Friday, April 25, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada
Home Blog Page 2

Canada’s men’s soccer defeat U.S. team  

0

For the second time in 39 years, Canada has defeated the United States in back-to-back matches.  

On March 23, Canada’s men’s national soccer team claimed a 2-1 victory over the U.S. in the third-place match of the Concacaf Nations League, creating a symbolic moment in what has traditionally been a one-sided rivalry with the U.S. a regular victor over its neighbour to the north. While the game wasn’t for a title, it still represented the Canadian team finally achieving a high level of play. 
 

The win wasn’t a fluke. Canada now holds a 2-0-1 record against the U.S. over their last competitive meetings, the first such streak since 1985. It’s a notable shift in the balance of power in North American soccer, a region long dominated by the U.S. and Mexico.  

Sunday’s match saw Canadian forward Jonathan David score the winner in the 59th minute, capping off a performance that earned him man of the match. Marking his 32nd international goal — the most in the Canadian men’s national team history. Forward Tani Oluwaseyi opened the scoring in the 27th minute, starting the game off with high energy.  

The numbers point to a trend, not a one-off. Canada finished the 2022 World Cup qualifying cycle atop the Concacaf table with 28 points — tied with Mexico as the Canadians held the tie breaker to finish first and three ahead of the U.S. — a feat not accomplished by the Canadians since 1997. In the past three years, Canada’s FIFA ranking has jumped from 73rd (January 2021) to 31st (March 2025), surpassing long-established regional rivals like Costa Rica and Honduras.  

Tactically, Canada has evolved into a high-pressing, direct attacking team with pace on the wings and a midfield that no longer struggles to keep possession. Canadian players like Alphonso Davies (Bayern Munich), Jonathan David (Lille) and Stephen Eustáquio (Porto) now play for top-tier European clubs — a level of experience and exposure Canadian players rarely had even a decade ago. 

But this Nations League result matters for reasons beyond mere bragging rights. It may be the first real indicator that Canada is ready to take its place alongside the U.S. and Mexico as a regional equal. And with all three nations set to co-host the 2026 FIFA World Cup, the timing couldn’t be more significant.   

For the U.S., the loss continues a frustrating trend under head coach Mauricio Pochettino, whose team failed to reach the Nations League final despite having the home advantage. Their defensive line was outpaced by Canada’s transitions and their midfield lacked rhythm — two issues that have plagued them since their World Cup round of 16 exit in 2022. Pochettino’s record now stands at 0-1 against Canada, a stat that will fuel growing skepticism from fans and media alike. 

What comes next is crucial. The Canadian team look to build on this momentum in the upcoming World Cup 2026, where they face elite competition for the first time in over a decade. Canada will enter its own World Cup as a genuine contender to advance — not just participate.   

Dizzying, intimate and raw, the Vertigo Festival was a night to remember 

0

The Vertigo Music Festival was an electric showcase of local musical talent, highlighting the importance of community in these dire days of political division. 

Sunlight streamed through the windows of Isaac’s Bar & Grill as I walked into “Niagara’s dizziest music festival” on Saturday, March 15. The mid-day light seemed strange considering I’d come for the main stage punk rock show, but with 13 bands promised to populate the festival, it made sense. 

Vendor tables lined the perimeter of the familiar setting, with the same stage I’ve sung karaoke on kitted out with a drum set, guitars and other technical gear. Isaac’s was in no way transformed, but that’s just a staple of how versatile it is as a venue (something I hope continues to be true after the incoming renovations). 

As expected, the pub was fairly sparse at the beginning of the day, but a decent crowd gathered for the opening act, Maggot Pizza, whose contagiously silly energy inspired patrons to dance and flail to the aliens’ “wacky grooves.” The arrival of the green and fishy alien Zorb on the drums was the set’s most memorable moment. 

Former Brock student Lydia Stephen launched into her lyrical, acoustic set in the Skybar the moment Maggot Pizza finished, setting up the rapid pace of the Vertigo Festival, in which a band was always playing, whether on the main stage or the side stage. Unfortunately, I didn’t have a ticket to the side stage, but Stephen’s music floated throughout the entire venue, letting me vibe along. 

This transition introduced a problem, though: the rapid pace meant the next main stage band, JULES IS DEAD, had to test their instruments during Stephen’s set. These tests were loud, and while I’m not sure if Stephen or any other side- stage performer could hear them, her ability to keep playing unaffected was certainly commendable. 

JULES IS DEAD followed Stephen with a main stage performance chock-full of catchy instrumentals, pop-influenced riffs and shredding vocals. Jules was an incredibly honest lead performer, even admitting to the crowd that they hadn’t played live in some time and was nervous. But JULES IS DEAD lit up the venue, getting the crowd to participate and mosh to released and unreleased songs like “Jason Hate Club,” “Eternally (undeath)” and “Blood Back.” 

At only 18 years old with only singles released for streaming, JULES IS DEAD is certainly a band to watch, having the potential to go a long way in coming years. 

Soft Animals was next on the side stage, combining gentle rock and almost psychedelic sounds to grace the ears of all in attendance. 

By 5 p.m., when the beach-bum-esque Sun Junkies took the stage, I expected a bigger crowd to have formed. This was not the case; however, the four-piece band infused the room with their intoxicating, contagious energy, stringing the crowd along by alternating between punk rock, fun-infused tunes and slow, melancholic ballads. The Sun Junkies’ set felt like a breath of fresh air, and when they ended, I was left eager for more. 

Velvet Beach was one of the side-stage bands I really wish I could have seen up close. Like Soft Animals, their sound incorporated some psychedelic riffs and ambience, but Velvet Beach kept a steady, upbeat tempo that made me want to move even from the main floor of Isaac’s.  

Unfortunately, I needed to eat dinner partway through the festival, and as such missed the second half of Sunshine Express’ (S.EX) set. They were certainly the most visually striking band of the night, bringing their own colourful lights to make S.EX as much an optical experience as an aural one. The music wasn’t my personal favourite, but with samples from “The Imperial March,” auto-tuned vocals and other ambient sounds, Sunshine Express was certainly one of the most unique bands of the night. 

I similarly missed the first half of local pop-rock-alternative-jazz artist Sophi’s set, but the country-pop blend of her voice and sound made me think of Shania Twain or Carrie Underwood, and the songs had everyone’s heads bouncing. 

Next up was DEAR-GOD, an industrial and hardcore punk rapper whose music I was more acquainted with before the show. Unfortunately, lead performer Robert Ortiz didn’t seem particularly enthusiastic about the smaller, seemingly uncertain crowd, repeatedly telling us to get moving and start dancing. I have never been a fan of this method of trying to rile up a crowd, and frankly, it was a little awkward. Still, Ortiz soldiered through, jumping around the stage with unabashed confidence to make a commendable performance that (mostly) won over the crowd when all was said and done. 

Lauren Dillen was the first performance of the night to go longer than 30 minutes, shifting the tone from hardcore punk to mellow folk music. It somewhat dropped the mood in Isaac’s, where more people had trickled in for The Dirty Nil, but it certainly made for a dizzying experience, as promised. 

Much to my surprise, the crowd was still relatively scant by the time the penultimate main stage performer Cam Kahin fired up his set, blending raucous punk riffs and sombre lyrical tunes much like the Sun Junkies had done. In fact, making the similarity even more striking was when one of Kahin’s guitar strings snapped mid-song, and the Sun Junkies’ lead performer had to run upstairs to grab his guitar. The debacle paused the set for a moment, but Kahin came back with the same force as before, thrashing around the stage and even jumping into the mosh pit during one of his more aggressive songs. 

Minuscule was the final side-stage performer of the night, and for good reason. Bringing a whole host of genres to the table, with alternative, country, jazz and rock influences framing their set, the prog-folk/femme-pop collective kept the energy in the venue high while introducing us to a new type of music. 

As Minuscule played and the clock ticked down to the arrival of The Dirty Nil, I expectantly looked to the entrance for the flood of people coming for the headliners. But there was none. Despite having a capacity of 600 people, I would say by the end of the night, only 200 people (at most) were present. 

And that’s a mighty shame because The Dirty Nil came ready to rock. 

Or maybe that’s not quite the right way to describe it. When the three-piece band took the stage and played their first few songs, it was obvious these guys were who the crowd had been waiting for. People thrashed and sang their lungs out, and the smaller gathering made for an intensely intimate experience. 

But lead performer Luke Bentham and bassist Sam Tomlinson were frank with us: they’d just come off a three-month, 37-show, cross-country tour in the United States, and they were tired. Bentham was visibly ill, coughing like a dying man between songs as his bandmates laughed, and admitting that he had an ungodly amount of cold medicine flowing through his veins. 

In other circumstances, this might have taken away from the performance, but The Dirty Nil, originally from Dundas, Ontario, kept telling us how good it was to be back in Canada, back home, especially given the political climate in the States. The tone of the performance was community and care as they told us to look out for one another and help each other in times of need. Perhaps this is just my nationalism speaking, but despite the smaller crowd and Bentham’s illness, The Dirty Nil seemed re-animated by their Canadian fans at the Vertigo Music Festival, and as such, their performance was electric and unforgettable. 

The band’s recent announcement that Tomlinson is stepping back from the band to pursue other projects, meaning the Vertigo Festival was his last show, makes the moment even more poignant in retrospect. 

Playing songs mostly from their last three albums, The Dirty Nil expertly guided the audience between high-energy thrashing and slow swaying as we sang the lyrics back to them. The band played a few new songs as well, including “I Hate the Internet” and the unreleased “Spider Dream.” 

The Dirty Nil are the crowning jewels of Canada’s contemporary punk rock scene, and it was a thrill and an honour to see them in such an intimate setting. 

Indeed, intimacy seemed to be a theme throughout the night. It was truly something special to see JULES IS DEAD standing in front of the stage for Cam Kahin’s set, their body swaying to the hardest of beats. The Sun Junkies moshed in the pit with the rest of us during The Dirty Nil’s set, and Maggot Pizza stuck around for the whole day, making regular appearances around the venue. 

I even shook hands with The Dirty Nil drummer Kyle Fisher after the show was over. 

The Vertigo Music Festival may not have been the most crowded event, and maybe the festival aspects like the vendors would have been better utilized by an outdoor concert, but it was a glowing reminder of humanity and community. Even rock stars are just people; people who can love a country and mosh with the rest of us. 

Press BUSU Board Check-In: Solution to BUSU’s club funding shortage delayed after discussions about discrimination and fairness 

0

Lengthy conversations about fairness and potential discrimination led to the BoD delaying a solution to fix the funding shortages that have plagued the CPC since 2023. 

At least once a month, the BUSU Board of Directors (BoD) meets to discuss and vote on a wide variety of student-relevant topics. Video recordings of these meetings are available on their YouTube channel, but this series aims to condense and relay the relevant information contained within them to Brock students. BUSU’s board meetings represent the core of student politics in the university and are, therefore, important for students to be in the know about. 

During their March 10 meeting, the largest topic of discussion was BUSU club funding. 

Indeed, the proposal — headed by BUSU Clubs Manager Chloe Villers and Clubs Administrator Jamie Wong — and subsequent board discussion lasted over an hour, filling most of the meeting. 

Villers launched the proposal by giving the BoD some updates about club funding in recent years, reminding directors of the fiasco in 2023-24 when funding ran out on November 16, a mere two months into the term. In 2024-25, explained Villers, the Clubs Policy Committee (CPC) acquired an extra $77,000 from closed club accounts and the surplus to supplement the $143,000 budget, but without this money, funding would have dried up as soon as November 1. 

The trend is both disturbing and clear: there’s simply not enough money to fund clubs at their current pace, especially considering that while the CPC will once again pull $50,000 from the surplus in 2025, that will be the final time. 

At the same time, said Villers, the number of clubs at Brock has increased at a rate of around 15 per cent per year since 2022, meaning more funding is being approved and requested while money is drying up. 

In September, the CPC released new funding guidelines for clubs that have helped streamline the process, and clubs are fundraising their own funds at a higher rate than before, but it hasn’t made the difference they hoped for, said Villers. 

One issue has been the primary cause, said Villers: in the 2024-25 academic year, a mere five clubs received 48 per cent of the overall club funding budget. Brock’s Model United Nations, Muslim Students’ Association, Pakistani Students’ Association, Black Student Association and Indian Students’ Association all received over $10,000 in funding, with some as high as $20,000 or more. In comparison, the remaining Brock clubs received an average of $1,315. 

Villers and Wong proposed that BUSU establish a $5,000 cap on the amount of funding any single club could receive in a year. Villers explained that this would still be above the average of other universities’ student unions — such as Guelph ($1,000 cap), Carleton ($2,700 cap), TMU ($5,000 cap) and McMaster ($800 cap; funding restricted to returning clubs) — while ensuring equal opportunities for all Brock clubs to grow and thrive regardless of their size or previous finding history. 

The CPC’s goal, said Villers, was to “eliminate disparities” between Brock clubs. 

But many of BUSU’s directors weren’t convinced. Tomas Oviedo was the most outspoken against the cap, saying that some clubs — such as larger cultural clubs or ones that represent Brock on a global stage, like Model UN — are more important than others, and as such shouldn’t be “unfairly discriminated against through the funding policy.” Oviedo suggested that a proportional or tiered system based on membership or the size and scope of events would work better than a flat limit, but his suggestion came with the unclear potential for specific clubs to receive more funding as determined on a “case-by-case” basis. 

Villers responded to this suggestion by saying that tiered systems are complicated to implement and can lead to unfairness among clubs. Sometimes clubs have vast memberships but only a portion of those members show up to events, and sometimes new clubs make waves in the student community. Moreover, “every single club is going to want to be the exception,” said Villers, and operating on a case-by-case basis like they are now means a fraction of student clubs receive significantly larger portions than the rest. 

“We obviously understand that those major clubs that were listed are very integral to Brock and they provide a great student experience,” said Villers. “I also would like to argue that every single club — so every 141 clubs that we do have — are integral to Brock and they are all very important to club members and club executives.” 

After Wong and Villers left the meeting, the directors continued to discuss different ways to solve the funding issue, all of which failed to address the impending lack of club funding that BUSU will soon find themselves facing. Oviedo continued to champion a proportional system, saying that the $5,000 cap was not very flexible, but nobody could figure out exactly how such a system would work.  

BUSU General Manager Robert Hilson pointed out that if the BoD gave the CPC an “open-ended” policy, it would be difficult to interpret and manage. He said that any sort of proportional system is going to have its drawbacks because all clubs are different. 

A few directors supported the CPC’s proposition. Board Chair Brielle Kaminsky was the most outspoken in her support, saying that the system already operates on a case-by-case basis and it’s proven to be unsustainable. Furthermore, she said that being flexible means being flexible for all clubs, not just a few. Kaminsky pointed out that if they need to re-evaluate the $5,000 cap in a few years, a later board can determine next steps, but the cap would do something about the problem now. 

Another director gave the example of the Medical Brigades at Brock University, which isn’t a BUSU club but raises thousands of dollars through individual fundraising efforts to travel the world and uphold their mission. 

The idea of a referendum to increase the BUSU Clubs Levy — which Villers had previously advised against due to the urgency of the issue — was discussed, but the majority of board members agreed that the $5,000 cap was too firm. 

As such, the CPC’s proposal was denied, with one in favour, six against and three abstaining. The board requested that Villers and Wong come up with a more flexible solution and re-present the revised policy in April. 

The board quickly moved into a 17-minute in-camera session before the video hopped into what seemed the middle of Hilson’s General Manager’s report. Hilson discussed a few topics in his report, including an upcoming meeting with the Board of Trustees to “come to legal terms” and finalize the Student Centre project, which could begin demolition as early as this summer. Hilson also discussed the omnibus agreement regarding Brock and BUSU’s relationship, in which the union is responding to Brock’s “requests” (which were not explained in any detail), and he opened the floor to any questions about the other items he privately circulated among the board members. With no questions and no other details, Pahuja gave her report. 

Much of the President’s report revolved around events both past and upcoming, but the most noteworthy bit was an update on her conversation with Brock’s Associate Vice-President of Students Brad Clarke about the Food First Program, vaguely mentioning issues about names and placement on Brock’s end. This has been an ongoing topic for Pahuja, but she said a final, detailed report would be coming in the next board meeting. Pahuja also reminded the board about the new Student Absence Self-Declaration Form and how she and the executives have been working to make the upcoming executive transition as smooth as possible. 

The BoD adjourned the meeting at 8:50 p.m., setting the stage for a busy April meeting, where a solution to the club funding crisis will hopefully be found. 

Chibi-Robo: Nintendo’s strange, charming and underappreciated hidden gem 

I’m willing to bet that you haven’t played Chibi-Robo

It’s fair to say that the game, released for the GameCube in North America in 2006, was always doomed to fail. It was the start of a new franchise with a strange gameplay loop released for a largely unsuccessful console at the tail-end of its lifespan. This all created a recipe for a surefire commercial failure — and what a spectacular failure it was, selling a measly 390,000 copies throughout its short time on store shelves. 

With that said, I can’t blame you if you’ve never experienced Chibi-Robo. After playing through the game for myself, however, I feel it’s my duty to tell you that you absolutely should

Chibi-Robo opens with its titular tiny, adorable robot being purchased for a little girl’s birthday in a suburban home in 2006. Chibi-Robo, a robot in a commercial line of identical replicas, finds itself purchased by the Sanderson family — consisting of the lazy and toy-obsessed Mr. Sanderson; his devoted yet frustrated wife Mrs. Sanderson; their frog-loving daughter Jenny Sanderson; and the family dog Tao. 

As Chibi-Robo, you are tasked with making the Sandersons happy. This objective leads you to explore an oversized home from the perspective of a four-inch-tall robot. As you climb up enormous cabinets, find secrets under a giant bed and discover creative ways to manoeuvre around the Sandersons’ house, you’ll find various ways to improve the Sandersons’ lives. For example, you’ll use a massive toothbrush to scrub Tao’s muddy paw prints off the ground, pick up and dispose of trash lying around the house, plant seeds to harvest flowers for Mrs. Sanderson, explore the depths beneath the kitchen sink drain to find a lost wedding ring, help Mr. Sanderson cook the perfect burger and much more. Many of the tasks you complete are fairly rudimentary, yet there’s an undeniably cozy feeling to every job you finish. As you run into the Sandersons throughout the home, there’s a continued sense that you’ve become part of the family — an appreciated and welcome family member that everyone seems to love. 

At nighttime, the household stays vibrant and alive as various toys spring to life. In the living room, you’ll find the action figure Drake Redcrest on patrol. Based on an in-game television superhero, the action figure believes himself to be the real Drake Redcrest and enlists Chibi-Robo on his quest for undying justice. Tao’s chew toy, Sophie, finds herself deeply in love with Redcrest, yet is too nervous to profess her feelings for him. A Barbie-like doll, Princess Pitts, watches over Jenny’s bedroom from the top of her castle, and you might want to help Mort — a mummified toy living in a shoebox under Jenny’s bed — build up the nerve to ask her out. Every room stays active through the night with unusual and deep characters containing their own motivations and interests, and the house is arguably even more exciting at nighttime because of it. 

Perhaps my favourite toys to encounter were the Free Rangers, a legion of plastic eggs hell-bent on defeating the family dog Tao, who has kidnapped the smallest Free Ranger, Memphis. The Free Rangers claim the foyer as their base of operations, complete with toy guns used to defeat intruders — including Chibi-Robo, until you eventually befriend them. 

As you venture into the storyline, you begin to realize that something troubling is surfacing. Indeed, not all is well in the Sandersons’ marriage: Mr. Sanderson is constantly between jobs yet spends all his money on toys, and Mrs. Sanderson is growing deeply frustrated with her husband’s immaturity. During the game’s opening acts, you’ll find him sleeping on the couch during the night, with Mrs. Sanderson sleeping alone in the bedroom. Eight-year-old Jenny, meanwhile, finds herself in the middle of the conflict, able to sense that something is amiss between her parents yet unable to express her feelings about it because she’s supposedly been “cursed” to only make frog sounds. It’s a strangely grim, realistic tale for a Nintendo game to focus on, which are often bright and bubbly in their themes, yet it made Chibi-Robo resonate with me even more. 

Despite Mr. Sanderson’s half-hearted attempts to repair the marriage he knows is falling apart, their relationship continues hurtling toward divorce. Mrs. Sanderson eventually locks herself in her room and Mr. Sanderson begins sleeping in the hallway outside. He tries enlisting Chibi-Robo with tasks to help bring him closer to his wife, but at this point, she’s so finished with her husband that everything he attempts simply drives them further apart. 

I don’t blame you if none of this sounds like fun. Divorce, and the effects that it has on children, are certainly not “fun” themes to explore in a video game. Yet, the true soul poured into the story, as well as the respectful way in which Chibi-Robo addresses its themes, drew me further into the game and its characters. I felt sorrow for Mr. Sanderson, who desperately wanted his relationship to survive yet couldn’t understand why his wife was falling out of love with him. I cared for Mrs. Sanderson, who had become rightfully fed up with her husband after years of coming second to his toys and collectibles. And I felt empathy for Jenny, as a child of divorce myself, understanding the pain she was experiencing at the hands of her parents while not being able to do anything about it. 

Despite its consistent use of humour through its nighttime characters, it’s Chibi-Robo’s mature handling of difficult themes that solidifies the game as one of the strangest Nintendo products I’ve ever played, yet also one of the most beautiful. It’s a game that doesn’t shy away from being strange and difficult to explain; instead, it embraces its peculiarity and takes pride in its uniqueness. It’s entirely possible that this type of story ultimately hurt the game’s mass appeal — it’s hard to imagine GameCube buyers in 2006 lining up at stores to buy a game about divorce — but I argue that it was what truly made the game special. 

There’s a lot more to be said about Chibi-Robo, but most of the excitement comes from experiencing the game’s quirkiness on your own. Some moments will leave you laughing, others will leave you in tears, and others will leave you wondering what the hell just happened, but it all culminates in an experience that deserves to be appreciated and celebrated even two decades after its release. 

Considering the game’s massive commercial failure, we may never see another game quite like the original Chibi-Robo — but it still deserves to be cherished for what it is, even if we’re 20 years late. 

Dating apps are the way of the future, and that absolutely sucks 

Dating apps are set to dominate the future of finding love, and I couldn’t be unhappier about it. 

It’s no secret that dating apps like Tinder, Hinge and Bumble have exploded in popularity over the last decade. What started as an impromptu social experiment blending technology and relationships has become a fairly standard method of finding love. 

This is especially true across Gen Z and young Millennials, who use dating apps at a far higher rate than older generations. A 2023 study by Pew Research Center found that 53 per cent of U.S. adults aged 18 to 29 have used a dating app, compared to 37 per cent of U.S. adults aged 30 to 49 and 20 per cent of adults aged 50 to 64. This startling trend represents a turning point in the way people find love, with the use of dating apps presumably only set to increase over time. 

It’s not hard to understand why so many people have opted for dating apps; I personally have several theories — it likely mitigates the fear of rejection when you don’t have to experience it face-to-face, it shows you a range of people who are actively seeking relationships, it allows you to easily select potential matches based on traits you find physically attractive, and you don’t have to worry about embarrassing yourself or making someone uncomfortable in-person. 

