; and extending coverage to 50 weeks. 

The response plan also includes removing the GST from “essentials like home heating” as well as Canadian-made vehicles to prevent U.S. corporations from taking valuable assets from Canadian plants. This move would incentivize processing in Canada to strengthen the job market and protect social services from cuts, said the NDP release. Also planned is the enlisting of a “No-Trade” clause, wherein Canadian industries cannot be exploited by foreign states and “Indigenous Treaty rights, Charter rights, French language and labour protections, and environmental safeguards” cannot be sacrificed in trade negotiations. 

The Green Party of Canada also posted a media release on their website regarding the tariff conflict, wherein they urged the federal government to keep infrastructure “safe and livable” by providing long-term maintenance funding for public housing, creating a Strategic Reserve of critical Canadian materials and reinvesting profits from Canadian industries back into our communities, not to “foreign shareholders.” 

Tax plans 

After the controversial consumer carbon tax was removed by Carney, taxes continue to be a major point of discussion in campaigning for the federal election. 

The Liberal Party announced plans to put forth a middle-class tax cut, wherein they plan to reduce the marginal tax rate on the lowest tax bracket by 1 per cent. This comes alongside their plans to eliminate the GST on homes, up to $1 million, for first-time home buyers as well as bring more efficiency to EI programs. 

The Conservative Party have also laid out their tax plans, promising to cut income tax by 15 per cent and reduce the tax rate on the lowest income bracket from 15 per cent to 12.75 per cent. According to the party’s media release, these tax cuts will save the average worker $900 per year and save the average family $1800 per year. 

The NDP proposed tax plans wherein GST would be permanently removed from “daily essentials” like “grocery-store meals, diapers and strollers, plus monthly bills including cell, internet and heating bills.” The NDP also pledged to reverse the “Carney/Poilievre capital gains tax cut,” double the Canada Disability Benefit and raise the Guaranteed Income Supplement to make life easier for seniors. 

The Green Party recently announced that they plan to raise the federal Basic Personal Amount to $40,000, which would provide $3675 in annual tax relief for 78 per cent of taxpayers earning less than $100,000 annually. This tax reform is a part of the Green Party’s “Fair Taxation” priority in their platform, wherein the party aims to end tax loopholes for the ultra-rich and relieve tax-related costs for those in low-to-middle income households. 

The cost-of-living crisis 

In the same vein as the tax plans, many parties are exploring other avenues to make daily life more affordable for Canadians. 

The Liberal Party focused their approach to the cost-of-living crisis on the lack of affordable housing options for Canadians. Through their Build Canada Homes initiative, the Liberal Party pledged to double the pace of homebuilding construction, resulting in approximately 500,000 new homes built every year if they are elected. They also plan to cut municipal development charges in half, provide $10 billion in low-cost financing and capital to affordable home builders, and use Canadian resources to build these homes sustainably. 

The Conservatives took a similar approach, with Poilievre announcing that his party would cut development taxes on new home construction. According to a media release from the party, the Conservatives will reimburse every dollar cut by a municipality in development charges at a rate of 50 per cent, leading to a total possible savings of $100,000 per household. 

Although the NDP also pledged to build 3 million homes by 2030 and establish a permanent $16 billion national housing strategy to protect affordable renting options and build homes faster, they also centred their approach to the cost-of-living crisis around daily costs rather than major ones like affordable housing. If elected, the NDP promised to introduce emergency price caps on food essentials like “pasta, frozen vegetables and infant formula.” They also plan to regulate pricing practices in the grocery industry. 

The Green Party also took the affordable housing focus in relation to the cost-of-living crisis, promising to launch the biggest public housing construction program since the 1970s using Canadian materials, prevent corporations from buying single family homes and ensure that houses built using public money are “truly affordable.” 

— 

Although we are just mere weeks away from election day, the federal parties still have time to clarify their campaign promises and respond to the promises made by their running mates in the upcoming debates on April 16 and 17. 

Brock Model United Nations offers what it’s actually like to be in the UN 

0

Brock Model United Nations engages in simulations of international affairs and diplomatic engagement. The Brock Press talked with the club to find out what it’s all about. 

Model United Nations (MUN) is an experiential learning opportunity for students to simulate the work of the United Nations (UN) through committees, discussions and the representation of various nations who are a part of the UN. Students are often assigned a nation whose role they assume and prepare by following the club’s research guides, which direct students on what research they should do on the committee they are in and the country they will represent. Simulations, debates, arguments and discussions take place as they would in the UN. 

MUN applies to contemporary society through the application of real-world issues in simulations. Innovative solutions are created through the collaboration of delegates as they represent allocations and propose a topic from a few options provided to set the agenda. 

The topics vary from simulation to simulation. “Each year, we tend to have three simulations per year. This year, we discussed issues from access to water, peace building, and the protection of historical and cultural sites,” said one of Brock MUN’s Secretary-Generals, Sadeen Kalbouna

“At BMUN, we keep things rather neutral, to an extent. Obviously, we discuss charged international relations issues during our meetings; however, it is all with the goal of having delegates resolving said issue with the standpoint of the nation they are representing. So, if we discuss issues like Trump’s global trade war and the war in Gaza, it would be students discussing it from the interpretation of that country’s foreign policy. More specifically, it would be within the context of a topic like ‘Fostering Environments for Freedom of Expression, Press Freedom and Journalistic Safety.’” 

Kalbouna said the most exciting conference they attend is the annual National Model United Nations New York Conference in New York City. 

This year, the team had to consider current U.S.-Canadian politics: “In anticipation of potential issues in regard to the border, we had prepared ourselves in a multitude of ways,” said Kalbouna. “We had our students clear their devices of any social media and obtained letters that confirmed our involvement with the conference. Thankfully, we encountered next to no issues at the border.” 

At the conference, the opening session had a keynote speaker from the United Nations Relief and Work Agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA), who discussed her experience in that field of work.  

“Mara Kronenfeld had discussed the goals of UNRWA and how their conception was created because of [the] creation of Palestine refugees,” said Kalbouna. “She discussed the topic in a personal matter as well, aside from her career. She talked about it as a person, which is sometimes rare to see from diplomats.” 

Everyone is welcome to partake in MUN, regardless of their experience level, background or area of expertise, said Kalbouna, creating an opportunity for students to garner interest in the UN’s work and become more educated on international affairs and diplomatic engagement between various Member States. 

BMUN members come from all kinds of backgrounds and years of study. BMUN is especially popular among Political Science students, but they have had students from all other kinds of backgrounds including sociology, labour studies and psychology. “We have some students in Economics, all kinds of Business, and even some STEM majors,” said Kalbouna. “We accept all students, and the interest is not based on any specific program. Interest in international relations covers all sorts of programs and students.” 

BMUN meets every week on Thursdays from 7 to 9 p.m. in a room that changes each year. The first meeting date of the school year is announced in the fall. During meetings, delegates take part in MUN simulations that mimic the inner workings of the UN. 

Model UN helps students develop all kinds of skills, but mainly research, negotiation, policy writing and public speaking. Model UN requires research as well as a relative understanding of events in the news and the diplomatic relations between countries. A lot of diplomacy requires negotiation in reaching a solution, said Kalbouna: “During our weekly simulations, students work on their ‘working papers’ where they create policy recommendations in the hopes of creating a successful passed resolution that will propose solving a global issue.” Delegates also create all kinds of speeches that they regularly perform in front of other members. 

Model UN has helped its members feel more confident in their public speaking skills and ability to network with people they don’t know. As a club, the creation of a community on the basis of this shared passion is a natural byproduct. Many club members graduate having made life-long friends and connections from BMUN. 

BMUN invites anyone interested to come and check out a meeting. No registration or RSVP is required for their weekly meetings, and everyone is welcome to join at any point. 

Many of BMUN’s members end up pursuing careers in the law, government and diplomacy. The executive teams from the first couple of years of the club’s foundation in 2019 have pursued careers as lawyers and government workers. The skills developed at BMUN help students with transitional skills that are relevant to many industries. 

When asked about their hopes for the future, BMUN said their goal was “to share the passion for international relations with more students! We hope to spread this passion to secondary school students in the Niagara region as well. This year we will be hosting our first Brock Model United Nations Secondary School Conference!” 

Check out Brock MUN’s Instagram and keep an eye out for the announcement of next semester’s first meeting. 

Looking back on the Cocteau Twins’ “Heaven or Las Vegas” after 35 years 

0

With 35 years passing since its release, the Cocteau Twins’ Heaven or Las Vegas remains an undoubtably iconic piece in the band’s discography and alternative pop music at large. 

On September 17, 1990, the Cocteau Twins released their sixth studio album, Heaven or Las Vegas. Since its release, the album has continued to represent the pinnacle of the band’s sound, with Las Vegas tracks almost entirely encompassing the band’s most streamed songs. According to the Cocteau Twins’ website, as of July 2024, tracks from Heaven or Las Vegas made up six out of the band’s 10 most listened-to songs despite the eight other studio albums in their corpus. 

Heaven or Las Vegas builds deep, sonic landscapes that are almost entirely reliant on instrumentals rather than building stories through lyrics, which tend to be purposefully incomprehensible in the mix. 

Notably, the band’s website has a whole page dedicated to their mystifying lyrical approach. The band contends that their main goal is to focus most on the sound of their tracks, not the lyrical content. The Cocteau Twins’ lead vocalist Elizabeth Fraser expanded on this idea in a 1993 interview with Mondo 2000

“Combining words in different languages that I couldn’t understand just meant I could concentrate on the sound and not get caught up in the meaning,” said Fraser. “They don’t mean anything, though, that’s the thing. You know all the transcendent sounds. It’s all sound all the way through.” 

Perhaps no track speaks to this sense of transcendence better than the album’s opener in the light and airy “Cherry-coloured Funk,” a cut with an immediately uplifting soundscape that perfectly sets the stage for the album. 

“Iceblink Luck” is another lighter cut, with Fraser’s vocals floating in high pitches over low, layered instrumentals. 

One of my personal favourite songs on the album is the titular track, which is almost as popular as “Cherry-coloured Funk” as the two share a similar lighter atmosphere. The track is just plain fun, with the higher-pitched rhythmic instrumentals and Fraser’s vocals, which are slightly more intelligible than usual, lighting up the song. 

Heaven or Las Vegas delightfully mixes more somber sonic atmospheres with lighter ones like the one found in the opening and title tracks. 

“I Wear Your Ring” is one of these tracks with a more somber aesthetic. The song opens with a very deeply pitched synth instrumental. Fraser’s vocals are densely layered in this track, with lower and higher pitched takes over top of each other to intensify the sonic atmosphere. 

The album also finishes with one of these more introspective and somber tracks in “Frou-frou Foxes in Midsummer Fires,” wherein deeper percussion and lower synth sounds contrast with Fraser’s angelic vocals until the standing-ovation-worthy closer. 

Other stand-out tracks on the album include “Pitch the Baby,” a less intense track that maintains the album’s fun sound; “Fotzepolitic,” an upbeat cut backlit by rhythmic, quick paced instrumentals; and “Wolf in the Breast,” a slower song that encompasses a more thoughtful atmosphere. 

Overall, Heaven or Las Vegas is undoubtably a standout piece of the Cocteau Twins’ work, with its influence on the band’s discography and the alternative dream-pop genre remaining undeniable, even after 35 years. 

“A Minecraft Movie”: a magical moviegoing experience for all the wrong reasons 

0

Score: 2.5/5 

Go watch A Minecraft Movie in theatres. Yep, that’s it. That’s the review. 

Just… don’t go into the theatre expecting an amazing movie, because this live-action adaptation of the hit video game Minecraft will almost certainly leave you disappointed. As a film, it’s very, very flawed. 

As I anticipated in my skeptical analysis of the film’s first trailer, the visual style of the live-action Minecraft world — arguably the most important part of a film attempting to adapt a game with an incredibly unique look — really isn’t up to par.  

For starters, the creatures inhabiting the world of Minecraft are creepy and unsettling.  

Cute blocky sheep have been transformed into terrifying vomiting monsters. Innocent in-game villagers now have lifelike human skin. The “piglins” living in the Nether dimension are now hairy and have fat, flabby stomachs. 

None of it is visually appealing, and in some ways, it feels strangely insulting to the charming style of its source material. While the Minecraft game feels like its visuals are crafted with love, its movie adaptation almost seems to make a joke out of it. As a longtime Minecraft player, the movie’s look really didn’t resonate with me. 

This disappointment is only sustained by the performance of Jack Black as Steve, the closest thing Minecraft has to a protagonist. Black was tasked with an undoubtedly difficult role in this project, considering the in-game version of Steve is a player avatar without any personality whatsoever beyond his structural role as the player’s avatar for exploring, building and mining as they please. He’s meant to become whatever the player wants him to be which prompted the question: How can you bring the role to life in a satisfying or resonant way through a story-based movie? 

You can’t. Or, at least, you can’t do it well. 

Oftentimes, Jack Black feels as though he’s simply playing himself rather than any specific movie character. He brings his signature charisma and sense of humour to the role, but this all amounts to his character simply feeling like Jack Black rather than someone who genuinely lives in the world of Minecraft. The film’s designers didn’t even do anything to alter his visual appearance; instead, we have regular old Jack Black wearing a teal shirt, complete with his unshaven, scraggly beard. 

Again, none of this can really be described as the actor’s fault, considering the in-game version of Steve doesn’t have any explicit character lore to work with in a story adaptation where he can talk. It’s just unfortunate that it feels like there wasn’t an attempt to make a unique Steve at all; it constantly feels like we just have Jack Black running around having fun in the movie’s blocky world. 

But back to the plot, Steve, who has lived in the world of Minecraft for some time, is eventually joined by a quartet of misfits once they stumble upon the “Orb of Dominance” and the “Earth Crystal,” which, once combined, open a portal to the world of Minecraft. It’s a bit disappointing to see the film use the rehashed “real-world people enter video game world” plot, which was also used in the likes of Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle and The Super Mario Bros. Movie — both of which, coincidentally, also featured Jack Black in major roles. It’s not like the film is breaking any new ground. 

Compared to Black, I vastly preferred Jason Momoa’s performance as Garrett “The Garbage Man” Garrison. His character was quite funny throughout the film, and despite Black’s character not being up to par, the chemistry they experienced on screen was palpable. One scene in particular, in which Steve and Garrison squeeze their bodies into a “man sandwich” to fit through a tiny hole, was especially funny. 

Sebastian Hansen took on the role of Henry, a creative boy who finds himself at home in the world of Minecraft, where he can finally use his imagination without limits. The young actor has some nice moments with Black and Momoa, with him forming a friendship with the latter that feels especially sincere. Henry exploring the world of Minecraft with a sense of wonder, as so many children have while playing the game in real life, was a highlight throughout the movie. 

Unfortunately, the two leading women were quite underutilized. Emma Myers’ Natalie and Danielle Brooks’ Dawn both showed signs of interesting character building, but ultimately didn’t appear too much throughout the movie. It would have been nice for the film to further explore their characters and motivations, and give them more screen time to shine. 

Surprisingly, many of the movie’s jokes land in stride. Jennifer Coolidge excelled in her role as a principal who falls in love with a Villager and was consistently funny every time she appeared on screen. She took a silly premise and made it delightful to watch, especially during a mid-credits scene that explores her relationship with the Villager further. 

Other than that, the film is pretty standard not-great-kids-movie fare, complete with an underwhelming story and generally subpar writing. A Minecraft Movie is probably better than what I had expected, but it’s still nothing to write home about. 

Why, then, am I strongly recommending you see this movie in theatres? 

It’s because there’s something else to A Minecraft Movie than the film itself: the magic that the movie has brought to life in theatres. 

See, the movie’s existence has become somewhat of a meme online, with particular lines from the trailers (“I… am Steve” and “flint and steel!” especially) having gone viral. This has led to an unusual sensation in which theatres break out in clapping and cheering anytime one of these lines is spoken on screen, and it’s the most hilarious moviegoing experience I’ve ever had. 

There’s something so strangely magical about a theatre full of kids, teenagers and twenty-somethings bursting into joint applause when Jack Black shouts “chicken jockey!” that is hard to describe in a written review. It’s something that needs to be experienced to be fully understood. 

See, when people start cheering, they’re not really celebrating the movie in a serious way. It’s an interesting dynamic where the movie is something to laugh at rather than laugh with, but that doesn’t make it any less hilarious. 

I strongly recommend that you go to the theatre and watch this movie on a busy evening, because the experience of attending A Minecraft Movie is unparalleled. I can confidently say that taking part in this meme-based movement makes sitting through A Minecraft Movie entirely worth it. It’s probably not worth watching after the movie leaves theatres, so I suggest you take part in the experience while it’s still relevant. 

So yes, you should go watch A Minecraft Movie — not because the movie’s any good, but because of the cultural phenomenon it’s awakened in everyone who goes to see it. 

Editorial: Farewell and thank you 

Contributing to The Brock Press for the past four years has been the most rewarding professional experience of my life, making my now imminent farewell that much harder.  

When I first came to Brock in 2020, inopportunely at the beginning of a global pandemic, I was full of an uncertainty which was not even largely due to the then nascent global health crisis.  

COVID-19 aside, like many humanities students, I was uncertain about what exactly I would do with my degree — studying English and rhetoric — and more than that, what else the school could offer me beyond my immediate studies.  

Just before I came to Brock, I had been running an amateur music blog on social media for a couple of years, where I reviewed and catalogued music, built up a small community and got some notice from even some mainstream artists. My experience blogging taught me that doing creative work which I could relay to people who found it resonant in some way was something I was passionate about. However, translating that into what a university English program had to offer employment-wise wasn’t clear to me at all at the outset.   

These threads of my life all came together in a serendipitous way, though, when I had the lucky coincidence of learning about The Brock Press through an academic advisor in early 2021. This occurred right alongside the unexpected death of one my favourite artists, the masked rapper MF DOOM, which had a deep impact on me as a major fan of his idiosyncratic artistry. His death inspired me to contribute a volunteer piece to the paper as an homage to the rapper, as well as to tie up of the chapter of my life doing music-related writing with an actual publishing credit in that lane. It was also just something to do that I could bring passion to with all the downtime I had given that the COVID-19 lockdown was in full swing.  

But after that piece was published, I caught an itch and just had to keep contributing. I pitched a couple more pieces which got published, and come the year’s end, Press leadership at the time suggested I apply for their assistant editor position for the 2021-22 publishing year.  

I applied and got this assistant editor position, finding what would become a professional and creative home for the next four years.  

It’s not much of an exaggeration to say that The Brock Press has been there since the beginning of my adulthood. Although the lines demarcating “adulthood” tend to be somewhat arbitrarily drawn in the abstract, I am a firm believer that the sense of adulthood for individuals — like most largely social designations of the kind — comes mainly from social processes based on institutions which confer symbolic statuses on those individuals. Said statuses come to shape us if we choose, unconsciously or consciously, to identify with them and take on the responsibility implied in that identification.  

The Brock Press — and especially the two years I’ve spent as Editor-in-Chief of the paper — had this shaping effect on me, catapulting me into something I’d call a sense of meaningful adulthood and the beginning of a career.  

The responsibilities I’ve had the honour of bearing as a result of being Managing Editor, Editor-in-Chief, and a director and chair of the board over the years at the Press fundamentally changed me. While large chunks of this change often came with lots of stress — especially with the long, uncertain bureaucratic and media battles spurred by antagonistic groups trying to silence our independent student voice and ability to speak truth to power — the personal mental toll of these spats was always worth the preservation of what we do best: unbiased, independent student journalism.  

But, as I’ve just argued, a role is nothing without other people to reflect it back to you through their expectations and support. And in that vein, the true magic of the Press for me — where I learned the most and felt myself shaped the most here — came from the wonderful individuals I’ve gotten to work alongside with over the past four years and change.  

It would take far too long for me to list every single name that had a significant impact on me at the Press, but I do want to specifically mention four individuals I’ve known during my time here who had the most impact on me and who I feel a great debt to. 

First is our Managing Editor, Christian Roethling, who I’ve worked with for three years now, serving as my right-hand man on the editorial side of the organization for two of those three years and who reignited my belief in the value of humour and levity even at work. 

Second is former Editor-in-Chief Noah Nickel, who offered me my first job at the paper and who stewarded a sense of confidence in my journalistic abilities, so much so that he suggested I apply for Managing Editor after working only a year at the paper as an assistant editor. I would never have considered attempting such a ladder jump in positions without Noah instilling a sense in me that I could and should do it. 

Third is Holly Morrison, who was my editorial senior for all but the past two years here and who was the Editor-in-Chief of the paper when I was second in command as Managing Editor. Holly, like Noah, inspired a sense of confidence in my leadership and journalistic abilities as she prepared me to be the eventual head of the paper, and I owe many of my interpersonal approaches as a leader to learning from her.  

And finally, I have to mention our acting Business Manager of the last two years, Kevin Diep. Kevin has been through thick and thin with me in maneuvering — sometimes this was a painful crawling — through the tangled weeds that have come with both maintaining and innovating the corporate-governance side of the company to help strengthen our independent student voice and internal accountability processes.  

Speaking of accountability processes, one of the greatest unforeseen pleasures I had working at the Press was spearheading the implementation of the worker-management system we began using as the base model of our governance structure and practices in 2023. This model was formed on values of workplace democracy: worker self-determination, systematized shared accountability and power over management.  

Through the conjunction of workplace elections for a majority worker bloc on our board of directors and an employee ratification process over all policy and governance items at the Press, we’ve ensured that our internal governance structure remains accountable to and directed by the student workers who put their essential labour into the Press. Ultimately, it is their work which keeps the lights on. 

