Sunday, February 22, 2026
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

NFL and Taylor Swift: The misogynists are right, but not for the reason they think

|
|

Taylor Swift showed up in a recent NFL promo, and the internet is up in arms about it.  

For months, Taylor Swift has been criticized for the amount of televised screen time she is given when she attends NFL games to cheer for her Kansas City Chiefs tight end boyfriend Travis Kelce. While many people have pointed out that Swift likely dislikes having a camera pointed directly at her face just as much as everyone else, her appearance in a 30 second NFL promo clip has stirred more controversy.  

Within two seconds of the video beginning, Swift can be seen shouting her support from her luxury box. Five seconds later, watchers are shown a similar clip of Swift with Donna Kelce, Travis Kelce’s mother. While one mention of Swift might have been acceptable considering fans also get a glimpse of Dolly Parton wearing the famous Dallas Cowboys cheerleader uniform, Swift is then shown a third, fourth and fifth time throughout the promotional advertisement. In fact, Taylor Swift is shown more than any one NFL player (including her boyfriend).  

As was typical in the past, the internet was quick to hate on the pop star for simply taking up space somewhere people have decided she doesn’t belong. While it is absolutely telling that much of the anger directed at Swift’s presence has come from men, it isn’t untrue to say that Taylor Swift doesn’t belong in an NFL promo clip. At least, not more than once.  

Although it makes sense why the NFL decided to include the pop star in the promo, with ratings skyrocketing amongst women 12 to 49 after Swift and Kelce began dating at the beginning of last football season, other players’ families aren’t being advertised so frequently. While Brittany Mahomes, Patrick Mahomes’ wife, is not a world-famous pop star who is currently in the midst of one of the biggest tours of all time, it doesn’t change the fact that the NFL should be focusing on their players, not their players’ friends and family.  

The general argument amongst Swift’s supporters is that the pop star would have had no control over her inclusion in the promo, but this simply can’t be true. Taylor Swift is more than just a name, it’s a brand and a corporation, and there is absolutely no way Swift’s team would have allowed her to be included in said promo without their approval. While perhaps the singer herself didn’t make the final decision on her screen time, it would be naïve to think that the people connected to her didn’t.  

Personally, I don’t agree with all the hate Swift is getting over the promo because as the original poster and owner of the content, the NFL should be the ones bearing the brunt of the anger. They created the video, they posted it on their social media and knew what they were doing including Taylor Swift. It was a marketing tactic that benefited them way more than it did her: no one is going to see the singer for the first time in an NFL advertisement and suddenly become a fan. Swift, with a $1.3 billion net worth, is worth way more than any currently working NFL player so it comes as no surprise that the NFL wants to profit off her being a supportive partner to Travis Kelce.  

While Swift and her team almost certainly signed off on her inclusion in this controversial promotional advertisement, solely hating on Taylor Swift and not the male-dominated realm of the NFL seems like another example of misogyny at its finest.  

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Social media has an alt-right pipeline problem, and women are its newest target 

Trends that urge women to step into their “divine feminine energy,” consume their way into a “clean girl aesthetic” and blame small mistakes on the fact they are “just a girl” are not products of neutral shifts in our algorithms. The differing frames women have been forced into online indicate subtle dog whistles to alt-right ideologies, ultimately functioning to naturalize conservatism, traditional gender roles and regressive choice feminism. 

The loneliness epidemic: a Gen-Z moral crisis, or a product of intimacy without dependency? 

If you’ve ever scrolled through social media, sat through a family dinner or had to endure a ‘situationship,’ surely you have been exposed to the common diagnosis of modern dating as a moral failure. It’s always the same arguments: the newer generation is impatient, nobody wants to put in the work, everyone is incapable of commitment and they’re all addicted to novelty. 

The presentation of technology and its inevitability  

For the first two decades of the 21st century, technology advanced at breakneck speed. Its rapid development often left sacrificed accountability, with tech being allowed to interfere with institutions like democracy, personal rights, privacy and ownership. 

The NHL is homophobic and the use of “Heated Rivalry” in their promotion doesn’t change that 

Piggybacking off the popularity of Crave’s new hit hockey show, Heated Rivalry, doesn’t make the NHL any less homophobic

Brock University’s Concurrent Education program is exhausting its students before they get the chance to become educators 

The Concurrent Education program at Brock University is unnecessarily difficult and ridiculously expensive, causing future educators to experience complete burnout before they even have a chance to reach the classroom. 

Should you do a moot court on a whim? 

On Jan. 24, on a frigid morning during a cold snap and with just four hours of sleep, I embarked at 7:40 a.m. to meet my partner in crime, Wenyang Ming, for my first mock moot court trial.  

A good rom-com shouldn’t be the exception, but the rule 

The rom-coms of today don’t just disappoint — they feel out of touch.

Editorial: Feelings over Trump’s military intervention in Venezuela are contrasting but not contradictory 

The response to the United States’ capture of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro displays an unusual juxtaposition: many Americans are upset at U.S. President Donald Trump for his unannounced military intervention while, on the contrary, many Venezuelans — namely those living within the U.S. — have met the news with widespread celebration.