In other words, dating apps solve a lot of common problems that come with the traditional method of asking someone out face-to-face. It’s hardly surprising, then, that these apps found great success in an increasingly digital world, especially after the pandemic opened a lot of avenues for us to be more technologically siloed in our day-to-day activities. 

But the proliferation of dating-app mediated matchmaking brings out an important question: Is it always a good thing to use technology to control the challenges associated with socially daunting tasks? Or could it be that the uncomfortable feelings associated with, say, approaching someone to ask them out, are an important part of the human experience? 

Don’t be mistaken, I’m not anti-dating app because they make things easier. I simply don’t think that human beings were meant to select potential partners based on a checklist of “compatible” traits, and certainly not a visible list of who’s the most objectively attractive. Not only does this reduce people to their looks and risk passing up people that might make a great partner for someone based on their personalities, but it starts making the search for love less of a quest for authentic connection and more like a Jubilee social experiment. 

Dating apps have effectively given said type of social experiment a human-generation-sized sample. Maybe it’s just me, but I find heartwarming stories about meeting your love-to-be in-person much more endearing than stories of finding them through a smartphone. 

My grandparents, for example, met in an A&W drive-through over half a century ago. My grandfather and his friend were sitting in his car when they noticed my grandmother and her friend seated in hers. The boys, naturally interested, asked the girls if they’d like to hop in their car, and the girls politely declined — only to ask the boys if they’d like to hop in theirs instead. My grandfather and his friend enthusiastically accepted the girls’ invitation, got talking to my eventual-grandmother and the rest is history. 

It’s a story they reminisced about for decades, and one my grandmother still fondly remembers him by today. For their 50th wedding anniversary, I remember emailing A&W’s headquarters to tell them my grandparents’ story, and they happily sent some free merchandise to commemorate the occasion. 

Now, imagine for a second that none of that ever happened, and they instead met through a dating app. Would they still have had the same fond memories of seeing each other for the first time? Or would the story of “how did you meet your partner” suddenly become a whole lot less interesting? 

Again, being forced to ask someone out in-person is usually a nerve-wracking experience, but it isn’t meant to be comfortable. I think the nerves that come with approaching someone are all a part of the experience, and they show that you care. When you remove that in the name of convenience, you might simplify the dating process, but you also remove an integral part of the experience that I don’t think is easily replaced. 

Let’s be clear: I’m not trying to point a finger at anyone using a dating app and tell them that’s wrong. I’m also not trying to tell anyone that they should feel guilty or that it makes their relationships any less valuable if they’ve used dating apps to meet their partners. The benefits of dating apps are clear to see, and it’s impossible to fault anyone for wanting to take advantage of them, especially if they haven’t had luck approaching people in-person. I, too, have considered using dating apps, and I’m not completely opposed to trying one out in the future. 

I’m simply making a case for the original, tried-and-true method of approaching people face-to-face, and why we shouldn’t give up on it. Dating apps might make things easier, but they should never replace in-person interaction even if it’s far less comfortable. We may not be at this point yet, but it’d be a crying shame if dating apps became the most popular way to find relationships across the board. 

So, face your fears and do something uncomfortable. Try creating a story that will last for generations to come. Who knows? In 60 years, your grandchildren just might be writing an article about it. 

Would the U.S. actually invade Canada? 

0

Trump’s repeated talk of annexing Canada begs the question: Could the U.S. ever actually invade Canada, and what would happen if they did? 

Earlier this month, in a statement made before Mark Carney replaced him as Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau claimed that President Donald Trump was deliberately trying to undermine Canada’s economy as part of his plan to eventually annex the country. Since winning re-election, Trump has consistently shown little respect for Canadian sovereignty, frequently calling Canada the “51st state” and referring to Trudeau as its “governor.” He has also described the Canada-U.S. border as “an artificial boundary” and cast doubt on the legitimacy of the 1908 treaty that established it. 

So far, Trump has not suggested deploying troops to Ontario. Instead, he appears convinced that he can force Canada into annexation by other means. 

But Canadians are firmly against the idea. 

“Canada will never, under any circumstances, become part of the United States,” Prime Minister Mark Carney firmly stated, leaving no doubt about the nation’s stance. Additionally, the Canadian Armed Forces reported in February that after years of declining recruitment, enlistment numbers have spiked since Trump’s inauguration, with roughly 1,000 more applicants compared to the previous year. While Canadian officials stopped short of directly linking this surge to Trump’s aggressive rhetoric, they didn’t dismiss the possibility. 

With Canada clearly unwilling to join the U.S. by choice, the question remains: Would Trump actually attempt to annex the country by force? If so, would U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth support such an outrageous move? 

In Trump’s previous term, his own team often stepped in to block some of his more reckless ideas — such as launching military strikes on Iran or Venezuela. Former Defense Secretary Mark Esper revealed that he had to prevent Trump from ordering law enforcement to shoot protesters in the legs during the George Floyd demonstrations near the White House. 

However, with complete loyalty to Trump now seemingly the primary qualification for government employment in the U.S., Trump may have freer reign. 

The idea of the United States invading Canada may sound like the plot of a far-fetched dystopian thriller, but history, rhetoric and modern geopolitics remind us that even the unthinkable, at times, is not impossible. 

St. Catharines — nestled in the Niagara region, just a stone’s throw from the U.S. border — would likely be among the first to feel the ripple effects of any cross-border aggression. To understand how such a scenario might unfold, it’s worth revisiting the last time it happened — the War of 1812 — and weighing that against recent political tensions and the realities of modern warfare. 

In 1812, the United States invaded what was then British North America, hoping to annex Canadian territory. The Niagara Peninsula was a key front, with battles fought in Queenston Heights and Fort George. Canadians, British troops and Indigenous allies resisted, ultimately preventing a U.S. takeover. The war forged a distinct Canadian identity, particularly in border communities like oursSt. Catharines. 

If the unthinkable occurred and the U.S. considered military action against Canada, what would happen first? 

  1. Diplomatic collapse: The first sign would be a severe diplomatic breakdown — trade freezes, ambassador recalls and NATO crises. The U.S. and Canada are NATO allies; an invasion would dismantle that alliance and trigger global outrage. 
  1. Cyber and economic warfare: Before boots hit the ground, cyberattacks would likely cripple communication networks and financial systems, targeting banks, infrastructure and emergency services. 
  1. Border seizures: Niagara would be a key target. Border crossings in Buffalo and Niagara Falls could be militarized almost instantly. Airspace closures, roadblocks and evacuation orders would follow. 
  1. Global response: Allies in Europe and Asia, as well as the United Nations, would condemn the invasion. Economic sanctions on the U.S. would be swift and severe (already, Germany and Britain have issued travel advisory warnings to the U.S.). 
  1. Canadian resilience: While Canada’s military is smaller, it is modern and well-trained. More importantly, Canada’s defence would be bolstered by global support. Unlike 1812, today’s Canada stands on the world stage with powerful allies. 

In reality, an outright U.S. invasion of Canada remains highly unlikely — not only because of military or political consequences, but because the two nations are deeply interconnected economically, culturally and diplomatically. Still, the War of 1812 teaches us that the unimaginable has happened before, and the political climate of recent years tells us that no scenario is too absurd to consider — especially when it comes to Donald Trump. 

For communities like St. Catharines, the question isn’t just “What if?” It’s a reminder to stay informed, engaged and aware of our place in both history and current affairs. 

Innovation in action: Brock’s Innovation Showcase 

0

Brock LINCS brings together innovation, networking opportunities and investors at Brock Innovation Showcase event.   

On March 18, the Rankin Family Pavilion Atrium at Brock University buzzed with energy as students, faculty, industry professionals and community members gathered for the first annual Brock Innovation Showcase. Hosted by Brock LINC (Learn, Innovate, Network and Collaborate), the event celebrated five years of fostering research, innovation and entrepreneurship at Brock. 

After a half-hour of exploring the showcases, Brock University President Dr. Lesley Rigg began a speech that kicked off the award ceremony. She began with a land acknowledgement before highlighting the significance of the evening. Dr. Rigg noted that while Brock University is celebrating its 60th anniversary, Brock LINC has been supporting innovation for five years, starting during the challenges of the pandemic. This year marked the first-ever Innovation Showcase, a milestone that, according to Dr. Rigg, will certainly not be the last. 

Dr. Rigg emphasized that innovation can come in many forms, such as a product, service, method or tool designed to better the community. She spoke about the importance of connection at events like this, which serve as platforms for entrepreneurs to meet potential investors, customers and supporters. In the face of today’s complex political and economic environment, she stressed that innovation at Brock is needed more than ever. “We have the ability to shape tomorrow — but only if we do it together,” said Dr. Rigg, underlining the spirit of collaboration that drives the university forward. 

Dr. Rigg also shared that Brock LINC supports over 500 entrepreneurs annually, providing them with the skills and structure necessary to learn, explore and build. Her remarks set an inspiring tone for the night, reinforcing that events like the Innovation Showcase are not just celebrations, but crucial gatherings that foster growth and possibility. 

Brock LINC offers four entrepreneurship programs, each designed as a step-up towards creating a business. The first program is the Kick-Starting Entrepreneurship, a collection of introductory workshops delivered with local partners focused on topics around started a small business. No commitment is required, and students can take as many or as few workshops as they find they need.  

After this introduction, there is NAVIGATE, an 11-week program that uses the Learn Startup methodology to validate a business idea. In this program, students work weekly with Brock LINC staff, external mentors and other entrepreneurs in the program.  

Next is Blueprint, designed to help entrepreneurs manage the confusing and expensive process required to develop an interactive physical or digital prototype for their product or service.  

Lastly is LINCubator, focused on supporting early-stage businesses. The LINCubator program includes customized growth plans, workshops, mentorships and peer-to-peer learning. 

The Showcase delivered on its promise to highlight cutting-edge research and entrepreneurial achievements. Attendees had the chance to engage with groundbreaking startups and witness the remarkable technologies developed by Brock’s brightest minds. The evening also provided invaluable networking opportunities with business leaders, investors and industry experts, making it a dynamic meeting point for innovation and collaboration. 

Spotlight on startups 

 
Several standout startups were featured at this year’s event: 

Adjective Noun Studios, co-founded by Brock alumni Agusia Krzywinska and Adam Henderson, showed off their impressive portfolio of interactive media projects, including collaborations with CBC Kids and Groupe Media TFO. ANS have partnered with game developer Falling Squirrel and have had numerous CBC commissions. For Accessibility Month in May, CBC Kids commissioned ANS to create a game for the visually impaired. The result was a game called Echo Hunter, where players take on the role of a small bat navigating its environment through sound cues — dodging trees using forest sounds and catching bugs through buzzing and chirping sounds. Using headsets, players need to determine whether the sounds are coming from the left, right or centre of the screen and respond accordingly. In addition, ANS is currently developing a fishing game featuring cute animals and audio descriptions, designed to be fully accessible for players who are blind or deaf. 

Fawkes Consulting Inc., founded by Matthew Cary, presented its research-driven recruitment solutions for 911 dispatch centres, aiming to improve candidate selection and address staffing challenges. 

Healthy Habits Coaches, led by Dr. Sean Locke and PhD student Isabelle Hill, demonstrated how their platform equips health professionals with tools and certifications to support lasting behavior change. 

MosoPlay Games, the brainchild of GAME student Cole Bereskin and graduate Alex Fischer, gave attendees a sneak peek at their upcoming free-to-play game that blends racing and fighting genres. 

OBN, founded by Graham McMillan, presented their A.I.-powered software that simplifies the often-overwhelming process of estate sales and decluttering. McMillan called the program an “efficiency tool” which he created after going through his late grandfather’s 30-acre property. 

FrostFit, created by MSc Kinesiology student Matt Hodgkinson, attracted attention with its wearable cooling device designed to help those with thermoregulation difficulties manage heat more effectively. Hodgkinson was inspired by his sister, who has a condition that makes thermoregulation difficult, especially while exercising. With the help of Dr. Toby Mondel, Hodgkinson developed his product with the intention of helping not only people with conditions like his sister’s, but also athletes and people working under harsh conditions, like in factories. 

pHer Health Inc. by Abbie Burchell is in the development stage of a wearable and non-invasive vaginal health monitor, which has been supported by a gynecologist. The prototype is in the development stage, estimated to be ready by December. The disposable product will cost between $10 to $20 and will be accompanied by an app also in development. 

Spotlight on technological developments 

The Innovation Showcase also highlighted major technological breakthroughs developed by Brock faculty and researchers: 

Dr. Jianbo Gao shared advances in photodetector materials, which offer faster response times and greater efficiency for use in medical imaging, communications and solar technology. 

Dr. Newman Sze presented promising research on new immunotherapy treatments targeting chronic, age-related diseases, which aims to reduce inflammation and improve long-term health outcomes. 

Dr. Tony Yan and his team displayed progress in mucosal vaccines using innovative adjuvants, potentially revolutionizing treatments for gastrointestinal, respiratory and sexually transmitted infections. 

Dr. Paul Zelisko demonstrated a self-healing silicone technology capable of repairing damage at room temperature, promising longer-lasting products in automotive, electronics and healthcare industries. 

Awards 

The evening also featured the presentation of several prestigious awards, recognizing outstanding innovation and entrepreneurship within the Brock community. Finalists for the Dobson Entrepreneurial Excellence Prize, valued at $5,000, included Isabelle Hill of Healthy Habits Coaches, Cole Bereskin of MosoPlay Games, and Matthew Cary of Fawkes Consulting Inc. Each finalist had the opportunity to present their business plans and articulate how they would utilize the prize funding. The award was ultimately presented to Bereskin. 

The Brock Entrepreneur of the Year Award recognized exceptional entrepreneurial achievement. This year’s finalists were Dr. Thomas Wolf, Matthew Cary and Dr. Sean Locke, with the award being given to Cary. 

The Brock Innovator of the Year Award, celebrating groundbreaking research with significant social or economic impact, was awarded to Dr. Sean Locke. 

— 

Guests enjoyed complimentary refreshments, snacks and a lively atmosphere, with a cash bar and free parking making the event both accessible and enjoyable. The event was sponsored by Hill & Schumacher. 

The 2025 Innovation Showcase was more than a night of celebration — it was a testament to Brock University’s growing role as a centre of innovation and research excellence. As the institution continues to support its community of thinkers, creators and entrepreneurs, it’s clear that Brock’s impact is being felt far beyond campus walls. 

Getting published isn’t as impossible as it seems: here are four Canadian journals who want your work 

0

So, you’re a novice Canadian writer looking to see your name in print.  

Good news! Writers looking to be published can submit their work to a variety of online and print publications across Canada. Simply searching “Canadian publishing opportunities” on Google will retrieve several thousand pages of possibilities, but unfortunately, this is often hardly helpful.  

While the list of journals, magazines, newspapers and writing contests out there is extensive, understanding the specific guidelines surrounding what you can submit, when you can submit and what you’ll get out of submission can be overwhelming. Furthermore, unless you’re writing something completely new that’s tailored to the specifications of a particular organization, it can be nearly impossible to find a publication whose requirements perfectly match the nature of a piece you’ve already written.  

While this can be frustrating, it isn’t a reason to give up. Here is a list of four of my favourite Canadian publication opportunities for you to consider.  

The Malahat Review: 

The Malahat Review, published by the University of Victoria, is one of Canada’s most prestigious literary journals, accepting poetry, short fiction and creative nonfiction. Throughout its nearly 60 years of existence, The Malahat Review has been named the Western Magazine Award Foundation’s Magazine of the Year three times and many of the authors whose work was first published in one of their issues have gone on to win various writing-related awards and prizes. 

Published quarterly, The Malahat Review is currently accepting submissions from Canadian writers via their Submittable page until June. It is important to note that writers are asked to submit their work only once per genre in each calendar year and that any work that has previously been published will not be accepted.  

For general poetry submissions, The Malahat Review asks that writers send in three to five poems formatted in a single document.  

For general fiction submissions, The Malahat Review will accept one piece of short fiction or up to three pieces of flash fiction. Short fiction cannot exceed 8,000 words in length and each piece of flash fiction can’t be longer than 750 words.  

For creative nonfiction, writers can submit up to three pieces at once. If you submit one longer piece, the word count must be under 5,000. If you submit two or three shorter pieces, The Malahat Review requires each work to be under 1,000 words. 

As of writing, The Malahat Review has put out a call for submissions for a special issue titled Inhale/Exhale: Contemporary Indigenous Storytelling. Special guest editor Richard Van Camp, a proud member of the Dogrib (Tłı̨chǫ) Nation, will be a part of the creation of this issue which will celebrate the work of Indigenous storytellers. All First Nations, Métis and Inuit storytellers are welcome to submit work in the genres of short fiction and creative nonfiction (up to two stories with a maximum word count of 3,000 words) or poetry (three to five poems with a maximum of 100 lines per poem). Submissions end on June 1. 

The Malahat Review is also looking for submissions for its Far Horizons Award for short fiction. Each piece of work must be no longer than 3,500 words but entries to this contest are unlimited and will not impact your ability to submit your work to the regular publication. Please note that you will be considered ineligible for this award if you have already published a book (defined as a work more than 48 pages in length). The deadline for submitting work to this award is May 1 at 11:59 p.m.  

More information regarding the formatting for any of these submission opportunities can be located on The Malahat Review’s submissions page.  

The Fiddlehead: 

The Fiddlehead is a well-respected Canadian journal that accepts submissions of poetry, short stories and creative nonfiction from both emerging and established writers. Published four times a year at the University of New Brunswick, The Fiddlehead is 80 years old and has acquired the reputation of being a Who’s Who in Canadian literature. Many well-known writers first found a home for their work in the pages of this journal.  

The Fiddlehead accepts work between Jan. 1 to March 31 and Sept. 15 to Nov. 30 through Submittable. While The Fiddlehead totes only a 1 to 2 per cent acceptance rate, submissions are free and therefore there is no reason not to give it a shot. 

The Fiddlehead accepts up to six poems per submission for poetry. All poems must be submitted in one document which may not exceed 12 pages in total.  

For fiction and creative nonfiction, The Fiddlehead will accept one piece per submission. The piece should be double-spaced and no more than 6,000 words.  

As of writing, The Fiddlehead is also currently open for submissions for its creative nonfiction contest. The contest will accept unpublished entries of up to 6,000 words until June 2 via their Submittable page.  

More information regarding the formatting of any of these submission opportunities can be located on The Fiddlehead’s submissions page.  

Room: 

Room is the oldest feminist literary magazine in Canada, publishing poetry, fiction and creative nonfiction penned by women and other gender-diverse writers. Published quarterly since 1975, many pieces that first found themselves published in the pages of Room have made their way into other award-winning publications such as The Journal Prize Anthology, Best Canadian Poetry, Best Canadian Stories and Best Canadian Essays. Many have even won National Magazine Awards. To keep things fresh, each issue of the magazine is edited by a different team of editors chosen from the Growing Room Collective, allowing for a variety of unique editorial visions to shape Room’s body of work.  

Room accepts work starting on Feb. 28 and their submissions remain open on a rolling basis until they reach their ascribed submissions limit. Submissions then open again in May, August and November according to the same principles. Pieces of poetry, short fiction and creative nonfiction can be submitted via Room’s Submittable page.  

Room will accept up to five poems at a time. No clear word or line limit is outlined.  

For short fiction and creative nonfiction, Room will accept submissions up to 3,500 words in length. 

Room is not currently running any contests as of writing, but starting April 1, submissions for their creative non-fiction contest will open. Their poetry and short forms contests will open on June 15 and Sept. 1 respectively and will run for exactly two months.  

More information regarding the formatting of any of these submission opportunities can be located on Room’s submissions page.  

Paloma: 

Paloma is an up-and-coming literary magazine that publishes a monthly issue featuring a variety of creative genres including poetry, reviews, essays, short fiction, creative nonfiction and more. While Paloma is a smaller publication that has just found its footing in the world of Canadian publishing, that doesn’t mean it has any less merit. 

To leave room for creative exploration, Paloma’s submission guidelines are rather vague. The only clear specifications given are that non-fiction cannot exceed a word limit of 1,000 and creative fiction cannot exceed a word limit of 3,500.  

Work can be submitted to Paloma via their email, palomathemagazine@gmail.com.  

More information regarding the formatting of any of these submission opportunities can be located on Paloma’s Substack account. 

— 

While the feeling of being published can be incredibly thrilling, it is not always easily accomplished. Similar to actors, writers often face the answer “no” far more often than they do the answer “yes.” Although it’s easy to get bogged down by the disappointment of rejection, the best writers continue to hone their craft and put themselves out there, even in the face of adversity.  

While this list cannot guarantee you will find the “yes” you’ve been looking for, it can provide you with a jumping-off point as you persevere on your journey towards becoming a published author. 

The end of “Cum Town”: An ode to a horrible podcast that was brilliant 

0

With the end of the at-one-time weekly comedy podcast Cum Town recently being made official by its hosts, a reflection on its cultural significance and, as a fan, an ode to its unique comedic character seems past due.  

The comedy podcast scene in 2025 is in a rough spot despite the space being more lucrative than ever before.  

The Joe Rogan Experience’s glaze-fest of an interview with Donald Trump just before the 2024 U.S. presidential election was something of a microcosm of everything that’s gone wrong with the current pantheon of comedy podcasts. Namely, many of the highly popular podcasts trading in or near the mainstays of the Rogan Experience brand — masculine topics and interests, a comedic angle, loose conversation with no little editing or script-work — are simply turning into right-wing hubs for lukewarm comedians to pretend like they have an important voice and platform for exploring societal issues.  

Chief perpetrators include Andrew Schulz and company’s Flagrant, Theo Von’s This Past Weekend and Tony Hinchcliffe’s live comedy podcast Kill Tony. All these comedians are united by a common enemy in something vague they call “wokeism,” which ranges from annoyingly over-sensitive university-campus politics by people with no actual power, to the elites of the Democratic Party.  

The overall decline in comedic quality alongside explicit right-wing affiliations from the top names of the comedy-podcast sphere is, in one respect, a product of how popular the industry of podcasting has become. Finding an audience for a podcast if you already had a career in comedy is much easier now than even a few years ago. With podcasts being the most popular they’ve ever been, not only are popular podcasters losing touch with the average problems of people, but as a group of mainly rich dudes, they’re also starting to realize which party has their cultural and financial interests in mind (*ahem* Republicans).  

All of this makes what I would argue is the funniest comedy podcast to have ever existed — which was itself one of the most popular podcasts in the world from roughly 2016 to 2022 — a fascinating cultural phenomenon to reflect on in an age of right-wing bro-style comedy podcast hackery.   

And yes, the name of this podcast is Cum Town

The impetus of this half reflection, half ode, is that the New York City-based comedian trifecta behind the absurd and raunchy podcast, Adam Friedland, Stavros Halkias and Nick Mullen, recently posted a series-concluding farewell episode of sorts in early March of this year. The episode was released on their Patreon page after the show took a two-year hiatus following Halkias stating publicly in 2022 that he had left the show.   