— 

I am endlessly grateful to the Press, and although my future is uncertain as I move on as a writer and journalist, I know that wherever I end up, the Press’ influence over me will continue to show in abundance. Moreover, having worked with and gotten to know personally those who will inherit the leadership posts of the paper in the near future, I am confident it is in safe hands to continue producing excellent work for Brock students, the Niagara Region, the city of St. Catharines and anyone who happens to stumble on our work around the world.  

And on that note, I’d like to conclude by thanking all the readers of the Press over the years for giving us the reason we do what we do. Your support is our lifeline, and it was a personal honour writing to you over the years.  

Thank you. 

– Haytham Nawaz 

Gala caps off Brock’s winning sports year 

0

The athletic term at Brock University closes with a celebration recognizing student athletes, coaches and teams who defined the 2024-25 season.  

Across national and provincial stages, Brock teams proved themselves a force to be reckoned with. Ten teams earned spots at national tournaments and 24 others made appearances at OUA championship events. The season yielded one national title and three provincial banners, with accolades distributed across nearly every corner of the university’s athletics community. 22 athletes were named All-Canadians, while 65 secured all-star status within the province. Eight major athletic awards were handed out, accompanied by three Coach of the Year selections.  

Leading the list of individual honours was swimmer Tatum O’Connor, who capped off a record-breaking season by becoming Brock’s first female swimmer in over 20 years to medal at the national level. With bronze medals in both the 50-metre and 100-metre backstroke events, her U Sports podium finishes ended a long drought and highlighted her national presence. O’Connor also dominated at the OUA level, amassing four medals and helping her team secure seven total podium appearances, a new program benchmark. In another standout meet, she helped deliver a record-breaking relay performance that sealed the team’s first ever divisional championship. Her achievements earned her the title of Brock’s Female Athlete of the Year.  

On the men’s side, pole vaulter Michael Ivanov soared to new heights — literally. With a winning jump of 5.12 metres at the U Sports championships, Ivanov claimed the first national gold medal in Brock track and field history. His dominance extended to the provincial circuit, where he successfully defended his OUA title with a 35-centimetre lead over his closest competitor. Undefeated throughout the university season, Ivanov was named both a U Sports First Team All-Canadian and OUA First Team All-Star and became the first men’s track and field athlete at Brock to receive the Male Athlete of the Year honour since 1979.  

Coaching excellence also took centre stage. Dave Ling, head coach of the women’s swim team, was named both the men’s and women’s OUA Coach of the Year. He guided the women’s team to a historic divisional championship and seven OUA medals — the most in team history. Tom Kent and Scott Anderson of the men’s rowing team shared the Men’s Team Coach of the Year after their crew collected their fourth consecutive OUA title and finished second at nationals.  

Team awards recognized continued dominance from the women’s wrestling team and the men’s rowing team. The wrestling team captured its 12th national championship and 23rd OUA title, medaling in every weight class at the provincial level. The rowers maintained their provincial stranglehold with their 15th OUA banner and repeated their national runner- up finish for a third straight year.  

Also honoured were student athletes who balanced academic excellence with athletic performance. Women’s basketball player Madalyn Weinert and rugby prop Brayden McReelis received the prestigious Surgite Awards, recognizing sustained achievement in the classroom and competition. Weinert, a U Sports All-Canadian and OUA Player of the Year, earned academic honours for a third straight year. McReelis mirrored that consistency with multiple Academic Excellence Awards and back-to-back all-star selections. 

Recognition extended beyond the field of play. Student therapist Emmery Borg received the Joseph P. Kenny Award, while performance interns Mike MacDonald and Marisa Freeman were lauded for their contributions to athlete support. The Marilou Lusi Memorial Service Award was given to long-time wrestling contributors Heather Sweezey and Dave Collie for their enduring commitment to the success of Brock’s wrestling team and its athletes.  

With a year marked by breakthrough performances, coaching leadership and community spirit, Brock University’s varsity teams have more than earned their moment in the spotlight. As the curtain falls on another competitive season, the impact of the 2024-25 season is sure to be felt well beyond the gala stage.  

Until next year, Badgers! 

Florida’s journey to winning NCAA championship  

0

With the 2025 NCAA Men’s Basketball Final Four concluded, the stage was set for the national championship game between the University of Florida Gators and the University of Houston Cougars. 

In the first semifinal match of the 2025 NCAA Men’s Basketball Final Four, the Florida Gators overcame an eight-point halftime deficit to defeat the Auburn Tigers 79-73. Junior guard Walter Clayton Jr. led the Gators with a standout performance, scoring 34 points, including five three-pointers. This marked the first time a player recorded consecutive 30-point games this deep into the NCAA Tournament since Larry Bird in 1979. Florida’s second-half surge was pivotal, with a 13-3 run that shifted the momentum in their favour. Auburn’s Johni Broome, who had been instrumental in their tournament run, was limited to 15 points, impacted by Florida’s defensive adjustments.  

The second semifinal game featured a dramatic comeback by the Houston Cougars, who erased a 14-point deficit to defeat the Duke Blue Devils 70-67. Houston’s defence intensified in the final minutes, holding Duke to a single field goal in the last 10 minutes and 31 seconds of play. A controversial foul call on Duke’s Cooper Flagg in the closing seconds allowed Houston’s J’Wan Roberts to sink crucial free throws, giving the Cougars their first lead since early in the game. LJ Cryer broke the tie and sealed the victory with a three pointer just before the buzzer, propelling Houston to their first national championship game appearance since 1984.  

The championship between Florida and Houston was on Monday, April 7 at 8:50 p.m., and aired on CBS. Both teams entered the final with impressive credentials: Florida seeking its first national title since 2007, while Houston aims for its inaugural championship.  

The highly anticipated national championship game lived up to expectations as the Florida Gators edged out the Houston Cougars 65–63 to capture their third NCAA men’s basketball title and their first since 2007. In a tightly contested battle, Florida overcame a 12-point second-half deficit with timely scoring and gritty defense. Walter Clayton Jr. delivered all 11 of his points in the second half and sealed the win with a crucial stop in the final seconds. The Gators held Houston to just 36 per cent shooting from the field, limiting their offensive rhythm down the stretch. Despite a strong showing from Houston’s LJ Cryer, who led all scorers with 20 points, the Cougars were unable to close out in the final minutes. With the win, Florida completed a resilient tournament run marked by comeback performances, balanced team play, and a return to championship form. 

UConn women finish season as champions 

0

The University of Connecticut Huskies clinched their 12th NCAA National Championship by defeating the University of South Carolina Gamecocks, marking UConn’s first national title since 2016.  

UConn established control from the very beginning of the game. Senior guard Azzi Fudd ignited the offence, scoring seven points in the first quarter and propelling the Huskies to a 19-14 lead. Fudd’s early aggression set the tone for UConn’s offensive rhythm. Complementing Fudd’s efforts was freshman forward Sarah Strong, who showcased remarkable poise by contributing eight points and dominating the boards with 11 rebounds by halftime. The Huskies’ defence was equally formidable, limiting South Carolina to a 31 per cent shooting average and forcing seven turnovers in the first half. This defensive tenacity allowed UConn to enter the break with a 36-26 advantage.  

The third quarter saw UConn increase their dominance. Fudd and Strong continued their offensive onslaught, combining for 23 of the team’s 26 points in the period. Fudd’s sharpshooting and Strong’s versatility extended the Huskies’ lead to 62-42 by the end of the quarter. Senior guard Paige Bueckers, in her final collegiate game, orchestrated the offence with precision, adding timely baskets and facilitating plays that kept the Gamecocks’ defence on its heels. Bueckers finished with 17 points, six rebounds and three assists, capping a storied college career with a championship.  

South Carolina’s attempts to mount a comeback were thwarted by UConn’s relentless defence and efficient offence. The Gamecocks struggled to find consistent scoring opportunities, with their leading scorers, Tessa Johnson and Joyce Edwards, each managing only 10 points. UConn’s defensive schemes effectively neutralized South Carolina’s offensive threats, culminating in a decisive 82-59 victory.   

The emotional resonance of the win was palpable. Head coach Geno Auriemma, who secured his 12th national title with this victory, was visibly moved during the post-game celebrations. In a heartfelt embrace with Bueckers, Auriemma expressed his profound appreciation for her contributions and resilience throughout her career. “I’ve never been happier than I’ve been the last couple of months coaching the team,” said Auriemma highlighting the significance of his championship run.  

Fudd’s outstanding performance earned her the Most Outstanding Player award for the Final Four. Reflecting on the journey, Fudd acknowledged the collective effort and determination that propelled the Huskies to the pinnacle of college basketball. “It’s amazing to have three players, three people like that on the same team,” Auriemma said. “You would think Sarah was graduating the way she plays, right? All three of them complement each other so well. They all have such unique skill sets.”  

This championship not only adds to UConn’s storied legacy but also serves as a testament to the resilience and unity of the team. Overcoming injuries and setbacks in previous seasons, the Huskies’ journey back to the top underscores their unwavering commitment to excellence. As Bueckers prepares to embark on her professional career, projected as the top pick in the upcoming WNBA drafts, she leaves behind a legacy that will inspire future generations of Huskies. 

In the annals of UConn women’s basketball, the 2025 national championship stands as a defining moment, symbolizing a triumphant return to glory and the enduring spirit of a team built on a foundation of perseverance and talent. 

Brock professor facing harassment campaign by Zionists for spearheading BUFA BDS motion to protest ethnic cleansing and scholasticide of Palestinians 

0

A Brock sociology professor who led a BDS initiative in BUFA in protest of scholasticide and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians by the Israeli state is now facing a harassment campaign from a notable right-wing media personality and pro-Zionist networks on and off campus.  

Gökbörü Sarp Tanyildiz, the professor in question, was interviewed by the Press wherein he gave his thoughts on the various forms of harassment he’s faced and expressed his steadfast commitment to bringing awareness to Palestinian erasure, which he says hasn’t wavered despite the concerted smear campaign against his character and credibility as a scholar. He also shared his thoughts on the disinformation campaigns directed against the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) motion in the Brock University Faculty Association (BUFA), which ultimately failed to be passed in a vote.  

— 

In a December BUFA meeting last year, Tanyildiz and his colleagues had an agenda item titled “Motion on Scholasticide in Palestine” approved for the official agenda. The motion was a call for the union’s total disinvestment and institutional cutting of ties with organizations — from companies to universities — that were complicit through direct and indirect support of the Israeli regime. The latest uptick of BDS motions like this one, comes in light of the ongoing flair up of violent ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian territories since the October 7 attacks in 2023, where roughly 50,000 Palestinians have been killed by the Israeli offence.  

Tanyildiz was already active in pro-Palestinian organizations before the motion, being involved with the Brock chapter of Faculty for Palestine, a network of academics who actively work to support the Palestinian plight in the face of the ongoing apartheid and ethnic cleansing of the Occupied Territories.  

In the intervening time since October 7, Israel notably destroyed the last university in Gaza. In the motion, Tanyildiz and his colleagues placed special emphasis on this act of scholasticide — the systemic mass destruction of education in a specific place — as a pertinent reason among others for why a union of university faculty should cut all institutional ties to Israel.  

The private December BUFA meeting in the union, however, had their discussions recorded and leaked to the right-wing and pro-Zionist journalist and op-ed writer Jonathan Kay, formerly editor-in-chief of The Walrus and current editor at Quillette.  

Kay went on to publish a smear piece against Tanyildiz alongside his motion-supporting colleagues in the union in Quillette in the early weeks of 2025. The piece, titled “Keeping BDS Out of Academia: A Canadian Case Study,” attempts a lazy character assassination of Tanyildiz by misconstruing the leaked recorded audio from the meetings as well as superficially deconstructing the professor’s scholarly interests. 

In terms of the actual substance of Tanyildiz’s reasons for the BDS motion, Kay is smugly satisfied with not dealing with that at all in his write-up: “Most of Tanyildiz’s motion consists of the usual BDS boilerplate — either copied or adapted from other BDS-inspired documents — and so isn’t really worth close scrutiny, [my emphasis]” Kay writes.  

Instead, Kay spends the bulk of his word-count obsessively detailing disparate aspects of the professor’s personality and physical characteristics such as his “sweeping, hectoring tone” and “his Brock faculty profile page — which reads much like a conservative parody of progressive intellectual fads.”  

Strategic deflections away from having to deal with the substance of the motion in the form of schoolyard insults aside, when Kay does try to appear erudite in citing historical events and figures in the piece, he doesn’t realize the shocking hypocrisy vis-a-vis his stance on October 7 in the anachronistically McCarthyite argument he haphazardly concocts.   

Kay writes specifically that Tanyildiz “appears in front of a 1970s-era Chinese propaganda poster celebrating the Paris Commune, whose brief takeover of Paris in early 1871 ended with a mass hostage slaughter.”  

However, Kay doesn’t cite the number involved in the hostage slaughter of the Commune — 110 priests and gendarmes, most of whom were supportive of the monarchist-imperialist Third Republic and a brutally exploitative bourgeoisie that had saddled up to the imperial aristocratic order — because it’s too low to make the next point he attempts to make apropos of Israel and Palestine.  

To run cover for this, simply because the poster is Chinese and from the late 20th century, he heavily implies that Tanyildiz is somehow tacitly supportive of the most disastrous policies from Maoist China, and thus a hypocrite in citing Israel’s killing of innocent civilians as examples of genocide when tens of millions were killed in The Great Leap Forward and so on:  

“For their part, China’s communists caused the extermination of somewhere between 20-million and 40-million innocents during the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution — three decimal orders of magnitude above even the most inflated Palestinian casualty statistics circulated by Hamas since Israel invaded Gaza following the 7 October 2023 terrorist attacks.” 

The omission of the Paris Commune massacre’s number and the political-economic context of the Commune alongside the leap of logic with falsely ascribing sympathies to the worst of Maoist policies to Tanyildiz is a prime example of how intellectually lazy and historically illiterate the far-right is.  

In fact, Kay, reminiscent of his lazy dismissal of getting into the substance of the BDS motion, treats the claim that Israel is committing genocide as a priori unfounded in his piece without feeling bothered to argue why, causing the whole piece to be an ideal candidate for a prime example of the begging the question fallacy.  

Here are all the moments in the piece where Kay references the idea that Israel’s actions are genocidal:  

“And for all his strange talk about BUFA’s ‘responsibilities’ to the International Court of Justice, no one in the Middle East, let alone The Hague, cares what professors at an Ontario university think about how Israel’s (non-existent) genocide figures into their academic ‘praxis’ […]  

“Consistent with other campaigns inspired by the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel, Tanyildiz accuses the Jewish state of not only ‘scholasticide,’ but also apartheid, genocide and war crimes. He calls for Brock’s administration (and its pension planners) to execute a ‘complete divestment’ from any organization that’s even indirectly ‘complicit’ in this regard — including multinational corporations and Israeli universities — and demands that Brock enact a long laundry list of pro-Palestinian policies […]  

“Somewhat detracting from the moral grandeur of this pronouncement, Tanyildiz then paused to assure fellow BUFA members that heroically standing up to genocide wouldn’t negatively affect their future pension payments […]  

“From there, it was a short rhetorical jump to the proposition that anyone at BUFA who opposed his motion was effectively a maidservant to genocide — not unlike, say, a citizen of Nazi Germany ignoring the daily clatter of trains bringing Jews to concentration camps.”  

Not a single one of these references, besides the bracketed modifying aside to genocide with “(non-existent),” actually attempts to argue the case with the same (attempted) flair of logic and numbers he brings to the Commune-Maoist point against the accusation of genocidal intent and practice.  

Ironically, then, pointing out the hostage massacre at the end of the Paris Commune makes Kay’s excusing Israel’s massacre of tens of thousands of innocent Palestinians since October 7 an absolute logical and moral contradiction considering the Commune took the hostages as bargaining chips to stop France’s prevailing Third Republic government, which was a ruthless imperialist army that — beyond awfully exploiting the working class at home (the impetus for the communards’ revolution in Paris) — was instrumental in the beginning of the New Imperialism of the 19th century with all the horror involved in the Scramble for Africa, among other examples.  

Kay proves he will run cover for colonialist projects, from Israel to the New Imperialist powers of 19th century colonial Europe, through cynically omitting and selecting numbers and historical facts, because he’s a neo-colonialist supporter at heart.  

This is not to say that the mass hostage executions in the Commune were justified.  Rather, it’s quite revealing to ponder the stunning dissonance inherent in Kay, on the one hand, condemning the Communards’ retaliatory hostage killings against the imperialist French Army when they were fighting to maintain their (quite successful) attempt at a secular non-hierarchical system of democratic civil society, while having nothing to say against the strongest power in the Middle East which illegally presides over a people that have been displaced, killing tens of thousands of innocent civilians which don’t even belong to the terrorist group that conducted October 7. In fact, in his own words, Kay defends the Israeli response as a justified retaliation, calling it a “largely successful military response.” 

But it wasn’t only Kay whose sycophantic Zionist support drove him to flimsy arguments in support of genocide erasure with respect to the BUFA BDS motion.  

A pro-Israel contingent of BUFA also distributed a plea statement to vote no against the BDS motion before it was brought to a vote.  

In the plea the group stated that the motion is “racist,” “antisemitic” and “performative” among other things. Under the accusation of racism point, they even attempt to turn the rhetorical tables on the pro-Palestinian movement by stating the BDS motion is “colonialist” through an act of mental gymnastics which belies the most obvious example of projection:  

“The motion is colonialist, claiming to know better what Palestinians need, denying them their own voice. Supporting Hamas’ claims is actually perpetuating the dictatorship of this terrorist organization over Gaza and its inhabitants.”  

The supposed claims of Hamas that the motion is ostensibly supporting are not cited or quoted anywhere in the plea, proving once again that the Zionist far-right exists in a permanent state of bad faith as their whole ideology is intellectually and ethically bankrupt.  

Despite this, the vote which took place on January 29 saw the defeat of the motion with 287 votes against, 149 for and 25 abstention votes with 76.8 per cent of the voting member body of the union participating.  

However, even after the vote, Tanyildiz has received harassment online and on campus with his office door being vandalized and talks at other institutions targeted for cancellation.  

— 

Our full interview with Tanyildiz: 

NAWAZ I think a productive launching point is for you to provide a brief statement in response to the Quillette piece.  

TANYILDIZ I do not have much to say about the Quillette piece itself because it was a poorly written ideological text devoid of any proper content to speak of. It made no arguments. For its reception, the text simply relied on the extremist right-wing doxa of its imagined reader. It was symptomatic of an anxiety about losing campus hegemony. All in all, the clumsy attempt to construct ideal-types to classify campus politics and contemporary academia betrayed an ignorance as to what a university is and how knowledge is produced. 

NAWAZ Can you explain the impetus, in your mind, behind triggering the BDS motion at the union meeting? Additionally, what concerns — if any — do you see in the leaking of the meeting contents?  

TANYILDIZ The knowledge community that academics in universities belong to is, by definition, international. In other words, as academics, our scholarship is embedded in the contemporary international context. We give papers at the annual meetings of our international professional associations, publish within venues that have global reach, and engage within our fields of study with debates produced not only in national borders but also beyond them. This very fact suggests that when a constituent of this global community is harmed, we have an epistemic responsibility to exercise. 

It was in this context, when all of the universities in Gaza were reduced to rubble and when Palestinian professors and students were murdered in unsparing genocidal rage, that my colleagues and I thought that we had to take up our responsibility and do what is required of us — that is to ask our representative body, BUFA, and colleagues to join us, as well as other academics and academic institutions worldwide, to contribute to the upholding of international law. 

I continue to believe that genocide and genocide denialism, in whatever context and form, undermine our scholarship, our work conditions and our students’ learning conditions. I am disappointed that a majority of BUFA members do not share this opinion. I am afraid such indifference, to say the least, is an example of the consent that is being manufactured for the legitimacy of the contemporary ascendance of fascism that we are witnessing all around the globe. However, I am not entirely pessimistic with the sound knowledge that neither I nor a considerable number of BUFA colleagues who voted in favour of the motion assent to this dangerous trend. 

NAWAZ Do you have any opinion on the way the Brock administration has treated this issue/Gaza and the BDS movement overall?  

TANYILDIZ As a professor who does not hold an administrative role, my interaction with the academic and non-academic members of the university administration is limited. Therefore, I do not know what kinds of local and extra-local relationalities, entanglements and concerns determine the decisions that university administration makes about this and other issues of governance. However, as a professor who takes teaching very seriously and who supervises students in three different graduate programs, I am rather sad to observe that Brock has not fulfilled its concept as a university in which, first and foremost, students develop a critical understanding of self, other and world relations that make us individuals, citizens and human beings as such.  

Instead, during this process, Brock has revealed itself as a place of profound contradictions. I will only highlight two examples: 1) For all the talk of pedagogical innovations as a hallmark of our university, the administration, as far as I am aware, did not provide any serious support for instructors and students struggling with the weight of genocide. I raised this problem with members of the Administration in two separate occasions to no avail. 2) For all its supposed awareness of the importance of decolonization within a settler-colonial society which still has not reckoned with the aftermath of the genocides against Indigenous peoples of Turtle Island, the Administration was not able to recognize the current situation properly and address it as another example of settler-colonialism and decolonization. Instead, as far as I am concerned, there seems to be an attempt at managing this process through culturalization, ethnicization and religiocization [sic] of students, staff and faculty. This approach, as I explained in an occasion to administrators, divides the constituents of our university community into groups with unreconcilable antagonistic differences.  

However, I can confidently say that such division does not exist in our community. Many of us, who are concerned with our epistemic responsibility to our knowledge community and students, work within multi-religious, multi-ethnic and multi-racial contexts on our campus in concord and harmony. I think, therefore, we need to invite the University Administration to recognize the strong unity, will and belief we have for justice, as well as for the University’s undeniable responsibility and role to achieve it.   

NAWAZ Do you have any comments you’d like to make about right-wing/Zionist organizations on our campus?  

