Sunday, October 12, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Brock students react to Brock’s re-enacted mask mandate

|
|

On Aug. 29, Brock University announced that medical-grade masks will be required in all instructional spaces.

Brock University students that all “classrooms, lecture halls, seminars, teaching labs and other spaces when teaching by instructors is taking place” would require students to wear a mask, effective Sept. 6.

This came as a shock to many students at Brock, especially considering many other Ontario post-secondary institutions have dropped or paused their mask mandates across their campuses. Following the announcement, a divide in opinions could be found. While some students agreed with the choice that the institution was making, others held a more negative opinion of the decision.

“[COVID-19] has been evolving more serious strains, while simultaneously mandates [and] protections become lifted and people become less eager to get vaccinated. Or, it’s getting more serious, but people are getting less serious,” said Lou Losier, a third-year Concurrent Education student, in favour of the new measures.

When asked about their thoughts on the upset comments, Losier said that they experienced shock upon reading them for the first time.

“It’s such a dramatic shock from the ‘we’re all in this together’ attitude from the beginning of the pandemic; seeing people say ‘if you’re scared of [COVID-19] stay home’ is appalling,” said Lou. Losier went on to explain that they believe that such an opinion comes from a place of privilege and a “lack of empathy” for individuals who lose their lives due to an absence of protection.

Holding vastly different views on the subject, another student said that he was not surprised to discover Brock University would be re-instilling the mask mandate.

“[The mask mandate] seems fairly nonsensical, since it only applies to ‘instructional spaces.’” said Iain Lockhart, a fourth-year Concurrent Education student opposed to the new measures. He further reflected that from what he’s heard about other universities in Ontario, he would not be surprised if other factors, rather than the wants of students and staff, were considered more heavily.

“In all honesty, I don’t think Brock cares much for a few students’ grumbling or the inconvenience they’re placing on students, compared to the fuss an angry union or two could be capable of. […] The negotiations on whether to enact mandates probably went on for weeks [or] months and certainly included Public Health, and probably unions and other organizations too. Unless I haven’t been paying attention, the student body has been largely left out of the discussion,” said Lockhart.

Brock University’s announcement has had a polarizing effect on the student populace. The mask mandate that the University will be enforcing takes effect on Tuesday, Sept. 6, and applies to all instructional spaces.

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Mapping MAMM #4: What the f*** is Canadian Literature anyway? 

Mapping MAMM is an ongoing series which gets into the research questions surrounding the Mapping Ann-Marie MacDonald Research Project. My previous articles have introduced the project as well as examined its cross-disciplinarity and ethics of care. In this fourth installment, I’ll get into the “fraught construct” that is CanLit. 

Late Night comedy in the face of censorship  

Jimmy Kimmel is a late-night comedy staple. Having been on the air since 2003, the comedian is perhaps best known for his viral videos, including “Mean Tweets” — where celebrities read hateful posts on X and his long running YouTube series “I Told My Kids I Ate All Their Halloween Candy.” Kimmel has always been a relatively tame figure in late night media. Though not as politically neutral as Jimmy Fallon, he is certainly not as outspoken as fellow late-night hosts Seth Meyers, Stephen Colbert, John Stewart or John Oliver. 

USA: Not fascist, just anti-anti-fascism 

The United States is not a fascist state. Elections still occur, courts still sometimes check executive power and journalists and comedians still speak out against the government. Within the remains of a democratic framework, on Sept. 22, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order designating “Antifa” — a composition of autonomous groups affiliated with political movements against fascism and other far-right extremist ideologies — as a domestic terrorist organization. Despite the lack of legal framework for this designation, the executive order purports that dissent against the Trump administration is a threat to national security rather than a legitimate democratic right

The war within: Pete Hegseth and the weaponization of U.S. military identity 

When Pete Hegseth — formally the U.S. Secretary of Defense, but ceremonially the Secretary of War — took the stage at Marine Corps Base Quantico on Sept. 30, his first words carried the weight of an era. “Welcome to the War Department,” he said to a packed auditorium of generals, admirals and senior officers. “The era of the Department of Defense is over.”

Five activities to add to your fall bucket list 

If you’re looking for something fun to add to your bucket list this fall, this list of autumn activities is perfect for you. 

Brock’s Wellness Fair spotlights countless student services and opportunities  

The 2025 Brock Wellness Fair gave students the chance to explore a wide range of services, supports and community spaces available both on and off campus. From volunteer initiatives and interfaith opportunities to a variety of mental health supports and athletics, the fair displayed a growing list of opportunities for students to take care of themselves, connect with others and make Brock feel like home. 

10 years after TRC’s Calls to Action and Canada’s promises of reconciliation are still pending 

Ten years have passed since the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) released their landmark Final Report in June 2015. The Commission, established under the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, spent seven years gathering testimony from over 6,000 Survivors to document the devastating legacy of residential schools. This led them to issuing 94 Calls to Action — a roadmap for governments, institutions and Canadians to repair harm and build a more just future. These Calls were never meant as symbolic gestures; they were concrete, actionable steps. A decade later, one question remains: has Canada lived up to them?

Buyback or backfire? Ottawa’s gun compensation program faces mounting pushback  

In late September, Ottawa announced an official gun buyback pilot program in Nova Scotia — the first step toward removing more than 2,500 models of legally purchased, now-prohibited firearms from licensed Canadian gun owners.