The period of inactivity from the podcast coincided with Friedland and Mullen starting up another creative project in the anachronistically fashioned interview talk-show The Adam Friedland Show and Halkias going on to produce a comedy special, create his own podcast in Stavvy’s World and acted in a Netflix series.  

Cum Town never dabbled in politics seriously at all, a fact that brought much amusement to the hosts when a piece in Vox attempted to say the podcast was an example of the socialist left’s misogyny problem. However, the Cum Town crew all supported Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaigns, and you can find audio of them all throwing out political affiliations that range from social-democratic to socialist. 

The podcast was proof that comedy can be expressly offensive and raunchy, but that the sole point of testing the waters with offensive content was to make people laugh. Their being intentionally offensive had no intended political valence, unlike those in the Rogan-sphere, and this was one of the ways they made you laugh while not feeling guilty about laughing at things you absolutely could not bring up at work.  

But beyond not being offensive out of some vague self-righteous feeling that by doing so one is attacking the ivory-tower politeness politics of a cretinous elite establishment, another unique part of Cum Town’s ability to make palatable some of their most offensive content was that said offensive content often had some absurdist premise built into it that subverted the distastefulness of joking about dark and taboo subjects.  

I can’t think of a more concrete example of this than in their “Love Island But They Have Guns” bit, where the joke is that if a single gun was thrown into the rotation of the hit reality dating show Love Island, the male talent would be able to get whatever sexual favours they wanted out of the women on the show when it was their turn to have the gun.  

Making what is, in essence, a rape joke, especially after the #MeToo movement, is not only incredibly taboo and risky, but often impossible not to make come off in poor taste. But as mentioned, the saving-grace of an absurd angle on this disturbing premise comes in the way the trio’s imagined lines of dialogue for the hypothetical show portrays the men with guns as inconsistently aware of how their possession of a firearm is the sole cause of any sexual act that happens on their date. At one point, Mullen in a himbo tone pretending to be a male contestant says: “I ended up getting head from Samantha last night. I don’t know if it was because of the gun, but I’m glad I had it.”   

While not as outright taboo as that bit, another pertinent example on this point is the beloved “Liberal Elmo” bit — a hilarious five-minute riff on the self-righteous, super egoic and hypocritical tendencies of the type of liberal that major partisans of the Rogan-sphere would describe as “woke.” 

The bit’s premise is that an interpolation of Elmo where the puppet, who is “socially conscious” but only for aesthetic reasons, discovers his Black neighbour Gordon has been evicted because taxes on the brownstone apartment he lives in got too high. The social justice warrior Elmo then proceeds to both express an over-the-top concern in making sure Gordon knows he’s hyper-aware of the issues surrounding African Americans while also opportunistically thinking of ways to use the new space made available by his eviction, thinking out loud about creating a podcast room all the while policing or ignoring Gordon’s opinions when they differ from his:  

Elmo [Mullen and Friedman]: Gordon, I totally get it. I went to all the [Black Lives Matter] protests last summer, you know? I am on your side. We really made a difference for those three days.  

Gordon [Mullen]: It’s really not that simple Elm— 

Elmo [Halkias and Mullen]: You know what, I’m kind of tired of talking about this. Can’t we just all move on? 

As the bit goes on, it sketches out more hilarious angles on the contradictory complexes unique to this type of liberal, with the most consistent throughline being how unconscious racism and fear of the other is projected through paternalistic over-attentiveness to educating minority groups and being perceived as knowing lots about their specific societal plights. 

A standout moment in this vein is when all three comedians as Elmo unload a set of mini punchlines in Elmo laying down ground rules for the now homeless Gordon:  

Elmo [Friedland]: Just because I want to defund the police, doesn’t mean I won’t call them on you.  

Elmo [Halkias]: If I hear Bachata music playing too loud, too late into the night, I can still call the police.  

Elmo [Mullen]: I called, but I requested a social worker. I told them I thought you were mentally ill… for letting your dog bark… after 7 p.m.”  

Note how the bit makes Gordon a completely sympathetic character as his struggles relate specifically to being a Black American. Mainly, he is evicted from a brownstone that his family has lived in for “generations” due to White gentrification, of which Elmo is clearly implied to be demographically a part of. Moreover, by the bit’s end, Gordon is unjustly arrested by the police who are called on him by Elmo when Elmo causes a scene after finding out Gordon’s granddaughter doesn’t have a permit for her lemonade stand. Amid Elmo making a stink about his granddaughter’s lemonade stand, Gordon asks, “Why are you doing this?” to which Elmo responds:  

Elmo [Mullen]: Honestly, your tone and the way you’re asking me, “Why are you doing this?” is frightening me, and now you’re leaving me very little option other than to call the police…  

Ideologically speaking, because I’m a good f*cking person, I don’t want to do it. But push comes to shove — I already did.  

I requested that they only bring tasers and a social worker, and if they don’t, it’s already out of my hands…  

Elmo [Friedland]: I’ll film it, in case you need it as evidence. 

While hilarious, the bit has an implied critique of identity politics without erasing genuine problems that African Americans face in the States. Add on that absurd angle with the annoying SJW-type of liberal being the beloved star of Sesame Street, and you’ve got a comedic bit that, if anything, is a critique of lefty traits from an implicitly further left position instead of a right one.  

But like I said, the podcast wasn’t political, and political undertones weren’t even a highly prevalent aspect of the show. The actual parts of it that made it great were more specific to unique aspects of the inter-dynamics between its hosts. 

Despite the secret formula of the podcast being ultimately the jigsaw social dynamics between the three comedians where Friedland is the quivering heel, Halkias the loveable everyman and charming conversationalist, and Mullen the enigmatic and borderline-sociopathic mind that seemingly rubber-stamps anything that comes to it with the absurdist gallows humour of previous mention — Mullen really was the star of the show.  

Friedland recently described Mullen as an “evil genius” in an interview during a reflective moment on the podcast. I can’t think of a more fitting descriptor for the Baltimore native who dropped out of high school to start doing comedy in his teens.  

As the creative producer of the podcast and the obvious steering genius of it, Mullen’s stream-of-consciousness bits and riffs had the charming quality of not being contrived at all. It’s apparent that Mullen’s mind amazingly and somewhat terrifyingly just works like that.  

A highlight in this respect is when in the middle of some standard conversation on an episode, Mullen spur-of-the-moment starts an 11-minute riff on what kind of dad he would have been if instead of choosing the precarious lifestyle of being a stand-up comedian, he had settled down to have a family instead.  

Here’s how he sets the scene of this alternate reality with Halkias acting as his dialogic wingman: 

Mullen: Me in the garage for like nine days, I just walk in [the house] completely nude with an owl perched on top of my head and I go in the fridge and I eat some bologna; I’m like, “Oh yeah hey…” 

“What’s up… what’s up family!’ 

Halkias: Your seven-year-old daughter [is like], “Hey Nick, could you drive me to school today?” 

Mullen: They’re all taller than me; all of my children are like 6’3, 6’4, I’m just, my penis is hanging out, there’s just a f*cking giant barn owl like digging its claws into my head, there’s blood pouring down. 

I’m like, “You guys having a good time at school?”  

They’re like, “It’s July.”  

I’m like, “Cool cool cool, nice nice… All right, I’m going to be out in the garage, see you guys at Christmas, I guess.” 

And that’s just the beginning. By the bit’s middle act, the nudist, garage-dwelling, owl-scarred, deadbeat-dad Mullen is found dead, a week-and-a-half after the fact, in his garage by his family, including his wife’s boyfriend who we learn supports them all financially. They discover his body in full unitard with one of his legs jammed in the springs of a trampoline because of a failed attempt to teach himself Olympic gymnastics. 

Another key ingredient to Mullen’s magnetism as a host came from being a gifted raconteur whose personal anecdotes were often like the fictitious bits he comes up with in their macabre-morose-tinged absurdity.  

Standouts in this department include: his haunting description of the nightmarishly packed Chinatown apartment he lived in alongside three generations of a Chinese family where the parents slept in the kitchen pantry and a random guy lived in the antechamber, and which nearly burned down while he was in it; when after a Mexican landlord had shown Mullen a room he was interested in, the landlord revealed to Mullen that his girlfriend had just broken up with him by beckoning to a painting of the moon he had painted for her which was sticking out of a trash container just outside and which sent the now torrentially tearing landlord embracing towards a confused Mullen’s shoulder; when after Mullen’s shifts working at a call centre he would go home, get drunk on his porch, and then proceed to prank call that same centre using his inside knowledge to his advantage in stringing along his co-worker victims.  

While Mullen’s almost Lynchian knack for finding twisted angles in the profoundly banal may come at the cost of some interpersonal and personal collateral damage (for proof of the former, see the time he actually upset Halkias on an episode to the point of making him leave a recording or when he had a random near-manic outburst at Friedland; and for proof of the latter, the fact that he seemingly can’t tell the difference between the best and worst days of his life) — he was the comedic glue that held the podcast together. 

But glue has to hold something together to be useful, and, again, the inter-dynamics of the three comedians was that essential composite that formed the magic of Cum Town.  

As exemplified in the deadbeat-dad bit, Halkias, for his part, was exceptionally gifted at quickly sensing whatever comedic angle Mullen was homing in on at the drop of a hat and throwing kindling to the fire with setups and tags that often would elevate Mullen’s initial premise to pure comedy gold. Observe, for another example, the way Halkias instantaneously becomes the curious-kid foil when Mullen spontaneously concocts a bit about a Holocaust-denying Bill Cosby who hosts a show called “Kids Say the Most F*cked Up Sh*t.” The bit shows how nimbly proficient Halkias was at assisting Mullen’s comedic layups.  

Friedland is another story. In his own words: “I was on a moronic podcast, and I was a nebbish-y heel. People called me a bug, and I had to tell my parents that’s how I made money.” Don’t let this self-evaluation fool you, though; Friedland’s positions as bully-bait and arch story– and bitderailer was an integral part of the podcast’s identity, producing some of the funniest moments and memes across the Cum Town corpus.  

For one thing, Friedland’s relegated comedic position on the podcast had an incredible community-creating effect through a set of memes related to his unique heelish qualities still circulating in the fanbase to this day. It is hard to find a comment section under Cum Town clips online without seeing fans giving ESPN-esque analyses on how Friedland derails a particular moment, messes up a bit, or is trying and failing to be cool. The flip side of this is true as well; for the rare moments where Friedland positively contributes to a bit, it is often commented on by fans in a hyperbolically celebratory way.  

If this sounds harsh — and frankly it was — there’s some solace to be taken in that Friedland has had something of a redemptive arch to his career as of late with respect to the standardized abuse he took on Cum Town. He essentially alchemized the same traits that made him a punching bag on the podcast into being the comedic backbone of his ongoing internet talk show The Adam Friedland Show. 

On TAFS, Friedland leans on his pitiable heel-ish traits and conversation-derailing abilities to create incredibly funny moments through conversational corks that are highly contrasting to the show’s pretenses to providing PBS-style informative interviews. The aesthetic and formal qualities that the show has which are befitting of serious late-night talk shows, from a carpeted Cavette-esque studio and pre-interview monologues to theatrical lighting sequences and end credits, end up forming something of a Trojan Horse for Friedland’s silly, out-of-field conversational punchlines which he delivers on his disparate celebrity guests (Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Chris Cuomo, Norman Finkelstein).  

But despite the show’s wool-over-the-eyes aping of a late-night talk show format to give punch to Friedland’s hilarious out-of-field topic swerves, he still pulls interesting personal, informational and genuinely heartfelt moments out of his guests. But I digress. 

Friedland was just as essential to Cum Town’s success as his podcast mates, the only difference being that his appeal came from being able to roll with the punches rather than what he chose to do for the most part. Nothing testifies to this more than one of Friedland’s defining moments on the podcast, a moment that will forever be in the annals (pardon the potential pun) of Cum Town’s greatest hits: when he defecated in his pants in the middle of recording an episode by accident.  

The last thing I want to note about what made this comedy podcast a gem was its commitment to maintaining low-quality production value.  

Even when the podcast started earning over a million dollars a year through membership fees, this was never reflected in experimental video content, planned high-budget segments or anything of the like. Not only that, but the three seemingly refused to do ad reads correctly, causing much laughter from fans despite the risk of losing sponsors.  

In fact, one of the biggest technical additions that came to the show during its financial zenith was a soundboard app programmed by Mullen. And with this new technological implement on the show, Mullen used it to, well, make a joke about Halkias being replaced by using soundbites of his voice to make a “Stavbot,” as well as, on another occasion, putting Friedland in a “box” by placing an echoey-muted sound effect over his mic feed to make him unintelligible. Yup, that’s it.  

It was an unabashedly amateur and bare-bones podcast from a technical standpoint for its seven-year run, but its charm relied on that aesthetic — anything else would have diminished their comedic product.  

Cum Town was ultimately a brilliant podcast because, beyond the breaming talent between its three hosts, its sole focus was making people laugh. It stands in stark opposition to bro-ish comedy podcasts today because its hosts are genuinely relatable people who don’t see how what they joke about is connected to coddling the rich, ignoring the issues minorities face and thinking universal healthcare is a slippery slope to communism.  

— 

Now, I can’t think of a more appropriate way to close this ode out than an honourable mentions list of some of my favourite, as well as fan-favourite, moments from the podcast that weren’t already highlighted.  

Enjoy: 

The time the boys sported their theatre hats as The Cum Town Players and created a 20-minute audio-exclusive interpolative play on To Kill A Mockingbird where the saga ends in a canonically-similar high-stakes trial, except this time “Atticus Mullen’s” final realization in front of the court is that the American South’s racism was premised on a grand error of the eye. The problem, he decrees, was in thinking Black people were, um, scary ghosts from, uh, “ghost town.” “Case closed!” Atticus Mullen states emphatically after his epiphanic realization before a British-takeover twist takes the play into boyish absurdity.  

All of Nick’s best characters and accents: Mershon, the Iranian high-general assassinated by Trump whose voicemail recordings were leaked and through them it was revealed that he had extensive correspondence with a close contact about his doctor’s reports that he had a micropenis; pedophile Anton Chigur from No Country for Old Men; the “Nigerian Shark Tank” guest where one of his genius ideas is a door on wheels with a slogan of “you can be a door man even at the beach”; Don King as a defence attorney for Derek Chauvin who tries to get him to learn Chinese to make him appear culturally sensitive in front of the jury; Mullen’s rewriting of The Confessions of St. Augustine; Indian Star Trek; and the classic Cool Adam.  

The time Halkias accidentally said “thousand-island stare” instead of the proper expression of “thousand-yard stare,” causing Mullen to pounce like a jaguar for the jugular.  

The time the boys made up a scenario where young Ben Shapiro is molested by Boy Meets World’s Mr. Feeny after winning a meet-and-great competition, the details of the assault explaining both Shapiro’s knack for argumentation as well as his high-pitched voice.  

The time the boys had a legendary argument about how many Costco samples you can take, and, by extension, whether Costco can be considered a catered event or not.  

And, of course, the best moments of the soundboard era.  

A special thanks to @saulfr, or saul on YouTube, for his original animations of moments from the podcast, many of which are linked in this article for the bits I mention. 

Watts scores a pair in Sceptres home win against Sirens 

0

Daryl Watts scored both of the Toronto Sceptres’ goals in their 2-1 victory against the New York Sirens on March 19 to inch closer to clinching a playoff berth. 

The low-scoring affair saw tremendous displays of goaltending at both ends of the ice, with Sceptres’ netminder Kristen Campbell and Sirens’ goaltender Corinne Schroeder each making 27 saves in the contest. 

After both goalies dazzled in the early going, making quality stops on high-danger scoring chances, Watts broke the deadlock late in the first period as her rocketing shot from the high slot beat Schroeder glove-side to give the hosts the one-goal advantage. 

Watts then doubled Toronto’s tally nearly a minute-and-a-half into the second period following a give-and-go passing play from Anna Kjellbin, who was making her Sceptres debut. 

“I usually get a lot of shots and thankfully they were going in,” said Watts following her seventh multi-point game of the season, which is tied for the league lead.  

Natalie Spooner also recorded an assist on Watts’ second goal of the night and eighth of the season, which was unsuccessfully challenged by New York for goaltender interference. 

However, the lengthy delay shifted momentum into the Sirens’ favour as Alex Carpenter cut the Sceptres’ lead in half midway through the frame after burying the rebound from the end boards with assists by Ella Shelton and Jaime Bourbonnais. New York continued piling on the pressure in the latter stages of the period, forcing Campbell to make 12 saves in the second — the most saves in any period — to preserve the Toronto lead. 

Campbell continued her dominance in the third as she made key stops on the penalty kill as Toronto was a successful five-for-five in the game against New York power plays. 

“[Campbell] is one of those goalies that just thrives off the confidence that she gets through her play and the confidence that our team gives her,” said Sceptres head coach Troy Ryan. “She seems to be in a good place right now.” 

Toronto’s confidence was on display in the final minute as they nearly added a third into the empty net, but the play was ruled offside as the hosts came up on top, 2-1. The Sceptres have now earned points in each of the last three games while extending their home point streak to seven, dating back to the last meeting between these teams when Toronto was victorious 4-2 on Jan. 25. 

With the win, Toronto (10-2-5-7) now sits just one point behind the Boston Fleet for second in the PWHL standings with 39 points and have a four-point cushion on the Minnesota Frost, who are currently in the fourth and final playoff spot with only six games remaining this season. 

Following the loss, New York (5-4-4-11) remains in the basement of the league standings with 27 points and are three back of the Ottawa Charge for fifth place and eight behind the Frost for the final playoff seed. 

Both teams have three games left before the league takes a nearly month-long hiatus for the IIHF Women’s World Hockey Championships, which are set to take place from April 9 to 25 in Czechia before the final playoff push resumes on April 26. 

Representing Canada from the Sceptres are Sarah Nurse, Natalie Spooner, Emma Maltais, Hannah Miller, Blayre Turnbull, Daryl Watts, Renata Fast and Kristen Campbell, as well as head coach Troy Ryan, who is tasked with leading the nation to their fourth gold medal in the last five years. 

For more information about the Toronto Sceptres, visit thepwhl.com. 

Badger Cole Tymkin signs with the ECHL’s Wheeling Nailers 

0

Cole Tymkin has gone pro after four seasons with the Brock Badgers men’s hockey team. 

The Fort Frances, Ontario, native signed his first professional contract on Feb. 20 with the Wheeling Nailers, the ECHL affiliate of the Pittsburgh Penguins. 

Tymkin is coming off a decent season for Brock where he recorded double-digit points for the third consecutive year, coming from three goals and seven assists in 27 games. 

His best season came in 2023-24, where he notched 19 points (six goals and 13 assists) in 26 games which included a valiant effort in Brock’s run to the U Sports National Championships.  

The Sport Management major scored a pair of goals in the Badgers’ win against the Windsor Lancers in game one of the quarterfinal best-of-three series before adding his third of the playoffs to open the scoring in game two where Brock was victorious by one goal. He then extended his playoff point streak to three when he tallied an assist on the game-winning goal in the Badgers’ 3-1 triumph over the TMU Bold in game one of their semi-final matchup. 

Over the course of his four years in the Badgers’ program, Tymkin registered 50 points (17 goals and 33 assists) in 85 games to average 0.59 points per game. He also brought a physical style of play to Brock where he received 111 penalty minutes, which is something he’s already shown in his early tenure in Wheeling. 

In 13 games with the Nailers at the time of writing, Tymkin has been assessed 44 penalty minutes to go along with two goals and an assist. 

His most impactful game in Wheeling was on March 8, when he recorded his first “Gordie Howe hat trick,” which pays homage to Howe’s tenacious playing style when a player records a goal, an assist and a fighting major in the same game.  

It was the Nailers’ first “Gordie Howe hat trick” of the season and Tymkin’s first fight since his days in the OHL with the London Knights where his career took off. 

After being drafted by the Knights in the fifth round (91st overall) of the 2015 OHL Draft, Tymkin went on to play 199 games in London where he tallied 93 points (38 goals and 55 assists) as well as 337 penalty minutes. 

Tymkin’s best season in junior came in the 2018-19 season when he was one of the assistant captains of the team. The six-foot-one forward notched 22 goals and 25 assists in 63 games to lead the Knights to the top spot in the OHL’s Western Conference standings. 

He now joins an exclusive list of Connor Ungar (Bakersfield Condors), Tyler Burnie (Rapid City Rush) and Zack Taylor (HK 32 Liptovsky Mikulas – Slovakia) to graduate from the Brock hockey program to the professional ranks within the last two seasons.  

For more information on Cole Tymkin, visit gobadgers.ca. 

Women’s volleyball: Four Badgers receive provincial honours, two earn national recognition 

0

Brock’s biggest volleyball stars were honoured on the OUA and U Sports stages. 

Emily Foest, Mackenna Knox, Charlotte Ross and Sadie Dick were each named to the OUA All-Star teams on March 3, with Ross and Dick earning spots on the U Sports All-Canadian rosters on March 12 at the annual awards banquet. 

Emily Foest – OUA Third Team All-Star 

Emily Foest nabbed an OUA Third Team All-Star nod for her second straight appearance on the provincial all-star teams following a first-team selection last season. 

The fourth-year outside hitter finished second on the Badgers with 142 digs and 2.03 digs per set while starring on offence, ranking top ten in Ontario in numerous categories such as kills (216 — 9th), kills per set (3.09 — 10th) and points per set (3.5 — 10th). 

The Medical Sciences major’s best game this season came against the Toronto Varsity Blues on Nov. 8 when she recorded a career-high 21 kills and 22 points as well as eight digs. 

In her four seasons with Brock, Foest has 793 kills, 2.63 kills per set, 670 digs and 2.23 digs per set, as her versatility has led to the Badgers’ continued success given her importance on both sides of the ball. 

Mackenna Knox – OUA Second Team All-Star 

Mackenna Knox had a stellar season leading the Badgers’ attack, which earned her OUA Second Team All-Star honours. 

In her first season as the starter, the second-year setter guided Brock’s offence to a .238 hitting percentage — which topped the province — and 12.44 kills per set, which placed second in the OUA. 

The Burlington native was also amongst the best setters in the country, as she finished second in U Sports with 10.1 assists per set and sixth with 626 total assists, with each ranking best in Ontario. She tallied a career-high 58 assists in a five-set victory over the top-seeded Queen’s Gaels in the season opener on Nov. 1, showing her knack for the big moments. 

Knox has meshed perfectly in the Brock attack as she’s filled the void left from the departure of reigning OUA Player of the Year, Sara Rohr, with Knox destined to contend for major awards herself in the seasons ahead. 

Charlotte Ross – OUA All-Rookie Team, U Sports All-Rookie Team 

Charlotte Ross made her presence felt in the Badgers’ system, being named to both the OUA and U Sports All-Rookie Teams in her debut campaign. 

The six-foot-two middle used her length to dominate at the net, where she registered 74 total blocks this season which placed her third in the OUA and sixth in U Sports. She averaged 1.0 blocks per game, ranking fourth in the province and eighth in the country, and recorded a career-high nine blocks against Windsor on Jan. 18. 