TANYILDIZ To this day, I am still rather amazed that a mere use of our democratic right as rank-and-file members of our union to bring forward a motion that asked our colleagues to consider a peaceful and historically well-regarded and efficient response to an ongoing scholasticide and genocide at a university should open the floodgates of hate, harassment and abuse against myself and my colleagues.  

It is now clear to me that I was mistaken in expecting a collegial, charitable, civil and curious engagement. From the outset, far-right and Zionist (given the misinformation about the term, it is crucial to note that I use the term to indicate a right-wing political ideology of ethnonationalist racist supremacy) members of BUFA flagrantly displayed their intention of not engaging with this motion in good faith by recording the union meeting meant for its members and sharing this recording with a media platform seemingly to make an example of those of us who dared to speak up for justice. 

There cannot be any legitimate argument and rationale for scholasticide, for genocide, for the murdering and maiming of civilians: innocent people of all ages, genders, ethnicities and religions. As a result, the leaked meeting and the following one were the most toxic and racist spaces I had the misfortune of experiencing at Brock.  

At these meetings, so many harmful misconstructions of the motion we put forward were generated. I was dismayed that not a single Palestinian emerged in these portrayals as human beings at all. Listening to some of those ill-conceived arguments terrorized me, especially when I thought that our students must be subjected to these sorts of arguments coming through the same set of mouths. The callousness and inhumanity of these arguments made in my own workplace still haunt me. 

Not surprisingly, these meetings, the recording, racism and toxicity chilled and silenced faculty who dared to have a better vision for humanity and our shared future. On my part, I received anonymous hate mails, was subjected to racist abuse, called names, slandered and thoroughly harassed. My office door was vandalized, and my academic talks at other universities were singled out as collective targets of cancellation. However, I am still here, I am still right in holding that universities are spaces not for hate, harassment and abuse, but for producing knowledge for social transformation to contribute to the making of liveable lives and justice.   

NAWAZ When we chatted about this situation, you mentioned hearing a common refrain regarding university spaces not being appropriate places for political speech and practice (the Quillette piece suggests this as well); how do you feel about the university and political speech, debate and action, in this instance and/or in general? 

TANYILDIZ The University is a space of politics, a political space and a space for politics. This much is clear to anyone who is familiar with the emergence and history of universities. Empirically, too, any methodological study of the documents governing universities makes it clear. Even a cursory look at university websites and newspapers makes this abundantly clear. Then, why, in increasing frequencies, do we keep hearing that the university and politics should not under any circumstance occupy the same sentence?  

It is because politics are an agonistic process with differing groups arguing for differing opinions for different structural and institutional outcomes. And those who are content with the existing outcome, normalized as the status quo and the common sense, do not realize that it is actually a result of negotiations with contending groups and can be changed in the future. Thus, they represent their position as the natural and neutral outcome — the nonpolitical one! 

The University is not an exception to what I describe above. Thus, people who are happy with the prevailing social arrangement, those who do not experience a bifurcation, a fissure, when it comes to measuring their expectations of society with their experiences of it, do not want those of us, who ask for a more equitable and just society in which a genocide is a genocide and must therefore be stopped to uphold the international law, to do the work necessary in our workplaces in relation to our vocational responsibilities and ethics. 

— 

You can make a safe donation to the Palestinian cause through the crowdfunding program BuildPalestine’s list of vetted charity organizations which can be accessed here. For more local support resources for Palestinians, you can find information from this U of T information page that points to resources and supports for Palestinian, Arab and Muslim community members.  

How to vote in the federal election  

0

As the April election approaches, it’s important to know that the voting process is more than just showing up to the polls on election day. 

After Prime Minister Mark Carney announced on March 23 that a snap election would be taking place on April 28, voter resources are becoming widely available as the election draws closer. However, it’s important to note that there are preliminary steps that must be taken before voting to ensure the process runs smoothly. 

First, you’ll want to register to vote. You can do so by visiting your local Elections Office, which is at 585 Niagara Street if you are located in St. Catharines. 

A quicker option, though, would be to register online. To register online, visit Election Canada’s Online Voter Registration Service.  

You can use this webpage for more than voter registration, as it allows you to check the information you have previously registered if you have already undergone the voting process and update your information if you have changed addresses, for example. You can also use it register to vote by mail. 

The website includes a questionnaire to determine your voting eligibility and previous registry information, if you have any.  

To be eligible to vote, you must satisfy three criteria: you must have status as a Canadian citizen, be at least 18 years old by April 28 — meaning you can still vote early if you will be 17 years old during that period, you just must be 18 years old on election day — and be able to prove your identity and Canadian address through identification documents. You may upload one form of ID issued by the Canadian government to prove this, giving you the option to use your driver’s license, a provincial ID card or any other government-issued card that includes your name, photo and current address. 

However, if the above are inaccessible to you, you may upload two forms of ID of your choice from a list outlined by Elections Canada, which includes your health card, your Canadian passport, bank statements and more. To see the full list of acceptable forms of ID, visit the Elections Canada website

If you, like many students, live in more than one place during the year, Elections Canada says to register using “whichever address you consider as home.” It is important to remember that you will be voting for a candidate in whatever riding you have chosen. Additionally, if you plan to vote on advanced voting days, you must be in your riding to do so, otherwise you must choose another voting option. 

If your information is up to date on the National Register of Electors, you should receive a voter information card in the mail by April 11. This card will tell you everything you need to know about your local voting process, your local voting location, the days they offer early voting and the hours they are open on election day. 

By law, all eligible voters must have three consecutive hours off work on election day for voting purposes. This means if your work schedule does not align with the hours of your local elections office on April 28, you have three consecutive hours protected by law to dedicate to voting while the polls are open which employers are compelled to abide by even if that means you arrive late or leave early from work. Under the Canada Elections Act, employers cannot deduct pay or penalize employees in any way for taking time to vote. 

However, there are many other voting options if you are unable to vote on April 28 for other reasons. You may vote at any Elections Canada office up to April 22 at 6 p.m. or on April 18, 19, 20 or 21 between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. at your assigned advanced polling station, which can be found on your voter information card or through Elections Canada’s Voter Information Service webpage

You can also vote by mail. To do so, you must apply to receive a vote-by-mail kit before April 22 at 6 p.m. You can apply online through the Elections Canada website or at your local Elections Canada office by printing off or requesting a special ballot form, filling it out, signing it and returning it to the elections office, whether that be in person, by mail or by fax. 

Once you cast your ballot by mail, you cannot change your mind and vote during in-person voting days. 

For more information about voting in the upcoming federal election, visit the Elections Canada website.  

Björk’s lovely “Post” celebrates its 30th anniversary this year 

0

After three decades, Björk’s sophomore album remains as vibrant as ever. 

On June 13, 1995, Björk released her second album Post. The album was a bold follow-up to her wildly successful solo album following her departure from the Sugarcubes, Debut, which was released two years prior.  

Evident right from the luscious bright pink cover art, Post brings an equally beautiful and chaotic sound to the Icelandic singer’s already lively budding discography. 

In an interview with Stereogum, Björk described Debut and Post as two halves of a whole. She said this is where she drew inspiration for the album’s title, attempting to signify that the two works were a “before-and-after kinda thing.”  

Though Björk’s overall sound is hard to pin down, ranging from ethereal, intense, technically precise and, at times, downright (enjoyably) bizarre, the synchronicities between the two albums are trackable as per their stated developmental connection by the artist. One even could listen to the two albums back to back and they would sound like a consistent double-album. Still, there are important differences between the two; Debut favours harsher pitches and Post is a bit softer in comparison, oftentimes employing a more muted and simpler sonic atmosphere. 

Despite Post’s lack of sharp noise, the album is not any less intense than its predecessor. The album opens with the aggressive “Army of Me,” a rhythmic cut with almost a technologically advanced rock track backing Björk’s warnings not to “complain once more” lest you meet the “army” within her. 

The repetitive percussion in the song almost gives it a heartbeat, which mirrors Björk’s production intent to “bring the album alive,” making Post its own universe through unique instruments and new sounds. 

In terms of the production process for Post, Björk said she felt the need to be “musically promiscuous” and bring a “different mood” to each track. She attributed this to her time producing Post in London and being “too excited” about it all. 

“The picture on the cover is me on Piccadilly Circus [in the West end of London], too excited, too many things, Bright Lights Big City kinda thing […] so my musical heart was scattered at the time, and I wanted the album to show that,” said Björk. 

Listening to Post shows that she clearly succeeded in this endeavour. Although many of the songs detail the throes of romantic endeavours, the album has an incredible sonic range that displays this subject matter in different ways on each track. 

Many of the album’s upbeat tracks have become staples of Björk’s discography — a considerable feat as she now touts nine other studio albums, many of which are considered classic works of modern music. 

One of these staple tracks is the highly theatrical “It’s Oh So Quiet,” which is the absolute opposite of what its title suggests. Filled with Björk’s screams and yells backed by Broadway style instrumentals, the track brings an incredibly fun listening experience. 

An equally enjoyable upbeat track on the album is “I Miss You,” where Björk sings about missing the idea of a lover she has yet to meet. The lyrics are backlit by a fun dance track and rhythmic beats, interestingly contrasting with the subject matter. 

However, I would argue that Post shines even brighter through its several softer tracks that bring an undeniably beautiful listening experience that I have rarely found replicated in any other artist’s work. 

“Cover Me” and “You’ve Been Flirting Again” are a couple of these beautiful tracks, with the former bringing two minutes of flowing strings and simple vocals to establish a mellow atmosphere and the latter bringing a soft serenade backlit by cascading instrumentals. 

Post’s crowning track is also one of these softer cuts (and my personal favourite song by Björk). “Possibly Maybe,” a song whose subject material spans an exciting romantic fling from beginning to end, opens with noises that resemble an old computer reluctantly starting up before soft synth notes draw in. The track revolves around the exciting uncertainty of a new relationship, with Björk repeatedly wondering what might “possibly maybe” happen with the connection. 

The song lifts the listener through an ethereal experience, immersing them in the emotion behind the song. 

Overall, Post currently stands as my favourite album by Björk for its beautiful intensity and reluctance to be confined to a singular genre, sound or sonic atmosphere.  

What you missed at BUSU’s Annual General Meeting 

0

BUSU’s latest Annual General Meeting featured a low turnout in an attendance of 16 people total, speakers included. Here’s what you missed. 

The Brock University Students’ Union’s (BUSU) 2025 Annual General Meeting, which took place virtually on March 25 from 10 a.m. and lasted a little over an hour, provided students with key updates on major projects, academic initiatives and campus events. Among the most significant discussions was discussion on the long-anticipated construction of the new Student Centre. 

Facilitated by chairperson Brielle Kaminsky, the meeting began with a land acknowledgement before moving on to a look at BUSU’s financing, with emphasis on how BUSU employment wages make up only 16.3 per cent of their expenses — at least when considering the $14,259,593 of expenses listed on their 2023-2024 audited statements, which are significantly higher than their estimated $2,344,316 of expenses in their 2023-2024 budget. Furthermore, due to the construction of the new building, the net book value increased nearly $200,000 from 2023 to 2024. 

BUSU’s General Manager Robert Hilson then went on to talk about the new Student Centre. Hilson said that demolition was aimed to begin early in the fall semester of this year, with construction to follow. BUSU hopes the new facility will open for the fall semester of 2027. The building has been in the works a long time, starting back in 2004 when students voiced their desire for a new student centre. In 2017 and 2024, there were referendums further emphasizing students’ desire for it. 

Hilson described how, in the last days of March, a meeting placed BUSU’s lawyers, the bank and the university council in the same room for the first time to go over the conditional loan sheet. 

With $41.5 million accumulated between the bank and BUSU, Hilson made it clear that “we have the funds,” adding that “with respect to the university, there needs to be an agreement for construction and management.” In May, there will be a meeting among the Board of Trustees to vote on providing the land and discuss “some tender documents.” 

Construction mobilization and demolition should start within the first two weeks of November 2025. 

Students then heard from BUSU President Anusha Pahuja, who is approaching the end of her last term. On the new Student Centre, she said “it’s been a tremendous project this year and we’ve made some great progress.” She added that BUSU got lots of great feedback, and she encourages students to go have a look at the website or drop by during their office hours to ask any questions. 

Pahuja highlighted some campus activities and events, including the time capsule celebrating 60 years at Brock, which will be sealed this June and expected to be opened in 40 years’ time. 

Pahuja also talked about BUSU’s success with Instagram livestreams, and how they have been a “great opportunity to connect with students through social media.” 

Next, students heard from Mark Chrabalowski, BUSU’s Vice-President of External Affairs, who discussed BUSU’s role in fostering open education resources (OER), which are free-to-use resources that allow students to access textbooks without having to pay for expensive physical copies. 

Chrabalowski also talked about the “Pizza with Politicians” event, saying it fostered the opportunity for students to mingle with local MPs, MPPs and mayors. 

BUSU’s Vice-President of University Affairs Carleigh Charlton brought up some interesting notes on transit. BUSU has had numerous conversations with Go Transit in terms of scheduling, although there are “very complicated systems” at play and local transit “has more sway.” BUSU has recognized that transit is an important factor for Brock students who live out of town, as well as those who have late classes. 

In July 2024, BUSU partnered up with FlixBus, a low-cost bus company. FlixBus services from Brock’s main campus run seven days a week with pickup on Isaac Brock Boulevard West near Parking Lot D. Students looking for transportation to and from Toronto or other major cities can purchase a low-cost ticket which includes amenities such as free Wi-Fi, power outlets and easy booking via its website or app. Charlton said that BUSU is still working on securing easy transit for students who need to get home after late evening classes. 

BUSU’s Vice-President of Student Services Shinaya Peiris went on to highlight the successful events of the past year, such as the 1,300-plus students who attended Free Grab and Go Breakfast events. “We’ve had 60 events throughout the year,” Peiris said. There were over 1,000 attendees at the ice-skating event, for which BUSU partnered with the Brock Winter Club. Peiris briefly talked about the Night Market and some other collaborations with clubs including the Brock Lego Club

Regarding clubs, Peiris announced that in the past year, 96 clubs received funding. She mentioned that Brock has never had so many clubs, with more than 140 being ratified last year. 

Which clubs receive funding and how much they get has been a hot topic for Brock students for a while now, but nothing was mentioned at this meeting. At the BUSU Board of Directors meeting on March 10, this was the largest topic of discussion

Peiris announced that there would be four new club awards, including the Community Impact Award, Diversity and Inclusion Award, Religious and Faith Award, Academic and Well-being Award and the General Interest Award, which falls under the general interests and arts pillar

Near the end of the meeting, chairperson Kaminsky reiterated that since less than 25 people were in attendance, no motions could be passed, meaning one of the only opportunities for students to meaningfully contribute to their student government was missed. 

The meeting concluded with BUSU inviting students to the “Isaac’s Last Call” event, which will give Isaac’s a “legendary send-off” before it closes its doors for the construction of the new Student Centre. 

“Success” is a stupid concept 

0

We’ve all heard it — the cliché that success is a steady climb up a corporate ladder, a house with a white picket fence and a wallet full of shiny credit cards: spouse, house and kids. But success in this respect is an outdated ideal, and it’s about time we change it. 

From a young age, we’re bombarded with the narrative that success means high-paying jobs, expensive vacations and a “perfect” life that we can put on Instagram for validation. But in a world that’s rapidly changing, it’s time we reconsider what a “successful life” really means. The outdated definition of success needs a major overhaul, because the truth is, it’s no longer one-size-fits-all. 

The “American dream” glorified the nuclear family unit, office jobs and owning a house. Appropriately so, young people these days are starting to question all that –– a desk job is not for everyone, not everyone wants kids and a spouse, and the idea of owning a house is out of reach for so many of us. 

For generations, success has been packaged into a neat, socially acceptable formula: graduate from a prestigious institution, land a high-paying job, climb the career ladder, buy a house, start a family and then retire comfortably at 65. It’s a dream many of us grew up with, and for some, it still holds strong. But it’s increasingly obvious that this formula doesn’t fit for the majority of us. What happens when the traditional markers of success — like money, status or homeownership — are no longer attainable or desirable for everyone? 

Let’s be clear: success has long been synonymous with material wealth, societal approval and outward achievement. The problem is that these markers don’t account for our well-being, our passions or the things that actually make us feel fulfilled. More than ever, we’re seeing how a rigid idea of success can leave us feeling hollow. We’re working ourselves into burnout, struggling with mental health and questioning whether the sacrifices we’re making are really worth it. 

One of the major shifts in recent years has been the rise of “side hustle” culture. People have found creative outlets, whether in the form of a small business or a passion project, that push them to constantly hustle, 24/7. But here’s the catch: hustle culture often leads to burnout. We’re told that success means working harder and harder, but when does it stop? At what point do we redefine success as something that’s not about how much you can produce, but about how much you can enjoy life? 

They say it’s the little things in life, right? Being present, enjoying every meal, hanging out with loved ones and trying new things… This is what I’ve been trying to do recently, but so often, we treat our wealth like life’s main goal and everything else like a side-quest. 

It’s time we start thinking of success as something more personal, something beyond external validation. Instead of chasing titles or paychecks, we should focus on living lives that are aligned with our values and desires. For some, that might mean pursuing a career in the arts or nonprofit work, even if it doesn’t come with a high salary. For others, it might look like building a fulfilling, unconventional lifestyle — like travelling or living in a tiny house — where happiness and experiences are the true markers of success. 

My therapist has been asking me for a while now –– what do you want? It’s a very important question; one I haven’t yet figured out completely. But it’s enlightening to think in this manner, and it can set you on the right track. You often start to realize that what you thought you wanted was just someone else choosing your path. Society, professors, parents… Their opinions can matter, but no one understands you better than you. 

Redefining success also means embracing the concept of failure — not as something to be feared, but as a necessary part of the journey. What if failure wasn’t the worst thing that could happen, but the greatest teacher we could encounter? The narrative needs to change so that we see failure as an opportunity to learn, grow and ultimately get closer to what makes us feel whole. 

We also need to embrace the idea that success doesn’t look the same for everyone — and that’s okay. For some, success may mean creating a family. For others, it could be building a career in a field that brings them joy or even taking a year off to travel and see the world; or moving to a small town and developing close relationships with everyone in it; or living secluded in the wilderness; or on a boat; or running a doggy day-care. Success shouldn’t be a one-size-fits-all definition, and it certainly shouldn’t be based on what other people think of you. 

You choose who and what you want in your life: where you want to be and how you want to be. Surround yourself with things you love! For me, that’s books and cats and dogs, but it can be literally anything

It’s time to recognize that a successful life isn’t about fitting into a mould, it’s about creating a life that aligns with your values and makes you feel fulfilled. Success is about finding joy in the small moments, making time for what matters and having the courage to live authentically, even when it doesn’t look like what society expects. (How long has the “crazy cat lady” been made fun of? And why, if she’s happy?) 

The truth is that success is subjective, and it’s about time we rewrite the narrative. A life isn’t measured in dollar signs or titles — it’s measured in happiness, fulfillment and the ability to wake up each day feeling content with where we are, regardless of where we’ve been told we should be. 

So, here’s to redefining success. Let’s make it personal. Let’s make it meaningful.  

Let’s make it real. 

Magnitude 7.7 earthquake hits Myanmar 

0

A magnitude 7.7 earthquake in Myanmar has left a rising death toll of at least 3,000. 

On March 28 at 12:51 p.m., a magnitude 7.7 earthquake hit central Myanmar near its second largest city. It is the strongest earthquake the country has seen in over a century, and the quake even toppled an unfinished high-rise building in Bangkok, Thailand over 1000 km away. The quake is believed to have been shallow, arising at a depth of just 10 km, making its impact even worse. 

According to United States Geological Survey (USGS), the Myanmar quake was the result of “strike slip faulting” between the India and Eurasia plates, meaning these two tectonic plates rubbed sideways against each other. 

The USGS says the region has experience several similar large strike slip earthquakes in the past, with six occurring within approximately 250 km of the current earthquake since 1900 that were magnitude 7 or greater. 

Two hundred Buddhist monks were reportedly crushed by a collapsing monastery, where the floors above fell down onto the men who were taking an exam. 50 children and two teachers were killed when a preschool classroom crumbled, and about seven hundred Muslims were struck while praying at mosques for Ramadan. 

Relief efforts have been further hampered by power outages, fuel shortages and spotty communications. A lack of heavy machinery has slowed search-and-rescue operations, forcing many to search for survivors by hand in daily temperatures above 40 degrees Celsius. 

On April 3, the death toll surpassed 3,000, with more than 4,500 injured and about 270 people still missing. The actual numbers are expected to be much higher and continue to rise as searches continue. 

Most hospitals received damage but are still standing, but they’re struggling to cope with the influx of injured people. There is also a shortage of medical supplies, food and clean water. The damaged airports make it difficult for supplies and rescue teams to reach the most heavily affected areas. Damaged roads and traffic also make it challenging for help to arrive; a convoy of 17 Chinese cargo trucks carrying critical shelter and medical supplies took over 14 hours to arrive. For the most part, rescue efforts have been made up of local volunteers trying to locate loved ones. 

In Naypyidaw, workers pulled a man from the rubble more than 100 hours after the quake, a miraculous rescue that offered a rare moment of hope. The man appeared tired and disheveled as he was pulled out of an air pocket between broken slabs of concrete to a round of applause. Other rescue efforts have succeeded in digging out citizens trapped under rubble. A 62-year-old woman was similarly pulled from broken slabs of concrete in Naypyidaw. 

On March 31, three days after the quake, a team of Chinese rescuers pulled four people — including a five-year-old child and a pregnant woman — from the rubble. 

Aftershocks have concerned and frightened citizens for days after the quake. On April 1, tremors still occurred on occasion, keeping citizens on-edge: “Many people are still sleeping out in the open on the streets or in the parks because they are too scared to go back into their homes,” said UN World Food Programme Country Director Michael Dunford

More than 10,000 buildings were destroyed or severely damaged. 

