Saturday, October 18, 2025
Brock's Only Independent Student Newspaper
One of the only worker-managed newspapers in Canada

Where does rapture content come from? 

|
|

As our political climate remains in a troubling state, whisperings that the “end times” are near can be convincing — leading theories to spread rapidly in online spaces. 

In mid-September, TikTok became flooded with videos surrounding the rapture, a belief largely residing in the evangelical sector of Christianity.  

This belief is debated amongst Christians, with some believing that during the rapture, all faithful Christians will be brought up to heaven with Jesus before the seven-year-long Great Tribulation (the “pre-tribulation” theory), whereas others believe that Christians will be raptured after this time of suffering and destruction brought on by the Antichrist (the “post-tribulation” theory). Following the Great Tribulation, it is said that Jesus returns for a 1,000-year period to rule all the earth as one nation.  

It is also debated among Christians whether the rapture is physical in nature or purely metaphorical. 

Those who do not believe in the Christian faith must stay on earth through the Great Tribulation, inevitably experiencing the apocalyptic wrath that it brings. However, the Christian Bible states that many people inhabiting earth will become Christians during this time, leading them to remain on earth with Jesus when his 1000-year rule comes. 

Though rapture or similar “end times” content recirculates online every so often — with around 15 dates being proposed for the “end times” already this decade — this time can be drawn back to a prophetic dream had by South African pastor Joshua Mhlakela. 

On an episode of the I’ve Been Through the Most podcast hosted by CentTwinzTV back in June, Mhlakela shared a dream where Jesus revealed to him that the rapture would occur on Sept. 23 and 24 of this year, with that followed by seven years of “destruction” and “devastation.” 

As we loomed closer to the proposed rapture dates, the interview began recirculating on TikTok, leading to a sudden wave of frightened users sharing videos of their rapture preparation and inquiries, while other users made satirical parodies of these videos — all 20,000 of which can be found under the #rapturetok page in the app. 

Obviously, the rapture dates came and went, though Mhlakela has conjured new dates for the rapture to occur. 

Regardless of belief systems, many who have studied the Bible assert that the rapture will never occur because no such prophecy of a “rapture” even exists in the Bible. 

The rapture theories we see today were born from the rise of Dispensationalism in the 19th century by John Nelson Darby. Darby proposed a more literal interpretation of the Bible, introducing the “pre-tribulation” rapture theory. Both 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 and Revelation 3:10 are significant passages used to evidence the rapture when literalized.  

The word “rapture” does not appear in the Bible, nor does an allusion to a date when a rapture-like event will take place. The Christian Bible also notes that nobody will know when this rapture-like event will happen, evident in the passage of Matthew 24:36. 

Despite the lack of clarity around the rapture’s presence in Christian texts, why do rapture prophecies continue to garner such intense reactions? 

It’s no secret that prophecies of mass destruction and suffering are pretty intimidating and could conjure some strong emotional reactions. 

Predictions of the rapture are not new. Since the rapture-esque interpretations of Bible passages began to attract public attention in the 1800s, inaccurate estimations as to when Jesus will return have repeatedly appeared.  

A couple centuries ago, it was far more difficult to circulate the newest theory as to when the “end times” would begin and Jesus would return. However, the digital age has brought a faster way to streamline these prophecies directly to the communities influenced by them: social media. 

It is not a surprise to learn that social media algorithms push content that evokes emotional spectacle to encourage engagement by drawing upon wild, shareable news. Obviously, telling the internet that our world will soon be engulfed in disaster and only some will be lifted away from it paints quite a sensational picture — a picture perfect for wide algorithmic circulation. 

Especially if these posts reach the right communities, others will continue to share equally sensational posts on the topic — whether they’re taking the issue seriously or making a joke out of it — bringing users to fuel the algorithm further by liking, commenting on and sharing these posts. 

This is the algorithmic cycle. 

According to Politico, rapture or “end times” prophecies often reappear in unstable political moments; when individuals feel powerless under destabilized political and economic realities, the hypothesis that apocalyptic times are upon us seems more viable. 

As the Politico piece notes, the rise in political violence, especially within the context of the recent assassination of Christian conservative influencer Charlie Kirk, further solidifies “end times” anxieties specific to Christian communities. 

