Sunday, October 12, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

In the face of MRP stream budget cuts, some students are fighting back 

|
|

Brock has cut funding to its MRP stream graduate programs, and students are speaking out in their defence. 

Morgan Crosby did her undergraduate studies in Human Rights and Social Justice at Carleton University. Following her graduation, she knew an advanced degree was required for the career she wanted to pursue, and her search garnered only two results: a Master of Human Rights at the University of Manitoba or a Master of Arts in Social Justice and Equity Studies (SJES) at Brock University. 

Her decision to study at Brock was heavily influenced by the funding package the University guaranteed, funding which she could not have completed her program without, at least not without accumulating copious amounts of debt in the process. 

Crosby decided to enter the Major Research Paper (MRP) stream, a route that many students pick because “it’s more accessible since it’s not as long, [both] in the length of the paper and the time it takes to complete,” said Crosby. The SJES MRP stream is only 16 months long compared to the two-year Thesis stream. 

Her paper, soon to be published in the Brock MRP Digital Repository, focuses on the impacts of Canadian mining on Indigenous communities in Guatemala. Crosby had a rare experience in which she got to travel to Guatemala last May through a geography course with the University of Northern British Columbia (UNBC) and talk with some of the people she was writing about in her research. 

This was not a typical experience, but she was able to do it thanks to her connections at Brock: “Because I had really great professors here in the SJES program, that supported me and told me about the [UNBC] program, and helped me transfer the credit… I was able to do that.” 

Now, as Brock faces a $37 million deficit in funds, Crosby is seeing significant cuts to the program type that gave her so many opportunities. 

“Major Research Paper (MRP) students will no longer be eligible for the Graduate Fellowship (worth $9,000 per year); MRP students will be eligible for a one-time merit-based entrance scholarship of $3,000 if their admission average is above 82%; [and] Thesis students who switch to the MRP route will be required to re-pay their Graduate Fellowship,” said the petition linked on posters as students expressed their discontent by sitting outside Brock’s first State of the University Address on Feb. 15. 

This came after Crosby and two other students, Sarah Pierson and Christian Santesso, spoke at the Brock Senate meeting on Feb. 14 to voice their concerns. 

Earliest among these concerns was the lack of transparency from the University. The decision was made in December, but Crosby herself only learned of the cuts in January, when she came back from the holiday break and was informed by a professor.  

“Students weren’t told,” said Crosby.  

“The professors were told because they had to make decisions about how they were going to let people into the programs for the upcoming year… That left a lot of us wondering – a lot of students wondering – why would the university not communicate these cuts to its graduate students? Do we not deserve to know the information that puts our program at risk?” 

To Crosby and others, this gave the impression that “the university doesn’t really care about its grad students, especially when [their] research and opinions and thoughts are really valuable to the institution.” 

There has been concern that the bulk of graduate students in the Faculty of Social Sciences (FoSS), the Faculty of Humanities (FoH) and the Faculty of Education (FoE) choose the MRP stream, meaning these three faculties are disproportionately affected by the cuts to funding. 

“How is the [SJES] program going to continue if we don’t have MRP students, and therefore no students coming in?” said Crosby. If these programs are expected to bear the brunt of the financial cuts, she worries that fewer students will be attracted to Brock programs, and current undergrad students may be driven to other schools. 

“That’s reducing a lot of knowledge and research that’s going to be produced in these fields that are… amplifying voices that are often excluded from academia, and producing research that is not always the standard or the norm,” said Crosby. 

Outspoken students are also concerned about the impact of these cuts on international students, who already pay incredibly high tuition rates, and the “barriers and impacts that this has disproportionately on BIPOC students,” said Crosby. 

Fortunately, the students’ efforts were received positively at the Senate meeting: 

“They thanked us for coming and speaking and voicing our concerns, and they said that it’s not often students go to Senate in most places and speak like that,” said Crosby. 

Similarly, at the demonstration outside the State of the University Address, positive feedback and reinforcement were the norm from people entering. After asking some questions at the event, mostly to spread awareness to those attending in person and online, Crosby, Pierson and Santesso were invited to speak at a meeting of the Brock Board of Trustees. They have not heard any feedback from the Board but are hopeful their voices were heard. 