Even before the quake, four years of civil war had left millions with inadequate shelter, battered health and poor infrastructure. The country already needed humanitarian aid, meaning the quake could exacerbate hunger and disease outbreaks, the U.N warns, and the civil war complicates rescue efforts. One group has declared a partial ceasefire, but the government and other armed groups have not stopped fighting. The government has lost control over large parts of Myanmar, making many areas hazardous or inaccessible to aid organizations even before the earthquake. According to the U.N., the ongoing conflict has displaced over 3 million people

With monsoon season starting in May, finding shelter is expected to be a major challenge for citizens.  

Rescue teams from multiple countries, including Russia, China, India and several Southeast Asian nations, are on the ground. Meanwhile, the European Union, Britain, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea and others have pledged millions of dollars in aid. 

Despite significant budget cuts and layoffs at the U.S. Agency for International Development, which oversees global humanitarian efforts, the U.S. Embassy announced that a team of experts was on its way to Myanmar. The embassy also stated it would provide up to $2 million in assistance through local organizations. 

As the days pass, rescue hopes have started to dwindle. Myanmar observed a minute of silence at 12:51 p.m. local time April 1, the exact moment the earthquake struck on March 28 three days earlier. 

Bayern Munich threatens legal action against Canada Soccer following Alphonso Davies’ knee injury 

0

German soccer club Bayern Munich have threatened to sue Canada Soccer in the aftermath of Alphonso Davies’ ACL tear, suffered during the latest international window. 

In the 12th minute of Canada’s 2-1 CONCACAF Nations League third-place match victory over the United States on March 23, Davies was subbed out of the game after falling to the ground holding his knee in the minutes prior. 

“We’re demanding a full investigation into the events from Canada Soccer and expressly reserve the right to take legal action,” said Bayern Chief Executive Jan-Christian Dreesen. 

Bayern Munich alleges negligence from Canada’s medical staff, citing that the full extent of Davies’ injury wasn’t known until he returned to Germany where club officials examined his knee. The club claims that Canada Soccer didn’t provide proper care for Davies, who, in the eyes of Bayern, shouldn’t have even been playing in the match given his questionable status before kickoff. 

“Sending a clearly injured player with a damaged knee on a 12-hour intercontinental flight without a thorough medical assessment is, in our view, grossly negligent and a clear breach of medical duty of care,” said Dreesen. “The participation of Davies, who already had muscular problems before the game, in a match of no sporting significance is incomprehensible.” 

However, Canada Soccer officials released a statement shortly thereafter, refuting Dreesen’s claims and citing that the association followed proper medical protocols. 

“Medical documentation confirms that proper care protocols were followed, and communication records show that our medical staff provided updates to Bayern Munich throughout the entire tournament. We spoke further with Bayern Munich today to provide them with context and details to address any misunderstandings,” read the statement. “We are all focused on supporting Alphonso in the months ahead.” 

While there isn’t an exact timetable detailing how long Davies will be sidelined, officials expect that he “will be out for several months.” 

Bayern Munich, who are currently first in the Bundesliga standings and face Inter Milan in the quarterfinals of the UEFA Champions League, will be without their star left-back for the rest of the season, adding to the frustration. 

Under FIFA’s insurance policy that covers players who are injured while playing for their national team, Bayern can claim some compensation due to Davies’ injury, up to $7.5 million USD per case. 

The Canadian squad, on the other hand, will be without their captain for June’s Canadian Shield Tournament and CONCACAF Gold Cup, as the team prepares to host next summer’s World Cup after what’s been a scandalous couple of years for the organization. 

Ahead of last summer’s Paris Olympics, the Canadian women’s team were deducted six points after being caught “spying” on opposing teams using a drone. The incident forced the firing of then-head coach Bev Priestman and left concern around the integrity of the men’s team due to their coaching ties with John Herdman, who served as a coach of both the men’s and women’s squads. 

Canada Soccer also faced governance concerns in the early 2020s as their business deal with a private company called Canada Soccer Business halted the revenue flow into the organization, which in turn affected the growth of the sport at both the competitive and grassroot levels. 

While Canada Soccer hopes that Davies’ injury and the subsequent reaction from Bayern Munich is just a blip in the road, further question marks surround the integrity of the organization before the biggest moment in Canada’s soccer history is set to take place in 14 months’ time. 

For more information on Alphonso Davies, visit canadasoccer.com. 

Banner SZN: Recapping U Sports winners of the 2024-25 indoor season 

0

Another U Sports season full of excitement, disappointment and triumph is in the books, leaving one team standing amongst each sport at the end of a grueling season. 

Here are the champions of the men’s and women’s basketball, hockey and volleyball divisions and their journeys to the top of the podium. 

Men’s Basketball – Victoria Vikes 

The Victoria Vikes have reached the top of the mountain for the first time in 28 years after a near-flawless season where the Vikes won 25 of their 26 competitive matches this year. 

Their lone loss came in the semi-final of the Canada West playoffs to the Calgary Dinos; however, the Vikes got their revenge when they defeated Calgary by 29 points, 82-53, in the national championship final to hoist the W.P. McGee Trophy. 

Victoria, who entered the U Sports tournament as the No. 4 seed, shined throughout the weekend as they beat both the No. 5 Bishop’s Gaiters and the No. 1 Ottawa Gee-Gees en route to their ninth U Sports title in school history. 

Women’s Basketball – Saskatchewan Huskies 

The Saskatchewan Huskies closed their season on a 30-game win streak after dropping their opening two contests of the campaign to win both the Canada West and U Sports Championships. 

After becoming Canada West Champions, the Huskies were slated as the top seed in the U Sports tournament. As expected, they cruised during the competition, beating the Alberta Pandas by nine points in the quarterfinals before defeating the UBC Thunderbirds in the semi-final by double figures to set up a championship rematch with the Carleton Ravens. 

After losing to the Ravens by three points in last season’s final, the Huskies came out on top, smashing Carleton 85-66 to win their third Bronze Baby Trophy in school history with all three coming within the last decade (2016, 2020). 

Men’s Hockey – Ottawa Gee-Gees 

The Ottawa Gee-Gees did the unthinkable as they became the first host to win the University Cup since 2017, when the UNB Reds accomplished that feat. 

En route to their first championship in program history, the No. 8 Gee-Gees dethroned the No. 1-seeded Reds — who won the last two titles and five of the last seven tournaments — before eliminating the No. 4 TMU Bold, 4-3, in the semi-finals. 

In the championship match, Ottawa outclassed the No. 3 Concordia Stingers, 3-2, as they were able to withstand a third period barrage by the Stingers to claim the gold medal on home ice. 

Women’s Hockey – Bishop’s Gaiters 

The Bishop’s Gaiters made school history as they became the first Bishop’s team of any sport to win a national championship in the 21st century, with the 1998 men’s basketball team being the last Gaiters squad to win a university banner. 

The RSEQ Champions, who defeated the Concordia Stingers in three games to win the Quebec division, squeaked past the No. 6 UBC Thunderbirds with a 4-3 overtime victory before beating the No. 2 Toronto Varsity Blues, 2-1, in the semi-final. 

The No. 3 Gaiters then shut out the No. 8 Waterloo Warriors, who were the hosts of the women’s tournament, by three goals to claim what is only the school’s fourth national championship in any sport and the first women’s hockey title in program history. 

Men’s Volleyball – Brandon Bobcats 

The Brandon Bobcats are one of the most unlikely teams in U Sports history to win a national title, yet the Bobcats hoisted the Tantramar Trophy for the first time in program history this year. 

After finishing the season with a 13-12 record and getting swept in the quarterfinals of the Canada West playoffs, Brandon only qualified for the national championships as the automatic host berth, but they showed their fight throughout the weekend. 

As the No. 8 and undeniably weakest seed in the competition, the Bobcats and their fans rallied to upset the No. 1 Winnipeg Wesmen, 3-0, before winning a five-set thriller to the No. 5 Saskatchewan Huskies in the semi-finals. 

In the championship match, the Bobcats stunned the No. 3 and reigning national champions, the Alberta Golden Bears, by winning 3-1 to become the first victorious host at the men’s volleyball championships since the Laval Rouge et Or in 2013. 

Women’s Volleyball – Manitoba Bisons 

The Manitoba Bisons continued their dynasty in women’s volleyball, winning their eighth national championship and 19th podium appearance, which are both ranked second all-time behind the UBC Thunderbirds. 

After cruising past the No. 6 Saint Mary’s Huskies in three sets, the No. 3 Bisons battled the No. 2 Thunderbirds — winners of three of the past four tournaments, who have won a U Sports-leading 14 banners — to a 3-1 victory, setting up a showdown with the No. 5 Montreal Carabins in the championship final. 

Manitoba came out swinging, winning the first two sets before ultimately defeating the Carabins in four sets to claim the Bisons’ first national title since 2014. 

— 

As the varsity calendar has now flipped to the 2025-26 season, teams across the country are beginning their preparations as they seek a magical journey to the top of the U Sports pyramid and hoist the national championship next season. 

For more information on U Sports, visit usports.ca. 

Ouellette, Hood named The Brock Press’ Rookies of the Year 

Rémi Ouellette (men’s track and field) and Sydney Hood (women’s hockey) have been selected as The Brock Press Rookies of the Year for the 2024-25 season. 

Men’s Rookie of the Year – Rémi Ouellette 

Rémi Ouellette (men’s track and field) has been named TBP’s Men’s Rookie of the Year following a sensational season where he won gold medals at both the OUA and U Sports Championships in the men’s shot put F41 ambulatory event. 

The New Brunswick native claimed the Badgers’ first para medal in school history at the national track and field championships in Windsor when he placed first with a throw of 7.69 metres. 

Ouellette also became the first Badger to win gold in a para event at the provincial championships, also hosted at the Dennie Fairall Fieldhouse in Windsor, when he reached a mark of 8.19 metres. 

His success on the provincial and national stage helped lead the Badgers to seventh place in the team standings at the OUA Championships with 28 points and 18th at the U Sports Championships, where Brock tallied 10 team points. 

The Sport Management major also competed in three additional meets during the season, placing fifth at the York Open in November with a throw of 7.82 metres as well as winning both the Can Am Classic in January at 7.90 metres and February’s Windsor Team Challenge with a throw of 8.40 metres. 

As a result of a dominant first-year campaign, Ouellette continued his development at Athletics Canada’s para development camp from March 24 to 26, which invited Canada’s top para-athletes to the Toronto Track and Field Centre to receive high-performance training and development opportunities in their disciplines. 

With Ouellette catching the eyes of many on the national level, his growth is expected to skyrocket as he looks to continue to break through barriers next year during his sophomore season. 

Women’s Rookie of the Year – Sydney Hood 

Sydney Hood (women’s hockey) has been named TBP’s Women’s Rookie of the Year after being selected to both the OUA All-Rookie Team and U Sports All-Rookie Team during her debut campaign. 

The Teacher Education major dominated the blue line as she tallied seven goals and 13 points in 26 games to finish third on the Badgers in both those categories. 

Amongst the conference, Hood was one of best rookie defenders in the OUA as she led all first-year blueliners in goals and points while ranking tied for first in goals and third in points among all rookies in the province. In addition, the Erin, Ontario native finished seventh in the league in points among all defenders. 

Hood scored her first career OUA goal in the season opener on Oct. 11 against Carleton, when she recorded her first of two multi-point games and her first of four power-play goals this season — which was tied with Madison Cronkwright for the team lead. 

She was joined on the U Sports All-Rookie Team by forwards Clara Chisholm (Laurier Golden Hawks), Noémie Fontaine (Bishop’s Gaiters) and Naomi Morin (Ottawa Gee-Gees) as well as defender Daphné Boutin (Bishop’s Gaiters) and goaltender Sarah Howell (Calgary Dinos). 

With an impressive rookie season complete, Hood has the skill and potential to capture more accolades in the seasons ahead and lead the Badgers back to the playoffs. 

—   

Stay tuned to The Brock Press next week when the Athletes of the Year will be highlighted.   

Want a say in selecting a winner? Email lcosta@brockpress.com to nominate a Badger. 

Ranking all 28 episodes of Black Mirror 

0

Even if you haven’t already heard of Black Mirror, you’ve almost certainly been living through it. Black Mirror, Netflix’s hit anthology series created by Charlie Brooker, explores the dangers of technology through an array of thought-provoking episodes, asking a series of “What if?” questions that leave you questioning everything you know about humanity and our overreliance on technology.  

It’s hauntingly prescient: we find ourselves closer than ever to living through a real-life episode of the show as the use of artificial intelligence continues to spiral out of control, proving the series’ unnerving parallels to our own reality. 

With Black Mirror’s seventh season rapidly approaching on April 10, there’s never been a better time to look through the show’s catalogue of episodes to see where it made us think, where it fell flat and where it might just define our future. 

Here are all 28 episodes of Black Mirror, ranked from worst to best. 

(*Heavy spoiler warning ahead for the entire show thus far.*) 

28) “Mazey Day” — Season 6, Episode 4 

When Black Mirror flops, it flops hard, and no episode demonstrates that better than “Mazey Day.” What starts as a terribly boring review of how the paparazzi negatively impacts the lives of celebrities — you know, a point that pretty much everyone already agrees with — gets even worse when the main character inexplicably transforms into a werewolf midway through the episode. This awful excuse for a plot twist came out of nowhere and left me intensely confused and frustrated by the end of the episode. After watching it, I had to wonder whether Brooker actually thought he had something insightful here, or if he wrote this episode as a joke because he lost some sort of bet. 

“Mazey Day” isn’t just the worst episode of Black Mirror — with zero redeeming qualities, it’s a strong contender for the worst episode of television I’ve ever seen, and I advise you to avoid it at all costs. 

27) “Metalhead” — Season 4, Episode 5 

The only reason “Metalhead” isn’t in last place is because Black Mirror somehow managed to top it (bottom it?) with “Mazey Day,” but trust me, that isn’t saying much. 

“Metalhead” is a wasted slog of an episode where we watch a lethal robotic dog chase a woman around and… yeah, that’s pretty much all that happens. While many Black Mirror episodes ask thought-provoking questions about technology and what it might become, “Metalhead” pretty much just asks what would happen if dogs were killer robots, and the outcome is about as predictable as you’d expect. There’s not much else to say here. 

Oh, and the entire episode is filmed in black-and-white, because having it with colour would apparently risk making it too entertaining. 

26) “Rachel, Jack and Ashley Too” — Season 5, Episode 3 

This episode is quite a bizarre watch because it all feels like some sort of weird joke. Its bright and bubbly themes make it feel like it shouldn’t be taking itself seriously, yet with a story about a celebrity being controlled by her manager, it does take itself seriously, and it’s never quite clear what this episode is trying to be. 

It also stars Miley Cyrus in one of the show’s biggest celebrity cameos, but it feels oddly out of place with the rest of the show. Other episodes explore silly and funny moments, but they manage to do so in a way that still feels distinctly Black Mirror

It’s not impossible for Black Mirror episodes to be quirky and silly; it’s certainly been done elsewhere. “Rachel, Jack and Ashley Too,” unfortunately, is not an episode that is successful at it. 

25) “Crocodile” — Season 4, Episode 3 

“Crocodile” has the bare foundation of a decent Black Mirror episode, but its execution falls flat in just about every way. The episode explores the idea of being able to physically see other people’s memories, but its plot just turns into a string of murders that makes it impossible to empathize with the protagonist and ultimately feels like wasted potential of a good Black Mirror concept. This is a rare instance of the show creating a good idea but squandering its exploration of the core concept, and it quickly becomes an episode that’s very hard to recommend. 

Plus, the ending simply feels needlessly cruel with a flubbed joke that’s not in line with the dark themes of the rest of the episode. While the rest of the episode was already far from perfect, the ending solidifies “Crocodile” as a truly bad episode of Black Mirror

24) “Bandersnatch” — special interactive episode 

Originally planned as part of Black Mirror’s fifth season, “Bandersnatch” was spun off into its own entity, and it’s not hard to see why. The episode is an interactive Netflix special, which means it’s up to the viewer to make decisions using their TV remote to guide the characters’ destinies and ultimately shape the plotline. It’s an incredibly cool concept that feels right in line with Black Mirror’s core themes, and its creators should be proud of the difficult concept they chose to tackle. 

Unfortunately, that’s about all that “Bandersnatch” has going for it. 

While the interactive gimmick is fun, it’s weighed down by an uninteresting story, unsatisfying endings and an ungodly amount of repetition. It’s the sort of thing that’s worth trying out if you’re interested in a choose-your-own-adventure-style episode, but after you’re finished going through its multiple endings once, it’s hard to find a reason to return. 

23) “Loch Henry” — Season 6, Episode 2 

“Loch Henry” is one of those occasional Black Mirror episodes that doesn’t go all-in on a futuristic technological theme, instead relying on a concept that already exists today as an overarching theme: in this case, documentary filmmaking. 

The episode explores the effects that true crime documentaries have on their stories’ real victims, and while there are occasionally interesting moments, it all unfortunately ends up quite boring. The episode isn’t helped by its final plot twist, which unintentionally ends up being quite humorous instead of horrifying when some old footage is rediscovered — which does a bit of a disservice to the entire purpose of the episode, which is meant to stand against the sensationalizing of victims’ stories. 

“Loch Henry” isn’t a grossly offensive episode of Black Mirror like some examples earlier on this list, but it’s only barely possible to describe it as a competent episode, if you can even call it that. 

22) “Men Against Fire” — Season 3, Episode 5 

“Men Against Fire” shows a neat concept with some interesting ideas, but it’s far from the show’s best. 

The episode shows soldiers at war attempting to go out and defeat “roaches”: supposedly evil, disgusting monsters who terrorize villages and must be eradicated. The plot twist eventually reveals that the “roaches” are in fact human beings of an unnamed ethnic group that the government is attempting to eliminate, and the soldiers only visually see them as monsters because of chips inserted in their brains. It’s an interesting idea, but it doesn’t go much further than that.  

The twist occurs somewhat late into the episode for my tastes, meaning so much of the episode is just a hunt for “roaches” before anything of interest happens. It’s an interesting allegory reminiscent of the Nazi party’s genocidal actions in World War II, but when so much of the episode consists of soldiers shooting up old farmhouses and abandoned buildings, it’s hard to consider it one of the most interesting. 

There’s nothing inherently wrong with “Men Against Fire,” it’s just not an episode that I could see myself returning to. 

21) “Demon 79” — Season 6, Episode 5 

“Demon 79” is actually one of the series’ more interesting episodes, but it loses points because it’s quite difficult to actually consider it a part of Black Mirror. Instead, the episode is framed as part of a new subseries entitled “Red Mirror,” which supposedly explores supernatural themes rather than technological ones. 

While the plot — which consists of a woman begrudgingly helping a demon save the world by committing a series of murders — is quite interesting, it feels completely out of place with the rest of the show’s lineup. It doesn’t help that this episode comes from the same season as “Mazey Day,” which suffers a similar problem with its werewolf theme even if that one isn’t branded an episode of “Red Mirror.” 

Black Mirror is at its best when it explores the terrors of technology, and “Demon 79” unfortunately strayed from that path. While it’s worth a watch if you enjoy supernatural stories, it’s fair to hope that it won’t define the future of Black Mirror

20) “Fifteen Million Merits” — Season 1, Episode 2 

As one of the show’s earliest episodes, “Fifteen Million Merits” has some kinks to iron out, but it still does an acceptable job overall. The episode details a world composed almost entirely of screens, where every wall of every building is lit up with some sort of advertisement.  

It’s the earliest episode to explore a dystopian future, and while you can start to see some of Black Mirror’s intelligence at times, I found it lacked the nuance exemplified by some of the show’s later episodes. This episode was also created before Black Mirror would eventually move to Netflix with its third season and see a corresponding jump in its budget, meaning this ambitious episode feels a bit cheap in places, such as the somewhat ugly Xbox 360-like avatars meant to digitally represent different people. The episode also explores too many themes, like advertisements, digital currency and game shows, which makes it impossible for “Fifteen Million Merits” to truly flesh out any single one of its many themes. 

For a very early episode of the show, it’s not bad by any means, but it’s certainly been outdone many times by the show’s future seasons as it grew in budget and concept. 

19) “Striking Vipers” — Season 5, Episode 1 

“Striking Vipers” is probably the first episode on this list that I find more enjoyable than not. The episode goes into the theme of virtual-reality gaming, with two old friends reconnecting over a fighting game called Striking Vipers X. However, things quickly go awry when the two friends, both of whom are men in the real world, pick their characters in the video game. One chooses to be a man and the other a woman, which progresses into them having regular sex with each other through virtual reality, since the game allows their physical bodies to feel the full sensations that it emulates. This starts driving one of the players away from his wife as he is wracked with guilt and confusion. 

It’s definitely an interesting watch, and a competent episode of Black Mirror that mixes themes of technology with that of humanity. Unfortunately, because it doesn’t reach the heights of other episodes of the series, it also just doesn’t stand out in my mind, leading to its placement on this list. 

18) “The Entire History of You” — Season 1, Episode 3 

“The Entire History of You” is the first episode of Black Mirror to home in on a specific technological theme in a futuristic setting. It’s also the first episode to focus on the idea of a computer chip that connects with your brain, a concept that would repeatedly (sometimes to a frustrating degree) get reused in future episodes. 

This episode, however, uses the brain chip to examine the relationships between people and how technology can come between us. In the episode, a man begins to fear his wife is having an affair, so he obsessively uses his brain chip to recall his own memories in search of clues to support his theory. His obsession with this, and his distrust of his wife, eventually begins to drive them apart, and we see the first example of Black Mirror using futuristic technology in a realistic way to create division between people. The concept is quite simple, but that’s part of the beauty of it. Not every episode needs to be elaborate to be successful. 

