Friday, November 21, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Online child safety, deep fakes and hate speech: uncovering the scope of the Online Harms Bill  

|
|

Years deep in development, the Liberals’ Online Harms Bill will be tabled at the House of Commons this following week.  

While the details of the bill will be revealed in the House of Commons, it is expected to tackle several kinds of harmful online content, with an emphasis on protecting minors. In particular, the bill’s framing indicates a concern for addressing cyberbullying, content that may lead to child self-harm and child sexual exploitation content. 

Since 2019, there have been multiple recorded attempts at creating legislative frameworks for social media platforms and the illegal content within. Under the direction of then-Minister of Heritage Steven Guilbeault, Bill C-36 was introduced to tackle hate speech but ultimately was unsuccessful and will never to be revisited as is. 

In 2021, the Liberals announced a technical discussion paper on harmful online content, which was phased out because of pushback during the election campaigns in 2021. The Liberals promised to introduce an online harms bill within 100 days of the election yet failed to deliver on time. 

As 2024 unfolds, the reimagination of previous proposed legislation over online harms, now the Online Harms Bill, will be tabled at the House of Commons, bringing forth amendments to the Criminal Code and the Human Rights Act. 

The scope of the bill, while largely unknown, is expected to draw from previously proposed regulations over five kinds of harmful content, including child exploitation, terrorist content, hate speech, incitement to violence, the sharing of non-consensual images and child exploitation.  

As for amendments to previous iterations of the bill, greater concern for children’s safety online and larger measures for tackling non-consensual sharing of sexually explicit “deepfakes” are expected to make it into the new bill. 

In anticipation of the bill’s tabling at the House of Commons, the Conservative Party has found an issue with possible encroachments on freedom of speech. Though Prime Minister Trudeau has stated that the legislation aims to protect children rather than censoring the internet. The Opposition does not perceive the bill as such.  

The leader of the Progressive Conservatives, Pierre Poilievre, has called the bill an “attack on freedom of expression” in that it will legislate online speech. 

Although Poilievre and his caucus have positioned themselves as greatly opposed to the bill, it is worth noting that the contents of the legislation have yet to be revealed. In line with the opposition’s lack of support for the Online Harms Bill, both Poilievre and Singh are looking to support a separate piece of legislation, Bill S-210. This piece of legislation, which is in the House of Commons for consideration, aims to restrict minors’ access to sexually explicit content through age verification across websites like Pornhub. 

As Members of Parliament prepare to discuss the Online Harms Bill at the House of Commons this coming week, and the details of the legislation are revealed, a balancing act between online freedoms and child safety awaits.  

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

A “travesty for democracy,” Bill 2 and the notwithstanding clause 

On Oct. 28, Premier Danielle Smith and the government of Alberta passed Bill 2 in response to the ongoing strike between the Alberta Teachers’ Association (ATA) and the continued negotiations of new contracts. The bill imposes the province’s most recent offer — one that nearly 90 per cent of teachers rejected — as a binding agreement. 

CUPE 4207 bargaining with Brock University  

On Oct. 23, a rally and barbeque in solidarity with CUPE 4207 took place at Glenridge A as the labour union continues engaging in collective bargaining with Brock University. 

Air travel woes as U.S. government opens following nation’s longest shutdown 

The United States government shutdown created travel woes for passengers travelling to or through the country. As a result of the shutdown, there is currently a lack of air traffic controllers, creating serious travel issues for would-be fliers.

Dr. Emily Grafton discusses her book “Divided Power: How Federalism Undermines Reconciliation” 

Dr. Emily Grafton — professor at the University of Regina and author of the newly released book Divided Power: How Federalism Undermines Reconciliation — delivered a lecture at Brock University on Nov. 11, encouraging Canadians to rethink the constitutional foundations that shape Indigenous and state relations. 

Amazon cuts 14,000 corporate jobs as A.I. reshapes the workplace  

Amazon has announced that their company will reduce approximately 14,000 corporate positions globally with plans to eventually reduce up to 30,000 positions altogether, calling the move a strategic shift towards greater efficiency and innovation in an increasingly A.I.-driven environment. The initial phase of cuts affected white-collar and middle-management functions, while warehouse and frontline logistics jobs remain largely untouched.  

Exploring modern masculinity: Brock’s new reading club takes on a cultural crisis 

Associate Professor in the Political Science department at Brock University, Dr. Stefan Dolgert, has started a small but growing initiative to create a safe and welcoming space for young men to discuss issues they may be facing today: loneliness, emotional isolation and the influence of harmful online ideologies. Spearheaded by Professor Dolgert, the Men’s Reading Club at Brock, has undergone its first official meeting with a second in progress.

What the federal budget means for students 

The 2025 federal budget announced on Nov. 4 has made waves across Canada. Ballooning deficits, spending cuts, major investments and infrastructure dominate headlines. But behind the chaos is one question: What does this budget actually mean for students and young Canadians? 

Concerns of fraud push feds to seek visa cancellation powers, singling out India and Bangladesh 

India and Bangladesh have been singled out as “country specific challenges” by the Canadian government in Bill C-12, which seeks mass visa cancellation powers for circumstances such as pandemics, wars and “country-specific visa holders.”