Ross, a St. Catharines local, is also a service specialist as she led the team with 31 services aces, ranking seventh in Ontario and second amongst middles in that category. The Child and Youth Studies major recorded a career-high 15.5 points and four aces in a Valentine’s Day matchup against the Nipissing Lakers and followed that up with a three-ace game in her playoff debut versus the Lakers on Feb. 21. 

With an exceptional rookie season behind her filled with a tremendous amount of game experience, Ross will be a force to be reckoned with in the years ahead. 

Sadie Dick – OUA First Team All-Star, U Sports Second Team All-Canadian 

Sadie Dick capped an exceptional Badgers career, receiving her fifth OUA All-Star accolade and her first All-Canadian selection in her farewell season. 

The St. Catharines native owned the Badgers’ attack where she finished eighth in the OUA in hitting percentage (.286), ninth in points (255.5) and tenth in points per set (3.5) and kills (210). Defensively, Dick used her six-foot-two frame to stymie the opposition’s offence while totalling 65 blocks this season, placing her seventh in the conference and 13th in U Sports. 

Dick also tallied career highs in numerous categories this season. She earned 21 kills and 22.5 points against the Gaels on Nov. 1, notched nine total blocks versus the Varsity Blues on Nov. 9 and registered 14 digs in a victory over the Western Mustangs on Jan. 25. 

The Child and Youth Studies major ends her Brock tenure with an OUA West Second Team All-Star and OUA All-Rookie Team selection in 2021-22, OUA First Team All-Star nod in 2022-23, OUA Second Team All-Star appearance in 2023-24 and a coveted OUA First Team All-Star and U Sports Second Team All-Canadian selection this season. 

She leaves Brock as the program leader with 1,069 points and 890 kills to go along with a career stat line of 2.92 kills per set, 409 digs and 1.34 digs per set. 

— 

Despite an unfortunate end to the Badgers’ season, losing in the Quigley Cup final to the McMaster Marauders, Brock has achieved many accomplishments this year. With title aspirations on their mind for the 2025-26 season, the Badgers have unfinished business and a collection of star players ready to reclaim the championship. 

For more information about the Brock Badgers women’s volleyball team, visit gobadgers.ca. 

Why did Mark Carney call an early election? 

0

With all the opposition leaders previously declaring their intent to facilitate an early federal election when parliament was to resume, it was in Carney’s best interest to call the election himself. 

Throughout the end of Justin Trudeau’s leadership in the Liberal Party, his government faced several warnings from the Conservative Party of Canada, the New Democratic Party (NDP) and the Bloc Québécois that they planned to trigger a non-confidence vote, which would allow members of Parliament to vote out the Liberal Party, likely leading to a federal election. 

All three opposition parties continued to hold this stance despite Trudeau’s resignation, all saying they would take the necessary steps to call an early election as soon as possible. 

However, on March 23, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that he requested Governor General Mary Simon to once again dissolve Parliament, calling for a federal election to take place on April 28. 

There are several factors contributing to Carney’s decision to call an early federal election in advance of what was to be Parliament’s return on March 24, here are a few reasons why his party could benefit from calling a snap election right now. 

Liberals surpassing Conservatives in the polls 

According to several voter polling surveys, including one from Nanos and another from Leger, the Liberals are seeing a trend of upward support, a stark contrast from a year’s worth of polling that saw the party significantly lagging behind the Conservative Party of Canada. 

Amidst Canada’s trade war with the U.S., which is being deemed by commentators in the media to have “revived” the Liberal Party, Carney’s status as a lifelong economist positions him as a voice of authority during this time of economic crisis. Long-held comparisons between Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre and President Trump could also shift voter support back to Carney if Canada-U.S. relations remain tense. 

Since the Liberal Party is seeing an uptick of support during these tense times for Canada, Carney might be able to take advantage of shifts toward the Liberal Party and secure himself another four years in office. 

The Liberals have not received this level of support in months, and the lead they have is fluctuating between mere percentage points, meaning their surge in voter support is fragile. If Carney did not take advantage of his party’s slight lead, voter support could easily shift back to the Conservatives and dissolve his electoral opportunity. 

Less time in office for the Liberals ahead of opposition campaigns 

Since Carney is not a lifelong politician, opposition parties cannot necessarily draw upon past governing mistakes he has made to sway voters away from the Liberals. 

This attack-ad tactic is extremely popular in all political advertising but was specifically evident in advertisements against Trudeau during his last days in leadership. 

For example, “Real change. The one promise he kept,” was the tagline featured in an advertisement issued by the Conservative Party of Canada when Trudeau was still prime minister. The advertisement compared the increased severity of the housing crisis from the beginning of Trudeau’s leadership in 2013 to a decade later in 2023, implying that his government was responsible for it. 

At the time of writing, many of the attack-ads targeting Carney focus on his past endorsement of Trudeau’s controversial consumer carbon tax — the tax which Carney will but cutting to zero per cent as of April 1 — as well as his decision to move Brookfield’s business headquarters from Canada to New York. 

As Carney does not have a political career to serve as a basis on which to judge how he might lead the country — aside from his time as Trudeau’s economic advisor, claims he’s made himself or predictions based on the way he navigated his career in the field of economics — the less time Carney spends in office ahead of the election, the less things for the opposition parties to use against him during the campaigning period.  

Opposition parties promise to call a non-confidence vote 

It might also have been beneficial for Carney to call a snap election before the opposition parties could call a non-confidence vote in his leadership when Parliament was initially set to resume. 

As mentioned, three of the opposition parties, including the Conservatives, the NDP and the Bloc Québécois, all confirmed their intent to immediately call a non-confidence vote in the Liberal government if Parliament were to return on March 24. Carney’s call for a snap election notably took place on March 23, the day before the new Parliamentary term was set to begin. 

Calling the election on his own terms works in favour of his public image as opposed to several party leaders warning they do not have confidence in his ability to adequately lead Canada. 

If the parties were to call a non-confidence motion upon their return to Parliament and Carney lost the vote, he would have had to resign and allow the Governor General to decide whether opposition parties should form a government or if a federal election should be called. 

Under this circumstance, Carney would clearly not have had control on the outcome of the confidence vote. A forced resignation would reflect poorly on his leadership, and all but ensure a Liberal defeat in the next election. 

With Carney calling the election himself, he was able to go without opposition parties expressing their doubts of his leadership on the Parliamentary stage — regardless of their tendency to do so in their own electoral campaigns. 

— 

Despite the many factors that might have contributed to Carney’s decision to call an early election, any approach to inciting a snap federal election is risky. The result of Carney’s decision will become clear in the coming weeks as parties gear up to campaign for leadership. 

Inhaler live at HISTORY 01/03/2025 

0

When I stumble out onto the ice-covered sidewalk of Queen Street East from the warmth of the packed streetcar, I have only two things on my mind: Josh Jenkinson and a ride back to Union Station. 

Around me, a line of wildly ill-clad, underdressed young people has begun to form, quickly wrapping around the façade of Drake’s new music venue, History. Glowing light emanates from a long screen displaying ticker-tape-esque text that reads “INHALER.” The sign would have been helpful confirmation that I was in the right place had the wall of leather jackets and Doc Marten boots not already tipped me off. 

For March 1, it’s desperately cold. Bundled in a long coat and a huge scarf I’ve wrapped tightly around my face, I quietly curse the stupid groundhog who saw his shadow and triggered six more weeks of winter. The weather wouldn’t be so hard to bear had it not been 10 degrees earlier in the week, giving us all a false sense of hope and melting the snow so it could freeze and turn into hazardous amounts of ice. 

When the doors open, we scuffle forward in an attempt not to slip and fall headfirst into a frozen snowbank, I make eye contact with a girl wearing jean shorts and a black t-shirt. She doesn’t look all that bothered by the cold, and considering I’ve just spent the last 15 minutes wondering whether they would accept snow pants at coat check, I figure I’ve probably reached the stage of hypothermia where you start to hallucinate.  

I don’t have much time to think about it though, because I am suddenly confronted by a remarkably industrious assembly line of security procedures. After having my driver’s license scrutinized for much longer than necessary at an all-ages venue, my bag checked thrice and my body scanned with not one but two metal-detecting devices, I’m finally inside and wishing I didn’t have to shrug off my coat.  

After languidly checking in my outerwear, I wander down into the pit and find myself in the second row, people slowly filling the space around me with overpriced drinks in hand and merch draped over their shoulders.  

I watch as the opener, an American indie rock band from New York called Been Stellar, disassembles their instruments and clears the stage after their set. The liminal period that exists between the opener and the main act always passes languidly, and by the time I glance down at my phone for what feels like the 800th time, I’m starting to get antsy. 

As sweaty bodies brush against sweaty bodies, the clock ticks down to 9 p.m. and suddenly, the lights go dark and smoke billows onto the stage, sending the restless crowd into a frenzy.  

The four boys that make up Inhaler enter stage left and take their places, adjusting guitar straps and fiddling with drumsticks. While they’re desperately trying to play it cool (an act they are only partially getting away with), I’ve always secretly thought that off stage, they all must be just as awkward as every other boy in his early twenties. Although with every show of theirs I see they get better at hiding it, they feel just as human to me today as they did when I saw them play their first solo show in Toronto in 2022. At least this time they didn’t have to kick their opener off the stage for sounding like a flaming, screeching car wreck.  

A driving drum beat and an electric, synth guitar line sends the crowd into a wild fit of cheering as Josh Jenkinson, the band’s guitarist, wastes no time getting the show started. For years, the band finished their sets with “My Honest Face,” a raucous rock anthem that put Inhaler on the map back in 2019, yet today they have chosen to start the show with it. It’s an interesting switch, one that briefly catches me off guard, but the reaction from the crowd tells me it was the right choice.  

Blue strobe lights illuminate the mob of people who have congregated in the pit, all of whom are proudly screaming the song lyrics. In the darkness, it’s hard to tell whose limbs are who’s as bodies melt into one another on the dance floor. Rob Keating’s thrumming bass line blares out of the speakers positioned right above my head, keeping the track, which is quickly dissolving into perfect musical chaos, from running completely off the rails.  

As I throw my head back, I get lost in the sound of Eli Hewson’s voice. Every fibre of my being desperately wants to completely disappear into the sound enveloping me, yet just as I am about to let my eyes flutter shut and surrender, the song ends and the crowd erupts into clamorous cheers. 

I’m not safe for long though. I spend the rest of the show fighting the wash of equanimity that has flooded over me, lulling me into a state of rhythmic hypnosis. The comforting familiarity of Ryan McMahon’s crashing drumbeats vibrate through me as I fade into the musicality of tracks I’ve heard a million times. While I rarely know the words to many of their newest songs, I never lose touch with the feeling of euphoria slowly taking over my body inch by inch.  

When I wake up from my trance that had expropriated me, I’m running to catch a streetcar that will take me back to Union Station. While everything around me has snapped into sharp focus, a glance back at the venue provides me with one last glimpse of the misty world of contentment I left behind through an open door.  

When I stumble out onto the ice-covered sidewalk of Wellington Street West from the warmth of the deserted streetcar, I have only two things on my mind: Josh Jenkinson and when I’m going to see Inhaler again. 

What to know about Mark Carney’s cabinet picks 

0

Carney chooses a much smaller cabinet than Trudeau’s as the country narrows in on the trade conflict with the U.S. 

After Mark Carney was sworn in as Canada’s prime minister on March 14, he revealed the collection of ministers who will serve in his cabinet to make up the 30th Canadian Ministry. 

Carney’s cabinet, including 23 ministers, is heavily condensed in comparison to former prime minister Justin Trudeau’s cabinet, which held 37 ministers. At a news conference following his swearing-in ceremony, Carney said that having a “leaner” cabinet will make it easier for the government to navigate the ongoing trade conflict with the U.S.  

Carney also said that a condensed cabinet will lead the government to spend less money and thus invest more money back into Canadians through home building efforts, investment in “conventional and clean” forms of energy, seeking “reliable” trade partners and solidifying a singular Canadian economy as opposed to 13 separate ones. 

Few ministers kept the exact same positions they served under Trudeau, but those who remain in the same positions include Bill Blair, the Minister of National Defence; Patty Hajdu, Minister of Indigenous Services; Jonathan Wilkinson, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources; Ginette Petitpas Taylor, President of the Treasury Board; Gary Anandasangaree, Minister of Crown–Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs; David McGuinty, Minister of Public Safety; and Nathaniel Erskine-Smith, Minister of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities. 

Carney also kept many well-known Ministers that served under Trudeau, including Carney’s former running mate Chrystia Freeland, who now serves as Minister of Transport and Trade; Dominic Leblanc, who kept his position as Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs while also serving as Minister of International Trade and President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada; Mélanie Joly, who retained her position as Minister of Foreign Affairs and now also serves as Minister of International Development; and François-Philippe Champagne, who now serves as Minister of Finance. 

Since the cabinet has less ministers overall, the responsibilities of many positions that have been cut were tacked under the responsibilities of other ministers, leading to many ministers representing several positions. This is not necessarily uncommon, but it is found to a higher degree in Carney’s cabinet. 

Carney faced criticism for his decision to condense minister numbers by removing certain ministry positions. The positions not found in Carney’s cabinet include those responsible for issues regarding women and gender equality and youth (WAGE), diversity, persons with disabilities and seniors, among others. 

Notably, issues regarding these groups are not completely out of discussions, they just no longer have specific ministers devoting their complete attention to representing these demographics. Instead, these responsibilities have been reallocated to fit under other ministers’ broader responsibilities.  

For example, CBC News clarified that Steve MacKinnon, the Minister of Jobs and Families, will be responsible for representing seniors and persons with disabilities, according to his portfolio. 

Issues regarding women and gender equality have been placed under Steven Guilbeault’s responsibilities as the Minister of Canadian Culture and Identity. Still, the Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women released a statement outlining their dissatisfaction with the decision to remove the minister position solely responsible for WAGE, calling Carney’s condensed cabinet “unacceptable.” 

Despite criticism, MacKinnon spoke on behalf of the government to emphasize that they still take these issues “extremely seriously” and will continue to give them as much attention as they were given under their own ministers. 

The full list of ministers serving in Prime Minister Mark Carney’s cabinet can be found on the Government of Canada website

What the impending closure of Hudson’s Bay at the Pen Centre means for Canadian retail 

0

Hudson’s Bay will start liquidating its entire business and begin the process of closing all its stores pending a court approval. 

On March 16, the Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC) announced its plan to liquidate products and begin the process of closing all its stores. The process has already started at the department store at the Pen Centre in St. Catharines, marking the slow disappearance of a well-established Canadian institution. 

For centuries, Hudson’s Bay has been more than a retailer. Founded in 1670, it is Canada’s oldest corporation and is part of the country’s economic and cultural fabric. Its iconic striped blankets and flagship locations once symbolized stability, tradition and Canadian identity. Yet, the closure of the Pen Centre location — a long-standing anchor in Niagara’s largest shopping mall — shows that even the most enduring brands are not immune to evolving market forces. 

Changing consumer behaviour 

 
The company’s statement described the closure as part of a broader plan to “reshape its real estate footprint,” reflecting the harsh realities of the modern retail landscape. Consumers increasingly favour online shopping for its convenience and competitive pricing, eroding the traditional appeal of large, multi-floor department stores. High operating costs and the inability to adapt quickly have only compounded the pressure on HBC. 

Ontario, which currently houses 32 Hudson’s Bay stores and accounts for more than half of the company’s Canadian workforce, will feel a disproportionate impact. The Pen Centre’s loss of Hudson’s Bay raises broader concerns about how malls will fill massive retail spaces and remain relevant in a digital-first economy. 

A broader retail shift 

Several Ontarians cite online shopping as the catalyst for the decline of Hudson’s Bay, noting that the habit of spending hours browsing department stores has given way to on-demand digital purchasing. The continued success of discount-driven department stores such as Walmart and dollar stores underscores consumers’ increasing prioritization of price over heritage or brand loyalty. 

Malls across Canada are already pivoting. In many cases, large retail vacancies have been transformed into fitness centres, entertainment venues or multi-use spaces that blend shopping, dining and other services. The Pen Centre’s management faces the challenge of redefining its commercial offering in a way that reflects this new retail paradigm. 

Legacy vs. modern retail realities 

The decline of Hudson’s Bay also serves as a cautionary tale for legacy Canadian brands. Longevity does not guarantee resilience, especially in a marketplace increasingly dominated by agile, digitally native competitors. Amazon, for example, operates without the burden of physical retail spaces, offering vast product selections, aggressive prices and fast shipping — advantages that traditional department stores struggle to match. 

The Canadian retail sector faces additional structural challenges: a smaller population spread across vast geographies makes large-format stores less viable. This reality has forced retailers to rethink how — and where — they operate. While HBC has experimented with smaller storefronts, luxury subsidiaries like Saks Fifth Avenue and online platforms, it remains unclear whether these efforts can meaningfully offset declining brick-and-mortar performance. 

Looking ahead 

For Canadians, the closure of Hudson’s Bay locations, especially in communities like Niagara, represents both economic disruption and the end of a familiar experience. Yet, it also signals a critical inflection point: Canadian retailers must evolve rapidly or risk irrelevance in a globalized, digitized market. 

The Pen Centre store’s shuttering is not just the loss of a retail space — it reflects a retail model that no longer fits within Canadian consumer behaviour. As HBC’s iconic doors close, the industry is left grappling with an urgent question: how can Canada’s oldest and most recognizable brands adapt and compete in the next chapter of retail? 

How the trade war is bringing voter support to the Liberals 

0

Amidst Canada’s trade war with the U.S., recent polling shows that a surge in voter support for the Liberals places them a mere point behind the Conservatives after months of trailing behind. 

Less than a month ago, Nanos polling measured voter support for the Conservative Party of Canada at 37 per cent, with the Liberals trailing behind at 33 per cent. This polling was fairly similar several months prior. 

However, March 7 brought new polling numbers that revealed an uptick in voter support for the Liberal Party a few days short of the party selecting their new leader, with the Conservatives measuring in at 35.7 per cent and the Liberals exactly one point behind at 34.7 per cent. 

Similarly, a Leger poll from March 10 showed a similar uptick in support for the Liberals, in which the parties were tied at 37 per cent of voter support. 

There is no doubt that the recent trade war incited by the U.S. is on voters’ minds as we progress closer to the recently announced early election taking place on April 28. The tariff conflict poses a tangible threat to Canadians, emphasizing the need for voters to research where they are placing their support to ensure Canada’s economy and industries remain protected. 

In the context of Canada’s trade war with the U.S. — which will likely last for the “foreseeable future” according to former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau — here are some factors that could contribute to a continued shift in support toward the Liberal Party. 

Trudeau’s response 

Since President Trump signed tariff orders on Feb. 10, the Canadian government has been working hastily to defend the economy. The seemingly newfound aggression in Trudeau’s Liberal government led many to assert that the trade conflict “revived” the party from the large amounts of dissatisfaction voters had with them over recent years due to contentious issues like the rising cost of living after the COVID-19 pandemic and the consumer carbon tax. 

It is quite likely that Trudeau’s comprehensive counter-tariffs onto American industries, which include 25 per cent tariffs on $30 billion of U.S. goods, with tariffs on $125 billion worth of goods still pending, relit a fire within the party. The situation is reminiscent of the promising position Trudeau held when he initially became the leader of the Liberal Party back in 2013.  

Mark Carney takes over as Liberal leader 

When your country is in a trade war, it’s helpful if your prime minister doubles as a lifelong economist — at least, this is what the recent Liberal leadership election seemed to suggest. 

A former governor of both the Banks of Canada and England, Mark Carney was elected to be the new leader of the Liberal Party and Prime Minister on March 9, following Trudeau’s promise to resign. 

Carney faced overwhelming success at the polls, winning 85.9 per cent of the vote. It is significant that the Leger poll showing equal support for the Liberals and Conservatives gathered research from March 7 to March 10 — allowing two full days of polling to be collected after Carney was elected. Considering voter concerns with the cost of living under the Liberal government, Carney put forth his finance-focused vision for Canada at a news conference before the government’s first cabinet meeting, outlining that he has already set up meetings with several European countries to “diversify” Canada’s trading partners.  

With his economic experience, Carney faces the electorate in times where he could use his past career to his campaigning advantage. 

Pierre Poilievre and “Trump comparisons” 

Comparisons between Poilievre and Trump are not new. In November of 2024, Le Monde called Poilievre “Trump-inspired” because of his insult-heavy political voice and overall support from those in Republican circles, naming Elon Musk as one of these supporters after he endorsed Poilievre on X. 

According to CBC News, Poilievre has been accused of “borrowing policy” from Trump after saying that the government would conduct “massive” cuts to foreign aid to fund an Arctic military base in early January, leading to broader comparisons to the U.S. president in Liberal attack ads ever since. 

In a recent ad titled “Made-in-America,” clips of Poilievre and Trump repeating similar phrases are spliced together, with text directed at Poilievre asking: “How can you speak for Canada when you sound like Donald Trump?” 

As evidenced by polling over the past year, Poilievre’s take on Trump’s populist strategies were initially successful when juxtaposed next to vast dissatisfaction with Trudeau. However, the trade war with the U.S. has made any tactics associated with Trump quite contentious for Canadians.  

Poilievre’s backing from Republicans and his overall Trump-like image could pose a threat to his campaign in the next election if he continues to pursue this strategy — as Conservative strategists have encouraged him to do — which might lead to increased support for the Liberal Party as a result. 

— 

Despite what preliminary polls might suggest, the parties still have time to outline their campaigns before this year’s election as the trade war progresses. Whether each party will continue in their current directions or respond to polling trends remains unclear. 

“Metamorphoses” seamlessly pulls mythology into modernity 

0

The Department of Dramatic Arts reminds audiences of the timeless importance of storytelling in their feature production. 

A glowing orb backlighting the centre of the stage reflects velvet orange curtains, creating a sparkly hue that glitters against a pond in front of the first row of audience members — the production they are about to see is bound to make a splash. Undoubtably, Brock University’s Marilyn I. Walker stage is fit to host gods, mortals and spirits alike. 

In the misty orange glow, Brock University’s Dramatic Arts (DART) students bring to life Mary Zimmerman’s Metamorphoses, a play inspired by Ovid’s epic poem of the same name.  

Metamorphoses is more than just a retelling of ancient mythology. The play draws on the timelessness of storytelling, immersing the audience in the ancient Roman context in which Ovid originally wrote his collection of myths while occasionally reminding them that the play’s interpreters have our modern context in mind. 

The connection from Ovid’s Metamorphoses to our contemporary social context is clear when Assistant Director Scott Young Yoo ushers the play into its beginning. Young Yoo begins the production with a land acknowledgement skillfully connected to the play itself. By approaching the land acknowledgement with as much care and thought as the rest of production, Young Yoo successfully conveys the importance of recognizing the land on which our art takes place. 

According to Director and DART faculty member Gyllian Raby, the directors aimed to “break away from a colonized view” of artistic education. 

“At Marilyn I. Walker, we try to bring a gratitude and awareness of social injustice to the gratitude for our ability to make creative work, because that is something that is robbed of so many people,” said Raby. 

