Thursday, October 23, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

How the trade war is bringing voter support to the Liberals 

|
|

Amidst Canada’s trade war with the U.S., recent polling shows that a surge in voter support for the Liberals places them a mere point behind the Conservatives after months of trailing behind. 

Less than a month ago, Nanos polling measured voter support for the Conservative Party of Canada at 37 per cent, with the Liberals trailing behind at 33 per cent. This polling was fairly similar several months prior. 

However, March 7 brought new polling numbers that revealed an uptick in voter support for the Liberal Party a few days short of the party selecting their new leader, with the Conservatives measuring in at 35.7 per cent and the Liberals exactly one point behind at 34.7 per cent. 

Similarly, a Leger poll from March 10 showed a similar uptick in support for the Liberals, in which the parties were tied at 37 per cent of voter support. 

There is no doubt that the recent trade war incited by the U.S. is on voters’ minds as we progress closer to the recently announced early election taking place on April 28. The tariff conflict poses a tangible threat to Canadians, emphasizing the need for voters to research where they are placing their support to ensure Canada’s economy and industries remain protected. 

In the context of Canada’s trade war with the U.S. — which will likely last for the “foreseeable future” according to former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau — here are some factors that could contribute to a continued shift in support toward the Liberal Party. 

Trudeau’s response 

Since President Trump signed tariff orders on Feb. 10, the Canadian government has been working hastily to defend the economy. The seemingly newfound aggression in Trudeau’s Liberal government led many to assert that the trade conflict “revived” the party from the large amounts of dissatisfaction voters had with them over recent years due to contentious issues like the rising cost of living after the COVID-19 pandemic and the consumer carbon tax. 

It is quite likely that Trudeau’s comprehensive counter-tariffs onto American industries, which include 25 per cent tariffs on $30 billion of U.S. goods, with tariffs on $125 billion worth of goods still pending, relit a fire within the party. The situation is reminiscent of the promising position Trudeau held when he initially became the leader of the Liberal Party back in 2013.  

Mark Carney takes over as Liberal leader 

When your country is in a trade war, it’s helpful if your prime minister doubles as a lifelong economist — at least, this is what the recent Liberal leadership election seemed to suggest. 

A former governor of both the Banks of Canada and England, Mark Carney was elected to be the new leader of the Liberal Party and Prime Minister on March 9, following Trudeau’s promise to resign. 

Carney faced overwhelming success at the polls, winning 85.9 per cent of the vote. It is significant that the Leger poll showing equal support for the Liberals and Conservatives gathered research from March 7 to March 10 — allowing two full days of polling to be collected after Carney was elected. Considering voter concerns with the cost of living under the Liberal government, Carney put forth his finance-focused vision for Canada at a news conference before the government’s first cabinet meeting, outlining that he has already set up meetings with several European countries to “diversify” Canada’s trading partners.  

With his economic experience, Carney faces the electorate in times where he could use his past career to his campaigning advantage. 

Pierre Poilievre and “Trump comparisons” 

Comparisons between Poilievre and Trump are not new. In November of 2024, Le Monde called Poilievre “Trump-inspired” because of his insult-heavy political voice and overall support from those in Republican circles, naming Elon Musk as one of these supporters after he endorsed Poilievre on X. 

According to CBC News, Poilievre has been accused of “borrowing policy” from Trump after saying that the government would conduct “massive” cuts to foreign aid to fund an Arctic military base in early January, leading to broader comparisons to the U.S. president in Liberal attack ads ever since. 

In a recent ad titled “Made-in-America,” clips of Poilievre and Trump repeating similar phrases are spliced together, with text directed at Poilievre asking: “How can you speak for Canada when you sound like Donald Trump?” 

As evidenced by polling over the past year, Poilievre’s take on Trump’s populist strategies were initially successful when juxtaposed next to vast dissatisfaction with Trudeau. However, the trade war with the U.S. has made any tactics associated with Trump quite contentious for Canadians.  

Poilievre’s backing from Republicans and his overall Trump-like image could pose a threat to his campaign in the next election if he continues to pursue this strategy — as Conservative strategists have encouraged him to do — which might lead to increased support for the Liberal Party as a result. 

— 

Despite what preliminary polls might suggest, the parties still have time to outline their campaigns before this year’s election as the trade war progresses. Whether each party will continue in their current directions or respond to polling trends remains unclear. 

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Where does rapture content come from? 

As our political climate remains in a troubling state, whisperings that the “end times” are near can be convincing — leading theories to spread rapidly in online spaces. 

Mapping MAMM #4: What the f*** is Canadian Literature anyway? 

Mapping MAMM is an ongoing series which gets into the research questions surrounding the Mapping Ann-Marie MacDonald Research Project. My previous articles have introduced the project as well as examined its cross-disciplinarity and ethics of care. In this fourth installment, I’ll get into the “fraught construct” that is CanLit. 

Late Night comedy in the face of censorship  

Jimmy Kimmel is a late-night comedy staple. Having been on the air since 2003, the comedian is perhaps best known for his viral videos, including “Mean Tweets” — where celebrities read hateful posts on X and his long running YouTube series “I Told My Kids I Ate All Their Halloween Candy.” Kimmel has always been a relatively tame figure in late night media. Though not as politically neutral as Jimmy Fallon, he is certainly not as outspoken as fellow late-night hosts Seth Meyers, Stephen Colbert, John Stewart or John Oliver. 

USA: Not fascist, just anti-anti-fascism 

The United States is not a fascist state. Elections still occur, courts still sometimes check executive power and journalists and comedians still speak out against the government. Within the remains of a democratic framework, on Sept. 22, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order designating “Antifa” — a composition of autonomous groups affiliated with political movements against fascism and other far-right extremist ideologies — as a domestic terrorist organization. Despite the lack of legal framework for this designation, the executive order purports that dissent against the Trump administration is a threat to national security rather than a legitimate democratic right

The war within: Pete Hegseth and the weaponization of U.S. military identity 

When Pete Hegseth — formally the U.S. Secretary of Defense, but ceremonially the Secretary of War — took the stage at Marine Corps Base Quantico on Sept. 30, his first words carried the weight of an era. “Welcome to the War Department,” he said to a packed auditorium of generals, admirals and senior officers. “The era of the Department of Defense is over.”

Five activities to add to your fall bucket list 

If you’re looking for something fun to add to your bucket list this fall, this list of autumn activities is perfect for you. 

Brock’s Wellness Fair spotlights countless student services and opportunities  

The 2025 Brock Wellness Fair gave students the chance to explore a wide range of services, supports and community spaces available both on and off campus. From volunteer initiatives and interfaith opportunities to a variety of mental health supports and athletics, the fair displayed a growing list of opportunities for students to take care of themselves, connect with others and make Brock feel like home. 

10 years after TRC’s Calls to Action and Canada’s promises of reconciliation are still pending 

Ten years have passed since the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) released their landmark Final Report in June 2015. The Commission, established under the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, spent seven years gathering testimony from over 6,000 Survivors to document the devastating legacy of residential schools. This led them to issuing 94 Calls to Action — a roadmap for governments, institutions and Canadians to repair harm and build a more just future. These Calls were never meant as symbolic gestures; they were concrete, actionable steps. A decade later, one question remains: has Canada lived up to them?