The reason this episode ranks fairly low on this list is because the brain chip eventually reveals that the man’s wife was indeed having an affair, causing a confrontation between them. Unfortunately, this twist did something that works against the general theme of Black Mirror: instead of painting the technology as something harmful, this twist inadvertently validates the technology it’s trying to paint as evil, which I feel works against the episode in the long run. However, “The Entire History of You” still does so many things well that it’s impossible to rank it any lower on my list. 

17) “Nosedive” — Season 3, Episode 1 

Despite not being higher on my list, “Nosedive” can probably be described as a quintessential episode of Black Mirror thanks to its dark technological theme and its corresponding effect on society. “Nosedive” explores a future in which everyone is linked to a digital social score out of five, where people influence each other’s scores by ranking the social interactions they have with them. This social score then affects every aspect of a person’s life, including their socioeconomic status. 

The episode reflects on the nature of social media and the way we perceive each other through “likes” and follower counts. It’s quite an interesting episode, it’s just not terribly exciting. It’s one of those episodes that feel like they deserve to be ranked higher, but frankly, there are so many other episodes of Black Mirror that are much more of a thrill. 

16) “The Waldo Moment” — Season 2, Episode 3 

Upon my initial watch of “The Waldo Moment,” I probably wouldn’t have ranked it this high on the list, but it’s grown on me due to the parallels it shares with the real world since the episode’s release.  

The episode follows a computer-animated bear named Waldo on a comedy show who pranks politicians. Waldo is voiced by an unhappy comedian, who is eventually surprised when television executives push for Waldo to run in an upcoming election. It explores the ideas of celebrities and popular figures running for political positions when they have no place in politics, and the effects that can occur when they use their power to get into office. 

Sound familiar? 

Indeed, “The Waldo Moment,” which originally aired in 2013, has been credited as “predicting” the rise of U.S. President Donald Trump, whose story mirrors that of Waldo’s rise to the top. It is for this reason that “The Waldo Moment” ranks higher on my list than it would have in the past: if an episode of Black Mirror is able to so closely reflect the future of reality, then it’s successful at what it set out to do. 

It’s just a shame that some use these cautionary tales as instruction manuals rather than what they actually are: warnings. 

15) “Hang the DJ” — Season 4, Episode 4 

One thing I love about Black Mirror is how many genres of film it takes on through its varying episodes, and as a rom-com-style episode, “Hang the DJ” is no exception. 

The episode follows a world where people use a machine that functions as an intensely thorough dating app, setting people up with romantic encounters that last for a predetermined amount of time before they break up and are matched with someone new, all in order for the machine to analyze their behaviour and eventually match them up with the “perfect person.” The episode can be seen as a critique on the culture of dating apps, and as a person who doesn’t like dating apps myself, the theme resonated with me. 

While I didn’t find the episode particularly gripping all the way through, it succeeds at what it sets out to do, telling a story about technology’s involvement in the world of matchmaking and the way it might actually be leading us astray. 

14) “Smithereens” — Season 5, Episode 2 

“Smithereens” is, in many ways, a story about closure. In line with its theme, it doesn’t reveal many of its protagonist’s motivations until the end of the episode, so viewers are left asking several questions throughout the majority of the show. This is a risky creative move by the showrunners, as it’s certainly possible to frustrate the audience by keeping them waiting too long, but it pays off in “Smithereens.” 

Throughout the episode, we follow a live hostage situation as the protagonist kidnaps an employee from the social media company Smithereen, threatening to kill him unless he is given the opportunity to speak with Smithereen’s CEO over the phone. The episode follows the law enforcement’s attempts to rescue the hostage, Smithereen’s internal panic as they debate whether to disturb their CEO, and the FBI intervening in the situation.  

It’s quite an exciting episode, and while there’s not a terrible amount of action on-screen, it’s an interesting glimpse into hostage situations and the immense pressure placed on law enforcement as they attempt to perform a rescue. The episode also has an incredibly satisfying ending with one plot point in particular that calls back to an early scene in the episode, solidifying closure as the episode’s overarching theme. This episode may not appeal to everyone, but I quite enjoyed my time watching “Smithereens.” 

13) “Playtest” — Season 3, Episode 2 

“Playtest” is Black Mirror’s take on a traditional horror episode, complete with a haunted house filled with nightmarish monsters. The twist is that none of these monsters are actually real; instead, they only exist in the mind of our protagonist Cooper, who has signed up to playtest a cutting-edge horror video game that exists on a computer chip drilled into the back of his neck. The chip analyzes his brain to find his deepest, darkest fears, then uses them to create a personalized horror experience unlike any other. 

By the end of the episode, you’re left wondering what scenes have actually taken place in the real world and what’s simply a figment of Cooper’s inescapable nightmare. The episode continually provides unnerving glimpses into Cooper’s familial experience with Alzheimer’s disease, and by the end of “Playtest,” you feel the overwhelming urge to give your parents a call to remind them that you love them. If that doesn’t make for a successful Black Mirror episode, then I’m not sure what does. 

12) “Joan is Awful” — Season 6, Episode 1 

“Joan is Awful” is an unabashedly silly episode of Black Mirror, and it’s not afraid to show it. The episode proves that not every episode of Black Mirror needs to be horrifying to be successful, and the comedic writing and acting on display throughout the episode leaves you laughing throughout.  

In the episode, Joan is left in shock when she finds the streaming service Streamberry (an obvious parody of Netflix) posting a new series called “Joan is Awful,” the events of which are eerily similar to her own life. She embarks on an adventure attempting to defeat Streamberry’s auto-generated show and learns a valuable lesson about reading full Terms & Conditions documents along the way. 

Unlike other episodes, “Joan is Awful” doesn’t try to leave you thinking too hard after watching. It just wants you to have a good time, and in my experience, it does a pretty good job. 

11) “San Junipero” — Season 3, Episode 4 

“San Junipero” was the first Black Mirror episode to win an Emmy Award, and it’s not hard to see why.  

The episode explores technology’s relationship with the afterlife, allowing the elderly to insert their consciousnesses into a virtual world where they can remain forever young, even after their bodies die in the real world. The episode’s ending is uplifting, an unusual characteristic for Black Mirror episodes, but it pays off here. 

The writing and performances in “San Junipero” are consistently effective, and so is the way the episode reveals the eventual twist about the nature of the virtual world that the protagonists are living in. It leaves you thinking about the afterlife and what it means to grow old. While I didn’t enjoy it quite enough for it to crack my top ten, I can wholeheartedly recommend you give this episode a watch. 

10) “Hated in the Nation” — Season 3, Episode 6 

As of writing, “Hated in the Nation” is the longest episode of Black Mirror, having a runtime of 1 hour and 29 minutes. The episode is a crime fiction in which police officers attempt to solve a series of strange deaths, in which people start suddenly writhing in pain before meeting their untimely demise. The police immediately deduce that it’s no coincidence each victim is in the midst of a major internet controversy when they die, leading them to question what could be causing the string of peculiar passings. 

The episode is an insightful look at cancel culture on the internet and might leave you questioning the way you treat others online — including popular celebrities and other influential figures. It’s all too easy to hide behind the veil of anonymity, and the episode explores this theme in full, questioning what might happen if everyone who partook in bullying online were held accountable for their behaviour. 

I highly recommend you give this episode a watch, especially if you enjoy taking part in online controversies yourself. Even if that’s not the case, there’s still a lot to be said about this episode: it’s an exciting ride from start to finish, and there’s not much more I could ask for from an episode of Black Mirror

9) “Arkangel” — Season 4, Episode 2 

“Arkangel” is a fascinating look at how technology affects the experiences of parenthood and the consequences of using it to track your child. The episode follows an overprotective mother having a chip implanted into her young daughter’s head, allowing her to track her child’s location and even see through her daughter’s eyes on a tablet-like device. It’s a terrifying idea that addresses the importance of privacy, and how that line might become blurred by a parent who simply wishes to protect their child. 

“Arkangel” could probably be described as the ideal episode of Black Mirror. It explores a sinister future technology, but better yet, you absolutely know that there would be plenty of people who would use this technology if it existed in the real world. The implant is essentially an extension of real-life privacy-invading apps like Life360, which are used by parents to track their children’s locations in real time.  

As much as people might deny that they would use a system like “Arkangel” if it really existed, there’s no doubt that it would become at least somewhat popular if it were normalized in the real world — and that creates an excellent foundation for any Black Mirror episode. 

8) “Black Museum” — Season 4, Episode 6 

“Black Museum” is one of two Black Mirror episodes that explores a chronology of twisted technological tales throughout a single episode, with all of the stories culminating in one grand conclusion at the end.  

Through the episode, we follow our protagonist as she enters the “Black Museum,” a largely forgotten old building on the side of a desert road filled with tons of tales of technological horrors. She speaks to Rolo Haynes, the operator of the museum, who tells her three stories that will leave you shaking by the end.  

Each story is effective in its own right — the second one, which features a comatose mother having her consciousness inserted into a teddy bear, particularly gripped me — but it’s when the stories all come together in the episode’s conclusion that the episode is solidified as one of the series’ best. Plus, the museum is full of little easter eggs referencing a variety of previous episodes, making the whole episode feel like one big love letter to the entire Black Mirror series. 

There’s one other episode that features multiple stories, and it performs the concept even better, but we’ll get to that shortly… 

7) “The National Anthem” — Season 1, Episode 1 

Having “The National Anthem” placed so highly might be an unpopular opinion, but it’s one I’m confident in. 

The episode follows the modern-day fictional British prime minister, Michael Callow, as he is faced with the most difficult decision of his lifetime: a member of the British royal family has been kidnapped, and her kidnapper will only release her if Callow has sexual intercourse with a pig on live television. The episode follows the public reaction to the unusual ransom demand and the increasing pressure felt by Callow behind the scenes as more eyes turn to him to rescue the hostage. 

Having this episode as the series premiere was certainly a risk as it might have turned people away from the show, but I’d argue that it’s an incredibly effective series opener. The plot follows the public’s sick obsession with watching Callow embarrass himself on live television and might leave you wondering whether you’d jump on the bandwagon to watch a politician embarrass themselves in such a degrading way. The episode is incredibly tense with a slight touch of humour in the ridiculous ransom request, and it all comes together to create an episode that is among the best that Black Mirror has to offer. 

6) “White Bear” — Season 2, Episode 2 

It’s strange that “White Bear” ended up so high on my list considering much of the episode is actually quite boring. The episode centres around a woman affected by amnesia on the run from hunters who want to kill her, as active bystanders stand around filming her on their phones, unresponsive to her requests for help. Maybe this is interesting to some people, but for me, it quickly became boring watching her hopelessly run around a residential area and forest confused and afraid. 

The reason this episode ranks so highly, then, is because its ending is so incredibly spectacular, tying together everything that’s happened so far into a story about punishment and the public’s enjoyment of torturing those who have done evil. 

When it’s revealed that the woman, whose name is Victoria Skillane, actually abducted and murdered a girl with her husband, everything starts to make sense. Every day, as part of her punishment, her memory is wiped and she is forced to live out the same psychological torture she’s endured over the day as she runs from hunters for the public’s amusement. She has no recollection of who she is or what misdeeds she has committed, but she is forced to live out the same hellish spectacle every day only to have her memory wiped by an electrical torture device. 

I admit that the episode had me questioning my own views on vigilantism, and what punishment I believe the worst offenders in society deserve to face. The episode does a brilliant job making you empathetic for Skillane before the plot twist is revealed, leaving you questioning everything you’ve just seen and whether it’s deserved. It’s true that some of the episode might be a bit of a slog, but I promise you, the ending makes it all worth it. 

5) “White Christmas” — Season 2, Episode 4 

“White Christmas” is the other episode that features multiple stories throughout a single episode. It has the same overall structure as “Black Museum,” but it simply does an even better job.  

The episode follows two men in a remote cabin on Christmas, telling each other stories about their past. The men have lived together in the cabin for five years but have hardly spoken, and they eventually open up to each other about their pasts and the guilt they’ve been holding onto. 

In true Black Mirror fashion, the episode features several terrifying technological concepts. The one that resonated with me the most was based around punishing people by forcing them to endure simulated long periods of time by submitting their consciousnesses into electronic “cookies.” Just like “Black Museum,” the episode’s ending ties together its various stories into one satisfying conclusion, and with some incredible writing and acting to boot, it’s no wonder that “White Christmas” ends up so highly on so many Black Mirror ranking lists. 

4) “Beyond the Sea” — Season 6, Episode 3 

“Beyond the Sea” proves that Black Mirror hasn’t lost its touch in creating intelligent and impactful episodes exploring frightening technology. The episode takes place in an alternate version of 1969, where two astronauts — Cliff and David — live together up in space but are able to transfer their consciousnesses to identical robots living back down on Earth. This way, they can continue to live with their loving families back on the planet while taking time to explore the cosmos. 

Things go terribly wrong, however, when David’s family is murdered by a cult that believes the robot replicas to be evil. Furthermore, his robot is destroyed by the cult, leaving him alone up in space knowing his family down below is dead. Cliff, feeling sorry for him, offers to let David use his robot, but tensions rise when David begins falling in love with Cliff’s wife using Cliff’s robot body. 

The whole episode explores the theme of control: as David begins controlling Cliff’s replica, things start falling apart between the real Cliff and his wife, and it all comes together in a disastrous ending in true Black Mirror fashion. I absolutely recommend you check this episode out; it’s undoubtedly one of the series’ best. 

3) “Be Right Back” — Season 2, Episode 1 

“Be Right Back” is another one of those perfect Black Mirror episodes that just manages to check all the boxes. The episode follows a young couple left torn apart after the boyfriend is killed in a car accident. His girlfriend is destroyed by grief; that is, until she discovers an online program that can dig through her boyfriend’s online activity to create an A.I. chatbot that perfectly imitates him. This quickly comes in the way of her grieving process as she begins to act as though her boyfriend were still alive through the chatbot. 

She begins talking to the chatbot over the phone and eventually purchases a full-size robot version of her late boyfriend, effectively replacing the real version of him. She is eventually put off by some of the replica’s robotic qualities, and the episode quickly becomes quite unnerving as she’s stuck with a robot boyfriend she no longer wants. 

The episode explores the way that technology can impact the grieving process, and with the use of A.I. chatbots being higher than ever before, it’s never been more relevant. This is an episode that embodies everything Black Mirror is to its very core: it’s unnerving, nuanced and it will certainly leave you with a lot to think about. 

2) “Shut Up and Dance” — Season 3, Episode 3 

There’s a reason that “Shut Up and Dance” is such a critically acclaimed episode of Black Mirror. Here’s the thing: the episode doesn’t feature any sort of hypothetical future technology that ruins the way humans interact with the world. Instead, everything that happens in “Shut Up and Dance” could very well happen today, and that’s part of its beauty. 

The episode follows Kenny, a young man, after he accidentally downloads malware onto his computer and hackers secretly film him masturbating through his webcam. The hackers then blackmail him into going on a long goose chase in which he must deliver a cake, rob a bank and engage in a fight to the death — the entirety of which he is most certainly an unwilling participant. The episode ends with a shocking plot twist that will stick in your mind for years to come; in fact, it’s worth rewatching this episode when you know the additional context, as the moments of foreshadowing might just make the episode even more exciting. 

This is a quintessential episode of Black Mirror that anyone interested in the show must watch. There’s a solid case to be made for “Shut Up and Dance” being the best episode of the show, but in my opinion, only one other episode has managed to top it. 

1) “USS Callister” — Season 4, Episode 1 

Where do you even begin to talk about “USS Callister,” the absolute pinnacle of the entire Black Mirror series? 

The episode follows a quiet, disrespected businessman with a dark secret: after the office day is over, he goes back to his apartment where he controls a virtual world containing copies of his coworkers, where he rules over them like a malevolent god. In his virtual world, he takes out all his frustrations toward his real coworkers, torturing and abusing their virtual replicas as he pleases. 

As the leader of the virtual gang plots an escape that will require her to call upon the assistance of her real-world equivalent, you’re taken on the adventure of a lifetime. 

The writing is fun yet terrifying, and the acting — especially from Jesse Plemons, who plays both the quiet businessman and his godlike counterpart — is utterly superb. The episode left me on the edge of my seat, rooting for the group of virtual companions to escape the twisted world ruled over by a truly broken man. The whole episode is such a spectacle, and its tense final act is some of the best work that Black Mirror has to offer. There’s no doubt about it: “USS Callister” is my favourite episode of Black Mirror, and frankly, it’s not even close. 

— 

So, that’s how I would rank all 28 episodes of Black Mirror. With so many wonderful (and less-than-wonderful) episodes to discuss, there will surely be plenty of varying opinions about how these episodes should be ranked, and that’s part of the fun of discussing the show.  

One thing’s for certain, though: no matter whether you agree with my rankings or not, as long as you enjoy Black Mirror as much as I do, we’re both ready and waiting with antsy anticipation for when the show’s long-awaited seventh season finally drops on April 10. 

Farokhizad, Fraser named The Brock Press’ Athletes of the Month for March 

0

Yazdan Farokhizad (men’s wrestling) and Brianna Fraser (women’s wrestling) have been selected as The Brock Press Athletes of the Month for March. 

Men’s Athlete of the Month – Yazdan Farokhizad  

Yazdan Farokhizad (men’s wrestling) has been named TBP’s Men’s Athlete of the Month for March after winning a gold medal in the 90-kilogram weight category at the U Sports Wrestling Championships on March 1. 

The second-year Sport Management major defeated Thomas Rousseau of the Alberta Golden Bears 10-0 by technical fall in just 35 seconds to be crowned a national champion, which followed a perfect 3-0 record in round-robin play with two wins by fall and another victory by technical fall, 12-2. 

Farokhizad now has two national medals to his name after earning a silver in his rookie campaign last season and claimed his second championship of the 2024-25 season after winning the OUA gold medal in his weight class earlier this year. 

The Iranian wrestler was named a U Sports First Team All-Canadian and OUA First Team All-Star following his impressive sophomore season that helped lead the Badgers men’s wrestling team to second at the national championships with 63 points in the team standings. 

Women’s Athlete of the Month – Brianna Fraser 

Brianna Fraser (women’s wrestling) has been named TBP’s Women’s Athlete of the Month for March following another gold medal in the 83-kilogram weight class which she also won at the U Sports Wrestling Championships on March 1. 

The Sarnia, Ontario native captured her third straight national gold medal and fourth U Sports medal overall when she beat Concordia’s Alexia Sherland by technical fall 14-2 to reach the top of the podium, which was preceded by a dazzling 4-0 pool play record where she won all matches by fall. 

With the win, the fourth-year Kinesiology major capped off an undefeated university season where she also won the OUA Championship for her third provincial gold and fourth OUA medal in a row while being named as a U Sports First Team All-Canadian and OUA First Team All-Star. 

Her success on the mat led the Badgers women’s wrestling team to the top spot in the team standings at nationals with 70 points as Brock won their second straight U Sports championship in women’s wrestling and their 12th overall. 

— 

With the end of the 2024-25 varsity season, here are all recipients of The Brock Press Athlete of the Month award during the school year. 

OctoberHolden Rogers (men’s hockey), Zoe and Isabella Durcak (women’s rowing) 

NovemberStephen Harris (men’s rowing), Tatum O’Connor (women’s swimming) 

JanuaryVictor Pietrangelo (men’s curling), Madalyn Weinert (women’s basketball) 

FebruaryMichael Ivanov (men’s track and field), Laurin Ainsworth (women’s volleyball) 

March – Yazdan Farokhizad (men’s wrestling), Brianna Fraser (women’s wrestling) 

Stay tuned to The Brock Press over the coming weeks as our Men’s and Women’s Rookie of the Year and Athlete of the Year award winners are announced. 

Men’s hockey: Three Badgers earn OUA accolades 

0

Three men’s hockey stars received provincial honours after a stellar 2024-25 season. 

Zack Stringer and Jacob Hoffrogge were named to the OUA West All-Rookie Team while Holden Rogers was selected as an OUA West Second Team All-Star during the OUA’s end of season awards announcement on March 13. 

Zack Stringer – OUA West All-Rookie Team 

Zack Stringer was named to the OUA West All-Rookie Team due to his scoring touch as a first-year forward. 

The Lethbridge, Alberta native registered 14 goals and 10 assists in 27 games this season to finish eighth in the conference amongst rookies with 24 points and tied for second in rookie goal scoring. 

Stringer scored his first career OUA goal on Oct. 10 against the Western Mustangs, his first of a team-leading six power play goals this season, and quickly elevated his game from there. The Business major tallied his first of five multi-point performances the following night in a 3-2 triumph over the Windsor Lancers. 

Stringer also recorded two game-winning goals this year, with the first coming on Nov. 10 against the Gryphons and his second on Feb. 13 also against Guelph, which is tied with Holden Rogers for the team lead in that category. 

With a successful rookie season behind him, expect Stringer to take another leap next year as his goal contributions will be crucial for the Badgers to find success and make it back to the playoffs. 

Jacob Hoffrogge – OUA West All-Rookie Team 

Jacob Hoffrogge shined on the blue line in his rookie campaign, earning a spot on the OUA West All-Rookie Team. 

The former Prince Albert Raider of the Western Hockey League notched 13 points in 27 games this season, ranking third in the conference amongst first-year defencemen. He scored his first career OUA goal on Nov. 10 to open the scoring in a 6-3 win against the Guelph Gryphons. 

His second goal of the season came on Jan. 26 in a 6-4 victory over the Carleton Ravens when he buried a power-play marker — an area he excelled in this year. Quarterbacking the Brock power play, Hoffrogge tallied seven points on the man advantage as the Badgers scored 22 power-play goals this season to rank eighth in that category. 