Raby’s commitment to gratitude in bringing Metamorphoses to a contemporary audience works favourably in many ways. The modern context is acknowledged not only through overt artistic decisions — like the play’s emphasis on its prefacing land acknowledgement — but also in subtle quips from the play’s characters, who occasionally break away from Ovid’s world to share a humorous comment with the audience, such as comparing the chariot of the sun to a sweet hot rod. 

The swift shifts between the ancient setting of the play and the inclusion of modern language keeps audiences intrigued, seeking to know which character they will share a moment with next. 

Metamorphoses is a very complex text when it comes to adaptation. As the play spans several myths instead of devoting three acts to just one story, the directors were tasked with threading a connection between the complex stories while maintaining both the attention and understanding of audience members. 

Raby mentioned that just one section of the play can include up to twenty-five action units — the smallest unit of action with a distinct beginning, middle and end — which is more than what would appear in a film. During these action units, audiences must understand the cues that signal to which character they are supposed to be watching at any moment while also digesting the dynamics between characters, assuming they do not have a vast knowledge of Ovid’s original poem. 

However daunting and deeply intertextual this task may seem, Raby and Young Yoo executed it seamlessly alongside their cast and production teams. 

Raby attributed the successful flow in Metamorphoses to Lighting Designer Chris Malkowski and Composer Joe Lapinski. Subtle mood shifts — and even world shifts — are foretold by changing hues and background noises, such as when Orpheus seeks out the long-lost Eurydice in a mysterious underworld, where light only comes in dark purple hues. 

Integral to the audience’s immersion into Ovid’s world is the outstanding work of all cast members in the play. According to Raby, the cast was required to do a “complete analysis” of their characters before rehearsals began. Notably, every cast member had more than one role to embody throughout Metamorphoses. Commenting on the intricacy required to perform in Metamorphoses, Young Yoo noted that it is a tough task to understand the inner motives of each separate character, but also increasingly difficult to embody how these motives shift as characters evolve throughout the play. 

“There’s a lot of feeling that goes into acting, but then there’s also just this analysis work that you have to accomplish,” said Young Yoo. “If you don’t understand the arc of the story, how is the audience supposed to?” 

Fortunately, the whole cast deeply immersed themselves into the feelings, desires and worlds of the characters they embodied. From Gia Lupparelli Nash’s entirely moving and guttural performance as Hunger, dominating the stage with her snarling demands for “more,” to Elliot Barron’s masterful embodiment of the sarcastic and flippant King Midas, the entire cast radiated with passion and a dedication to their craft. 

Although Metamorphoses is set in times that have long passed, the play’s dedication to storytelling rings endlessly relevant. Young Yoo said there was a clear “mutual respect” between everyone working on the play as they came together to breathe life into Ovid’s myths. 

“There was such a great sense of community, and it was all to just tell stories,” said Young Yoo. “We brought this huge group of artists together to create this beautiful project and it was all to tell stories.” 

Filled to the brim with passion from every member of its production, Metamorphoses brings Ovid’s myths to a modern audience and makes clear that the centuries-old appreciation for the craft of storytelling is a timeless one. 

Ivanov, Oullette strike gold at U Sports Track & Field Championships 

0

Michael Ivanov and Rémi Ouellette made Brock track and field history at the U Sports Championships. 

The pair of Badgers men’s track and field stars won Brock’s first gold medals at the national track and field championships, hosted by the University of Windsor at the Dennis Fairall Fieldhouse from March 6 to 8. 

Ivanov, a pole vaulter from Niagara Falls, won his first national gold and second U Sports medal after a successful attempt of 5.12 metres — a personal best — claimed the top of the podium. His jump was 0.32 metres better than Western Mustangs vaulter Emanuel Desilets, who placed second at 4.80 metres.  

The result surpassed Ivanov’s previous 5.00-metre jump that earned him a provincial gold in February and bested his 4.75-metre vault that captured bronze at last season’s nationals. The Business major also finished in fifth place (4.72 metres) in his U Sports debut in 2023. 

Joining Ivanov atop the podium was Oullette, who also made school history with the Badgers’ first para medal at the national championships. 

Ouellette, a native of New Brunswick, won gold in the men’s shot put F41 ambulatory event, recording a throw of 7.69 metres. The Sport Management major also claimed glory in the same event when he threw 8.19 metres in the provincial final, winning Brock’s first para gold at the OUA Championships. 

With a successful rookie season complete, Ouellette has been invited to Athletics Canada’s para development camp, which provides high-performance training and development opportunities to Canada’s top para-athletes nationwide. The camp is set to take place at the Toronto Track and Field Centre from March 24 to 26. 

Ivanov and Ouellette’s stellar results helped give the Badgers 10 team points in the men’s standings, which placed them 18th of 25 teams. Winning the men’s division was the Western Mustangs with 139 points, followed by the Guelph Gryphons (85 points) and the Manitoba Bisons (79 points). 

The Mustangs also placed first in the women’s team standings with 119 points as Guelph finished second with 85 points and the Saskatchewan Huskies claimed third with 74 points. 

Representing Brock from the women’s team was Sarah Saldutto, who competed in both the women’s 60-metre hurdles and the women’s long jump events. 

Looking to build upon her silver medal winning performance in the 60-metre hurdles on the provincial stage, Saldutto finished 13th with a time of 8.90 seconds. Calgary Dinos hurdler Sienna MacDonald won the event with a time of 7.99 seconds, which was a new U Sports and facility record. 

In the long jump competition, Saldutto placed ninth with a jump of 5.74 metres, which surpassed her jump of 5.55 metres that earned her ninth in the OUA Championships. MacDonald broke another U Sports record with a 6.25-metre jump. 

— 

The Badgers will look to continue the successes of the 2024-25 season when they seek more accolades and records in 2026. 

For the complete results from the U Sports Track & Field Championships, visit gobadgers.ca. 

Weinert named OUA Player of the Year and U Sports All-Canadian for second straight season 

0

Madalyn Weinert continues her domination of collegiate basketball with provincial and national recognition. 

The St. Catharines native was named the OUA Women’s Basketball Player of the Year and selected as a U Sports First Team All-Canadian for the second consecutive season, while also earning her second OUA First Team All-Star honour. 

Weinert took her game to another level this season, leading the OUA and U Sports in numerous categories. 

The fourth-year guard led the country in points per game (21.8) and total points (480) while scoring a career-high 36 points against McMaster on Feb. 8. She was also tied for first in Canada in free throw percentage (87.7 per cent) and three-point percentage (39 per cent) amongst players who appeared in 60 per cent of their teams’ games this year. 

Weinert also demonstrated her lethal mid-range game as she led the OUA in field goals made this season (161) and placed seventh in field goal percentage (46.9 per cent). 

Along with her ability to score, Weinert was a force on the glass, registering the second most total rebounds (262) and rebounds per game (11.9) in the province this season. The Medical Sciences major finished third and fourth in the nation in both of those categories, respectively. She also portrayed her playmaking ability this year, tying for sixth in the provincial rankings in assists per game (3.2). 

Complementing her dominant offensive game was Weinert’s defensive force. She finished second in U Sports in total blocks (42) and ranked second in Ontario in blocks per game (1.9). Weinert also finished top 10 in the OUA in steals per game (2.6), showcasing her versatility at both ends of the floor. 

Joining Weinert on the U Sports First Team is Gage Grassick (Saskatchewan Huskies) — who won the Nan Copp trophy as the U Sports Women’s Basketball Player of the Year — Clara Gascoigne (Saint Mary’s Huskies), Victoria Gauna (Bishop’s Gaiters) and Natsuki Szczokin (Ottawa Gee-Gees).  

Weinert’s contributions helped lead the Badgers to a 16-6 regular season record, which placed Brock second in the OUA Central standings and qualified them for the playoffs for the sixth straight season and fourth consecutive with Weinert. 

In her four seasons, Weinert has now received OUA honours in all of them after being named to the All-Rookie Team in 2022, a Second Team All-Star in 2023 and a First Team All-Star in 2024. 

With her fifth and final season on the docket for 2025-26, Weinert will be looking at winning the biggest prizes of them all — the Critelli Cup, awarded to the OUA Champions, and the Bronze Baby Trophy, awarded to the U Sports Champions — two awards she has yet to win in her career with the Badgers. 

For more information on Madalyn Weinert, visit gobadgers.ca. 

NFL offseason heating up with flurry of moves 

0

Football season is still five months away, but the NFL is intercepting headlines with a busy week of transactions. 

As the new NFL year officially kicked off on March 8, teams began overturning their rosters in the hopes of making a Super Bowl run in 2026. With players signed, traded and released, here are some of the biggest moves that have already occurred early in the offseason. 

Bengals re-sign Ja’Marr Chase and Tee Higgins to four-year deals 

The Cincinnati Bengals have solidified their offence for the next four seasons, with mammoth extensions awarded to each of their two top receivers. 

After coming off one of the greatest seasons in NFL history where he led the league in receptions (127), receiving yards (1,708) and touchdowns (17) — becoming only the third ‘Triple Crown’ winner of the century — Ja’Marr Chase was rewarded with a four-year, $161 million contract extension which makes him the highest-paid non-quarterback in NFL history. 

Chase, who was named to the Pro Bowl in each of his first four seasons in the league and selected to the All-Pro team for the first time in 2024, led to the Bengals’ offence dominating the NFL in numerous offensive categories including receiving yards (4,640) and touchdown receptions (43). 

His wide receiver partner Tee Higgins also had a lot to do with Cincinnati’s success on the offensive side of the ball as Higgins secured a four-year, $115 million deal after a stellar 2024. 

The 26-year-old was tied for sixth in the league with 10 touchdown catches and added 73 receptions and 911 receiving yards to his tally, hitting the 900-yard plateau for the fourth time in his five seasons. 

Paired with quarterback Joe Burrow, who was an MVP finalist and winner of the AP Comeback Player of the Year award last season, Cincinnati is in a prominent position to compete in the AFC in the years ahead with hopes of advancing to the Super Bowl for the first time since 2021. 

MVP Josh Allen remains in Buffalo on a massive extension 

After signing a lucrative six-year, $330 million contract with $250 million guaranteed, Josh Allen and the Bills are poised to run the AFC East — a division they’ve dominated with five straight titles — for the better part of the next decade, as he’ll be in Buffalo through the 2030 season. 

The timing is perfect for Allen, who’s coming off his first MVP season where he led the league in rushing touchdowns amongst quarterbacks (12) and recorded the fourth-most total touchdown with 41. 

With Allen under centre, Buffalo has enjoyed repeated regular season success, having reached the AFC Divisional Round in each of the last five seasons, but hasn’t seemed to find an answer for the Mahomes-led Chiefs in the postseason. 

With another six years (at least) in Western New York, Allen and the Bills are surely destined for the promise land as Buffalo craves their first Super Bowl appearance since the agony of losing four straight championship games from 1991 to 1994. 

Myles Garrett inks record-breaking deal with Browns  

Myles Garrett became the highest-paid defensive player after reaching a four-year, $160 million contract extension with the Cleveland Browns that’ll pay him $40 million per year with $123.5 million guaranteed. 

Since being drafted by the Browns with the first overall pick in the 2017 NFL Draft, Garrett has been one of the league’s most prestigious defensive players. He became the first player to reach the 100-sack plateau before the age of 29 in 2024 and currently sits with 102.5 career sacks, which is the second most from the 2017 draft class. Garrett was also named the AP Defensive Player of the Year in 2023 and followed that with another 14-sack performance last season. 

The only thing still unknown surrounding this deal is what Cleveland will do to build around their franchise player. In Garrett’s eight seasons in Ohio, the Browns have only qualified for the playoffs twice and won one postseason game.  

With the Browns holding the second overall pick in the 2025 NFL Draft after a disappointing 3-14 season, all eyes will be on what General Manager Andrew Berry does to surround Garrett with quality talent moving forward. 

Sam Darnold joins Seahawks after Geno Smith trade 

When the Seahawks traded their starting quarterback Geno Smith to the Las Vegas Raiders, it raised a lot of eyebrows as it left Seattle with a void at the quarterback position — but it was all part of their plan in signing free agent Sam Darnold to a three-year deal. 

Darnold is coming off his best season of his career in Minnesota, where he led the Vikings to a 14-3 record while recording career highs in completion percentage (66.2 per cent), passing yards (4,319), touchdowns (35) and passer rating (102.5) to finish as a finalist for the AP Comeback Player of the Year award. 

While Darnold’s career trajectory seems to be trending upwards, the Seahawks are still taking a ton of risk in trading Smith, who’s been a solid quarterback during his tenure in Seattle, and throwing $110.5 million to Darnold, who, quite frankly, has only had one good season in his career. 

His lows have hit rock bottom, throwing more interceptions than touchdowns in both the 2020 and 2021 seasons when he played for the New York Jets and Carolina Panthers, respectively. 

Only time will tell if this was the right move by Seattle, and it’ll be interesting to see which version of Sam Darnold will be on display in the Pacific Northwest. 

D.K. Metcalf traded to Pittsburgh and signs five-year contract 

Another former Seahawk will don a new jersey in 2025, but in Metcalf’s case, it was his choice. 

After requesting a trade out of Seattle, Metcalf got his wish and was traded to the Pittsburgh Steelers, with whom he immediately signed a five-year, $150 million contract. 

For Metcalf, the change of scenery makes sense as he’s coming off a career-low five touchdown receptions as well as 992 receiving yards, which was his lowest since his rookie season. 

From the Steelers’ perspective, Pittsburgh now has a franchise play-maker — something they’ve lacked since the departure of Antonio Brown in 2019. Paired with young, developing star George Pickens, the Steelers could field one of the best wide receiver duos in the AFC this season. 

However, putting a caveat on that possibility is the quarterback position. The Steelers only have Mason Rudolph signed for next season, who has only started 18 games in his career, and are likely hoping to sign a veteran passer who can elevate the Pittsburgh offence to compete with the behemoths of the AFC North. 

Cooper Kupp added to new Seattle offence following cut from Rams 

The Seahawks’ offensive overhaul continued as they signed Cooper Kupp, who was released from the Los Angeles Rams earlier in the week, to a three-year, $45 million contract to shape their new-look offence. 

Kupp has been one of the best receivers in the game since his debut in 2017, making his release rather shocking to many in the football community. 

The 31-year-old was a key component in Los Angeles’ Super Bowl LVI victory, where he was named Super Bowl MVP following a historical regular season when he led the league with 1,947 yards, 16 receiving touchdowns and 145 catches — making him the first player to lead the NFL in all three categories since Steve Smith Jr. in 2005. 

It’s important to note, however, that Kupp has dealt with injuries over the last three seasons and hasn’t played a full 17-game schedule since the 2021 campaign. 

If there’s a theme of the Seahawks’ offseason, it’s risk, as Kupp and Darnold fit the bill of potentially being two of the greatest free agent signings of all-time, or conversely, two of the worst. 

Davante Adams signs with Rams after New York release 

Continuing the wide receiver carousel, Davante Adams has signed a two-year, $46 million deal with the Rams, seemingly filling the slot left from Kupp’s departure. 

Adams had an interesting 2024 season, suiting up for three games with the Las Vegas Raiders before being shipped to New York to join friend and former teammate Aaron Rodgers on the Jets. Despite the happy reunion, the team lacked success, causing New York to move in a different direction and release the six-time all-star in the offseason. 

Even during the circus that was 2024, Adams still recorded his sixth 1,000-plus yard season in only 14 games played and should excel with a veteran quarterback in Matthew Stafford and the stability in Los Angeles’ system. 

Coupled with the explosive Puka Nacua, the Rams duo is set to become the best pass-catching pair in the NFC and possibly the NFL. With this very high ceiling, there aren’t many downsides to the move as L.A. pushes for their fifth postseason appearance in the last six years. 

— 

With plenty of moves happening early in the offseason and many more deals expected over the coming weeks and months, the NFL may not be on our televisions yet, but it is certainly dominating our timelines. 

For all the updates as transactions happen, visit nfl.com. 

Dissecting the embarrassing Trump-Vance meeting with Zelenskyy 

On Feb. 28, U.S. President Donald Trump met with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to discuss strategies for dealing with the Russo-Ukrainian War that has ravaged the streets of Ukraine since the Russian invasion over three years ago. What ensued can’t simply be described as a failed negotiation — the meeting put the embarrassing ineptitude of the Trump administration on display for the whole world to see. 

The meeting came just over a week after Trump referred to Zelenskyy as a “dictator” in a heated exchange, a moment that makes me wonder whether Trump is flat-out lying or if he’s actually stupid enough to believe that to be true. 

Like any democratic country, Ukraine holds governmental elections to determine their leader. When Trump said that Zelenskyy “refuses to have elections,” it’s likely he was referring to the fact that Ukraine’s spring 2024 election process was cancelled because Ukraine has been under martial law since Russia’s 2022 invasion. It’s important to point out that delaying elections in wartime is completely ordinary and has occurred in several countries across the globe over the last century. 

Regardless, when the meeting between the two leaders began in the Oval Office on Feb. 28, Trump clearly wasn’t entering the conversation with an open mind. Before Zelenskyy even stepped foot into the building, Trump mocked the Ukrainian leader for not wearing a suit, joking with reporters that “he’s all dressed up today.” 

For the record, Zelenskyy’s attire — a black sweatshirt displaying the Ukrainian trident — isn’t the figurative middle-finger to the U.S. that Trump and his cronies are making it out to be. Zelenskyy has said he chooses clothing in solidarity with his soldiers fighting on the front lines. 

But Trump, a known draft dodger, wouldn’t understand what it’s like to stand courageously in support of his country. He’s out for himself and his massive ego, something we continued to see as he sat down with Zelenskyy for conversation. 

The mockery and bullying of Zelenskyy throughout the 49-minute conversation are certainly difficult to watch. Trump made several mentions of his efforts speaking to the Russian leader and actual dictator Vladimir Putin, as if he was going to suddenly keep his word on the battlefield after committing a series of heinous war crimes that have caused the International Criminal Court to put out a warrant for his arrest. 

Despite all of this, Trump seemed bewildered by Zelenskyy’s “tremendous hatred” for Putin, saying it’s hard to “make a deal with that kind of hate.” He also made sure to mention that “the other side isn’t exactly in love with [Zelenskyy] either.” 

Zelenskyy, of course, has every reason to hate Putin. The Russian war criminal is responsible for the widespread destruction of Ukraine, causing the deaths of 46,000 Ukrainian soldiers, forcing millions of Ukrainians to seek refuge, and bombing children’s and maternity hospitals, to name a few examples. There shouldn’t be any reason to question Zelenskyy’s hatred or play “devil’s advocate” in this situation. 

This causes even more reason to believe that Trump has somehow aligned himself with Putin. He seems to see Putin as a brother-in-arms, having said that the Russian leader “went through a hell of a lot with me,” hinting at a sense of solidarity with the dictator. This, of course, would make Zelenskyy a common enemy. 

After half an hour of Trump taking questions from the press, the conversation erupted into angry disagreements between the leaders, particularly from Trump and  Vice President J.D. Vance. 

Vance launched into a confusing and somewhat childish tirade about how it’s “disrespectful” for Zelenskyy to discuss these issues in front of the American media and telling the Ukrainian leader that he “should be thanking” Trump for trying to help achieve a ceasefire. He then accused Zelenskyy of bringing people on a “propaganda tour,” as Trump smugly sat there enjoying every moment. 

First off: despite Vance’s claims of disrespect, Zelenskyy has repeatedly thanked Americans and U.S. leaders since the start of the Russian invasion — at least 33 times, in fact. Vance’s rage seems not to be borne of Zelenskyy’s insufficient gratitude; it’s more likely he’s upset with the fact that Zelenskyy doesn’t immediately agree with Trump on everything he says. 

Second, this point created a massive distraction in the conversation, bringing the leaders away from peace talks and toward debating whether Zelenskyy was thankful enough for Trump’s goal of helping end the conflict in Ukraine. 

For a moment, it became unclear whether this was a high-level government meeting or a group of kindergarteners trying to accuse each other of not using their manners. It was confusing and strange, but also emblematic of the short-sighted and impulsive decision-making process often used by the Trump administration. 

Zelenskyy attempted to respond by warning the American leaders that succumbing to Putin would eventually cause them problems of their own: “Even you [will have problems], but you have [a] nice ocean [separating you from Russia] and don’t feel [it] now. But you will feel it in the future.” 

This genuine, valuable warning seemed to only frustrate Trump further, presumably because it insinuates that his new buddy Vladimir Putin might go back on his word.  

“Don’t tell us what we’re going to feel,” said Trump. “We’re trying to solve a problem. Don’t tell us what we’re going to feel, because you’re in no position to dictate that. You’re in no position to dictate how we’re gonna feel. We’re gonna feel very good. We’re gonna feel very good and very strong. You’re right now not in a very good position. You’ve allowed yourself to be in a very bad position, and [Vance] happens to be right about it.” 

As Zelenskyy tried to interject and re-iterate his point, the U.S. President continued rambling, reminding Zelenskyy that he’s powerless without the support of the U.S. government. 

The display from Trump was not only deeply sad –– it was embarrassing. 

This is the leader of a global superpower failing to understand a warning about why you shouldn’t align yourself with a dictator and war criminal, and getting defensive about how untouchable he is. It’s the kind of showing that you can only imagine other democratic world leaders cringing at while Putin enjoys every second. 

In typical far-right fashion, reporter Brian Glenn gleefully continued the mockery of Zelenskyy’s attire by berating the Ukrainian leader in front of Trump and Vance. 

“Why don’t you wear a suit? You’re at the highest level in this country’s office, and you refuse to wear a suit. Just want to see — do you own a suit? A lot of Americans have problems with you not respecting this office.” 

During the one-sided exchange, Vance could be seen with a visible smile on his face as he soaked in the verbal attack on the Ukrainian leader. The utter unprofessionalism and disrespect shown by Glenn and Vance are unbefitting of a high-level meeting between world leaders, and Trump allowing it to continue proved that he’s no better. 

We’re in a difficult moment right now. The future is more uncertain than ever as the U.S. government is overtaken by short-sighted individuals only out for themselves and “great television.” Four more years of this is going to be frustrating, scary and sad. 

And now you can add another word to that list: turns out it’s also going to be deeply embarrassing. 

Diving into the subreddit that hates Taylor Swift 

The behaviour of the Reddit community r/travisandtaylor goes far beyond fair criticism of Taylor Swift — it’s devolved into full-on hating for the sake of hating, with a dash of misogyny. 

Upon entering the subreddit r/travisandtaylor, I expected to find people who are fed up with hearing about Taylor Swift levying justified criticism at the megastar. I thought I might have stumbled upon an interesting place to learn about and respectfully discuss some of the celebrity’s nefarious deeds. 

It turns out I put too much faith in the internet. 

Instead, what I found was a barrage of unnecessary and concerning hatred being thrown at Swift, oftentimes for what appeared to be the supposed crime of simply existing. 

The subreddit, which boasts a staggering 150,000+ members as of writing, makes its mission clear in the community’s description: 

“We’re here to roast and criticize Taylor Swift’s PR stunts (looking at you, Travis), her questionable ethics and the never-ending antics she wants fans to (literally) buy. If you’re here to defend Mother, you’ve come to the wrong place. Let us be clear: fan behaviour will incur bans, and harassment of our members will be reported to Reddit admins. Remember, ‘silence is actually showing restraint.’” 