The spread of rapture content is built upon anxieties — and understandably so, as the prospective event is not only terrifying, but it can also alter one’s trust in their faith. If someone deeply believes that the Bible states that the rapture will happen, how might their perception of their faith change if this does not end up occurring? This may also lead them to think that the rapture might’ve occurred and they were left behind, which is just as anxiety provoking. 

Since social media algorithms are trained to spread emotionally triggering content, rapture prophecies make for the perfect new TikTok conversation that will keep users scrolling as they attempt to find answers to ease their anxiety. 

Since social media is always also reminding us of our unsettling political reality, users were likely seeing disturbing political news juxtaposed with countless assertions that the rapture is coming, which demonstrates how the internet has cultivated an environment for anxiety-inducing topics like the rapture to spread and thrive. 

Though rapture or “end times” theories are far older than the internet, the social media age fosters an environment where they can spread across the world like wildfire. Even if you’re not religious, you were likely exposed to the massive flood of rapture content online — which precisely demonstrates the power of algorithms. 

With consideration to the meticulous work of algorithms, it is always a good reminder to take what you see online with a grain of salt and unplug from social media as often as you can. 

More by this author

RELATED ARTICLES

Mapping MAMM #4: What the f*** is Canadian Literature anyway? 

Mapping MAMM is an ongoing series which gets into the research questions surrounding the Mapping Ann-Marie MacDonald Research Project. My previous articles have introduced the project as well as examined its cross-disciplinarity and ethics of care. In this fourth installment, I’ll get into the “fraught construct” that is CanLit. 

Late Night comedy in the face of censorship  

Jimmy Kimmel is a late-night comedy staple. Having been on the air since 2003, the comedian is perhaps best known for his viral videos, including “Mean Tweets” — where celebrities read hateful posts on X and his long running YouTube series “I Told My Kids I Ate All Their Halloween Candy.” Kimmel has always been a relatively tame figure in late night media. Though not as politically neutral as Jimmy Fallon, he is certainly not as outspoken as fellow late-night hosts Seth Meyers, Stephen Colbert, John Stewart or John Oliver. 

USA: Not fascist, just anti-anti-fascism 

The United States is not a fascist state. Elections still occur, courts still sometimes check executive power and journalists and comedians still speak out against the government. Within the remains of a democratic framework, on Sept. 22, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order designating “Antifa” — a composition of autonomous groups affiliated with political movements against fascism and other far-right extremist ideologies — as a domestic terrorist organization. Despite the lack of legal framework for this designation, the executive order purports that dissent against the Trump administration is a threat to national security rather than a legitimate democratic right

The war within: Pete Hegseth and the weaponization of U.S. military identity 

When Pete Hegseth — formally the U.S. Secretary of Defense, but ceremonially the Secretary of War — took the stage at Marine Corps Base Quantico on Sept. 30, his first words carried the weight of an era. “Welcome to the War Department,” he said to a packed auditorium of generals, admirals and senior officers. “The era of the Department of Defense is over.”

Five activities to add to your fall bucket list 

If you’re looking for something fun to add to your bucket list this fall, this list of autumn activities is perfect for you. 

Brock’s Wellness Fair spotlights countless student services and opportunities  

The 2025 Brock Wellness Fair gave students the chance to explore a wide range of services, supports and community spaces available both on and off campus. From volunteer initiatives and interfaith opportunities to a variety of mental health supports and athletics, the fair displayed a growing list of opportunities for students to take care of themselves, connect with others and make Brock feel like home. 

10 years after TRC’s Calls to Action and Canada’s promises of reconciliation are still pending 

Ten years have passed since the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) released their landmark Final Report in June 2015. The Commission, established under the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, spent seven years gathering testimony from over 6,000 Survivors to document the devastating legacy of residential schools. This led them to issuing 94 Calls to Action — a roadmap for governments, institutions and Canadians to repair harm and build a more just future. These Calls were never meant as symbolic gestures; they were concrete, actionable steps. A decade later, one question remains: has Canada lived up to them?

Buyback or backfire? Ottawa’s gun compensation program faces mounting pushback  

In late September, Ottawa announced an official gun buyback pilot program in Nova Scotia — the first step toward removing more than 2,500 models of legally purchased, now-prohibited firearms from licensed Canadian gun owners.