Wednesday, December 24, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Concerts in 2025: Ticketmaster still wins   

|
|

The state of concert-going in 2025 seems to be worse than ever.  

It always starts the same: your favorite artist announces a tour. Hopefully they’re coming to Canada and maybe there’s a night in Toronto, Montreal or even Buffalo. You sign up for fan pre-sale, hoping to have a code appear in your inbox the night before the big day.   

You wait by your laptop with anticipation hoping to get a good spot in the queue. Once it’s your turn to shop, there are one of two outcomes: the venue is already sold out or surge pricing has destroyed any hope of an affordable seat. Hours of refreshing, checking emails and anticipation all to end up ticketless or broke. You start to wonder: was it always this hard to see live music? 

Ticketmaster  

Ticketmaster has been called predatory for years and nothing has changed. The company’s revenue is derived from fees — venue, service, processing and delivery fees — on top of the face value of the ticket. A 2018 U.S. Government Accountability Office report found that primary ticket fees average 27 per cent of a ticket’s cost.  

Worse, Ticketmaster’s pursuit of fees has led them to incentivize scalpers. In 2018, the Toronto Star revealed that the company was incentivizing ticket brokers to use its Trade Desk software when bulk buying tickets. This software aids resellers in listing scalped tickets on resale sites like Ticketmaster. Each resell through Ticketmaster means additional service fees, doubling profits by forcing the fan to pay twice.  

In 2024, as a response to the Taylor Swift Ticketmaster controversy, the U.S. Department of Justice sought an antitrust lawsuit, accusing Live Nation — Ticketmaster’s parent company — of illegally monopolizing the live event market. Calls to break up the company followed, though fans are still left with a broken system.  

The artist’s complicity 

Blaming Ticketmaster alone won’t solve the issue; artists and promoters also shape your ticket buying experience. Together, they set the price or “face value” for tickets and choose whether to use dynamic pricing and platinum tickets — regular tickets whose prices adjust in real time based on supply and demand and other factors. Superstars like Taylor Swift or Beyoncé have the final say in those decisions but smaller artists are not afforded the same choice.  

For The Eras Tour, Swift chose not to use dynamic pricing; same goes for Ariana Grande whose tickets for The Eternal Sunshine Tour went on sale earlier this month.  However, acts like Coldplay, Bruce Springsteen and Oasis opted into the strategy.  

Some artists have successfully used more fan focused systems. Pearl Jam, Billie Eilish, The Cure and Neil Young all used “face value exchange:” a system that locks resell prices for tickets at the original price they were purchased for, while making tickets non-transferable. This ruins scalpers’ chances of making a profit or selling on a different site but allowing every artist and promoter to use it would threaten Ticketmaster’s profits.  

Scalpers and resellers: old villains, new tricks 

Scalpers aren’t new, but the digital age has seen them grow into full scale enterprises. 

Although Ticketmaster’s bot detection algorithm Verified Fan promises to make it impossible for scalpers to use bots when buying tickets, scalpers can still use hundreds of accounts to buy up large sections of tickets and resell them at higher prices. If brokers use Ticketmaster to resell, Ticketmaster further lines their pockets. So, there’s no incentive to further crack down on this issue. 

To make things worse, brokers get a better deal than a regular fan reselling through Ticketmaster. A fan looking to resell their ticket would have to pay a 7 per cent service fee but a broker using the Trade Desk software has that fee reduced to 3 per cent, according to The Toronto Star 

–– 

Fans are trapped in a system where Ticketmaster, artists, promoters and scalpers all profit at their expense. Although use of face value exchange is growing, the instances of the system in use are exceptions, not the rule. All the while, social media continues to glamorize tours, endlessly making them all feel like a once in a lifetime experience worth any price. 

The result? Ticket buying is broken on every level. Ticketmaster exploits fans, artists are either too small or too greedy, resellers are allowed to thrive and still we pay.  

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

“Wicked”: the end of an era  

This review contains spoilers for Wicked: Part One, Wicked: For Good and Wicked, the Broadway musical.  

It’s time to shut up about opting out of the compulsory bus pass fee because you own a car 

Owning a personal vehicle doesn’t make your argument against a compulsory bus pass good. In fact, this grievance tends to be deeply classist. 

Niagara Transit could do a better job with public communication  

Niagara Transit (NT) is scheduled to undergo some rapid changes over the next 10 years as part of a strategic growth plan. This is great news, as there is plenty of room for optimization and growth in the region’s transit system.

Identities aren’t something that can be sold 

In the age of doomscrolling and rampant consumerism, identities are becoming increasingly centred around products and online aesthetics. Despite the fact that one’s identity can’t be boiled down to a “type,” your social media feed might try to convince you that, with the right products, you can try on pre-conceived identities until you find the right match. 

Why are we so obsessed with self-improvement? 

The rise of the “winter arc” trend isn’t anything new. The internet is obsessed with self-improvement messaging, reinventing a lifechanging trend to leave us feeling unproductive and inferior with the come of each new season. 

Shopping isn’t the only way to spread Christmas cheer   

The celebration of Christmas in the contemporary context is deeply embedded in consumerism, but it doesn’t have to be. 

The race to label a glitchy TikTok as “censorship” signals eroding trust toward media institutions 

A video discussing the Jeffrey Epstein emails appears to “glitch” the moment its creator says “Syria,” cutting or de-syncing the audio in a way that behaves differently depending on how and where the clip is played. The comments immediately and confident started labelling the glitch as a form of deliberative platform censorship. This diagnosis provides a small but indicative reflection of how people view the current political and media environment with such distrust that anomalies are read as manipulation by default, not errors. 

Short-form content posted on TikTok has become the music industry’s biggest helper and largest enemy   

While TikTok has skyrocketed many previously unknown musicians into stardom overnight, it has also created a desire for instant gratification amongst consumers.