Saturday, October 11, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Online child safety, deep fakes and hate speech: uncovering the scope of the Online Harms Bill  

|
|

Years deep in development, the Liberals’ Online Harms Bill will be tabled at the House of Commons this following week.  

While the details of the bill will be revealed in the House of Commons, it is expected to tackle several kinds of harmful online content, with an emphasis on protecting minors. In particular, the bill’s framing indicates a concern for addressing cyberbullying, content that may lead to child self-harm and child sexual exploitation content. 

Since 2019, there have been multiple recorded attempts at creating legislative frameworks for social media platforms and the illegal content within. Under the direction of then-Minister of Heritage Steven Guilbeault, Bill C-36 was introduced to tackle hate speech but ultimately was unsuccessful and will never to be revisited as is. 

In 2021, the Liberals announced a technical discussion paper on harmful online content, which was phased out because of pushback during the election campaigns in 2021. The Liberals promised to introduce an online harms bill within 100 days of the election yet failed to deliver on time. 

As 2024 unfolds, the reimagination of previous proposed legislation over online harms, now the Online Harms Bill, will be tabled at the House of Commons, bringing forth amendments to the Criminal Code and the Human Rights Act. 

The scope of the bill, while largely unknown, is expected to draw from previously proposed regulations over five kinds of harmful content, including child exploitation, terrorist content, hate speech, incitement to violence, the sharing of non-consensual images and child exploitation.  

As for amendments to previous iterations of the bill, greater concern for children’s safety online and larger measures for tackling non-consensual sharing of sexually explicit “deepfakes” are expected to make it into the new bill. 

In anticipation of the bill’s tabling at the House of Commons, the Conservative Party has found an issue with possible encroachments on freedom of speech. Though Prime Minister Trudeau has stated that the legislation aims to protect children rather than censoring the internet. The Opposition does not perceive the bill as such.  

The leader of the Progressive Conservatives, Pierre Poilievre, has called the bill an “attack on freedom of expression” in that it will legislate online speech. 

Although Poilievre and his caucus have positioned themselves as greatly opposed to the bill, it is worth noting that the contents of the legislation have yet to be revealed. In line with the opposition’s lack of support for the Online Harms Bill, both Poilievre and Singh are looking to support a separate piece of legislation, Bill S-210. This piece of legislation, which is in the House of Commons for consideration, aims to restrict minors’ access to sexually explicit content through age verification across websites like Pornhub. 

As Members of Parliament prepare to discuss the Online Harms Bill at the House of Commons this coming week, and the details of the legislation are revealed, a balancing act between online freedoms and child safety awaits.  

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Mapping MAMM #4: What the f*** is Canadian Literature anyway? 

Mapping MAMM is an ongoing series which gets into the research questions surrounding the Mapping Ann-Marie MacDonald Research Project. My previous articles have introduced the project as well as examined its cross-disciplinarity and ethics of care. In this fourth installment, I’ll get into the “fraught construct” that is CanLit. 

Late Night comedy in the face of censorship  

Jimmy Kimmel is a late-night comedy staple. Having been on the air since 2003, the comedian is perhaps best known for his viral videos, including “Mean Tweets” — where celebrities read hateful posts on X and his long running YouTube series “I Told My Kids I Ate All Their Halloween Candy.” Kimmel has always been a relatively tame figure in late night media. Though not as politically neutral as Jimmy Fallon, he is certainly not as outspoken as fellow late-night hosts Seth Meyers, Stephen Colbert, John Stewart or John Oliver. 

USA: Not fascist, just anti-anti-fascism 

The United States is not a fascist state. Elections still occur, courts still sometimes check executive power and journalists and comedians still speak out against the government. Within the remains of a democratic framework, on Sept. 22, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order designating “Antifa” — a composition of autonomous groups affiliated with political movements against fascism and other far-right extremist ideologies — as a domestic terrorist organization. Despite the lack of legal framework for this designation, the executive order purports that dissent against the Trump administration is a threat to national security rather than a legitimate democratic right

The war within: Pete Hegseth and the weaponization of U.S. military identity 

When Pete Hegseth — formally the U.S. Secretary of Defense, but ceremonially the Secretary of War — took the stage at Marine Corps Base Quantico on Sept. 30, his first words carried the weight of an era. “Welcome to the War Department,” he said to a packed auditorium of generals, admirals and senior officers. “The era of the Department of Defense is over.”

Five activities to add to your fall bucket list 

If you’re looking for something fun to add to your bucket list this fall, this list of autumn activities is perfect for you. 

Brock’s Wellness Fair spotlights countless student services and opportunities  

The 2025 Brock Wellness Fair gave students the chance to explore a wide range of services, supports and community spaces available both on and off campus. From volunteer initiatives and interfaith opportunities to a variety of mental health supports and athletics, the fair displayed a growing list of opportunities for students to take care of themselves, connect with others and make Brock feel like home. 

10 years after TRC’s Calls to Action and Canada’s promises of reconciliation are still pending 

Ten years have passed since the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) released their landmark Final Report in June 2015. The Commission, established under the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, spent seven years gathering testimony from over 6,000 Survivors to document the devastating legacy of residential schools. This led them to issuing 94 Calls to Action — a roadmap for governments, institutions and Canadians to repair harm and build a more just future. These Calls were never meant as symbolic gestures; they were concrete, actionable steps. A decade later, one question remains: has Canada lived up to them?

Buyback or backfire? Ottawa’s gun compensation program faces mounting pushback  

In late September, Ottawa announced an official gun buyback pilot program in Nova Scotia — the first step toward removing more than 2,500 models of legally purchased, now-prohibited firearms from licensed Canadian gun owners.