Saturday, October 11, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Critical race theory, U.S politics and The Curse of La Llorona

|
|

The Hispanic and Latin American Studies Film Club, a subsection of the Department of Modern Languages, Literatures and Cultures, hosted an online discussion on Nov. 4 titled “American Dreams, American Nightmares: La Llorona, Race, and Politics.”

Through the online discussion of The Curse of La Llorona (2019), the film club demonstrated that just because the spooky season is finally over, there’s no excuse to ignore horror films, especially in the context of providing racial and gendered analysis. This type of analysis can be favourable to dismantle the social structures that said films tend to critique or perpetrate subtly.

For this event, Dr. Cristina Santos, an associate professor at Brock University, who specializes in Hispanic and Latin American Studies, invited Dr. Bernadette Marie Calafell, the Chair of Critical Race and Ethnic Studies at Gonzaga University, to talk about the research and film analysis that she has crafted in regards to horror films and the portrayal of pressing political issues that Latinos in the U.S face in the said genre of cinema.

Something notable from Dr. Bernadette’s presentation is that she made sure to tie factual political occurrences to her analysis of the horror genre. For instance, she mentioned during her presentation that many American horror films create monsters partly inspired by historical and political figures that have terrorized the lives of those living on the margins of society.

A striking example she brought up was the comparison between the character “Pennywise” from Stephen King’s It (2017) and the 45th president of the United States; Donald Trump. More specifically, she clarified that in the same way that the character Pennywise terrorizes children, so did Trump’s administration by creating a political climate with a severe distaste for immigrants and brutal carelessness leading to Hispanic children being separated from their families and kept in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) camps indefinitely.

Although Dr. Bernadette explored various horror films throughout her presentation, most of the emphasis was on examining the subtle racial and gender commentaries seen throughout La Llorona (2019). The film choice is incredibly relevant to examine Hispanic culture, so it makes the most sense to connect the events in the movie with the lived experiences of Latinos in the U.S. and elsewhere.

La Llorona (2019) is a modern reimagination of an old myth prevalent in South America that tells the story of the spirit of a woman that weeps at night near bodies of water in hopes of finding her children that she murdered. Many interpretations of the “weeping woman” myth also portray her as a temptress. She is a questionable mother figure for killing her children and is also perceived as an entity that seduces unloyal, evil men who unknowingly are lured to their death.

Perhaps the most exciting piece of analysis stemming from critiquing the character development choices in La Llorona is that of the perceptions of racialized/Hispanic motherhood placed against societal notions of white motherhood.

Dr. Bernadette explained that in the film, the white mother, Anna, and her white children, are seen as benevolent and morally superior, especially compared to Patricia, a Mexican woman who is seen as an irresponsible mother and an “angry brown woman” in the film. These characterizations, of course, mirror how society perceives mothers of different ethnicities and how patriarchal confinements place women in two boxes: the racialized, bad mother or the white, good mother.

Regrettably, despite the rich analysis provided by Dr.Bernadette during the online presentation, the fast-paced nature of her commentaries left the audience with questions and wanting a deeper understanding of the concepts and political comparisons that the professor was making.

Likewise, the live chat meant for audience members to input their questions needed to be fixed, which is something that the facilitator, as well as Dr. Bernadette, seemed not to be aware of.

For more events hosted by the Department of Modern Languages, Literatures and Cultures at Brock, click here.

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Mapping MAMM #4: What the f*** is Canadian Literature anyway? 

Mapping MAMM is an ongoing series which gets into the research questions surrounding the Mapping Ann-Marie MacDonald Research Project. My previous articles have introduced the project as well as examined its cross-disciplinarity and ethics of care. In this fourth installment, I’ll get into the “fraught construct” that is CanLit. 

Late Night comedy in the face of censorship  

Jimmy Kimmel is a late-night comedy staple. Having been on the air since 2003, the comedian is perhaps best known for his viral videos, including “Mean Tweets” — where celebrities read hateful posts on X and his long running YouTube series “I Told My Kids I Ate All Their Halloween Candy.” Kimmel has always been a relatively tame figure in late night media. Though not as politically neutral as Jimmy Fallon, he is certainly not as outspoken as fellow late-night hosts Seth Meyers, Stephen Colbert, John Stewart or John Oliver. 

USA: Not fascist, just anti-anti-fascism 

The United States is not a fascist state. Elections still occur, courts still sometimes check executive power and journalists and comedians still speak out against the government. Within the remains of a democratic framework, on Sept. 22, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order designating “Antifa” — a composition of autonomous groups affiliated with political movements against fascism and other far-right extremist ideologies — as a domestic terrorist organization. Despite the lack of legal framework for this designation, the executive order purports that dissent against the Trump administration is a threat to national security rather than a legitimate democratic right

The war within: Pete Hegseth and the weaponization of U.S. military identity 

When Pete Hegseth — formally the U.S. Secretary of Defense, but ceremonially the Secretary of War — took the stage at Marine Corps Base Quantico on Sept. 30, his first words carried the weight of an era. “Welcome to the War Department,” he said to a packed auditorium of generals, admirals and senior officers. “The era of the Department of Defense is over.”

Five activities to add to your fall bucket list 

If you’re looking for something fun to add to your bucket list this fall, this list of autumn activities is perfect for you. 

Brock’s Wellness Fair spotlights countless student services and opportunities  

The 2025 Brock Wellness Fair gave students the chance to explore a wide range of services, supports and community spaces available both on and off campus. From volunteer initiatives and interfaith opportunities to a variety of mental health supports and athletics, the fair displayed a growing list of opportunities for students to take care of themselves, connect with others and make Brock feel like home. 

10 years after TRC’s Calls to Action and Canada’s promises of reconciliation are still pending 

Ten years have passed since the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) released their landmark Final Report in June 2015. The Commission, established under the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, spent seven years gathering testimony from over 6,000 Survivors to document the devastating legacy of residential schools. This led them to issuing 94 Calls to Action — a roadmap for governments, institutions and Canadians to repair harm and build a more just future. These Calls were never meant as symbolic gestures; they were concrete, actionable steps. A decade later, one question remains: has Canada lived up to them?

Buyback or backfire? Ottawa’s gun compensation program faces mounting pushback  

In late September, Ottawa announced an official gun buyback pilot program in Nova Scotia — the first step toward removing more than 2,500 models of legally purchased, now-prohibited firearms from licensed Canadian gun owners.