Joining Hoffrogge and Stringer on the OUA West All-Rookie Team are forwards Jaxson Murray (Waterloo Warriors) and Jordan D’Intino (TMU Bold) as well as defenceman Luca Fasciano (Lakehead Thunderwolves) and goaltender Matteo Drobac (Western Mustangs). 

Holden Rogers – OUA Second Team All-Star 

Holden Rogers dominated the OUA this season to earn his first all-star team appearance after being named as an OUA Second Team All-Star. 

After registering only two points last season in his first year with the Badgers following a transfer from the TMU Bold, Rogers took his game to another level this season, finishing with 14 goals and 19 assists in 28 games to rank top 20 in the country and tied for fourth in the conference with 33 points.  

The Sport Management major recorded a team-leading eight multi-point games this campaign, including a four-point performance against the Ravens on Jan. 26 in a 6-4 win. 

He also scored two game-winning goals this season, first in the season opener on Oct. 3 against the Waterloo Warriors and again on Oct. 19 against the Nipissing Lakers, earning him The Brock Press Athlete of the Month honours for October. 

Rogers is joined as an OUA West Second Team All-Star with forwards Franco Sproviero (Western Mustangs) and Connor Bowie (TMU Bold), defencemen Jake Gravelle (Western Mustangs) and Jaden Condotta (TMU Bold) and goaltender Kai Edmonds (TMU Bold). 

— 

After missing the playoffs for the first time since the 2015-16 season, the Badgers are destined to reach the postseason again in 2025-26 and have a great deal of young talent ready to lead Brock to a playoff berth next season. 

For more information on the Brock Badgers men’s hockey team, visit gobadgers.ca. 

United’s bold new era: Stadium vision signals return to glory 

0

Manchester United has officially announced plans for a world-class, 100,000-seat stadium as part of a major regeneration project in the Old Trafford area.  

Designed by Foster + Partners and backed by Sir Jim Ratcliffe, the ambitious proposal aims to modernize the club’s infrastructure while revitalizing the surrounding community.  

The project, expected to generate 92,000 jobs and bring in an additional £7.3 billion annually to the UK economy, positions the stadium as a symbol of progress. However, while the club looks to the future with this new development, questions remain about the team on the pitch and the financial feasibility of such an ambitious project. 

United’s long-term goal is to have the world’s best team playing in the world’s best stadium. But a new venue alone won’t bring success — changes need to happen on the pitch as well. With Rúben Amorim now at the helm, his tactical philosophy demands a squad overhaul. Amorim’s high-intensity, dynamic attacking football — built around a well-structured back three, quick transitions and aggressive pressing — will require significant recruitment changes.  

Many current players lack either the technical ability, tactical intelligence or athleticism to execute his vision effectively. For years, United’s squad has been assembled without a clear identity, resulting in inconsistent performances and managerial turnover. 

The financing question looms large given Manchester United’s approximately £1 billion of existing debt, a legacy dating back to the Glazer family’s leveraged buyout in 2005. This debt has been a constant drain on club resources, with hundreds of millions of pounds paid in interest rather than being reinvested in the team or infrastructure.  

The proposed stadium would likely cost between £2-3 billion based on comparable projects, with potential funding coming through private investment from Ratcliffe and INEOS, commercial partnerships, public-private initiatives, additional debt financing or a phased development approach. 

Despite the excitement surrounding the stadium plans, many United fans remain deeply frustrated with the Glazers’ ownership. Their mismanagement since 2005 has led to financial instability, a decaying Old Trafford and years of underachievement. Even with the minority investment from INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe, concerns persist over whether this project will be executed with the club’s best interests at heart — or if it’s simply another distraction from United’s footballing struggles. 

The crucial challenge facing United is balancing this massive infrastructure investment with the immediate need to support Amorim in the transfer market. The manager needs backing to reshape the squad according to his tactical vision. Fans rightly worry that stadium plans could become an excuse for limited team investment when the priority must always be winning — because no matter how impressive the new stadium is, fans care most about what happens on the pitch. A clear recruitment strategy, aligned with Amorim’s philosophy, must be implemented. Without that, no amount of infrastructure investment will return United to the top. 

As the club enters a consultation and planning phase for the new stadium while addressing squad deficiencies, fans will be watching closely — not just to see how the stadium project unfolds, but to ensure that the club prioritizes footballing success above all else. A new stadium is exciting, but trophies define Manchester United. The club must ensure that both the stadium and team are built for the future without compromising either priority. 

Why won’t Poilievre get his security clearance? 

0

Poilievre’s reluctance to get his security clearance has become central to the Liberal Party’s campaign strategy for criticizing the Conservatives, and for good reason. 

Since Prime Minister Mark Carney discussed the lack of security clearance obtained by Conservative Party of Canada leader Pierre Poilievre during the Liberal leadership debate in February, the issue has resurged as a major point of discussion as campaigning for the federal election begins. 

Although Carney originally framed Poilievre’s reluctance to fill out his security clearance papers as an act of ignorance, saying that Poilievre “never bothered” to approach the subject, Poilievre’s reaction to the topic suggests that there are other reasons behind the decision. 

What is the purpose of security clearances? 

According to the Government of Canada website, security clearances are screening processes done by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) to ensure that those close to classified information are adequately vetted beforehand as a safety measure for national security. 

As there are four different types of security clearances, the process ranges based on factors like one’s level of authority, how much sensitive information one could be exposed to as well as the damages that could occur from leaking the protected information. 

CBC News released a video where Parliament Hill reporter Catherine Tunney fully details the importance of security clearances in the political sphere. 

Tunney explains that to be involved in classified conversations about national security, as one example, participating individuals would need to undergo a “robust,” months-long clearance process; however, security clearances are only valid for five years once you have successfully undergone the process. 

Although security clearances are not mandatory for opposition leaders as they do not directly make parliamentary decisions, Tunney cited the concerns of foreign interreference within parties which were prevalent last year, leading to officials suggesting all party leaders undergo security clearances. 

In being subject to this process, party leaders gain access to sensitive information outlining if there are any suspicions of interference within their own parties, but under the Security of Information Act, this information must remain classified.  

Poilievre is the only party leader at the federal level who has been reluctant to complete this process. 

Poilievre’s position on security clearances 

In a news conference in Vaughan, Ontario, Poilievre said he refuses to undergo the security clearance process because he views it as an “oath of secrecy” put forth by the Liberal Party. 

Since security clearances provide individuals access to sensitive information, but do not allow them to share this information, Poilievre implied that undergoing the security clearance process would silence him from speaking on potentially devious relations between his politic rivals and other nations. A few seconds after saying this, Poilievre contradicted this sentiment by saying that obtaining a security clearance would only provide him with “breadcrumbs of intel.” 

Poilievre also noted that he was already cleared as a cabinet minister, but because that clearance was certified over five years ago it is no longer valid. 

Later in the news conference, Poilievre said that he refuses to be “silenced” on issues like interference through a security clearance, though as Tunney notes, he would not have access to this information without a clearance. 

Poilievre’s foreign interference controversy  

On March 25, The Globe and Mail published a piece covering CSIS’s allegations that India was involved in Poilievre’s bid for Conservative leadership back in 2022. 

In the piece, Globe and Mail writers Robert Fife and Stephen Chase explain that a source with top-secret clearance said that CSIS suspects “agents of India and their proxies allegedly meddled” in Poilievre’s leadership race, claiming that they raised money and organized “within the South Asian community” for Poilievre’s campaign.  

However, both authors outline that CSIS was unable to share this information with Poilievre because of his lack of security clearance, nor did they have evidence that he knew about the alleged interference at all. 

Poilievre’s refusal to get a security clearance, then, allows him to both be ignorant to potential interference that helps his campaign, giving him plausible deniability if it’s ever revealed, while he gestures as if he’s refusing to be cleared out of some populist pledge to not be silenced. 

Although Poilievre seems to be firm in his stance against participating in the security clearance process, it is unclear whether he will change his mind ahead of April’s federal election. 

Carney triggers snap election set for April 28 

0

Amidst the ongoing trade war with the U.S., Prime Minister Mark Carney has triggered a snap election set to take place in late April. 

On March 23, Carney held a news conference outside of Rideau Hall in Ottawa after meeting with Governor General Mary Simon to announce his request to dissolve the next parliamentary session, which was set to begin on March 24, and instead call an early federal election which will occur on April 28. 

Although a federal election was set to occur this year, it originally was not supposed to take place until the fall. However, Carney said that his decision to call an early election centred around the ongoing trade crisis with the U.S. 

Calling President Trump’s attack on Canada’s economy “the most significant crisis of our lifetimes,” Carney said that the “fair” thing to do is ensure Canadians have stable mandates and protections in place to limit the effects of the trade crisis on those whose industries are targeted most. 

“We can control our destiny,” said Carney. “We can have a new Canada built by us, for us. We can give ourselves more than any foreign government can take away.” 

After announcing the snap election, Carney launched into his campaign for a re-election of the Liberal government. During the news conference, he outlined a policy which would bring a tax cut to the middle class — cutting the lowest income bracket by one per cent — with the intent of building a stronger Canadian economy to match up with the threats imposed by the U.S. 

The other party leaders who have begun their campaigns for the election are Pierre Poilievre, representing the Conservative Party of Canada; Jagmeet Singh, representing the New Democratic Party (NDP); Yves-François Blanchet, representing the Bloc Québécois; as well as Elizabeth May and Jonathan Pedneault, who will co-lead the Green Party of Canada. 

The other party leaders responded to the federal election announcement quickly, discerning their campaign promises and electoral approaches.  

There is a consensus evident among party leaders that the trade war is a top priority in campaigning for the upcoming election. At a news conference in Gatineau, Quebec following Carney’s announcement, Poilievre echoed Carney’s sentiments that Canadians can build the government’s response to the ongoing trade crisis with the U.S., using their vote to “transform [their] anxiety and anger into action.” He also said that the Liberals are not apt to fight against Trump’s threats. 

When speaking to reporters in Ottawa, Singh shared similar doubts in Carney’s leadership. Referencing the need for a prime minister who will work in the best interests of Canadians amidst the trade conflict, Singh said that Carney’s career history “serving the interests of billionaires, shareholders and CEOs” puts him in a questionable position. Singh added that Poilievre would be an equally questionable leader, as “his only solution [to the trade crisis] is tax breaks for the wealthy.” 

Blanchet, May and Pedneault also began their campaigns. Blanchet emphasized his commitment to protecting Quebec and its industries through attacks on the Canadian economy while the co-leaders of the Green Party said they are the only leaders who have the “courage” to tax the ultra-rich and pledge to bring “the most honest, brave and visionary Parliament” to Canadians. 

Alongside the trade war with the U.S., other major points of discussion in campaigning for the federal election include trade relationships outside of the U.S., the cost of living, crime and the drug crisis. 

Although the election is taking place on April 28, there are advanced polling options from April 18-21 as well as mail-in voting options that you must apply for before April 22. 

For more information about how to vote in April’s federal election, visit elections.ca. 

Canada Soccer announces new Canadian Shield Tournament in preparation for World Cup 

0

Canada Soccer took another step in scheduling quality matches in advance of Canada’s home World Cup next summer. 

On March 19, Canada Soccer announced a new friendly tournament called the Canadian Shield Tournament, which will see the Canadian men’s squad host matches at Toronto’s BMO Field in preparation for Canada’s World Cup opener at the venue a year later.  

“Toronto is preparing to play host to the biggest sporting event in the world next summer, and with it, brings the opportunity to make history,” said President and CEO of Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment (MLSE), Keith Pelley. “The Canadian Shield will not only give the Canadian Men’s National Team a chance to prepare against some of the best competition in the world, but it continues to build the excitement for the city and the global fans here of the beautiful game.” 

Canada, Cote d’Ivoire, Ukraine and New Zealand have been selected as the four teams that will participate in the inaugural competition during June’s international window, which will be a feisty test for the Canadian side who have high aspirations ahead of the World Cup. 

Canada, currently the 31st-ranked team in the world in the latest FIFA World Rankings, will battle the 25th-ranked Ukraine on June 7 before going up against Cote d’Ivoire, the 46th-ranked nation in the world and reigning Africa Cup of Nations champions, on June 10. 

In the other two matches of the tournament, New Zealand — the 89th-ranked country in the world, who is one of only four non-host countries to have already qualified for next summer’s soccer spectacle — face Cote d’Ivoire on June 7 in the second match of the doubleheader before battling Ukraine on June 10 to open the day’s schedule. 

All matches will require a winner as games will head directly to a penalty shootout if tied after 90 minutes. Teams will be awarded three points for a regulation win, two points for a shootout win and one point for a shootout loss, with a tournament winner being crowned after all four matches are completed. 

“Every competitive match from now until the World Cup will be critical to get our team the preparation it needs ahead of welcoming the world next year,” said Jesse Marsch, head coach of Canada. “This is an extraordinary addition to our annual competitive calendar and to be able to play at home in front of our fans again will be really special for our guys.” 

Canada last played at home in November when they defeated Suriname in the two-legged quarterfinal of the CONCACAF Nations League, a tournament that Canada finished in third place after beating the Americans 2-1 in the third-place game on March 23. 

But the Canadian Shield Tournament allows the Canadian squad the opportunity to play teams from other confederations, something that hasn’t happened since Canada’s 2-1 defeat to Uruguay in the third-place match of the 2024 Copa America last summer. 

Having the ability to familiarize themselves with different tactics and styles of play from nations worldwide will be beneficial as Canada prepares to compete in some of the biggest soccer events in the world in the years ahead. 

With the Canadian Shield Tournament set to become an annual event at BMO Field, Canada is slated to contend against the world’s best nations on home soil and continue the growth of the Canadian men’s soccer program as they soar to new heights. 

For more information about the Canadian Shield Tournament, visit canadasoccer.com. 

“Equus Asinus” is a delightful addition to Men I Trust’s discography 

0

Score: 4/5 

Being the first installation of a two-album conceptual project from Men I Trust this year, Equus Asinus is a tranquil work that matches the band’s well-worked sound. 

Men I Trust, a Canadian indie band from Québec City, released their fourth studio album Equus Asinus on March 19, with its counterpart Equus Caballus still awaiting release.  

The album sonically matches what can be heard across Men I Trust’s discography: simple rhythmic tracks dominated by soft chords and the light voice of lead singer and guitarist Emma Proulx.  

The album’s first track “I Come With Mud” opens with a minute-and-a-half long intro of simple, repeated guitar chords backlit by a consistent, soft beat before Proulx begins her vocals.  

The long intro is effective in establishing the slow nature of the album, with many tracks drifting through dozens of seconds of instrumentals between vocal takes — which isn’t out of the ordinary for the band, especially when looking at earlier albums like Oncle Jazz, released in 2019. 

There are several songs that shine through on Equus Asinus, placing themselves as lovely additions to Men I Trust’s discography. 

Among my favourite tracks on the album, “All My Candles” stands out as a sonically delicate yet deeply introspective cut. Although the lyrics ponder the malleability of one’s character, the lighter and sometimes playful strings in the background accompanied by incredibly delicate drums make the track feel softer than its lyrical content suggests. 

“The Landkeeper” brings an equally soft listening experience. Backgrounded by dreamy instrumentals, the lyrics describe a “home away from home” with “morning dew on cherry trees.”  

Although Men I Trust’s sound is easily identifiable, I would argue that the album staying faithful to their core sonic style works in favour of the band. Even though Men I Trust’s listeners can expect their distinct, delicate sound, each song employs this sound in its own individualized way, even if many of the songs are threaded together by similar, soft beats which guide the tracks in the background. 

Although the album largely reflects Men I Trust’s customary sound, it also includes some experimental tracks which make the album distinct.  

One of these experimental tracks is “Moon 2,” which employs disjointed keyboard and string instrumentals that swing back and forth in pitch, eliciting a similar effect to an overused whammy bar. 

“What Matters Most” also takes a slightly different approach from Men I Trust’s overall sound, including more distinct jazzy piano instrumentals while the rhythmic hum of a record player floats over the track. 

Overall, Equus Asinus continues the softness of Men I Trust’s discography in fresh ways, creating another lovely listening experience from the indie band and fueling anticipation for the album’s companion LP to follow later in 2025. 

Women’s bracket heats up in Elite Eight  

0

The 2025 NCAA Women’s Basketball Tournament has reached the Elite Eight, and the stage is set for an epic week of games.  

After an exciting Sweet 16 full of nail biters and star performances, eight teams remain in the hunt for the national championship. Each regional final is exciting in its own way.  

Below, we break down each Elite Eight matchup with recaps of how the teams got here, key player highlights, team strengths and predictions into who might punch a ticket to the Final Four.  

South Carolina Gamecocks vs. Duke Blue Devils 

South Carolina outlasted No. 4 seed Maryland 71-67 in a hard-fought Sweet 16 game. The Gamecocks, who entered the tournament 33-3 and first in the SEC, leaned on their depth and defence to pull through.  

Duke advanced by grinding down No. 3 seed North Carolina 47-38 in an all-ACC Sweet 16 slugfest, holding the Tar Heels to just 38 points. Duke’s defensive effort — a hallmark of Kara Lawson’s team — stifled UNC and sent the Blue Devils to their first Elite Eight in over a decade.  

Under coach Dawn Staley, South Carolina reloaded this season after losing its famous 2023 senior class. The new-look Gamecocks are led by freshman forward Joyce Edwards (13.0 points per game [ppg]) and junior forward Chloe Kitts (8.0 rebounds per game [rpg]). Senior transfer guard Te-Hina Paopao provides veteran leadership (team-high 3.0 assists per game) while local sophomore MiLaysia Fulwiley adds an offensive spark (12.1 ppg). South Carolina plays fast and presses on the defence, having averaged over 80 points and 16.8 assists per game this season. They’ve won with balanced scoring — five players between 8 and 13 points — and relentless rebounding, both hallmarks of Staley’s teams.  

Duke, meanwhile, prides itself on defence. The Blue Devils allowed just 47 points in the Sweet 16 and led the nation in scoring defence during stretches of the season. Offensively, 6’2” freshman forward Toby Fournier has emerged as a go-to scorer, averaging 13.1 points and 5.3 rebounds. Fellow underclassman Jadyn Donovan, a 6’0” guard, leads Duke in rebounding (6.4 rpg) and blocks (2.3 blocks per game [bpg]) despite her guard position — a testament to her athleticism and Duke’s gang-rebounding philosophy. Junior point guard Taina Mair (a transfer who averaged 7.8 assists last year at Boston College) now runs the offence, dishing 3.7 assists per game to lead the team. Duke’s scores tend to be lower; they rely on a slow tempo, half-court defence and an opportunistic offence. In their Sweet 16 win, no player scored more than a dozen points — instead, they forced 20 plus turnovers and held UNC to 25 per cent shooting in a defensive clinic.  

This matchup pits experience against a rising team. Dawn Staley has built a dynasty at South Carolina with multiple national titles, and her 2024-25 team won the SEC regular season. The Gamecocks’ ability to reload (despite losing stars like Ailyah Boston and Zia Cooke to the WNBA last year) is on display again.  

On the other sideline, Kara Lawson has quickly turned Duke into an Elite Eight team. Lawson, a former Olympian and WNBA champion, has instilled toughness in the Blue Devils. This is Duke’s first Elite Eight since 2013, and they’ll lean on that strong defence to try to upset South Carolina. Notably, South Carolina’s size in the paint (6’5” centre Sakima Walker and 6’3” forward Ashlyn Watkins) will challenge Duke’s shooters in the lane, while Duke’s perimeter defenders will try to contain South Carolina’s guards.  

Expect a low-scoring, physical battle. South Carolina averages around 82 points per game, but Duke holds opponents in the 50s. The Gamecocks will look to push the pace and crash the boards — Chloe Kitts (8.0 rpg) and Sania Feagin (1.5 bpg) give them an edge inside. Duke will counter by slowing it down and seeking high-percentage looks for Fournier and senior wing Reigan Richardson. If South Carolina’s freshmen (like Edwards) handle the moment and Paopao knocks down timely shots, the Gamecocks should have enough offence to prevail. Duke’s path to victory is to muck it up — replicating the defensive intensity that held UNC to 38 points.  

Ultimately, South Carolina’s depth and championship pedigree make them the favourite. Look for Staley’s crew to make the plays late to win a close one and advance to yet another Final Four.  

UCLA Bruins vs. LSU Tigers 

The top-seeded UCLA looked powerful in a 76-62 victory over No. 5 Ole Miss. The Bruins used a strong second half to pull away, showcasing their blend of inside power and backcourt skill.  

Meanwhile, No. 3 LSU knocked off No. 2 NC State 80-73 in a high-scoring Sweet 16 affair. LSU’s duo of Aneesah Morrow and Flau’Jae Johnson propelled the Tigers past the Wolfpack in what was effectively a shootout. These results set up a star-studded Elite Eight battle between the Pac-12 (now Big Ten) champions in UCLA and the defending 2023 national champions in LSU.  

UCLA (33-2) has perhaps the most balanced roster in the nation. The Bruins feature 6’7” sophomore centre Lauren Betts, who has been dominant since transferring from Stanford. Betts averages a double-double with 20.1 points and 9.7 rebounds per game, leading UCLA in both categories. She has converted an eye-popping 65.4 per cent of her shots from the field, often overwhelming opponents in the paint. Complementing Betts is junior point guard Kiki Rice, the former No. 1 recruit, who chips in 13.1 points and a team-high 5.0 assists per game. Rice is also a pesky defender (1.5 steals per game) and steady floor general. UCLA bolstered its roster with impact transfers: forward Janiah Barker (a 6’4” junior who adds athleticism in the frontcourt) and sharpshooting guard Charlisse Leger-Walker (a senior transfer from New Zealand). The Bruins can play inside-out basketball by feeding Betts on the block or kicking out to guards for three. They average around 82 points per game and have multiple players capable of leading the scoring on any given night.  