I quickly realized that my idea of a safe haven to constructively criticize T-Swift was falling apart before my eyes. If the moderators were willing to enact bans on people for speaking in support of Swift, then there’s no way this community could facilitate any proper discussions. Silencing the voices of those who disagree with their narrative and rejecting such arguments by equating it to “fan behaviour” means there’s no feasible way to respond to inaccurate claims that might be made by this army of haters. 

To be fair, the moderators have every right to do this. It might be censoring an entire side of a fairly interesting argument, but as long as they hold power over the subreddit, they’re not technically obligated to allow free discussion on their platform. It might be unfortunate, but they still hold the authority to make their own decisions on who they allow in their community. 

However, this also means we cannot possibly consider this subreddit a place that’s trying to find or share the truth. If this were the case, they would allow people on both sides of the argument to speak their minds. The fact that speaking out in support of Swift is banned proves that this community isn’t interested in meaningful discussion or constructive criticism — they’re just here to hate, and they seem fine with that. 

Now, let’s be clear: there are various valid criticisms that can and should be directed at Swift. Things like her ludicrous amount of jet usage and her suspicious tendency to stop younger women artists from topping the charts through timed releases definitely deserve investigation and criticism — and believe me, this subreddit is full of that. But that just makes this feel like even more of a wasted opportunity, since again, this community is more interested in blind hatred than actually getting to the truth. 

I’m no fan of celebrity worship, and I can understand how it might become frustrating constantly hearing about one person all over social media. Yet, it needs to be recognized that Swift having accrued a massive fanbase doesn’t justify transforming her into a communal verbal punching bag. No one is forced to be a fan of Swift’s, nor do they have to enjoy her music, and she shouldn’t be thrown under the bus through strangely personal attacks meant to discredit her character for the sole purpose of joining a bandwagon online. If you’re going to attack someone’s character, do it when their actions have justified it, not just because you’re tired of hearing about them, which is exactly what I suspect is going on here. 

So, what exactly are these posts? Here are some of the subreddit’s most topical posts as of writing. 

“She’s been making up stories and playing the victim since the beginning,” reads the title of one post sharing an old video of Swift describing her supposed friends lying to her. To back up this baseless assumption, the poster adds that “this is obviously a lie, we all know Taylor was and still is the mean girl bully. This really showcases her need to always be seen as an innocent victim. It also shows her lack of creativity because, really? She couldn’t have come up with a more believable sob story? She should have asked one of her ghostwriters for help.” 

Yikes. And the comments are just as bad: 

“Even if it is true, it just shows that no one liked her, probably [because] she was a bully lol,” reads one of the top comments. 

“Classic narcissist behaviour. They love to paint themselves as the victims and life’s underdog,” assumes another. 

“I don’t blame the friends. Would you want to hang out with someone who is all about herself and constantly needs attention?!?” another adds. 

As you can likely imagine, the remainder of the 120+ comments on this post are more of the same. More assumptions, more accusations and more insults. 

Remember that these commenters aren’t here to actually discuss Swift’s behaviour from a realistic perspective; by the subreddit rules’ own implied admission, they’re here just to berate her. While it’s technically possible that Swift is indeed a “mean girl,” they have no way to know this for certain, and are flinging verbal attacks in her direction while operating under the assumption that they’re all true. 

It’s also ironic that many of these commenters are attacking Swift based on her supposedly being a “mean girl” when they themselves seem much meaner than anything I can find about Taylor online. It might be fun to hide behind the veil of anonymity provided by a computer screen and keyboard, but it brings into question whether these commenters are equally unpleasant to their online personas in real life. 

Regardless, let’s look at another post: 

“​​At this point, she really can’t stand Travis,” reads another post in reference to NFL player and Swift’s boyfriend Travis Kelce. 

“Honestly, I don’t think their relationship is completely fake — they are dating — but they’re both in it for their own benefit. I think they pretend to be interested in each other, even in private, though they both know it’s all just for show. But after the Super Bowl, Taylor couldn’t even fake it anymore, and that’s why they disappeared for a while. It would’ve made sense for them to show up somewhere after the game to make it look like Taylor still supports and loves Travis. But she was so done with him she couldn’t even pretend. Now that they’ve been spotted again, all we’ve got is a blurry video where Taylor’s face is completely out of sight. She doesn’t even try to put on a mask of interest anymore. Maybe she’ll pull it together, and they’ll go back to their usual lovey-dovey act soon. But it won’t last long. She’s clearly had enough of him. This is just my opinion, but I’d love to hear yours!” 

(…provided, of course, that “your opinion” agrees with this post, otherwise you might find yourself banned from the subreddit for disagreeing with the hivemind.) 

It’s equal parts humorous and disconcerting that this community spends so much time obsessing over Taylor Swift, inspecting clips of her relationship to find evidence supporting their theory that everyone in her personal life hates her and she’s a miserable person to be around. 

There seems to be some type of obsession going on here; it’s almost a cult-like mentality where anyone who disagrees with the general sentiment is ostracized and excluded. This community clearly has an extreme interest in Taylor’s personal life, conducting detective work with old clips and analyzing any blurry footage they can find. This hatred, in a strange way, seems parasocial. 

Wait a moment — this sounds kind of familiar, doesn’t it? 

Could it be that these ravenous haters are just as obsessed with Taylor Swift as the celebrity’s parasocial fans that they outwardly despise so strongly? Is it possible that the cult-like mentality of Taylor’s most obsessive fans extends to the philosophy of her biggest critics? 

See, what these people don’t realize is that they’ve fallen into the same trap as Taylor’s parasocial fans; the only difference is that they’re revelling in their shared hatred rather than shared support. To someone like me, who is neither a fan nor a critic of Swift’s, they just appear like two separate groups who share a joint obsession with Taylor Swift. 

It’s also hard not to see this whole thing as misogynistic. While I’m not trying to suggest that some men don’t face online hate campaigns of their own, it’s a little tricky trying to imagine Swift getting this same backlash if she were a man. Would her apparent “mean girl” attributes be seen as perseverance and passion? Would her romantic relationships be praised rather than deeply scrutinized? Would people place a greater focus on her accomplishments rather than trying to find reasons to tear her down? 

Indeed, it feels like part of this aggression would be curbed if Swift simply wasn’t a woman. While none of these critics come right out and say they’re being especially harsh on her for this reason, it’s difficult to imagine she’d face this same whirlwind of rage if she were a man. 

Either way, that doesn’t stop this community from being one devoted to hating Taylor Swift, unintentionally sharing the same parasocial obsession with her most devoted fans. If these people dislike her so strongly, perhaps they’d be better off not spending so much time thinking about her and instead going on to focus on things they do enjoy. 

There may be a sense of excitement that comes from complaining on a computer like a de facto keyboard warrior, but especially in turbulent times like this, maybe it’s time to focus on putting a bit more positivity into the world rather than rotting in hatred over people whose lives don’t affect your own. 

Canadian players making an impact in the WNBA  

0

Canadian players are making serious waves in the WNBA, bringing international experience and talent to a league now thriving at the highest level. 

Over the past few years, the influx of Canadian talent has been impossible to ignore, with both established veterans and new-wave rookies proving they can hold their own at the highest level of women’s basketball.  

Kia Nurse has been at the forefront of Canada’s rise in women’s basketball. The Hamilton, Ontario, guard was drafted 10th overall in 2018 and wasted no time making an impression. She’s built a reputation as a tough perimeter defender who isn’t afraid to take the big shots. Her time with the New York Liberty showed she could be a primary scoring option, and later with the Phoenix Mercury and Seattle Storm, she proven she can adjust her game to fit different team dynamics. Injuries have slowed her down at times, but she’s remained a steady presence in the league, bringing a level of grit and professionalism that teams value. 

Bridget Carleton, from Chatham, Ontario, has taken a more under-the-radar path but has quietly become one of the WNBA’s most reliable role players. She wasn’t a top draft pick, but her ability to adapt and contribute in different ways makes her an important player. Now with the Minnesota Lynx, Carleton defends the post, makes smart passes and hits timely shots. In other words, she is the kind of player every team needs.  

While players like Nurse and Carleton have already established their roles, the next generation of Canadian talent is arriving fast. Aaliyah Edwards, a forward from Kingston, Ontario, is one of the most promising young players to enter the league in recent years. She dominated at UConn, where her mix of size, athleticism and skill made her a nightmare opponent. Drafted sixth overall by the Washington Mystics in 2024, Edwards has wasted no time adjusting to the WNBA’s pace. She’s an amazing rebounder with a tough interior presence who plays with intensity. Her ability to outwork opponents makes her stand out, and she’s already proving to be a solid addition to Washington’s rotation.  

Laeticia Amihere, another rising star from Mississauga, Ontario, is following a similar trajectory. Coming out of South Carolina, where she played under Dawn Staley and won an NCAA title, Amihere entered the WNBA because of her defensive versatility. She’s got the wingspan and athleticism to guard multiple positions, making her a valuable asset in a league that’s always looking for players who can switch defensively. She’s still finding her role, but it’s clear that her combination of size and mobility will make her a problem for opponents in the coming seasons.  

Canada’s influence on the WNBA isn’t just temporary — it reflects how much the country’s basketball culture has evolved. The days of Canadian players being seen as outsiders in the league are slowly disappearing. Now, they’re key members of their teams, playing important minutes and helping shape the way the game is played. As the WNBA continues to grow, so will the number of Canadians making an impact. The talent pipeline isn’t slowing down, and it’s clear that Canadian players aren’t just here to fit in — they’re here to compete, to win and to make an everlasting impression.  

Trump’s remarks spark tensions in Canadian sports  

0

The impacts of politics on sports have become increasingly apparent, particularly in the context of recent events involving the United States and Canada.   

This month, U.S. President Donald Trump imposed a 25 per cent tariff on steel and aluminum imports on Canada, citing the need to protect the U.S.’s domestic industries. Canada’s Liberals, recognizing that Trump had started a trade war, responded with retaliatory tariffs totaling nearly $30 billion CAD on U.S. imports, encompassing a wide array of products including sports equipment. Canadian Finance Minister Dominic LeBlanc emphasized that these measures were necessary to safeguard Canada’s economic interests in light of U.S. actions.  

The inclusion of sports equipment in the tariff list has direct implications for Canadian athletes and sport organizations. Increased costs for equipment such as hockey sticks, helmets and protective gear could strain budgets, particularly for amateur and youth sports programs that operate with limited funding.  

Moreover, this financial pressure may lead to reduced participation rates, even potentially hindering the development of future Canadian athletes.  

The political-economic tensions have now spilled into the cultural fabric of sports, intensifying nationalistic fervor between the neighboring countries. The example that’s made the most headlines in this respect was the inaugural 4 Nations Face-Off hockey tournament in February, featuring teams from Canada, the United States, Finland and Sweden. The tournament occurred amidst escalating political tension, notably Trump’s suggestion that Canada could become the 51st U.S. state — a proposal met with widespread condemnation in Canada.  

The political climate heightened the stakes of the Canada-U.S. matchups. In Montreal, Canadian fans expressed their discontent by booing the U.S. national anthem before a game against the American team. This sentiment was reciprocated in Boston, where American fans booed “O Canada” during the tournament’s final.  

This trend has proven to extend beyond hockey as well. At a recent Toronto Raptors basketball game, fans booed the American national anthem, reflecting the growing tensions after Trump’s imposition of tariffs on Canadian imports. Similar reactions were observed at NHL games in Ottawa and Calgary indicating a national unity in sentiment towards the actions of the U.S. government. 

The political climate also influences the performance of national symbols. During the 4 Nations Face-Off championship game, Canadian singer Chantal Kreviazuk modified the lyrics of “O Canada” as a form of protest against Trump’s remarks about annexations. She changed “in all of us command” to “that only us command,” emphasizing Canadian sovereignty. Kreviazuk later explained that her alteration was a deliberate statement against abuses of power.  

These incidents illustrate the deep impact political statements and actions can have on sports events. They not only shape the atmosphere in arenas but also influence the behaviour of fans, athletes and even national leaders. Political tension intensifies sports rivalries, and this is bad for both the integrity of competition and the sports culture. It shifts the focus from athletic excellence to political grandstanding, creating a divisive atmosphere where games become proxy battles for national disputed rather than moments of shared experience. Instead of uniting people through sports, these tensions create hostility, turning arenas into sites of conflict rather than celebration. The more politics infiltrate sports in this way, the harder it becomes to maintain the purity of competition, where respect, teamwork and fair play should be at the forefront.  

Ivanov and O’Connor lead Brock to victory  

0

Michael Ivanov and Tatum O’Connor made history for the Badgers, crowning them as Brock University’s student athletes of the week.  

For the first time in Brock University history, the track and field team can boast a national gold medalist. Michael Ivanov, a third-year athlete from Niagara Falls, cemented his place in the record books with a dominant performance at the 2025 U SPORTS Championships on March 8. Competing in the men’s pole vault, Ivanov not only won gold but set a new personal best, clearing 5.12 metres in an exciting moment that had the crowd on its feet. The victory marked a milestone not only for Ivanov but for Brock’s entire track field team, as it secured the team’s first-ever U SPORTS gold.  

Ivanov entered the competition with confidence, successfully clearing four different heights before securing the win with a 4.90-metre jump. Rather than stopping there, he pushed himself further, attempting — and succeeding — in clearing 5.12 metres on his first attempt. His final jump was an impressive 32 centimetres higher than the second-place finisher, Emmanuel Desilets of the Western Mustangs, who cleared 4.80 metres.  

The win capped off a remarkable season for Ivanov, who dominated the pole vault event at both the Ontario University Athletics (OUA) and U SPORTS Championships. His consistency throughout the year earned him Brock University’s Athlete of the Week honours three times and his gold-medal performance at nationals solidified his status as one of the best athletes in the country. 

Meanwhile, Brock’s swimming program also had a historic moment, thanks to second-year swimmer Tatum O’Connor. The Dundas-born athlete delivered an outstanding performance at the U SPORTS Championships, ending a 23-year medal drought for Brock’s swim team. Her ability to rise to the occasion and perform under pressure showcased not only her individual talent but the growth of Brock’s swimming team. 

O’Connor’s first breakthrough came on March 7, when she claimed bronze in the 50-metre backstroke with a time of 27.65 seconds. The following night, she built on that success, earning a second bronze in the 100-metre backstroke with a time of 1:00.31. Her speed and precision in the water made her one of the standout performers of the championship. She came within milliseconds of adding a third medal to her collection in the 50-metre butterfly, finishing just outside of a podium position in fourth place with a time of 27.40 seconds. 

Her performance at nationals was the perfect ending to a season filled with success. Earlier in the year, O’Connor dominated the OUA Championships, winning three gold medals and one silver. Her ability to consistently perform at the high level earned her Brock’s Athlete of the Week award on three separate occasions. Her progression from a strong provincial competitor to a national medalist is proof of her dedication and steady improvement.  

The significance of Ivanov and O’Connor’s achievements are more than just their individual successes. Their performances have helped elevate Brock University’s reputations in U SPORTS, proving that its athletic programs can compete with the best in the country.  

Looking ahead, both athletes still have more to accomplish. Ivanov, with another year of eligibility left, has the opportunity to defend his title and push his limits even further. If his progression continues, he could set sights on representing Canada on the international stage. O’Connor, only in her second year, has already positioned herself as one of the top swimmers in U SPORTS. With more experience and training, she has the potential to turn her national bronze medals to gold.  

A maple syrup lover’s paradise: Check out a local Niagara Region treasure, White Meadows Farm

0

Looking for something fun to do this spring? Check out White Meadows Farm.  

White Meadows Farm, located on the outskirts of St. Catharines, is a locally run farm that has belonged to the Bering family since 1937. However, it wasn’t until nearly 60 years after the family settled on the 200 acres of cropland that they found their farm’s claim to fame — maple syrup.  

Known locally for this sweet and sticky treat, White Meadows Farm sells maple syrup in stores all around the Niagara Region. The Maple Sweet Shop, located at 2519 Effingham St., is their main location and is situated on the farm itself. Their other two stores are located at 27 Queen St., Niagara-on-the-Lake, and 6380 Fallsview Blvd., Niagara Falls.  

While maple syrup is the farm’s main product, the business also benefits from guided tours held between March and October. The farm is open throughout most of the year, but due to their Sugar Bush Trek and Discover Maple Sugar Bush Tour, the Bering family and their staff welcome most of their visitors from the early days of spring until the late days of fall.  

The Sugar Bush Trek is a nearly two-hour-long excursion offered every weekend from March 1 to April 13. The trek starts aboard the “Sugar Shuttle,” which takes guests on a 10-minute drive through the meadows and cropland of the farm. After this, visitors are guided on a 45-minute walking tour that educates them on the sugar maple tree and the history of making maple syrup. At the end of the tour, visitors can participate in a rite of passage for children born in Canada: eating maple taffy on snow. 

The Discover Maple Sugar Bush Tour is a little longer at nearly two-and-a-half hours long. Offered on weekends from May 17 to Oct. 26 and daily from June 30 to Aug. 29, this tour follows a similar itinerary to the Sugar Bush Trek, but ends with a tasting of four flavours of maple syrup: golden, amber, dark and very dark.  

While the Sugar Bush Trek and the Discover Maple Sugar Bush Tour are geared toward young children and families, White Meadows Farm also offers tasting boards for an older audience. From May 17 to Aug. 29, visitors can enjoy either a classic or deluxe maple-inspired charcuterie board paired with a glass of maple iced tea.  

Enjoyed by generations of Niagara Region locals, the White Meadows Farm experience is a great way to spend a cold spring morning or a sunny summer afternoon.  

DART Invitationals provide a unique audition process at Brock 

0

High school students across Canada are preparing for Brock University’s upcoming DART Invitationals. 

DART, an acronym that refers to the Dramatic Arts program at Brock University, recently held their first annual invitational of the year on March 1. Students who received a conditional offer of admission to the Bachelor of Arts (Honours) Dramatic Arts or Bachelor of Arts (Honours)/Dramatic Arts Concurrent Education programs were invited to attend the invitational, held at the Marilyn I. Walker School of Fine & Performing Arts (MIWSFPA), as a part of their admissions process.  

Unlike other, more traditional auditions, students who attended the invitational participated in a series of workshops that allowed them to develop introductory skills in performance, creation, design and production. The day gave students an opportunity to use what they learned to work together and create a piece of theatre with their peers.   

In preparation for the second invitational on May 3, The Brock Press spoke to DART student Adia Buckle — who participated in the process in May 2024 — about her experience being a part of the event. 

Buckle said while she got nervous driving herself from her hometown of Hamilton, she was “so excited to create.”  

The day started with a series of activities that allowed Buckle and her fellow classmates to get comfortable in the space they would be working in. The attendees, having been asked to read Sophocles’ play Antigone, all came with an essay they had prepared about the work. Their reading and writing helped guide them, inspiring many of the pieces they worked on throughout the day.  

This work was facilitated by upper-year student volunteers, professors and other Brock staff, allowing students like Buckle the opportunity to meet some of their future DART peers. David Vivian, a professor in the Dramatic Arts department at Brock, said he thinks professors and the current students are the heart of the DART invitational experience. 

“The Chair of the Department, Jennifer Roberts Smith, and the Invitational team of faculty and students, begin the day with presentations to the applicants and their parents and guardians about the program […] and then about the ideas that circulate in and inform our understanding of the play that we have asked our applicants to come prepared to investigate and explore during the day [of the invitational],” said Vivian. 

By allowing students to work with their prospective instructors, Vivian believes DART places all their applicants on a path to success for when they arrive in September. The process also allows students to get acquainted with the campus. 

“I had an opportunity to meet some of my future classmates,” said Buckle, an experience that gave her and her peers something to talk about when classes started in the fall. “Even figuring out where the bathrooms were prior to the first week of school was a comfort to me in those first days of university where everything was a little scary.” 

But most meaningful to Buckle was the experience she had working with her group to create a piece of theatre. “The moment where all of us were excitedly brainstorming, our passion at an all-time high,” said Buckle, “that is my favourite part of theatre creation.”  

While Buckle has spent much of her life working in the theatre world, she said the adrenaline of that moment is what draws her back to the work time after time. Getting to work alongside fellow artists and creatives helped cement her choice to pursue studies in dramatic arts at Brock University.  

Creating this feeling is the goal for Vivian and the other event organizers, as Vivian said participants often report that the experience helped them make sure they were making the right choice.  

“[Students] often remark that our methods and the context of learning at the MIWSFPA are different than what they’ve experienced when applying for other programs,” said Vivian, “and that by participating in the Invitational, they’ve discovered something that is unique and attractive to them.” 

Vivian, much like the students who attend the invitational, has found that his favourite part of the process is getting to learn about applicants’ dreams and hopes for the future, as well as what matters most in their lives. 

“Our applicants never fail to impress us with the depth and breadth of their passion for making theatre,” said Vivian, “whether by teaching theatre to youth in their future careers as teachers, as theatre artists, content generators, scholars and researchers, [or] as entrepreneurs and community leaders who want to make change in our world.”  

The work that Vivian and his colleagues are doing is important and timely, shaping young artistic minds to ensure the future of dramatic arts is in exceptionally good hands.  

BMT brings a fresh, fun take on “Grease” 

0

Brock Musical Theatre’s take on the all-time classic Grease was bold, fun and blew the audience away.  

As the doors opened and I strolled inside to find my seat with a glossy program in hand, I quickly found myself immersed in the world of Rydell High School.  

While the Robertson Theatre is a relatively small space, the set design for Brock Musical Theatre’s production of Grease was still quite impressive, especially with the limited budget sizes BUSU clubs are typically alloted. Prioritizing dynamic movement and interesting levels, the set consisted of raised metal platforms and rudimentary scaffolding, the latter of which created a catwalk above the set’s main level. A few rubber tires accented the corners of the stage and a banner featuring images of period-popular stars such as James Dean and Marilyn Monroe hung overhead. Although the set was simple, it was incredibly effective. Although a rather small touch, the pre-show playlist, which featured 1950s hits, expertly rounded out the theatre’s atmosphere and showcased the creative team’s commitment to audience immersion.  

As the lights went dark and the overture began to play, we were introduced to an older woman played by Lucy Burnett. Referred to as “Greaser Lady” in the program, Burnett took centre stage to reminisce, flipping through the 1959 edition of the Rydell High School yearbook. As the overture ended and the stage flooded with the rest of the cast taking their places to sing “Alma Mater,” the show took shape and sprung to life. 

Throughout the first act, the audience was introduced to the host of characters that occupied Northwest Chicago’s Rydell High at the tail end of the 1950s. 

The Pink Ladies — Rizzo (Anna Varga), Frenchie (Abbey Rivers), Marty (Kashvi Sharma) and Jan (Moria Vaughan-Lee) — lit up the space with their bright back-and-forth banter and hilarious one-liners. Vaughan-Lee’s portrayal of Jan was especially electric as she balanced expert vocals and perfect comedic timing. 