While the cuts regarding the upcoming school year have already been finalized, Crosby believes “there is room for the years afterwards to make adjustments.” 

“What we’re asking for now is that the cuts be distributed equitably across all [faculties], rather than just three [faculties] taking the brunt of this,” said Crosby. That way, the impact won’t be so large or negative on any one group. 

Crosby has spoken to students and professors in programs across Brock, and the consensus is that supporting this effort is worthwhile, encouraging them to continue applying pressure to the school. 

“It’s not just me that’s doing this work, it’s a collective of students and professors that have been responding to these detrimental cuts. There’s a lot of strong, hard-working students that are putting their voices behind this,” said Crosby. 

“There’s so many students that are doing such cool work that aren’t in a thesis stream… it’s still such great, valuable work that doesn’t deserve to be cut.” 

Whether or not changes will be made to the financial cuts is yet to be seen or announced, but Crosby is undeterred. They will keep fighting. 

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Mapping MAMM #4: What the f*** is Canadian Literature anyway? 

Mapping MAMM is an ongoing series which gets into the research questions surrounding the Mapping Ann-Marie MacDonald Research Project. My previous articles have introduced the project as well as examined its cross-disciplinarity and ethics of care. In this fourth installment, I’ll get into the “fraught construct” that is CanLit. 

Late Night comedy in the face of censorship  

Jimmy Kimmel is a late-night comedy staple. Having been on the air since 2003, the comedian is perhaps best known for his viral videos, including “Mean Tweets” — where celebrities read hateful posts on X and his long running YouTube series “I Told My Kids I Ate All Their Halloween Candy.” Kimmel has always been a relatively tame figure in late night media. Though not as politically neutral as Jimmy Fallon, he is certainly not as outspoken as fellow late-night hosts Seth Meyers, Stephen Colbert, John Stewart or John Oliver. 

USA: Not fascist, just anti-anti-fascism 

The United States is not a fascist state. Elections still occur, courts still sometimes check executive power and journalists and comedians still speak out against the government. Within the remains of a democratic framework, on Sept. 22, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order designating “Antifa” — a composition of autonomous groups affiliated with political movements against fascism and other far-right extremist ideologies — as a domestic terrorist organization. Despite the lack of legal framework for this designation, the executive order purports that dissent against the Trump administration is a threat to national security rather than a legitimate democratic right

The war within: Pete Hegseth and the weaponization of U.S. military identity 

When Pete Hegseth — formally the U.S. Secretary of Defense, but ceremonially the Secretary of War — took the stage at Marine Corps Base Quantico on Sept. 30, his first words carried the weight of an era. “Welcome to the War Department,” he said to a packed auditorium of generals, admirals and senior officers. “The era of the Department of Defense is over.”

Five activities to add to your fall bucket list 

If you’re looking for something fun to add to your bucket list this fall, this list of autumn activities is perfect for you. 

Brock’s Wellness Fair spotlights countless student services and opportunities  

The 2025 Brock Wellness Fair gave students the chance to explore a wide range of services, supports and community spaces available both on and off campus. From volunteer initiatives and interfaith opportunities to a variety of mental health supports and athletics, the fair displayed a growing list of opportunities for students to take care of themselves, connect with others and make Brock feel like home. 

10 years after TRC’s Calls to Action and Canada’s promises of reconciliation are still pending 

Ten years have passed since the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) released their landmark Final Report in June 2015. The Commission, established under the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, spent seven years gathering testimony from over 6,000 Survivors to document the devastating legacy of residential schools. This led them to issuing 94 Calls to Action — a roadmap for governments, institutions and Canadians to repair harm and build a more just future. These Calls were never meant as symbolic gestures; they were concrete, actionable steps. A decade later, one question remains: has Canada lived up to them?

Buyback or backfire? Ottawa’s gun compensation program faces mounting pushback  

In late September, Ottawa announced an official gun buyback pilot program in Nova Scotia — the first step toward removing more than 2,500 models of legally purchased, now-prohibited firearms from licensed Canadian gun owners.