Sunday, October 12, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

When it comes to virtue signalling, sharing isn’t caring

|
|

In most cases, people who take part in online trends intended to fight hate are more concerned with making themselves feel righteous than making any sort of meaningful difference. 

After the murder of George Floyd in May of 2020, there were mass protests, memorials and condemnations across the world. The murder reinvigorated the Black Lives Matter movement and became a major topic of public discussion, creating widespread conversation over the inequalities faced by Black Americans on a daily basis.  

In the following days, social media users banded together, deciding to use their massive collective power to make a difference. Well, at least, that was the plan. 

On June 2, 2020, millions of Instagram users posted black squares to their accounts, flooding the average user’s feed with the hashtag #BlackoutTuesday. The online “protest” was meant to effectively shut down the platform’s regular usage for a day. Many users would post a black square, put the trending hashtag in the caption and move on with their day. 

Unfortunately, as we have since discovered, a bunch of people posting literally nothing on their social media pages before returning to normal the next day doesn’t seem to have much of an impact on racial disparities, racist police brutality and more casual forms of everyday racism. 

What was the expectation here? Was this some sort of attempt to legitimately combat racism? Was it supposed to make an impact on the treatment of Black individuals? Or, perhaps it was an effort to spread awareness or resources on the Black Lives Matter movement? 

In truth, it was none of these things, regardless of what anyone might claim. Posting a black square on Blackout Tuesday was simply an incredibly easy and thoughtless way to feel as though you’ve made some sort of impact or statement. The “protest” wasn’t concerned with making any sort of valuable difference, it was a display of self-righteousness meant to make you feel like a good person without putting in any effort. 

In fact, it can be argued that those who took part in this trend actually hurt the Black Lives Matter movement, since the #BLM and #BlackLivesMatter hashtags became clogged with empty, black squares rather than actual resources to help those searching for information. 

So, to those who blacked out their social media accounts, congratulations; do you feel like you’ve made a meaningful difference? 

This is the act of virtue signalling: the public display of good intentions to make yourself look or feel like a good person without anything of substantive value to back up your displays. 

Anyone with an Instagram account and thirty seconds of free time can partake in virtue signalling. The act is mindless, yet the belief that “I’m a good person for doing this” is real. It takes someone who actually cares about a movement to attend a physical protest, make a donation to a cause or display any level of sincerity through true action. 

It doesn’t end with black squares, though. Mindlessly reposting resources to Instagram stories is often another form of virtue signalling. While it might seem like people are trying to share valuable resources, many are just looking for an easy way to demonstrate solidarity without truly caring about the subject matter much at all. 

Those who posted a black square for Blackout Tuesday or reposted some pre-created templates on their Instagram story as the fullest extent of their effort to “show solidarity” should know that they haven’t supported the Black Lives Matter movement in any valuable way. Instead, they’ve simply contributed to one of the most lazy, arrogant and embarrassing social media trends to exist over the last decade. 

Of course, not everyone has this mentality, and some people are out there fighting for legitimate change. The same cannot be said for individuals who upload a social media post and call it a day. For many, lazy social media posts or changed profile pictures are the only support they’re willing to show. Those individuals should realize the lack of value they are bringing to these important conversations. 

Perhaps some feel that they’ve shared enough resources or have publicly conveyed a strong enough stance that this couldn’t possibly apply to them. I invite those individuals to reflect upon their own actions throughout major events and ask themselves whether they’ve really done their part to create an impact in the world.  

It is only once we end the collective will to act solely for self-benefit that we can move closer to making the world a brighter place for all. 

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Understanding the populist era through Doug Fords alcohol fixation.  

Pouring out a bottle of Crown Whiskey on live stream is a political appeal to populism. Doug Fords progressive conservatives maintain popularity within Ontario’s democratic system by employing a pragmatic style of populism best understood through the provinces alcohol policies.

Trump and acetaminophen: The Western right and mistrust of scientific authority 

The recent claims from the Trump administration regarding the absent link between acetaminophen and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) reflect a growing mistrust toward scientific authority from the right.

Textbook costs are a barrier to education 

Hefty textbook lists have clear class implications and rack up expenses for financially vulnerable students.

Canada Post is not failing — it’s being failed 

I dread December through March at Brock. It is not just the exams and dark skies, but the cold and icy daily trek from Lot 2. For Canada Post workers, that’s the job; bone chilling, frost biting, wind whipping walks; eight hours a day, five days a week, four to six months out of the year.

When growing up means growing apart 

Last spring, I made the difficult decision to take an extra year of undergrad.  

Is veganism a class privilege? 

The meat industry benefits from nutritionally sufficient plant-based diets remaining unaffordable for many. 

Poilievre would not bring stability to the working class 

Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre’s criticism of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s response to the cost-of-living crisis is hypocritical given that his policy values are antithetical to defending the stability of the working class. 

Editorial: Remember when technology was exciting? 

When Apple revealed its latest iPhone lineup during their annual September event, I was forced to reckon with an uncomfortable yet inevitable realization: new technology just isn’t all that exciting anymore. This is especially disappointing because only a couple decades ago, technological innovation was one of the most exciting points of discussion and speculation as we watched it consistently evolve and change our lives in mind-blowing ways.