The Greaser Guys — Kenickie (Cam Playter), Sonny (Tejay Morley), Roger (Sidd Goyal) and Doody (Natali Tobar) — were also standouts. Playter’s Kenickie was bold, and the characters of Sonny and Roger skillfully walked the fine line between unbelievably ridiculous and perfectly goofy. The gender-bent portrayal of Doody by Tobar shone the brightest, her jokes and gags always managing to pull a full-bellied laugh from the audience.  

The comradery that existed between the two gangs throughout the whole show was arguably the highlight of the production. It was easy to believe that a deep friendship existed between both groups and that this had been the case for many years, highlighting the strong connection shared between the cast members.  

Still, the relationship between Emily Moore’s Sandy Dumbrowski and Landon Drexler’s Danny Zuko was truly the heart of the show.  

Moore’s portrayal of the girl next door Sandy Dumbrowski was beyond strong. While it can be difficult to believably play quiet innocence in a musical theatre production where everything must be exaggerated, Moore did a great job of playing Sandy’s sweet personality, yet her demeanor wasn’t so small that she was lost in the crowd.  

Drexler’s portrayal of bad boy Danny Zuko was dynamic and new. It was clear that Drexler made a conscious choice to shift from the way Danny’s character is often played. He made him a hopeless goofball rather than a major jerk, leaning into the character’s awkwardness and cringing at himself in a way that made his portrayal of Danny feel incredibly human.  

While the cast occasionally struggled to find the balance between accentuating the show’s unique humour and being so goofy that the characters began to feel unbelievable, there was no doubt that they worked hard to bring this production to life.  

The dance numbers, choreographed by Emma Clarke, were clean and well-rehearsed, showcasing the amount of work the cast and dance captain Moira Vaughan-Lee put into learning Clarke’s hard-hitting choreography. The show’s choral sections were also fine-tuned and the cast’s expert ability to harmonize was well showcased. The show’s musical director, Bailey Williams, and vocal captain, Sidd Goyal, clearly prepared the cast well.  

Other elements of the show such as sound and light design were good, although they sometimes left more to be desired. The set transitions felt clunky at times with many of them occurring while the stage lights were still on, which took the audience out of their state of suspended disbelief. Furthermore, there were a few instances when an actor began to speak or sing before their microphone had been turned on, temporarily breaking the immersion. While these issues likely came as a result of the cast and crew not being allowed ample time to rehearse in the theatre space before the production opened, these technical problems should have been less of a problem by the midway point of the show’s run.  

Still, with a relatively small budget, Brock Musical Theatre did an excellent job with their production of Grease and should be commended for their ability to make such magic with the resources they had. The cast and crew’s commitment to both the production of the show and the creation of its characters made the aforementioned complaints seem rather small at the end of the night.  

“The Giving Tree” isn’t as bad as people say 

0

The Giving Tree has faced a lot of rightful criticism over the years, but the book is still a very important piece of literature. 

For those unaware of the classic children’s book originally published in 1964, Shel Silverstein’s The Giving Tree is about a Tree that loves a Boy so much she gives up everything for him. When I say everything, I mean everything: her apples, her leaves, her branches and her trunk. By the end, she is nothing but a stump and allows the Boy (who is now an old man) to rest on her.  

Throughout the book, the Tree is always happy when the Boy is near, and she enthusiastically gives pieces of herself away because she knows it will make the Boy happy — yet the Boy doesn’t seem to show any sort of gratitude. 

You can see where the negative reviews come in: the two characters share a pretty toxic relationship. The Boy is ungrateful and takes without giving back; meanwhile, the Tree is perfectly happy destroying herself for the Boy. What’s more, there is no happy ending. Sure, it ends with, “And the Tree was happy,” but the image of a lonely stump certainly does not seem happy. The Tree isn’t even a tree anymore! 

The Boy and the Tree have a very complicated relationship. Whether you interpret it as a romantic or platonic relationship, a mother-son dynamic or an environmental analogy, it shows children the flaws of certain relationships; just because a person is happy in a relationship doesn’t mean it’s healthy. 

I’d like to briefly explore the different interpretations. First, the romantic or platonic relationship. In this interpretation, the two people in the relationship are equal, or at least, they should be. The book shows a toxic relationship where one person gives everything for their partner in the hopes of receiving more love but ultimately ends up alone and empty. The mother-son dynamic, on the other hand, is often viewed more positively, although I believe this has begun to shift in the recent years. 

The Tree’s pronouns are she/her on purpose, giving her a motherly feel. The Tree as a mother figure devotes her entire life to the Boy, always being around when he comes asking for more things, always giving everything she can and desperately craving the love of her child. For some mothers, this makes perfect sense, but for the independent woman who values her individuality, this may not be the case.  

There’s a growing shift in the narrative when it comes to motherhood. Motherhood used to be a woman’s purpose, her duty, her greatest joy in life and something she’d be proud to identify with first and foremost. To a lot of women, this is the case; their children are their whole world. Feminist theories, however, argue that a woman is first and foremost an individual. Women should take care of themselves and their children. She shouldn’t destroy herself for her child (unless it’s a life-or-death situation, I suppose). She should care for, love, support and help her child when it makes sense, but she has her own life, her own thoughts and desires, and shouldn’t strip herself (to the stump) for anyone else. 

There’s also the environmental analogy, though it isn’t a very popular one. One could interpret the Tree as being a loving “Mother Earth” figure who allows humanity to take and take without giving back. Most likely though, you’ve interpreted the story as being about one of the first two. 

People’s problem with the book is that, as a children’s story, they feel it should have some moral or important lesson. Instead, the book’s ironic mixing of emotions and lack of happy ending opens up important discussions for kids.  

But this is by no means a bad thing, and it shouldn’t be a point of criticism. The melancholy of The Giving Tree gets kids thinking, asking questions and wondering why the book has such a sad feel to it. It teaches empathy and the difference between compassion and selflessness. It’s a cautionary tale: giving is good, but don’t give your whole self, especially to someone that eagerly takes and never (or rarely) gives back. 

Like real life, the book is not completely positive or negative. The Tree is happy, but the Tree gave everything she had away. The Tree is full of love, and that’s positive, but the fact of the matter is she gave her whole being for a Boy that didn’t love her back nearly as much. Relationships in life can rarely be simplified to “good” or “bad”; there are complications, doubts, fears, resentments and lopsided loves. 

Children will learn this more in depth as they get older, but The Giving Tree is an important preview that gets them thinking at a young age that the world is not all black and white, and relationships certainly aren’t. 

As a children’s book, perhaps it is a bit too adult in its themes, but as a work of art, no one can doubt the cultural impact The Giving Tree has had, hate it or love it. 

However, there’s no doubt some kids also had problems with the book due to the incredibly unflattering and frankly frightening photo of Shel Silverstein on the back, to which I have no defence for.

Mark Carney to be the next Liberal Party leader 

0

Canadian economist Mark Carney has been chosen to take over Justin Trudeau’s position as leader of the Liberal Party and prime minister of Canada. 

On March 9, Carney was named the new leader of the Liberal Party after receiving 131,674 votes from registered Liberals, representing 85.9 per cent of voter support. 

In his victory speech, Carney outlined his initial plans for the new Liberal government. The first thing Carney mentioned was that his Liberal government will remove the consumer carbon tax for families, farmers and small-to-medium-sized businesses.  

During the Liberal leadership debate, Carney prefaced this as one of his biggest priorities, with plans to change the carbon tax so “big polluters” are financially responsible for the environmental damage they contribute to. He also proposed that larger companies should have better access to sustainable options in their production processes to ease their impact on the environment. 

Carney also said that his government will stop the rise in the Capital Gains Tax to incentivize builders to “take risks” with greater rewards. 

Carney has entered leadership in precarious times as Canada’s trade war with the U.S. intensifies. In his speech, he mentioned that Canada’s current retaliatory tariffs will bring maximum impacts to the U.S. economy, with minimum negative effects faced by the Canadian economy. Carney said he will keep Canada’s retaliatory tariffs in place “until the Americans show us respect and until they can join us in making credible and reliable commitments to free and fair trade.” 

The new Prime Minister said the revenues accumulated from the tariffs will go toward protecting Canadian workers in industries affected by Trump’s tariffs, but he did not clarify specifically how the government plans to do so. Days later, when Carney visited a steel plant in Hamilton, Ontario, he elaborated on this sentiment, saying that the Liberal government will strengthen their relationship with industries targeted by Trump and work towards a “comprehensive approach to trade.” 

During his victory speech, Carney said that Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre poses an equal threat to Canadians as President Trump. Carney called Poilievre the type of lifelong politician who “worships at the altar of the free market despite never having made a payroll himself.” Carney also said that Poilievre would “undermine” the Bank of Canada and “let our planet burn.” 

Carney said that Poilievre is not demonstrating leadership, but instead demonstrating “ideology,” saying that his beliefs reject Canadian values of togetherness and express a “fundamental misunderstanding” of the economy. 

Carney reassured his audience that Canadians do have the power to “control [their] economic destiny” despite the threats to their economy. In doing so, Carney once again brought up his plans to create one Canadian economy instead of 13, as he outlined during the Liberal leadership debate. 

Similar themes of unity were prevalent throughout Carney’s victory speech. He continually mentioned the necessity of conquering political polarization and standing unified against threats to Canada’s economy and sovereignty at large, using the stark political polarization in the U.S. as a cautionary tale. 

Carney finished his speech by recognizing his status as an economist but clarified that he cares about the economy not because of his career, but instead because he cares about how the economy affects people. 

Carney is set to be sworn in as the prime minister of Canada on March 14. During this time, he will announce who will serve as his cabinet ministers. 

Carney’s full victory speech can be found on CPAC’s website. 

Brock LINC’s Innovation Showcase takes place March 18 

0

Brock LINC is hosting its fifth annual Innovation Showcase to highlight Brock’s researchers and entrepreneurs’ achievements. 

The Brock Innovation Showcase is an annual event run by Brock LINC (Learn, Innovate, Network and Collaborate) that celebrates Brock University researchers and entrepreneurs who are developing new research-based technologies, startups and partnerships with industry or community organizations. The event will take place at the Rankin Family Pavilion Atrium on March 18 from 5 to 8 p.m. and present students with the opportunity to network with investors, business leaders and industry professionals. Attendees will also be supporting some of Brock’s most driven students, alumni and faculty. 

The Showcase will present several startup companies and technological advances accomplished by Brock students and alumni. 

Brock startups 

Co-founded by Brock alumni Agusia Krzywinska and Adam Henderson, Adjective Noun Studios is a St. Catharines-based interactive media and game development company. They focus on transforming creative visions into engaging interactive experiences, including games, interactive storytelling and VR projects, while also developing their own original IPs for mobile and PC platforms. Their portfolio includes collaborations with CBC Kids, Groupe Media TFO and Huckleberry Films. 

Startup company Fawkes Consulting Inc. tackles the challenges of understaffing and inefficient recruiting methods in 911 dispatch telecommunication centres by offering research-driven candidate selection services. Founder Matthew Cary, who spent 10 years as an ambulance dispatcher, is currently pursuing a Bachelor of Nursing/Master of Nursing degree at Brock University. 

Healthy Habits Coaches equips health professionals with evidence-based tools to support behavioural change. The company provides two key services: personalized health coaching and a globally recognized certification program for health coaches. Co-founders Dr. Sean Locke and PhD student Isabelle Hill have transformed their behavioural research into this innovative venture. 

MosoPlay Games is creating a free-to-play game that blends elements of racing and fighting genres. The studio was co-founded by Cole Bereskin, a fourth-year GAME student, and Alex Fischer, a recent GAME program graduate. 

OBN is transforming DIY estate sales by making the process of decluttering and estate clearance more manageable. Their A.I.-powered, human-supported software enables users to effortlessly photograph, categorize and organize belongings with ease. Leveraging advanced image-recognition technology, OBN swiftly sorts items into categories like Keep, Sell, Donate or Dispose, simplifying decision-making and giving users greater clarity and control over their possessions. Founder Graham McMillan is a LINCubator alumni. 

FrostFit is a wearable cooling device designed to support individuals with thermoregulatory deficiencies. The innovation is led by founder Matt Hodgkinson, an MSc student in Kinesiology and a researcher with Brock’s Exercise and Thermal Physiology labs. Committed to improving heat management, Matt focuses on creating accessible and effective solutions for those in need. 

Technological advances 

Associate Chemistry professor Dr. Jianbo Gao led the Brock University research which has developed new photodetector materials using Silver Selenium and Silver Sulfite quantum dots. Conventional photodetectors often suffer from limited signal efficiency and slow response time, but Dr. Gao’s innovation doubles signal efficiency and responds in picoseconds. This advancement enhances cameras, solar panels and infrared sensors, significantly improving applications in communications, medical imaging and LiDAR technology. 

Dr. Newman Sze, Health Sciences & Canada Research Chair in Mechanisms of Health and Disease, led the development of a new type of immunotherapy for age-related chronic diseases. Aging causes damaged isoDGR-modified proteins to accumulate, leading to inflammation and afflictions like cardiovascular disease, dementia and lung disease. Brock researchers have developed an antibody therapy to remove these harmful proteins, which reduces inflammation and potentially extends one’s healthy lifespan by addressing its root cause. 

Chemistry associate Dr. Tony Yan leads research into the mucosal vaccines Brock researchers are developing by using fluorinated cyclic dinucleotides (FCDs) as adjuvants in oral vaccines, making them safer, more effective and easier for patients. This approach has a broad potential for treating gastrointestinal, respiratory and sexually transmitted infections. 

Dr. Paul Zelisko led researchers in the development of self-healing silicones that repair damage at ambient temperatures, enhancing the durability and extending the lifespans of numerous products. This innovation provides a sustainable, cost-efficient solution for industries like automotive, electronics, and healthcare, enhancing performance and lowering maintenance costs in seals, electronics, and consumer products. 

Brock University researchers have also created a vessel that enhances the sensory experience of alcoholic beverages like wine when paired with virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) headsets. Unlike current solutions that use straws, which limit the sensory experience, this vessel preserves aroma and flavor while integrating wearable technology. It is ideal for the VR/AR industry, tourism and hospitality, consumer testing, sensory training and assistive technologies. 

— 

There will be two awards given out at the Innovation Showcase. The Brock Entrepreneur of the Year Award celebrates and recognizes the most promising entrepreneurs developing their businesses at Brock, highlighting the innovative startups that are shaping the world and inspiring action. The Brock Innovator of the Year Award honours Brock faculty and staff who have demonstrated excellent innovation or commercialization and have successfully translated their research into social or economic impacts. 

The 2025 Innovation Showcase marks the five-year anniversary of the Brock LINC and will feature opening remarks from Brock University President Dr. Lesley Rigg. The event provides an opportunity for the Brock community, industry professionals, investors and community partners to celebrate Brock’s research and commercialization successes.  

Complimentary refreshments and snacks will be provided at the event, along with a cash bar. Registration for this event is required and parking is free. 

The Brock Innovation Showcase is more than just an event — it is a testament to Brock University’s growing reputation as a hub for research, innovation and entrepreneurship. Through the Brock LINC and other initiatives, Brock is fostering a thriving ecosystem of discovery and commercialization, where researchers and entrepreneurs can develop, test and launch their ideas into the marketplace. 

Lana Del Rey’s “Honeymoon” celebrates its 10th anniversary 

0

Lana Del Rey’s Honeymoon still brings crystal-clear images of a white-hot and melodramatic summer 10 years later. 

Released in the early days of September 2015, Honeymoon encapsulates the highs and lows of a romance-filled summer. The 14 sultry odes on the album range from pleads of desperation for a lover to return to depictions of an engulfing romance. 

With Honeymoon, Lana Del Rey, known off-stage as Elizabeth Grant, followed her widely successful debut Born to Die alongside its sister EP Paradise, as well as her dark sophomore work Ultraviolence

Although Honeymoon remains wholly original in Grant’s discography, some of its tracks take influence from the records that preceded it. This is likely because some of Honeymoon’s tracks were envisioned during the creation of Ultraviolence. Tracks like “Freak” and “Art Deco” could have easily appeared on Born to Die, mirroring the sizzling party anthems found on Grant’s debut. Similarly, “Religion” and “The Blackest Day” would thematically fit on Ultraviolence, sharing discussions of blind obsession backlit by a distinctly dark sound. 

Despite some thematic mirroring with her earlier releases, on a sonic level, Honeymoon brings an entirely individualized sound to Grant’s discography. 

In an interview with BBC Radio 1, Grant said that her love for the word “Honeymoon” inspired the album’s title, saying it’s “probably the most romantic word.” 

Grant expanded on Honeymoon’s thematic sound in the interview, saying that the album’s production began with Grant “knowing exactly what [she] was doing” before it progressed into something she didn’t expect. Grant cited the album’s atmospheric “touch of psychedelia” and loud production as unplanned, despite their core influences on the album’s recognizable sound today. 

The album unmistakably takes place in the depths of summer. The fourth track, “God Knows I Tried,” opens with a sizzling noise that replicates the sound of cicadas buzzing on a hot summer night. On “Freak,” Grant plays to her summery setting when comparing the deep summer heat to the way she feels for her lover, expressing that her “hot love’s full of fire.” 

Honeymoon creates an atmosphere of melodrama right from the opening title track “Honeymoon.” The record opens with high pitched violins that fade and rise in intensity before silencing when Grant’s vocals begin. 

The album shifts between depictions of almost reckless feelings of freedom juxtaposed with the desperation that arises in a complicated relationship. On the title track, Grant sings softly about a world where it is just herself and her partner, musing that they could “cruise to the blues” or do “whatever you want to do,” framing her world around their connection. 

Grant’s thematic concern with an almost obsessive romantic connection continues in tracks like “Salvatore,” “Swan Song” and “Religion,” where she declares that her faith to her lover is like a religion. 

However, Honeymoon also explores the flipside of a romance that fully engulfs you, with tracks like “The Blackest Day” depicting the emphasized pain that comes when her lover abandons her. In this track, Grant sings that “looking for love / in all the wrong places” led her to being “on [her] own again.” 

Honeymoon is equally melancholic and deeply introspective, with thought-provoking lyrics interrupting the melodrama of several tracks. For example, at the end of the title track “Honeymoon,” after depicting a world where the speaker’s life revolves around her lover, Grant repeatedly sings the lyrics “dreaming away your life” to end the song. 

The album also has a spoken word interlude, where Grant philosophizes for a minute and a half. She asks if “time present and time past / are both perhaps present in time future” before continuing to muse about the concept of time. 

The interlude finishes by relating her philosophical inquiries back to the main thematic focus of the album, with Grant saying that her and her lover’s “footfalls echo in the memory / down the passage which we did not take / towards the door we never opened into the rose garden.” 

The album finishes with a cover of Nina Simone’s famous track “Don’t Let Me Be Misunderstood,” which is more than fitting for the experiences Grant explores on Honeymoon, asking her lover — and listeners themselves — not to judge her for being “just human” with “faults like anyone.” 

Honeymoon is a vast exploration of human emotion, seeking to display that even downward spirals in love can be backlit by beautiful instrumentals and lush images. Despite a decade passing since its release, Honeymoon is as timeless as ever, returning annually to soundtrack sultry summer days. 

Three ways for students to explore Toronto’s art and entertainment scene without breaking the bank 

0

While the city of Toronto has a vibrant arts scene, enjoying it can often be unaffordable. From transport to accommodations to the price of tickets alone, being a patron of the arts is often unrealistic for the everyday person.  

Here are three ways that post-secondary students can enjoy Toronto’s arts and entertainment scene without breaking the bank. 

Public Transit 

To enjoy Toronto, you first need to be able to get there. Using public transit options such as GO Transit or the TTC are cost-efficient ways to get into and around the city.  

What is the easiest way to use public transit? For post-secondary students, Presto is the way to go. With one black card, you can pay for the fares of 11 different transit agencies in and around the GTA.  

The user-friendly Presto card only costs $4 and with the use of the Presto app, loading money onto your card is super easy. Not only does Presto allow you to stop wasting time using ticket machines and fumbling around with loose change, but it also provides its users with a 15 per cent discount on standard fare. Even better, post-secondary students get 40 per cent off, knocking nearly half of the price off your ticket. 

For those planning on travelling using GO Transit, Presto is still a great option. However, on the weekends, the more cost-effective option is the GO Weekend Pass. Only $10, the GO Weekend Pass is valid for 24 hours and can be used on as many GO train or bus rides as you need. While it unfortunately only covers GO Transit and not the TTC, the cost of one full-price ride from Burlington to Union Station is over $14 just one way. With the Weekend Pass (which also can be used on holidays), you can cut the cost of just one ride by $4 and if you plan to utilize the pass for more rides than that, you are essentially using transit for free.  

Transit usually runs pretty quickly and frequently. While not always the most time-efficient option, it does save money by eliminating the need to pay for astronomically expensive parking or the wildly fluctuating price of Ubers around the city. This makes it an easy way to cut costs when you are trying to enjoy the art and entertainment scene in Toronto.  

Student Discounts 

As a student, many places around Toronto offer discounts to anyone enrolled in a post-secondary institution.  

The Toronto Symphony Orchestra, for example, offers $20 rush tickets for the Main floor and Balcony and $35 for Mezzanine, and the TIFF Bell Lightbox offers $11 tickets during the regular season and free screenings during the TIFF Next Wave Festival. But these are not the only options for student discounts. Many places have some kind of student offer hoping to bring more young people into the world of art. There’s is no harm in checking to see if the event you want to attend offers a lower price to those enrolled in post-secondary school, as it might just save you a chunk of change! 

Pay What You Can or Free Admission 

Another great way to enjoy the art and entertainment scene in Toronto is by utilizing the pay-what-you-can (PWYC) system. Many museums, such as the BATA Shoe Museum, Mackenzie House and the Spadina Museum, offer certain days where you can simply pay what you can to enter. On days when this is not offered, you can simply check out what local museums have free admission. The Museum of Contemporary Art has free admission on Fridays from 5 to 9 p.m. and the Royal Ontario Museum is free on the third Monday of each month from 5 to 8 p.m. These offers make it super easy to cut costs when you are trying to enjoy the art and entertainment scene in Toronto. 

— 

Although enjoying the overabundance of culture Toronto has to offer can sometimes be expensive, there are many ways to make the experience worthwhile while staying on a budget. 

There’s nothing wrong with Shrek 5’s new look 

The teaser for Shrek 5 might use a different visual design for the franchise’s characters than what fans are used to, but the public backlash isn’t warranted. 

On Feb. 27, Universal Pictures released the first teaser for the highly anticipated Shrek 5, which revealed new designs for characters like Shrek, Fiona and Donkey. While the differences might be difficult to spot for those that aren’t Shrek aficionados, side-by-side comparisons make the alterations a bit easier to detect. 

In the teaser, we can see that Shrek’s eyes have been moved closer together and his nose and mouth have been made a little larger. His face is visibly wrinklier, though this is likely a design choice meant to represent the 15 years that have passed since 2010’s Shrek Forever After

Donkey has seemingly received an even larger redesign than his titular counterpart, sporting larger eyes that are also closer together, larger teeth with a larger mouth in general, a more prominent tuft of hair growing from his chin and altered facial proportions. 

