Sunday, February 22, 2026
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

The Federal Conservatives are turning their backs on Canadians 

|
|

The federal Conservatives are telling us what they stand for, and it’s not Canadians. 

You don’t have to be paying attention to realize there’s a lot happening in Canadian politics right now. Between Justin Trudeau’s resignation as leader of the Liberal Party, the threat of a trade war with the United States and a federal election somewhere on the horizon, the last month has been nothing if not eventful for the good folks on Parliament Hill. 

The most concerning developments of all, however, have come from Pierre Poilievre, leader of the Conservative Party of Canada and likely shoo-in to become our 24th prime minister, based on most polling. His party has spent the better part of three years in campaign mode, spending approximately $8.5 million on advertising in 2023 alone. No doubt you’ve heard or seen some examples: “Axe the Tax,” “Build the Homes” or the inexplicably phrased “Stop the Crime.” 

Not only do these slogans more resemble a drunken chant at a hockey game than robust policy proposals, but they also ring eerily familiar to anyone who hasn’t been living under a rock since Donald Trump was elected U.S. President in 2016 (although if you have been living under a rock, I can’t say I’d blame you). To put it succinctly, Poilievre is the Canadian poster boy for a shallow brand of right-wing populism inspired by the success of the MAGA movement from our neighbours to the south. Evidently, they won’t be putting an import tax on nationalist sycophants anytime soon. 

Poilievre refers to his simple — read: painfully stupid — messaging as a reflection of “common sense values,” and has frequently used the increasingly nebulous strawman of “woke politics” to provoke strong rallying emotions among his supporters. The strategy is clear: he wants us to feel afraid, and more than that, he needs us to feel broken. 

But now Poilievre has a problem. In a recent CBC article, sources from the Party revealed that the federal Conservatives are scrambling to adapt their messaging after a sudden shift in attitude around our national identity: “The start of a tariff war with the United States is changing voters’ moods. It’s harder to talk about a broken Canada when there’s a growing sense of patriotism,” said one of the Conservative insiders.  

Everyday citizens standing in solidarity against the economic bully that is the U.S. can only be bad for the federal Conservatives’ campaign of sowing division. In other words, Trump’s unjustifiably austere tariffs have provoked a sense of protective patriotism that is quickly unifying the country across partisan lines. This is troublesome for the Conservatives because their interests simply do not align with Canadian unity. 

It gets even better. In a media address on Feb. 3, Poilievre vowed to “put Canada first” and renewed calls to “protect our borders.” The irony is truly lost on Conservatives if their official response to Trump’s sabre-rattling is just a sad imitation of his “America first” dog-whistle. It should come as no surprise that Poilievre has the backing of “special government employee” and far-right oligarch Elon Musk, not to mention noted pseudo-intellectual and right-wing conspiracy theorist Jordan Peterson. 

This begs the question: What can we expect should Poilievre sneer his way to victory? He is, after all, a career politician whose record in the House of Commons is available to the public. For example, Poilievre received a full pension at the age of 31 before voting to raise the age of eligibility for Old Age Security (OAS) and Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) in 2012; he rallied against marriage equality in 2005; and he suggested that residential school survivors ought to have a stronger work ethic in 2008.  

One wonders what might become of the $10-a-day childcare program or increased dental and pharmacare coverage — all fruits of the now-defunct Liberal-NDP agreement — under his proposed “budget fixing.” 

The Conservatives have also added the CBC to their list of targets. Damien Kurek, the party’s heritage critic, called the network a “broken and failing propaganda machine” and proposed the bizarre image of turning the CBC’s downtown Toronto headquarters “into beautiful homes for Canadian families.” It speaks volumes that Poilievre and company would seethe at the existence of a national public broadcaster whose written mandate is to promote and develop Canadian identity from coast to coast. 

If you’re really sniffing around for a propaganda machine, look no further than the overwhelming number of Canadian media publications affiliated with the PostMedia Network, which itself is majority owned by Chatham Asset Management, an American conglomerate with close ties to the Republican Party. A suspiciously high volume of anti-Trudeau sentiment and carbon tax misinformation has been circulated through tabloid rags like The Toronto Sun and even the more innocuous sounding National Post, both of which are PostMedia properties. 

Maybe the most concerning fact of all is that Poilievre refuses to subject himself to the rigorous background checks necessary to gain top-level security clearance, as is customary for every Leader of the Official Opposition. That means he won’t receive a briefing on the CSIS investigation into foreign interference among members of the Conservative Party. 

Poilievre has argued that gaining security clearance would prevent him from being able to speak freely about government issues. However, declining access to the proper intelligence has led to gross oversights in the past for Poilievre. Consider back in November of 2023, when he hastily labelled a car explosion on the Rainbow Bridge as a “terrorist attack.” Poilievre defended himself by suggesting the error came from the media. Meanwhile, the CBC determined only one outlet had reported the explosion as terror-motivated at the time of Poilievre’s comment. It was Fox News

All this is to say that the federal Conservatives have made it very clear what they stand for: economic opportunism, anti-intellectualism and national populist rhetoric. We’ve already watched the U.S. go down that slippery slope. Let’s not do the same. 

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Social media has an alt-right pipeline problem, and women are its newest target 

Trends that urge women to step into their “divine feminine energy,” consume their way into a “clean girl aesthetic” and blame small mistakes on the fact they are “just a girl” are not products of neutral shifts in our algorithms. The differing frames women have been forced into online indicate subtle dog whistles to alt-right ideologies, ultimately functioning to naturalize conservatism, traditional gender roles and regressive choice feminism. 

The loneliness epidemic: a Gen-Z moral crisis, or a product of intimacy without dependency? 

If you’ve ever scrolled through social media, sat through a family dinner or had to endure a ‘situationship,’ surely you have been exposed to the common diagnosis of modern dating as a moral failure. It’s always the same arguments: the newer generation is impatient, nobody wants to put in the work, everyone is incapable of commitment and they’re all addicted to novelty. 

The presentation of technology and its inevitability  

For the first two decades of the 21st century, technology advanced at breakneck speed. Its rapid development often left sacrificed accountability, with tech being allowed to interfere with institutions like democracy, personal rights, privacy and ownership. 

The NHL is homophobic and the use of “Heated Rivalry” in their promotion doesn’t change that 

Piggybacking off the popularity of Crave’s new hit hockey show, Heated Rivalry, doesn’t make the NHL any less homophobic

Brock University’s Concurrent Education program is exhausting its students before they get the chance to become educators 

The Concurrent Education program at Brock University is unnecessarily difficult and ridiculously expensive, causing future educators to experience complete burnout before they even have a chance to reach the classroom. 

Should you do a moot court on a whim? 

On Jan. 24, on a frigid morning during a cold snap and with just four hours of sleep, I embarked at 7:40 a.m. to meet my partner in crime, Wenyang Ming, for my first mock moot court trial.  

A good rom-com shouldn’t be the exception, but the rule 

The rom-coms of today don’t just disappoint — they feel out of touch.

Editorial: Feelings over Trump’s military intervention in Venezuela are contrasting but not contradictory 

The response to the United States’ capture of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro displays an unusual juxtaposition: many Americans are upset at U.S. President Donald Trump for his unannounced military intervention while, on the contrary, many Venezuelans — namely those living within the U.S. — have met the news with widespread celebration.