LSU (31-5) brings explosive scoring and talent. Coach Kim Mulkey’s Tigers led the SEC in offence this year, and it starts with forward Aneesah Morrow. The DePaul transfer is a double-double machine, averaging 18.8 points and 13.7 rebounds per game. Morrow’s motor on the glass (grabbing nearly 14 boards a night) and scoring touch around the rim have powered LSU all season. Alongside her, junior guard Flau-Jae Johnson — who helped LSU win the 2023 title as a freshman — has blossomed into a star, averaging 18.3 points and shooting 38 per cent from three. Johnson had a big Sweet 16 (she poured in over 20 points against NC State, per game reports) and is known for her ability to heat up from long range. Another key senior point guard is Shayeann Day-Wilson (a Duke transfer), who leads LSU with 3.5 assists per game and pushes the tempo. LSU’s roster is loaded with talent: sophomore guard Mikaylah Williams was the No. 1 recruit in 2023 and contributes on both ends, and 6’6” centre Aalyah Del Rosario provides a steady post presence. The Tigers love to run in transition and score in bunches — they eclipsed the 100-point marker twice in earlier rounds of the tournament. Expect Mulkey’s team to aggressively attack UCLA’s defence off the dribble and crash the offensive boards.  

This matchup features two coaching heavyweights. UCLA’s Cori Close has steadily built the Bruins into a national contender and now has them one win from the program’s first Final Four since 2018. On the other side, Kim Mulkey is chasing history — she’s already won NCAA titles at Baylor (three) and LSU (one) and is looking to repeat with LSU.  

The coaching chess match will be fascinating: Close will certainly try to utilize UCLA’s size advantage with Betts and 6’3” freshman-reserve Amanda Muse, while Mulkey will likely emphasize her team’s quickness and aggression. One subplot is experience versus youth: LSU’s core has big-game experience from last year’s championship run, whereas UCLA leans on some underclassmen. However, UCLA’s Lauren Betts is playing arguably better than anyone in the tournament — she averaged 20 points in the first two rounds and is coming off a 22-point, 11-rebound game in the Sweet 16. LSU’s defence will need to find an answer for Betts inside. Conversely, can UCLA’s perimeter defence contain LSU’s slashing guards? The Bruins allowed just 62 to Ole Miss, a defensively oriented team, but LSU’s offence is a different game.  

This game promises to be high scoring and physical. Look for UCLA to establish Betts early — if she can dominate the paint and perhaps get LSU’s forwards in foul trouble, the Bruins will have a major edge. UCLA also has a capable secondary scorer in Kiki Rice, who can exploit LSU’s sometimes inconsistent perimeter defence. On the other hand, LSU will likely try to speed up the pace. If Johnson and Morrow can get out in transition and turn it into a track meet, LSU could put UCLA on its heels. One matchup is on the glass: Morrow (13.7 rpg) vs. Betts (9.7 rpg). Both are elite rebounders; whichever team earns more second-chance points could swing the outcome. Another X factor is three-point shooting — LSU’s Flau’Jae Johnson has the edge there (LSU hit 8 threes against NC State) while UCLA’s outside shooting is respectable but not their primary weapon. In crunch time, expect a battle of wills between Betts in the post and Morrow attacking from mid-range.  

It’s truly a toss-up game. If the Bruins can dictate a half-court game and Betts continues her tour de force, UCLA should survive. But don’t be surprised if LSU’s championship pedigree and Mulkey’s tactics produce a minor upset. Either way, this heavyweight showdown could come down to the final minutes.  

Texas Longhorns vs. TCU Horned Frogs 

In an all-SEC (newcomer) vs. SEC classic, No. 1 seed Texas defeated No. 5 Tennessee 67-59 to advance. The Longhorns led wire to wire, using a big fourth quarter from their young stars to pull away from the Lady Vols.  

Meanwhile, No. 2 seed TCU continued its Cinderella run by knocking off No. 3 Notre Dame 71-62. The Horned Frogs, who had never before reached the Elite Eight, were led by graduate guard Hailey Van Lith’s 26-point performance. Van Lith’s heroics helped TCU eliminate the ACC champion Fighting Irish, stamping TCU’s ticket to a historic Elite Eight, the first in team history.  

Texas (43-3) has been a model of consistency and balance under coach Vic Schaefer. Interestingly, the Longhorn’s leading scorer this season is a freshman — 6’1” forward Madison Booker, who averages 16.4 points and 6.8 rebounds per game. Booker was a highly touted recruit and has more than lived up to the hype, shooting 46.7 per cent from the field and an impressive 42.4 per cent from three-point range. In the Sweet 16, Booker again led the team in scoring, showcasing a polished mid-range game beyond her years. The engine of the Longhorns, however, is senior point guard Rori Harmon. Harmon is the team’s leader in assists (6.0 per game) and steals (2.2) and is the floor bender who makes Texas go. She nearly averages a double-double with points and assists, and in the win over Tennessee she stuffed the stat sheet (unofficially eight points, 10 assists, three steals). Texas also boasts 6’4” senior forward Taylor Jones (12.3 points, 6.9 rebounds, 1.8 blocks), an inside presence who will be critical in protecting the rim. Another impact player is senior wing Laila Phelia (a transfer from Michigan), who provides scoring on the perimeter.  

The Longhorns play a tough, physical style — not surprising given Schaefer’s Mississippi State teams were known for defence. They led the SEC in field-goal defence this year. Offensively, they share the ball (Harmon’s 6.0 assists led the conference) and can get points from various players — six players average six-plus points. Texas also has depth: 6’6” junior Kyla Oldacre rotates in to bolster the post, and senior Aaliyah Moore is a significant player as a former All-Big 12 forward returning from injury. In summary, Texas is balanced, combining youth and experience with a defence-first mentality.  

TCU (34-3) has become the story of the tournament. The Horned Frogs were a No. 2 seed, but many doubted them due to a lack of deep tournament history. Nevertheless, they’ve emphatically silenced those doubts. Their style is defined by one name: Hailey Van Lith. The fifth-year senior guard (who previously starred at Louisville and won a title with LSU in 2023) transferred to TCU for her final year and she has led by example. Van Lith averaged 19-plus points and four assists, and she lit up Notre Dame for 26 points to carry TCU into the Elite Eight. In fact, this marks Van Lith’s fifth consecutive trip to the Elite Eight (three times with Louisville, once with LSU, now with TCU) — an astounding streak of personal success. Her experience is rubbing off on a TCU team that has never performed on this stage. Aside from Van Lith, TCU relies on a balanced backcourt consisting of senior guard Knisha Godfrey and junior Lauren Heard.  

The Frogs push the tempo and love the three-ball. They hit 10 three-pointers in their second-round upset of No. 7-seed Louisville and continued to shoot well against Notre Dame. In the regular season, TCU averaged around 78 points and was among the nation’s leaders in three-point attempts. Defensively, TCU isn’t as stout as some other teams, but they thrive on creating turnovers and fast-break chances. Van Lith’s fiery leadership has ignited this team — she’s often seen urging her teammates on and brings skill from her championship pedigree. One concern, however, is that TCU’s front court is undersized compared to Texas. The Frogs’ starting centre is 6’1”, which could be an issue against Taylor Jones and Madison Booker in the paint.  

This matchup is a Texas-sized showdown — literally a battle for bragging rights in the Lone Star State, now on the national stage. Texas head coach Vic Schaefer took Mississippi State to back-to-back national title games in 2017 and 2018 (famously snapping UConn’s 111-game win streak), but he’s seeking his first championship win. He’s in his fifth year at Texas and has already amassed a 128-34 record, building the Longhorns back into a powerhouse.  

On the other sideline, Mark Campbell (in his first year coaching at TCU) has engineered a stunning run. Hired last offseason, Campbell inherited Van Lith via the transfer portal and quickly molded a cohesive unit that broke through the Big 12 (TCU won the Big 12 tournament, per their 16-2 conference mark) and now the NCAA bracket.  

The contrast in experience is at stake; Texas is used to deep March runs (Elite Eight in 2022), whereas TCU is brand new to this pressure. Yet TCU is playing with house money and has the tournament’s most seasoned player in Van Lith. A subplot to watch is fatigue and composure — Texas has a deeper bench, while TCU leans heavily on Van Lith, who logged 39 minutes in the Sweet 16. Can TCU sustain their momentum against a more rested Texas team?  

Expect an emotional, high-energy contest. These schools know each other well (former conference rivals in the Big 12), and that familiarity might breed some excitement. Texas will look to establish their interior game — feeding Taylor Jones in the post and attacking off the dribble with Rori Harmon. Madison Booker versus TCU’s forwards is a mismatch Texas will try to exploit, as Booker’s versatility (she can hit the three and post up) could give TCU fits.  

TCU, on the other hand, will put the ball in Van Lith’s hands and let her go to work. Don’t be surprised if Van Lith puts up another 20-plus shot attempts — she knows what it takes at this stage and has the green light to carry the offence. If Texas can force the ball out of Van Lith’s hands and make others beat them, their chances improve significantly. Look for Texas to perhaps throw a box-and-one or trap defence to make Van Lith give it up. TCU will need a secondary scorer to step up — perhaps senior forward Emily Fisher or another shooter hitting timely threes.  

Ultimately, Texas’s balance may be the deciding factor. The Longhorns can score inside and out, and they have multiple defenders to rotate on Van Lith and try to wear her down. TCU’s fairy-tale run has been phenomenal, but to continue, they’ll need an almost perfect game from Van Lith and the team. Given Texas’s edge in the paint and superior depth, the prediction leans toward the Longhorns ending TCU’s impressive run. 

USC Trojans vs. UConn Huskies 

No. 1 seed USC reached the Elite Eight by defeating No. 5 Kansas State 67-61 in the Sweet 16. Impressively, the Trojans did so without star guard JuJu Watkins, who sat out due to injury. In her absence, freshman Kennedy Smith and sophomore guard Avery Howell delivered clutch performances as USC held off a late Kansas State rally, sending them to their first Elite Eight since 1994.  

Their opponent, No. 2 seed UConn, is far more familiar with this stage — the Huskies blew past No. 3 Oklahoma 82-59 behind a vintage performance from Paige Bueckers. Bueckers erupted from a career-high 40 points, becoming the first UConn player ever to score 40 in an NCAA tournament game. Her second-half takeover (29 of her 40 points came after halftime) carried UConn comfortably into the Elite Eight.  

USC (31-3) has quickly become a contender under coach Lindsay Gottlieb thanks to advanced recruiting and strategic transfers. JuJu Watkins, the 6’2” sophomore guard who was the nation’s No. 1 recruit in 2023, is the centrepiece. She led USC with 23.9 points, 6.8 rebounds and 3.4 assists per game this season — extraordinary numbers that underscore her do-it-all talent. Watkins was the Pac-12 (now Big Ten) Player of the Year but suffered a minor knee injury in the Sweet 16 win; her status for the Elite Eight is the big question mark. In her stead, USC leans on a balanced group. 6’3” senior forward Kiki Iriafen (a transfer from Stanford) has been a deadly force, averaging 18.6 points and 8.5 rebounds. In fact, Iriafen shouldered the load in earlier rounds, pouring in 36 points with 9 boards in USC’s second-round win. Versatile freshman wing Kennedy Smith contributed across the board (Big Ten Freshman of the Year with 12 points and 2n2 steals per game), and don’t forget senior centre Rayah Marshall, an elite shot-blocker (2.2 blocks per game) and rebounder who returned late in the season and anchors the paint on defence. USC’s style under Gottlieb is a blend of pace and space, having averaged around 85 points often running offence through Watkins’ playmaking. They also led the Big Ten in steals, using Smith and sophomore guard Kayleigh Heckel to pressure opponents. 

UConn (34-3), on the other hand, needs no introduction. Geno Auriemma’s Huskies are in their 29th consecutive Elite Eight, an unparalleled streak. After some injury-plagued seasons, UConn is back at near-full strength and playing with a chip on its shoulder — they haven’t won the national title since 2016, a drought by UConn standards.  

Leading the way is redshirt senior Paige Bueckers, the 2021 National Player of the Year, who is fully healthy after knee surgery in 2022. Bueckers has played brilliantly, with 19.2 points, 4.8 assists and 2.1 steals per game, while shooting 54 per cent from the floor and 90 per cent from the line. Her 40-point outburst in the Sweet 16 was a reminder of her ability to take over games single-handedly. Alongside her is fellow senior Azii Fudd, a sharpshooter averaging 13.4 points on 45 per cent three-point shooting. Fudd missed some games mid-season due to a knee injury, but she’s back and providing UConn with a lethal perimeter threat. The revelation for UConn has been freshman forward Sarah Strong — the 6’2” rookie is averaging 16.1 points, 8.5 rebounds, 2.4 steals and 1.7 blocks. Strong’s emergence (she led UConn in rebounding and was second in scoring) gave the Huskies a dynamic frontcourt presence reminiscent of past UConn greats. UConn also gets contributions from sophomore point guard KK Arnold (who steps in when Bueckers rests, 2.9 (assists per game) and senior wing Aubrey Griffin (a defensive stopper, though limited to 13 games by injury).  

Tactically, UConn plays a fast-paced offence with precise passing, having averaged 19 assists per game and nearly 85 points. Defensively, they often smother teams; against Oklahoma in the Sweet 16, they forced turnovers and held the Sooners to a measly 36 per cent shooting average. UConn’s offence can explode in spurts, demonstrating that this is a team peaking at the right time.  

There are rich storylines here. Lindsay Gottlieb, in just her third season at USC, has taken a program that was middling for years and turned it into a national contender — largely by recruiting Watkins and others to stay home in L.A. She now faces Geno Auriemma, the Hall of Famer with 11 national titles, in a true test of how far USC has come. It’s a bit of a rematch: these teams met in last year’s Sweet 16 (2024), where UConn eliminated USC en route to the Final Four. USC surely hasn’t forgotten that. Adding intrigue, this game is effectively a home contest for USC — the regional final is being played in Anaheim, and Trojan fans will be out in full force. Can the new blood (USC) take down the ultimate women’s basketball blue blood (UConn)?  

Also, watch the injury report: JuJu Watkins’ availability could swing USC’s chances significantly. The coaching match will involve adjusting to whether Watkins plays. If she does, Geno will likely throw multiple defenders at her (perhaps using the quickness of Caroline Ducharme or Qadence Samuels off the bench to double-team). If Watkins is out, USC’s offence may run through Iriafen in the post, which could favour UConn — Auriemma’s teams excel at helping defensively and could collapse on Iriafen. On the flip side, USC must devise a plan for Bueckers. Kansas State tried everything, yet Bueckers still dropped 40 on them. Expect USC to put the taller Kennedy Smith on Bueckers at times to contest her shots and use their depth to keep fresh legs on her. The battle inside between Rayah Marshal and Sarah Strong — two athletic forwards who can block shots and run the floor — will also be pivotal.  

If JuJu Watkins were fully healthy, this game would be a potential classic down to the wire. With her status in doubt, though, USC faces a tougher hill to climb. The Trojans will need another all-around team effort like they had in the Sweet 16. Look for USC to try to dictate tempo: they’ll want to run off of turnovers and not let UConn’s half-court defence get set up. Kennedy Smith’s slashing ability and Avery Howell’s shooting will be critical to support Iriafen inside.  

For UConn, the game plan is simpler: put the ball in Bueckers’ hands and play through their star. Paige Bueckers is averaging nearly 30 points per game in the tournament and has that killer instinct; if the game is tight late, she’s proven she can close. Additionally, UConn’s supporting cast might have easier matchups if Watkins is absent — Azzi Fudd could have a big night from three if USC’s defensive focus shifts elsewhere. A key factor will be turnovers. USC is young in the backcourt, and UConn’s pressure could rattle the Trojans into making mistakes. In their Sweet 16, USC nearly let Kansas State come back late, committing a few turnovers and shaking possessions as K-State cut the lead before USC sealed it. Against UConn, any such lapse will be punished swiftly.  

Given all these factors, UConn is favoured to advance. The Huskies have the edge in experience (this core made the Final Four last year) and health. However, don’t count USC out — they have a home crown, considerable talent and the motivation of revenge. If Watkins somehow suits up and is effective, USC’s chances rise dramatically — she’s the kind of transcendent player who could duel Bueckers shot-for-shot. Without her, expect UConn to gradually pull away.  

My prediction is that UConn will win, using their defence and sheer will to force turnovers down the stretch to secure the win. USC’s rise has been remarkable, and this experience will only further solidify them as a future powerhouse, but the stakes still belong to the Huskies, who appear destined for yet another Final Four in their quest to end the title drought since 2016.  

— 

As the Elite Eight tips off, all eyes are on these four marquee matchups. Will the traditional powers prevail, or can the newcomers continue to upset the balance? By the end of the Elite Eight, we may see familiar faces like South Carolina and UConn in the Final Four, or we could witness new history with teams like UCLA, TCU or USC breaking through. One thing is certain: fans can expect more drama and heroics as these teams battle for a trip to the Final Four. The road to the national championship is narrowing, and every team left believes this is their year. 

University namesake Sir Isaac Brock condemned for American nationalism 

0

After 213 years of being worshipped as a Canadian hero, inconceivable truths about Sir Isaac Brock have come to light, and the university population is reeling. 

Some Brock students may be familiar with Sir Isaac Brock, the war hero who defended Canada in the War of 1812. 

The story goes that Brock died in the Battle of Queenston Heights after taking a musket ball straight to the chest, with his death inspiring Canadian and Indigenous soldiers to fight even harder to repel the invading Americans. 

This was the widely accepted story, but recent discoveries by Drew “Pop” Peacock, a local historian, suggest a much darker tale. 

“I was hanging out in the She-Wolf statue for, um, personal reasons when I found this leather-bound book in the deepest, darkest crevice,” said Drew Peacock. “It was covered in all sorts of ungodly fluids, but after flipping through the musty pages, I discovered a terrible secret: Sir Isaac Brock was a fraud.” 

The book holds hundreds of diary entries that have been verified as Brock’s own handwriting, detailing how the pocket-sized Bible in his breast pocket shielded him from the would-be deadly musket ball. Passed out from shock, Brock later woke up when the battle had ended. 

“I fear the worst,” the diary reads, “the Yankees have stormed our poor country. I knew there was no way we could resist; we should have recruited the beavers, but they said I was a madman! Alas, there is naught else to do but flee south and hope for the best.” 

The diary then details Brock’s long journey to Nebraska, where he opened a shop selling luxury hats manufactured by child labourers. Reportedly, his favourite part of the operation was telling his workers to “Surgite!” 

Pop Peacock’s report was largely disseminated by a Reddit user called “REJECT_BROCK,” which calls for Brock students to tear down and destroy whatever Brock signage or paraphernalia they see around the school. The biggest proposed teardowns are the Sir Isaac Brock statue in front of the school and Isaac’s Bar & Grill, though BUSU has already called dibs on that one in the comments section. 

Already, graffiti has appeared around the school, with students drawing moustaches and genitalia on portraits of Brock. Whether or not broader acts of destruction will come remains to be seen, but many students report being simply too busy with exams to do anything about it. 

“I’ve got one more paper to write,” said third-year English major Ben Dover. “Once I finish that, I’ll get started on the rioting. My roommate’s in the same boat.” 

Interestingly, the REJECT_BROCK account was linked back to none other than Brock President Lesley Rigg herself. Rigg privately informed The Badger Press (our not-so-new name after these horrors were leaked) why the administration had done such a thing: 

“To be honest, we just don’t have enough money to change all the signs, what with this budget crisis. We already spent our last drops of funding on those new boulders around campus, so we’re hoping the students can do most of the heavy lifting. We’ll charge them for vandalism, of course, but not until after everything ‘Brock’ is gone. Then we can pivot; we’re thinking of switching to ‘Tecumseh University.’ He fought and died so we could build our university here, and he deserves to be recognized for that.” 

“If investors can’t get behind that, maybe we’ll go for ‘Sheaffe University’ or name it after some other British soldier,” added Rigg. “That way, we can keep the logo the same.” 

Most shocking, however, is that Drew Peacock’s findings came nearly three years ago and have not been made public until now. 

“We were so close to Brock’s 60th anniversary, we thought we’d wait it out,” said Rigg. “Plus, the whole Canada-America tension right now makes the whole story much riper. It was the perfect time to unite the students against that traitor.” 

As the students at Brock are rocked by the revelation, sales of pitchforks and torches are steadily increasing throughout the region. Brock’s comeuppance is coming, and with so many statues around the region to tear down, this summer promises to be one defined by vengeance. 

Rigg encourages all rioters to post their experiences with #F*ckBr*ck to raise awareness for the cause. 

**This article is part of a special edition of The Brock Press for April Fools and is completely satirical. None of the content contained within this article is meant to be representative of reality and none of the quotes used within are legitimate.** 

Student union graciously adopts our newspaper: Introducing “The BUSU Press” 

Forget what you know about The Brock Press. September 2025 brings a new chapter to our humble newspaper with the all-new The BUSU Press

Following an abysmal production year which flaunted communist agendas, unjust criticism of our valiant student union and not nearly enough Nintendo articles, The Brock Press has finally kicked the can, ushering in a new dawn of student journalism at Brock University. 

“BUSU’s been gunning to get the paper for a while now,” said BUSU General Manager Robert Hilson. “They fought it for a while, but after that dismal two-star rating on Google, we knew we had to do something about it. Just so embarrassing the paper had to fall to such depths.” 

This isn’t just a name change, though. With Hilson at the head of the paper, establishing himself as the new editor-in-chief on top of his position with the union (and the extra salary to boot), there will be some much-needed changes to the content and production of the newspaper. 