While the look of the characters has certainly changed, they don’t look worse. In fact, based on just the 27-second teaser alone, it appears that the characters have gotten more expressive in their facial animations, able to portray a wider array of emotions than their predecessors from two decades ago. 

This shouldn’t come as a surprise. After all, animation technology has naturally improved since Shrek’s last outing, allowing the artists at DreamWorks Animation more creative liberty in how they allow Shrek and his friends to express themselves. This isn’t meant to be a critique of the characters’ old designs; rather, it’s simply pointing out that animation has evolved over time and the changes to the characters’ 2025 designs reflect that evolution. Shrek’s old look worked based on animation equipment that was available in the 2000s, but two decades later, it should be expected that the animation style would improve in some fashion. 

Unfortunately, many fans online have not been receptive to these changes, with some going so far as to compare Shrek 5’s new look to the original scrapped design of the titular character in the first Sonic the Hedgehog movie. The original design for Sonic, which is often referred to as “Ugly Sonic” by the online community, caused great amounts of backlash upon its initial reveal, eventually causing Paramount Pictures to delay the movie as the production team redesigned the character from scratch and raced to reanimate the character throughout every scene in the movie. It was an incredible testament of a company listening to fan feedback, causing them to fix a design that was truly flawed and disturbing. 

There’s a major difference here though, which is that Shrek’s new look isn’t flawed nor disturbing. Sonic’s original look wasn’t just different from his in-game appearances — it was terrifying to look at, complete with beady little eyes, white fur on his hands rather than the gloves the character traditionally wore, and off-putting human teeth. It was a disgusting abomination that attempted to fuse the beloved video game character with human proportions, and it just ended up as nightmare fuel. It was also a betrayal to long-time fans, who expected the character to be a loving interpretation of the in-game design rather than being arbitrarily changed. 

Note that Sonic’s new design doesn’t look exactly like his in-game counterpart either — he’s got lifelike quills covering his body and eyes that aren’t conjoined at the middle, unlike his design from the games. Yet, because it’s clear that the animators took much more inspiration from Sonic’s in-game design in this iteration, it doesn’t need to look exactly the same. It’s simply an evolution of the look that fans already know and love. 

That’s the exact case with Shrek and his friends’ new appearances. They don’t fundamentally destroy the original design like Sonic’s original look did; instead, they enhance the qualities portrayed by the designs that fans have grown accustomed to. As I mentioned earlier, it looks like Shrek’s new look will allow him to become far more expressive, which is an exciting step forward for the character even if he’s undergone a slight redesign. 

Don’t get me wrong. Fans are absolutely allowed to prefer one iteration of Shrek over the other. There’s no “objectively better” version here; it’s entirely up to every individual person which style they prefer. But to pretend that Shrek’s new look is somehow a huge betrayal of the character anywhere close to Sonic’s original movie design is simply disingenuous and frankly insulting to the animators working on Shrek 5. You have every right to prefer Shrek’s old look, but let’s not act like this is the end of the world or attempt to pressure DreamWorks into bringing back the old design. 

Shrek 5’s new look might be different than what you were expecting, but don’t blow it out of proportion — the movie looks totally fine, and in many ways, it looks even better than its predecessors. 

An overview of the trade conflict between Canada and the U.S. 

0

Despite a one-month reprieve for certain Canadian products protected by CUSMA, the tariff conflict between the U.S. and Canada remains ongoing. 

As far back as November, President Trump has been threatening levies on Canadian products. However, when the tariffs materialized earlier this month, the proposed 25 per cent levies became much more complicated than they initially seemed. The Brock Press has provided a thorough breakdown of the events leading up to Trump’s initial decision to place tariffs on Canadian products. 

At the time of writing, the proposed tariffs have undergone several alterations and small changes — as has Canada’s retaliatory response to the U.S. 

Here’s an overview of what has changed regarding Trump’s original tariff proposals and how Canadian officials have responded to the issue. 

Trump’s newest order to delay tariffs 

On March 6, Trump signed an order to delay tariffs on certain Canadian products until April 2. According to the White House, the only products included in the tariff reprieve are those that comply with the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), which is a free trade agreement between the three nations to ensure that they remain the “largest free trade region in the world” with “strong economic ties.” 

Products that comply with this agreement must be produced or obtained in Canada, the U.S. or Mexico. If they are not, they must meet a Regional Value Content (RVC) threshold, wherein a certain percentage of each product’s value must be sourced from CUSMA countries. 

Suppliers who have not ensured that their products comply with CUSMA, and who supply industries that the American tariffs initially targeted, will continue to face a 25 per cent tariff. 

However, Trump has made a few extra exceptions regarding these products. For example, the tariffs on Canadian potash — an ingredient in agricultural fertilizer — was lowered to 10 per cent after pressures from farming industries. He also exempted three major car manufacturers — General Motors, Stellantis and Ford — from the tariffs as their reliance on North American suppliers would threaten both economies. 

As of March 12, Trump has put forth 25 per cent tariffs onto steel and aluminum goods entering the U.S., lowering from his original threat to place 50 per cent tariffs on these items. 

The Canadian response 

Several Canadian politicians had responses to Trump’s decision to go forth with his tariff orders, each sharing similar sentiments. Dominic LeBlanc, Canada’s Minister of Finance, shared a post on X saying that Canada “is being unfairly targeted” by the U.S., sharing a link to a Government of Canada news release calling the tariff conflict “unjustified.”  

Ontario Premier Doug Ford echoed LeBlanc’s response, saying that the trade war has become “an absolute mess” in an interview with Fox News

“People are going to be losing their jobs in the U.S. and in Canada, and inflation is happening already,” said Ford. “One thing the market doesn’t like is uncertainty.” 

In response to Trump’s tariff orders, Ford originally said he would place a 25 per cent tariff on Canadian energy going to New York, Michigan and Minnesota, regardless of any tariff delays from Trump. However, Ford took back this threat during negotiations after Trump threatened 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminum goods. 

At a news conference on March 6, former Prime Minister Trudeau said that “conversations shall continue” between the two countries to ensure that tariffs do not cause extreme damage to the sectors they are inflicted upon. However, Trudeau warned Canadians that Canada will be in a trade war “for the foreseeable future.”  

Retaliatory tariffs 

Despite Trump’s order to delay some tariffs on Canadian products, the Canadian government decided to leave their retaliatory tariffs in place. According to a government source, Trudeau will not make amends with the U.S. until they remove all the increased tariffs they have put in place over the last month. 

At the time of writing, Canada has placed a 25 per cent tariff on $30 billion worth of U.S. goods, with a second round of tariffs worth $125 billion still pending. 

A full list of all the affected products can be found on the Government of Canada website. The list stretches in length, covering products ranging from meat and dairy to coffee and sunscreen. 

— 

The tariff conflict has proven to be a day-by-day issue, with change arising frequently. Until a resolution is made between Canada and the U.S., Trudeau said that Canadians should focus on buying locally-made Canadian products to minimize the economic impact of the tariffs on their daily lives. 

“A stab in the back”: candidates disqualified from BUSU BoD election without explanation

0

During BUSU’s February election, a pair of candidates were disqualified from running to serve on the BoD without warning nor substantiated reason after the voting period had already begun, driving concerns surrounding the credibility of democratic elections within BUSU. 

On Feb. 11, 12 hours after the voting period began for the Brock University Students’ Union (BUSU) February election for seats on the BUSU Board of Directors (BoD), the Brock Senate and the Brock Press BoD, two candidates saw their platforms entirely removed from voter ballots in the BoD race.  

One of these candidates was Binoy Mahmud, a fourth-year business student at Brock who has served in BUSU throughout every year of his studies until now. Mahmud served a range of positions within BUSU, including as a BUSAC Counsellor, a member of the Clubs Policy Committee and a member of the Election and Referendum Committee. He also held a seat on BUSU’s BoD during 2023 and is the president of the Brock Muslim Students Association (MSA). 

Candidates like Mahmud received emails from BUSU stating that the current BoD held a meeting in which they declared some candidates as “not in good standing” with the students’ union, leading to their disqualification. 

According to BUSU’s BoD policies, to run in the election, candidates must: 

  1. “Be a member of the Corporation,” 
  1. “Be at least eighteen (18) years of age, must not be an undischarged bankrupt, must be mentally competent and must not have been convicted of any offences listed under the Canadian Criminal Code,” and, 
  1. “Have a minimum 60 per cent average as confirmed by the Brock University Registrar Office before that start of the campaign period.” 

In an interview with The Brock Press, Mahmud said that upon reflection of BUSU’s bylaws, he satisfied all of the qualifications to run as a candidate, which left him wondering why he could have been disqualified. 

After accumulating so much experience working within BUSU, and unable to think of what may have incited such a consequence, Mahmud likened his disqualification to “a stab in the back.” 

“It really was very emotional for me,” said Mahmud. “The moment I received the disqualification email, I sat in my room […] and I was like ‘okay, this was my last shot. This was my last year.’” 

What proved to be especially frustrating for Mahmud was the lack of explanation from BUSU following his disqualification from the BoD election. According to Mahmud, BUSU did not follow up with an explanation as to why he was disqualified, other than their initial explanation that he was “not in good standing” with the students’ union. 

“Saying that I’m not in good standing is very subjective,” said Mahmud. “I didn’t really expect that disqualification because there are no policies or bylaws that say if someone inside BUSU disagrees with my platform or my stances as a candidate, they can simply remove me.” 

According to Mahmud, he satisfied all of BUSU’s requirements to run for a seat on the BoD. The union accepted his nomination and allegedly didn’t mention any issues regarding his candidacy to him in advance of the voting period. As a result, Mahmud was left puzzled as to why BUSU deemed him as “not in good standing” with the union. 

Mahmud also said the BUSU BoD did not provide him with an appeal process on their decision to disqualify him from the election. 

“An organization I served for four years says that I am not in good standing, […] they didn’t even give me an opportunity to explain my side,” said Mahmud. 

Mahmud has some inclinations as to why he faced disqualification which would still not warrant a disqualification under BUSU’s bylaws and BoD policies. 

Mahmud considered his past efforts to bring back executive elections while serving on BUSU’s BoD in 2023 as a possible reason as to why BUSU chose to remove his candidacy from voter ballots. 

Mahmud also said that his past attempts to discuss reinstating executive elections in BUSU as a director on the board “would always be shut down.” However, Mahmud noted that the reason he advocated for executive elections was to amplify the voices of many “student groups” who wanted them back. 

Since Mahmud has advocated for executive elections in the past, he said that BUSU might have thought he was connected to the RESTORE BUSU movement, a group advocating for increased transparency in the students’ union and alleging that BUSU staff compromise hiring processes and democratic elections. 

According to Mahmud, he pre-emptively told BUSU General Manager Robert Hilson that he was not connected to the RESTORE BUSU movement in an effort “to avoid controversy,” despite their shared campaign effort to bring back executive elections. He said that if his disqualification did stem from this, it would have occurred “without any evidence” and would be based on “an assumption.” 

“Being a loyal member to BUSU, I remembered my fiduciary duty to an organization that I really cared about and served,” said Mahmud. “I do support bringing back executive elections and, if that’s something students want, I […] will push for it in my platform.” 

However, Mahmud said that, from his understanding of the bylaws, even being a member of a student-led movement like RESTORE BUSU would not warrant a disqualification, as it is not a criminal offence. 

However, Mahmud’s history of pushing for executive elections still brought him to a dead end when searching for answers, citing the electoral success of other candidates who pushed for executive elections “at a much bolder level.” 

Despite inquiring, Mahmud did not receive any reasoning for his disqualification. The current BoD, the only elected body in the student’s union, are responsible for any disqualification decisions regarding the incoming BoD, which Mahmud called “a little unfair.” 

“I feel that […] there is a little bit of [a] conflict of interest when the current BoD are making decisions on the future BoD,” said Mahmud. “It’s like a systematic way of ensuring the people who get elected follow [their] stances.” 

Another board candidate and former Brock Press member, Andrew Hawlitzky, faced a similar experience in February’s election. Hawlitzky shared his letter from BUSU in a post on his campaign Instagram page

In the caption of the post, Hawlitzky wrote that he did not receive “a single warning” from BUSU in advance of his disqualification. 

Hawlitzky also released a public statement via Instagram wherein he outlined a series of events leading to his disqualification that mirror the ones Mahmud faced. In the statement, Hawlitzky wrote that he, too, received a disqualification email from Brielle Kaminsky, the Chair of BUSU’s board, wherein he was also deemed “not in good standing” with the union. 

However, in reference to the same BoD election policy, Hawlitzky also said there would be no reason for his disqualification. He went on to explain that he received no response from Kaminsky or any other BUSU personnel upon reaching out for clarity surrounding his disqualification. 

His statement goes on to say that “some of BUSU’s board members believe” that he and Mahmud are leaders of RESTORE BUSU, leading to their disqualification. Similar to Mahmud, Hawlitzky denied leading the movement and guessed that BUSU saw overlaps between RESTORE BUSU’s criticisms of the students’ union and Hawlitzky’s campaign efforts. 

The Brock Press reached out to several BUSU personnel for comment on this issue, including General Manager Robert Hilson and President Anusha Pahuja, but received no response at the time of writing. 

Get tickets for “Niagara’s dizziest festival experience” this weekend 

0

Stressed-out Badgers are in luck: tickets are still available for the Vertigo Music Festival, the perfect distraction from the anxieties of March. 

Dubbed “Niagara’s dizziest festival experience,” the Vertigo Music Festival returns to Brock this Saturday, March 15, after launching last year. Boasting an impressive 13-band lineup across two stages, the festival’s second iteration promises to be bigger and better than its predecessor. 

Whether you stick to the Main Stage or the Side Stage or traverse between both, festivalgoers are in for a sprawling aural epic of musical excellence, with the opener starting at 3 p.m. and the main act not coming on until 10 p.m. 

Better yet, all these bands are local within Ontario, some even within the region. Maggot Pizza and Sunshine Express, two of the early acts, are both signed under the Niagara-based record label Routine Exploits, and pop artist Sophi is from Niagara Falls. 

You’ll find me at the main stage, rocking out to the seven bands spanning emo, punk, electronic, indie, rock and other genres: Maggot Pizza, JULES IS DEAD, Sun Junkies, Sunshine Express, DEAR-GOD, Cam Kahin and the headlining, certified rockers, The Dirty Nil. 

The Dirty Nil single-handedly make the ticket worth it for me. I’m a recent fan, but I fell hard for these punk-rockers, whose songs exude youthful, carefree energy and have a wicked knack for getting my head to shake back and forth. Despite St. Catharines being an old haunt of theirs, having played at Merchant Ale House and Warehouse in their early years, I’ve only seen them live once for their AC/DC tribute show in Hamilton, which I covered in a previous article. At Vertigo, St. Catharines gets to welcome this stellar band once again with a new generation of Niagara punks. 

And with so many local powerhouses supporting them, Vertigo is gearing up to be one of the best local concerts in recent years — on a similar level, I’d argue, as the momentous Born & Raised concerts in 2022 and 2024. 

The Main Stage Vertigo show might be the best thing for stressed and burnt-out Badgers. Haven’t been to the gym since January? You’ll burn that winter weight right off after eight hours in the mosh pit. Worried about the political scene with the U.S.? These Canadians will give you but a taste of our country’s majesty. Stressed about exams, graduating and your future beyond your undergrad? The Nil’s chainsaw-ripping guitar riffs will drown those worries out, no problem. 

If that doesn’t sound like your cup of tea, the Side Stage might just be for you. With bands influenced by pop, folk, rock, jazz, country and alternative sounds, the show features Lydia Stephen, Soft Animals, Velvet Beach, Sophi, Lauren Dillen and prog-folk, femme-pop choral collective Minuscule. 

The Side Stage show won’t be nearly so intense, providing a serene and poetic experience — whether that’s experienced between the hard stuff or purely on its own. 

Tickets can be purchased for just the Main Stage ($69.83), the Side Stage ($48.88) or both ($97.77) on DICE. 

It wouldn’t be a festival without vendors, and that’s why Vertigo teamed up with Cozy Bones to organize a vendor fair with “20 amazing handmade and hand-curated vendors” alongside the live performances. Interested businesses can still sign up for a spot at $75 per table. Rosewood Print Co. and Warehouse Concert Hall are also listed as sponsors and partners alongside Cozy Bones. 

The Vertigo Music Festival promises to be the best local music event of the year: not only a showcase of local talent, but a rip-roaring rock concert, period. Let’s show these bands just how great Brock is: that we can rock with the best of them, and that we’re a crowd worth playing for. 

I’ll see you in the pit. 

Stay tuned to The Brock Press for my upcoming review of the Vertigo Music Festival Main Stage show. 

Lady Gaga hones her instinct for pop music on “MAYHEM” 

0

Score: 4/5 


Pop music pioneer Lady Gaga has returned with her seventh studio album MAYHEM, a chaotic, anthemic examination of her career and impressive flex of her musical prowess. 

With each of its tracks, MAYHEM throws a new handful of ideas at the wall, some of which land more than others. In the end, you’re left with a mosaic of ideas that hit the mark, while held back slightly by a few ideas that miss the mark. It’s mostly successful at honing Gaga’s strongest qualities, but it’s hard to avoid the few missed opportunities. 

First of all, let’s get one thing out of the way: none of these songs fall short of three minutes and thank God for that. In the age of two-minute, bridge-less, post-chorus-less, built-for-TikTok-snippet pop songs, Gaga takes the wheel and offers fully realized, complete songs. There’s plenty of open space between choruses and verses to soak in the pop-maximalism here. 

MAYHEM lacks the certain pulse behind Gaga’s previous albums that made them click. For instance, her previous 2020 release Chromatica had a vibrant, house-pop theme woven into Gaga’s fictional world with the same name. The string holding MAYHEM together is less firm and linear than her previous records, demanding attention to fully appreciate the effort she’s put in. 

The first taste of the album comes from the first single and opening track “Disease,” which could very well be the best of the bunch here. It’s quintessential Gaga, harkening back to the larger-than-life vocal performances on choruses from Born This Way and the deep, harsh beats of ARTPOP. “Disease” feels like a night out with an old friend where you’re reminded of all the reasons you love them and bear witness to their growth over the years. It’s a career highlight and one of MAYHEM’s best cuts. 

As the album’s second single and track, “Abracadabra” picks up the pace from the creeping bass of “Disease.” Overblown bass and synths, a throbbing acid beat teased across the track and a blaring vocal performance on the chorus that sounds more like an intelligible incantation than a coherent string of words (a trend across Gaga’s best songs) make this an overwhelmingly passionate, four-minute banger. 

“Garden of Eden” and “Perfect Celebrity” are throwbacks in every sense of the word. They’re grimy, alluring tracks ripped directly from the early days of The Fame era in the 2000s. The former is a nostalgic, shameless tune reminiscent of her early songs that birthed countless Little Monsters — Gaga’s fan base — back in the late 2000s: impressionable kids permanently altered by the “Bad Romance” music video. 

After an electrifying four-track run, the album begins to lose its edgy sound and adopts cleaner, groovy elements. “Vanish Into You” veers into ballad-territory blended with a throwback groove to its production. It’s familiar territory for Gaga and an amalgamation of the elements she does best, blending romance, impressive vocals and a sticky chorus engineered to ring in your head long after listening. 

“Zombieboy” has probably spawned on every Halloween party playlist across the internet by now. It’s an eclectic, throwback banger with one of the album’s catchiest choruses: “Oh, I can’t see straight and my hands are tied / I could be your type from your zombie bite.” 

MAYHEM’s biggest pitfall is, ironically, the lack of mayhem going on throughout. The most impressive tracks are lined up one after another in the first half, setting the tone for a gritty, high-energy experience. However, the energy progressively dwindles, shifting in tone to safer, approachable songs packaged as universally accessible tunes. The B-side tracks each lack a certain quirk integral to their identities. If the weaker tracks were shaved down, the front-heavy A-side would be much more effective as a shorter album. 

As bizarre as it seems to have 2024’s radio-hit single “Die With a Smile” as the closing track, it strangely works here due to the ballad quality of previous tracks. MAYHEM’s chaotic musical evolution is tied up nicely with a romantic anthem to soundtrack any occasion: weddings, funerals, graduations… You name it and it’ll fit. 

MAYHEM is the sort of album whose identity will be shaped by memories and time. It’s not quite as clear cut as some of Gaga’s previous work, but it revels in being unreadable. It’s meant to be soaked in, soundtrack the listener’s life and shape the landscape of pop music. Time will tell how this album is remembered, but as it stands, MAYHEM is already eager to live rent-free in your head. 

Badgers women’s volleyball fall to Marauders in Quigley Cup rematch 

0

Brock’s season comes to a disappointing end in a defeat to McMaster in the OUA Championship. 

The Badgers women’s volleyball team were looking to win their fourth consecutive Quigley Cup title and second straight against the Marauders but fell short, losing 3-0 to McMaster on March 7 at the Bob Davis Gymnasium. 

Outside hitter Emily Foest, who was named an OUA Third-Team All-Star this past week, led Brock with 9.5 points coming from eight kills, one solo block and one block assist. Setter Mackenna Knox, selected to the OUA Second-Team, registered a game-high 28 assists as well as a team-high 12 digs in the contest. 

In the opening set, the Badgers jumped to the early 4-1 lead after a string of errors by McMaster as well as an ace from Charlotte Ross, who was named to the OUA All-Rookie Team, gave the home side the quick advantage. 

However, errors were the theme of the first set, as costly mistakes by the Badgers, who made 12 attacking errors in the set — by far the most by either team in a set all match — allowed the Marauders to level the game at 15. 

The teams then traded jabs, resulting in a 22-22 deadlock before a trio of McMaster blocks, a category they dominated with 13 blocks in the game compared to Brock’s four, gave the visitors the first set victory, 25-22. 

The momentum from the opening set win carried into the second set as the Marauders jumped to a 3-0 lead and never looked back. 

An early timeout by the Badgers was unable to cease the Marauders’ momentum as McMaster held their lead for the entirety of the set, a rare occurrence in OUA women’s volleyball. 

Despite a statistically strong attacking set by Brock, hitting .324 per cent, the Marauders doubled their advantage with a 25-19 set two win. 

The third set featured the same domination from the McMaster side as they once again leaped to a 5-2 advantage that grew to 11-6, forcing Brock to call another early timeout. 

However, the timeout sprung the home side as the Badgers rallied four straight points, three of which were kills from Foest and OUA First-Team All-Star Sadie Dick, as Brock found themselves back in the set and down only two, 14-12. 

But that was the closest the Badgers came in the set, as another error and a pair of McMaster aces — another category the Marauders won with seven aces in contrast to Brock’s four — restored momentum into the McMaster side looking for revenge after their loss to the Badgers in last season’s final. 

With the Marauders holding match point, they got their vengeance when a Sullie Sundara smash, who led all players with a game-high 15 kills, gave McMaster the 3-0 (25-22, 25-19, 25-18) victory to win the OUA Championship. 

For the Badgers, the loss ends another hard-fought season for the team. Brock qualified for their fifth straight provincial final and had a 16-4 regular season record, which placed them second of 15 teams in the OUA standings. 

For more information about the Brock Badgers women’s volleyball team, visit gobadgers.ca.