Thursday, January 1, 2026
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Online child safety, deep fakes and hate speech: uncovering the scope of the Online Harms Bill  

|
|

Years deep in development, the Liberals’ Online Harms Bill will be tabled at the House of Commons this following week.  

While the details of the bill will be revealed in the House of Commons, it is expected to tackle several kinds of harmful online content, with an emphasis on protecting minors. In particular, the bill’s framing indicates a concern for addressing cyberbullying, content that may lead to child self-harm and child sexual exploitation content. 

Since 2019, there have been multiple recorded attempts at creating legislative frameworks for social media platforms and the illegal content within. Under the direction of then-Minister of Heritage Steven Guilbeault, Bill C-36 was introduced to tackle hate speech but ultimately was unsuccessful and will never to be revisited as is. 

In 2021, the Liberals announced a technical discussion paper on harmful online content, which was phased out because of pushback during the election campaigns in 2021. The Liberals promised to introduce an online harms bill within 100 days of the election yet failed to deliver on time. 

As 2024 unfolds, the reimagination of previous proposed legislation over online harms, now the Online Harms Bill, will be tabled at the House of Commons, bringing forth amendments to the Criminal Code and the Human Rights Act. 

The scope of the bill, while largely unknown, is expected to draw from previously proposed regulations over five kinds of harmful content, including child exploitation, terrorist content, hate speech, incitement to violence, the sharing of non-consensual images and child exploitation.  

As for amendments to previous iterations of the bill, greater concern for children’s safety online and larger measures for tackling non-consensual sharing of sexually explicit “deepfakes” are expected to make it into the new bill. 

In anticipation of the bill’s tabling at the House of Commons, the Conservative Party has found an issue with possible encroachments on freedom of speech. Though Prime Minister Trudeau has stated that the legislation aims to protect children rather than censoring the internet. The Opposition does not perceive the bill as such.  

The leader of the Progressive Conservatives, Pierre Poilievre, has called the bill an “attack on freedom of expression” in that it will legislate online speech. 

Although Poilievre and his caucus have positioned themselves as greatly opposed to the bill, it is worth noting that the contents of the legislation have yet to be revealed. In line with the opposition’s lack of support for the Online Harms Bill, both Poilievre and Singh are looking to support a separate piece of legislation, Bill S-210. This piece of legislation, which is in the House of Commons for consideration, aims to restrict minors’ access to sexually explicit content through age verification across websites like Pornhub. 

As Members of Parliament prepare to discuss the Online Harms Bill at the House of Commons this coming week, and the details of the legislation are revealed, a balancing act between online freedoms and child safety awaits.  

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Bill 33: what students should know 

Ontario’s Bill 33, Supporting Children and Students Act, 2025, received Royal Assent on Nov. 20, creating a set of postsecondary law changes that will take effect only if and when the government proclaims Schedule 3. The schedule would require publicly assisted universities and colleges to publish admission criteria and access applicants on merit, authorize new regulations on admissions and student fees and require institutions to develop research security plans subject to ministerial directives. 

Aubrey Reeves presents findings on Canada’s Arts and Culture Sector 

On Dec. 1, the FirstOntario Performing Arts Centre (PAC) hosted local arts leaders, policy advocates and community members for a presentation on new national research, highlighting the economic and social contributions of Canada’s arts and culture sector.

2025 Ontario environment policies: the battle between competitiveness and accountability 

The Canadian federal and Ontario provincial governments’ 2025 policy decisions were focused on affordability and competitiveness-focused responses to trade pressure and rising electricity demands. The influence of this on Ontario’s climate can be seen in all of the climate adjacent policy decisions made regarding energy, infrastructure, land-use and fiscal decisions that either increased the pace of low-carbon buildout or weakened environmental guardrails and climate accountability, depending on the file.

What’s happening with Canada’s latest pipeline proposal? 

The Canadian Federal Government is moving in lockstep with Alberta’s Provincial Government towards establishing a new bitumen pipeline through to British Columbia’s northern coast despite objections. 

Here’s what the Auditor General’s report reveals about Ontario’s healthcare  

The Auditor General of Ontario, Shelley Spence, provided a news release on a newly tabled report that audits performance in healthcare related areas across the province. The news release highlights physician billing, medical schools and access to healthcare with the procurement of personal protective equipment also making headlines separately.  

Kick off the semester with Frost Week and more 

Before the winter term kicks into high gear, BUSU aims to make sure that you still get your fill of Brock fun — meeting new people, reconnecting with friends and getting some much-needed social time through Frost Week.

Toronto’s Union Station using facial recognition for targeted advertising 

Reports of Toronto’s Union Station implementing the use of facial recognition software to better target advertising made media waves a few weeks ago. Here’s what students who may be using the station during this upcoming break should know.  

Alberta’s alarming dependence on the notwithstanding clause 

On Nov. 18, Alberta invoked the notwithstanding clause for the second time in under a month — a retaliatory move in the face of pushback from the judiciary that threatens the rights of trans youth and young women across the province.