Firstly, The BUSU Press will only publish BUSU-promotional news from here on out, much like BrockTV: important stuff, like fun events for students and OUSA updates. The Opinion section will be immediately abolished, as there’s no place for bias in a newspaper, and the Arts & Entertainment section will naturally only positively cover BUSU events. Lastly, with BUSU BoD meetings moving to an exclusively in-camera format, there will be no need for the TBP BUSU Check-In anymore. Let’s be honest, who actually reads that shit anyway? 

General Manager Editor-in-Chief Robert Hilson will determine which stories are published and which editors are paid for their work based on the new BUSUmeter, which uses A.I. to determine how “BUSU-friendly” a story is. 

The move has some students up in arms, namely the former Press staff, who have all since resigned and formed an encampment on the site of the future Student Centre, also known as Isaac’s Bar & Grill. The group of revolutionaries can often be seen getting raucously drunk and shouting about such ridiculous fictions as The BUSU Press’ alleged “fascism” and “censorship of free speech.” 

Former Editor-in-Chief Haytham Nawaz is the most outspoken of the protestors. This TBP reporter tried to interview him, but he was so unintelligible that none of his quotes could be salvaged. It is important to note, however, that the entire encampment seems not to have showered in weeks. The whole thing smells of “wokeism,” both figuratively and metaphorically. 

“I’m not sure why they couldn’t just take it like BrockTV did,” said General Manager Editor-in-Chief Business Manager Hilson. “That’s been good, right?” 

A giant BUSU sticker has been plastered over the old entrance of The Brock Press’ main office, partially to keep the dissenters out but also because that dump won’t be needed anymore since The BUSU Press will have a private newsroom in the new Student Centre once it’s built. 

The BUSU Press interviewed students and faculty around the school about what they thought about the re-branding: 

“I personally love the decision,” said BUSU Vice President of University Affairs Carleigh Charlton. “The paper has been on a startling decline ever since they started paying their workers a living wage. That’s just not how a student business should operate.” Unfortunately, Charlton had to cut our interview short to travel to the Bahamas for an OUSA conference using student funding. Best of luck, Carleigh! 

“It’s a tragedy; The Brock Press was a crucial part of—” [the rest of this quote has been cut for spreading misinformation.] 

The Brock Press? Oh, you mean that company that sells empty newsstands around the school?” said a spokesperson from Brock’s Co-op Education Office. 

Clearly, the students aren’t too bothered about this. Anyone worth their salt can see that The BUSU Press takeover merger is a good thing not only for the school but the student population as a whole. 

“We’re really happy about this, all of us here at BUSU,” said Supreme Leader Hilson. “We think we might have a shot at the Board of Trustees by 2028 and the Senate by 2030. Imagine this: BUSU University. It’s got a nice ring to it, don’t you think?” 

I personally think this is objectively great, and I would know, considering I’m the new News Editor for The BUSU Press. The future of journalism is bright here at Brock, and it’s only a matter of time before the national accolades start trickling in. 

BUSUmeter rating: 7/10 Could have spoken a bit more about how awesome we are. Great work though, Mac, I bet you’ll get paid for the next one! – Rob 

**This article is part of a special edition of The Brock Press for April Fools and is completely satirical. None of the content contained within this article is meant to be representative of reality and none of the quotes used within are legitimate.** 

New “Cry Pods” will allow students to breakdown in private 

0

With exam season right around the corner, Brock has approved the construction of “Cry Pods.” 

As early as April 6, students will see the arrival of personal, soundproof booths all over campus. 

Undergrad student Joe King sent in the request months ago for a “safe, private place to have a mental breakdown.” In response, the university recently declared the new arrival of the new “Cry Pods,” which will be ready for use the day before exams start. Brock intends to give students the opportunity to get all their tears and frustrations out before, during and after examinations. 

“I can’t believe it,” said Joe King. “They really listened, and now I’ll get to have meltdowns on campus. No more silent screaming in bathrooms or rushing to my car to be alone anymore.” 

The Cry Pods, which have been given the nicknames “ohmigod-pods” and “fit-pits,” are private, soundproof booths that will pop up all over campus starting April 6. These pods will be repurposed from the old study pods that appeared on campus two years ago, in which some students were already having meltdowns in. 

The booths will be the size of a closet and feature no windows, one lockable door and a very harsh “DO NOT DISTURB” sign to ensure students can take their time without fearing any tentative knocks. There will be a variety of light options including (but not limited to): seaside blue, rage red, insanity yellow, harsh reality white and gentle sunshine. 

The booth walls will feature screens capable of depicting a variety of images and videos depending on your breakdown style, like forest fire, beachfront, puppies and kittens, etc. The screens will also have a “blank” setting for those that prefer to take comfort by hiding under their bedsheets.  

The pods will have the option to turn off the wi-fi for a fully private and disruption-free experience, but there’s also a variety of music choices, a stopwatch for limiting the length of your meltdowns and a pull-out mirror and tissues for when you’re ready to get back out there (to fix your hair, practice acting like everything’s okay, dry your tears and whatnot). Brock officials say that using the Cry Pods for any other “private” activity is strictly forbidden; stay in the She Wolf you animals. 

Cry Pod advocate and musical undergraduate student Lou Natick wrote a limerick that he hopes will become catchy when referring to the pods: 

When you’re feeling really shitty 

And don’t want your friends to pity 

Come on down 

To meltdown town 

And have a blubbering quickie! 

The Cry Pods are being developed by a new company called StressLess that specializes in cute animal videos, stress balls and fidget toys. The pods are the beginning of their new venture to bring university students a safe space to “let it all out,” whether that consists of therapeutic screaming, a waterfall of tears or a healthy mix of both. 

**This article is part of a special edition of The Brock Press for April Fools and is completely satirical. None of the content contained within this article is meant to be representative of reality.** 

Stop believing the propaganda: It’s time to accept that Santa Claus is real 

0

No amount of anti-Santa propaganda will ever convince me that the jolly fat man who enters my chimney at Christmastime isn’t real. 

For centuries, there has been a harrowing amount of propaganda plaguing the Christmas season, seemingly intending to disparage the existence of Santa Claus. Despite mountains of evidence to the contrary, society has continued to spread the lie that Claus simply doesn’t exist — a claim that becomes more laughable the more you think about it. 

I was first exposed to this bold-faced lie at the hands of my own mother, who sat me down last year to inform me that Claus apparently “isn’t real,” and that she has been the one putting Christmas presents under our living room tree every year. 

Perhaps the most glaring flaw in this claim is that it contradicts the basic fact that elves are the ones building the toys in a workshop in the North Pole. It remains unclear how my mother, or any parent for that matter, would have reliable communication with the elves constructing the toys, let alone how the toys could be transported from the North Pole to my house if not for magical flying reindeer. 

Unfortunately, my mother had become so brainwashed by anti-Claus propaganda that she somehow believed she had gone to retail stores in the weeks preceding Christmas to purchase the toys herself. 

While it was disheartening to hear these blatant mistruths from my own mother, it’s not as though they can’t be explained. A 2023 study proves that exposure to fake news can create false memories in a phenomenon known as a “congruence effect,” which would explain her misinformed belief that she had gone to stores in the weeks preceding Christmas to pick up my Nintendo 3DS and copy of Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Cabin Fever

It’s sadly probable, however, that this sort of scientific discussion would be wasted on her. If she has somehow managed to convince herself that she could squeeze down our chimney to deliver presents overnight, she might be too far gone. 

If her agenda were to be believed, it also creates a series of other hard-to-answer questions. For example, is she the one delivering toys to billions of other children overnight? Where have my letters to Santa been going if he simply doesn’t exist? And why would she let me sit on the lap of a fat man at the mall if he’s some sort of impersonator? 

It doesn’t take a genius to see that her story just doesn’t line up, no matter how you slice it. By pushing her views to their logical extreme, you would also be left questioning the existence of figures like the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy and Queen Elizabeth II, which proves how preposterous her entire rhetoric is. 

It’s time to stop buying into the lies of those who hope to commercialize Christmas and strip it of its magic. It’s time to think critically, using what we know to be true to inform our beliefs. And finally, it’s time to be nice not just throughout December but rather through the entirety of the year, because you sure as hell don’t want to find coal under your tree on Christmas morning. 

Santa’s watching. Don’t mess this up. 

**This article is part of a special edition of The Brock Press for April Fools and is completely satirical. None of the content contained within this article is meant to be representative of reality.** 

SOS: I, Ed A. Cock, am locked in the Press office 

0

I’ve been locked in the Press office for close to 100 days. I need help. 

Being the savant in journalism promotion that I am, I was hired in January by The Brock Press to promote the issue that I’m currently doctoring this article to fit into, a.k.a. The Brock Crass edition.  

Over the last 60 days, I’ve been trying each of the few hundred passwords that I’ve found on sticky notes or old trashed papers in here to get onto one of the computers. Well, after waiting three days for the password-failure failsafe timer to reset on one of them, I finally got in a few days ago.   

I then sneakily submitted this piece under the name of the Editor-in-Chief in their storylist; I know he’s been away on a political retreat doing non-violent terrorism to Tesla factories based on information I gathered from a personal schedule he left in his small office here.  

Let me give the story though. 

You see, part of being hired involved recording a promo podcast with the Managing Editor of the Press. When we recorded it, he showed up in a goddamn monkey suit… then thought the podcast was Hot Ones and then, after the cameras stopped rolling, he freaked out and told me that my unpreparedness was to be met with a “steep consequence.”  

He promptly knocked me out with the mug full of wing bones in his hand. I awoke on the cold floor of the Press office with the door locked, lights off and the front windows blacked out. All that remained was a note: “Do the crime, do the time — also your service fee has been reneged on, b*tch.”  

So here I am, surviving off the minimal protein that the invasive wall crickets and whatever was left in the fridge provide me, as well as barely hydrating myself using the now nearly empty water cooler jug left here. In short, I’m withering away day by day. 

Me! Starving! Can you believe it? — I was once the Don King of journalism promotion, but now I look like Ghandi without the societal prestige that even he had. It’s embarrassing. 

I am writing this as an SOS: I need one of the Brock students reading this to please make the university or BUSU or someone aware of my hostage situation and BREAK ME OUT. Don’t read the rest of this stupid Crass issue, and don’t you dare watch the promo podcast they released without paying me after holding me hostage: that would be trauma porn on your part. 

This is real — I need your help now.  

Call 289-681-3491 to learn how you can help me.  

**This article is part of a special edition of The Brock Press for April Fools and is completely satirical. None of the content contained within this article is meant to be representative of reality, but you should still call the number (wink).** 

From sprints to shots: which athletes black out where  

0

Nothing says “elite performance” like vodka crans and shin splints.  

Forget curated cocktails or rooftop lounges — St. Catharines runs on sticky floors, cheap drinks and athletes pretending they aren’t getting on a bus at 7 a.m. the next morning. Every bar here has its regulars, and if you’re paying attention, the patterns are easy to spot. Different spots have different energies, but there’s always someone in team gear acting like a bar isn’t their favourite place to be.  

Moose & Goose is a magnet for the loud, hyper-social types who treat nightlife like its game day. These are the athletes who travel in packs, never take off their hats and can’t go five minutes without starting a chant. They’re loud, sweaty and probably know the bouncer. If someone’s climbing on furniture, shotgunning beers or getting kicked out before midnight, they came with this group.  

Daisy Dukes attracts those who don’t need much to have a decent night. They’re not dressing up, not putting on a show and certainly not pretending they came for the music. They grab a drink, post up near the back and lean on a wall. If they end up on the dance floor, it’s probably by accident.  

Mansion House is where the “don’t care, but still kinda care” athletes show up. They’re not polished, just dialed in. They move in groups, stake out a spot and run into everyone who ever ghosted them. It’s less about drinking and more about hovering in the same five feet of space for hours. Every conversation starts with: “Yo, didn’t expect to see you here!” Everyone expected it.  

Level is a blackout waiting to happen, where you’ll find the athletes who sprint through their nights like they’ve got something to prove. It’s all flashing lights, slippery floors and zero accountability. There’s no conversation, just chaos. Arms in the air, heads spinning and bodies colliding in a blur: definitely a good cardio workout.  

Fiddler’s Pour House is loud, fast and filled with athletes who are trying to go hard without dealing with a club. It’s shoulder-to-shoulder, with drinks hitting faster than expected and old music that somehow keeps getting louder. People here are the ones who still want a full night out, just with a hoodie and no lineups. Fiddler’s is uncomfortable, sweaty and always somehow more intense than expected. No one’s pacing themselves here — they’re just not at Level. 

The Dive Pub is where the night goes when plans fall apart. The athletes still out at this point are on autopilot. No one came here on purpose, but no one’s leaving either. It’s dark, loud and the drinks come fast without questions. It’s not good, but it’s exactly what it needs to be at 2 a.m.  

Brass Monkey Local is the late-night safety net, where the athletes are still going after most people have called it. They’re not out for the experience, they’re just not ready to go home. Hoodies, fried food and staring at nothing while pretending to be locked-in are staples of this pub. Someone’s falling asleep in a booth. Someone else is convincing everyone that the night is still young. It’s never the plan, but it always happens. 

Every spot has a vibe. Every athlete falls into a pattern, and they’re not hard to spot. As Badgers in a small city, you’ll see the same faces and witness the same messes — but you’ll still be back next weekend.  

**This article is part of a special edition of The Brock Press for April Fools and is completely satirical. None of the content contained within this article is meant to be representative of reality.** 

Trump declares himself “King of America,” says democracy is overrated 

0

Donald Trump declared himself “King of America” in a speech that’s gone viral. 

In an official announcement made on March 30, President Donald Trump declared himself “King of America,” citing what he called “overwhelming support from billions and billions of people.” Besides J.D. Vance — who said only “Hallelujah!” — the Trump administration has made no comment. 

In his 29-minute-long speech, Trump promised to make his monarchy “so much better, so much classier than the old ones.” He claimed that America needs a king to “look up to,” idolize and worship: “And like I’ve said, it’s me –– I am the chosen one!” 

“A lot of people are saying, ‘Sir, you can’t just make yourself king.’ But I checked — nowhere in the Constitution does it say I can’t,” said Trump. 

In trading his title of president for the much more “tremendous” title of king, Trump said he’d be able to get things done “with the flick of my wrist.” He stated that the title of president was “too weak, too small” and didn’t garner him “enough respect.”  

“Kings get things done,” said Trump. “Kings don’t have to deal with fake news. Kings don’t get rigged elections. Kings get treated the way they deserve. And let’s be honest, folks, I’ve been acting like a king for years, so let’s just make it official, okay?” 

Trump stated that democracy is outdated: “We’ve tried it, we had a good run. Look, the Founding Fathers were smart guys. Some say not as smart as me, but they were okay. But they made one big mistake –– they didn’t think about me.” 

“A lot of people are saying, ‘Sir, wouldn’t you be an amazing king?’ And I have to say, folks, they’re not wrong,” said Trump. “Kings live in castles –– I have many castles. Kings wear crowns –– I have the best hair, golden, basically a built-in crown. That being said, I will of course need a crown, and it will be the biggest, best crown you’ve ever seen –– people will be able to see it from miles away and they’ll say, ‘Now there’s a king!’ 

“You know, a lot of people don’t realize this, but I’ll probably be the best king in history. Better than the British kings –– some were okay, but a lot of them? Very weak. Lame. Not a lot of winning. As America’s king, I’ll have the biggest, classiest throne, gold-plated of course, and the people would absolutely love it. I mean, they already love me. 

“Things are going to change around here. First royal decree? No more fake news. Gone. Second? We rename Washington, D.C. to Trump, D.C. because, let’s be honest, I did more for this country than Washington ever did. And third, my face on all the big bills –– I don’t want the little 1s, 5s or 10s, only the 20s and up.” 

World leaders responded to the declaration with a mix of shock, amusement and deep concern. British King Charles III reportedly choked on his tea upon hearing the news, and his royal advisors are currently drafting a very careful statement in response. Russian Dictator Vladimir Putin immediately congratulated Trump, calling him a “fellow strongman.” North Korea’s Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un expressed disappointment when he wasn’t invited to Trump’s coronation, and reportedly said, “He stole my thing!” France’s President Emmanuel Macron was said to be visibly confused and “couldn’t comprehend the joke.” Finally, Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney was left speechless. The United Nations held an emergency meeting, where one delegate summed up the situation as: “I don’t even know anymore.” 

While legal scholars debate whether America can, in fact, become a monarchy overnight, Trump insists it’s already a done deal, and says he is awaiting his “coronation gifts” from other countries and world leaders. 

**This article is part of a special edition of The Brock Press for April Fools and is completely satirical. None of the content contained within this article is meant to be representative of reality.** 

IOC elects first woman president  

0

For the first time in its 131-year history, the International Olympic Committee will be led by a woman — and she’s African.  

Kirsty Coventry, a seven-time Olympic medalist from Zimbabwe and former Minister of Youth, Sport, Arts and Recreation has been elected as the International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) new president — a moment that is as symbolic as it is seismic. In a space long dominated by White men, nine of her predecessors being so, Coventry’s rise signals a break in tradition that many argue is long overdue. 

Coventry, at 40 years old, brings to the table more than just athletic excellence. Her career in the pool began humbly in Harare but culminated in Olympic greatness, with two golds, four silvers and a bronze across three Games. As Africa’s most decorated Olympian, she not only carried the hopes of her nation but also served as an example for aspiring athletes across a continent often overlooked by global sporting institutions. After her competitive years, she transitioned into politics, serving as Zimbabwe’s Minister of Youth, Sport, Arts and Recreation since 2018, where she gained a reputation for diplomacy and genuine advocacy.  

But her election is not just about representation; it’s about reshaping an institution at a critical crossroads. The IOC has been under pressure for years to modernize, diversify and become more progressive.  

As of 2023, women made up 41 per cent of IOC membership — double the percentage from a decade earlier. Yet, leadership roles remained stubbornly gendered until now. Coventry’s appointment could create a path for more inclusive leadership across sport, especially from the Global South. 

She’ll inherit an organization in flux. The debate around athlete activism, transgender participation and political boycotts have intensified; the commercialization of the Olympics continues to clash with its conservative roots; and younger audiences are tuning out — only 41 per cent of Gen Z watched any part of the Tokyo 2020 Games, compared to 71 per cent of Baby Boomers.  

Coventry’s track record suggests she’s well-equipped to navigate this terrain. Her leadership on the IOC Athletes’ Commission has been marked by efforts to centre athletes in conversations that in the past have been left out. She has publicly championed mental health funding, equal pay for Olympic medalists and increased investment in developing nations’ sporting infrastructure — a crucial move for a body accused of prioritizing elite markets. 

Still, skepticism remains. Critics worry she may be a continuity candidate — someone who will preserve the status quo rather than challenge it. Her close alignment with former IOC president, Thomas Batch, who endorsed her candidacy, has raised eyebrows among reformists who hoped for a more radical shake-up. But even if she does tread carefully, the mere optics of her presidency represent progress. 

This moment matters deeply, especially for young girls in Africa who’ve never seen someone with this closeness to their home in such a position of global authority.  It sends an empowering message that Olympic dreams don’t end at the podium, even if you are a woman.  

Coventry herself summed it up in her acceptance speech: “I know what it feels like to be underestimated, to be overlooked and to be counted out. That’s why I’ve spent my life proving otherwise, and that’s exactly what I intend to keep doing.”  

As the Olympic torch passes to its newest bearer, Coventry will be tasked with navigating the tension between tradition and change. The Olympics have become more than just a stage for athletic excellence — they’re now a platform for global conversation and representation. 

And for the first time, the conversation will be led from Africa.  

Brock rowers to compete in Paraguay  

0

Three standout athletes from Brock University’s men’s rowing program are set to compete on the international stage, having been selected to represent Canada at the Junior Pan American Games Qualification Regatta in Asunción, Paraguay.  

Euan Coulson, Riley Watson and Maddox Harrison were named to the Canadian roster for the March 19 to 22 event, which served as a key qualifier for the upcoming Junior Pan American Games. Their participation marked not only a significant step in their rowing careers but also a moment of pride for Brock’s rowing community. Adding to the accomplishment, Brock’s head coach, Katie Bruggeling, will also be heading south as part of Rowing Canada Aviron’s (RCA) coaching staff.  

The national coach and players began pre-competition training on March 14 and spent several days preparing before taking to the water in Paraguay, where they competed against top talent from across the Americas. For all three student-athletes, the chance to wear the Maple Leaf is a milestone moment. 

“We are very excited to be representing our country and the Brock Badgers, and we hope to make our country and school proud,” the athletes shared in a joint statement. “We are incredibly grateful to be receiving this opportunity, and we are deeply thankful to the Brock rowing program for supporting us and making our dreams come true.”  

The trio arrived on the international scene after a highly successful university season. Between them, they claimed five medals — three at the Ontario University Athletics (OUA) Championships and two at the Canadian University Rowing Championships (CURC). Watson played a huge role in capturing gold at the provincial level and silver on the national stage in the lightweight four boat event. He also teamed up with Coulson and Harrison in the men’s eight boat to earn silver at the OUA and bronze at the CURC. Coulson added an OUA silver in the men’s four to his individual accomplishments. 

Coach Bruggeling emphasized how significant the moment is for the program and the athletes alike.  

“It’s an incredible opportunity for our Brock rowers to compete at the Junior Pan American Qualification Regatta,” said Bruggeling, adding that the international competition will make for a good test. Athlete selection for the regatta was the result of RCA’s rigorous talent identification system.  

The national federation’s NextGen Assessment and Monitoring Program, combined with performances at domestic events including the CURC, OUA Championships, National Rowing Championships and the Royal Canadian Henley Regatta, was used to evaluate candidates. Those who were selected demonstrated consistency, competitiveness and a readiness to compete at the international level. 

This call-up reflects the strength of Brock’s rowing infrastructure — from athlete development to coaching leadership. The university continues to be dominant in the sport, and this latest milestone reinforces its place among Canada’s elite rowing institutions.